通过对盱眙香樟、女贞、侧柏、广玉兰、杨树、海桐、油茶和淡竹等8种树种的鲜枝叶含水率和枯枝叶最大持水率的测定,分析了不同木质可燃物的失水率。结果表明:(1)杨树的鲜叶含水率、鲜枝含水率、枯叶最大持水率和枯枝最大持水率等4种含水率都明显大于其他树种,女贞、广玉兰、海桐、油茶等4种植物的4种含水率也相对较高;侧柏和淡竹除了枯叶最大持水率稍高外,其他3种含水率较低,香樟枯枝最大持水率较低,其他3种含水率中等。(2)广玉兰和杨树的鲜叶和鲜枝失水速率都是最慢的,而侧柏和油茶较快,其他树种为中等失水速率;枯枝叶失水都较慢的有杨树、广玉兰和女贞,其次为香樟、侧柏,其他树种有的枯叶失水快,有的枯枝失水快。
Abstract
The moisture of fresh leaves and branches and the maximum waterholding rate of withered leaves and branches at 8 tree species in Xuyi county were determined in laboratory, and different fuel moisture loss were analyzed. The results showed that the moisture of fresh leaves, fresh branches, leaf litter and branch litter in Populus tomentosa was the highest among the 8 tree species. Ligustrum lucidum, Magnolia grandiflora Linn., Pittosporum tobira and Camellia oleifera Abel. were in the second. The maximum waterholding rate of leaf litter in Platycladus orientalis and Phyllostachys glauca McClure was higher than those in the other 6 tree species. However, the maximum waterholding rate in fresh leaves, fresh branches and branch litter were lower than those of the others. The maximum waterholding rate of withered branches in Cinnamomum camphora Presl. was significant lower, and of fresh leaves, fresh branches and leaf liter were in medium. On the other hand, fresh leaves and branches moisture loss in M. grandiflora Linn. and P. tomentosa was the slowest, while P. orientalis and C.oleifera Abel were the fastest. Withered leaves which had slow moisture loss were P. tomentosa, M.grandiflora linn and L. lucidum, but C. camphora Presl. loss moisture faster than other tree species for withered leaves.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
［1］徐爱俊,李清泉,方陆明，等.基于GIS的森林火灾预报预测模型的研究与探讨［J］.浙江林学院学报,2003,20(3):285-288.
[2]吴海涛,孙晓红.森林火灾对生态环境的危害及预防措施［J］.黑龙江环境通报,2007,31(2):10-12.
[3]Cruz M G,Alexander M E,Wakimoto R H.Development and testing of models for predicting crown fire rate of spread in conifer forest stands［J］.Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2005,35(7):1626-1639.
[4]贺萍,孟超,田丰.小兴安岭地区森林地被可燃物含水率变化规律及其与森林火险等级关系［J］.黑龙江气象,2008,25(3):25-27.
[5]王晓丽,牛树奎,马钦彦,等.以地表死可燃物评估八达岭林场森林燃烧性［J］.生态学报,2009,29(10):5313-5319.
[6]高永刚,张广英,顾红,等.森林可燃物含水率气象预测模型在森林火险预报中的应用［J］.中国农学通报,2008,24(9):171-175.
[7]Yebra M, Chuvieco E,Rinao D.Estimation of live fuel moisture content from MODIS images for fire risk assessment［J］.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2008,148(4):523-536.
[8]Chuvieco E,Cocero D, Rinao D,et al.Combining NDVI and surface temperature for the estimation of live fuel moisture content in forest fire danger rating［J］.Remote Sensing of Environment,2004,92(3):322-311.
[9]Chuvieco E,Aguado I,Dimitrakopoulos A P.Conversion of fuel moisture content values to ignition potential for integrated fire danger assessment［J］.Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2004,34(11):2284-2291.
[10]Dasgupta S, Qu J J, Hao Xianjun, et al.Evaluating remotely sensed live fuel moisture estimations for fire behavior predictions in Georgia,USA［J］.Remote Sensing of Environment,2007,108:138-150.
[11]何忠秋,李长胜,张成钢，等.森林可燃物含水量模型研究［J］.森林防火,1995(2):15-16.
[12]覃先林,张子辉,易浩若，等.一种预测森林可燃物含水率的方法［J］.火灾科学,2001,10(3):159-162.
[13]单延龙.大兴安林森林可燃物的研究［D］.哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2003.
[14]Garcia M, Chuvieco E,Nieto H,et al.Combining AVHRR and meteorological data for estimating live fuel moisture content［J］. Remote Sensing of Environment,2008,112(9):3618-3627.
[15]Nieto H,Aguado I, Chuvieco E,et al.Dead fuel moisture estimation with MSG-SEVIRI data.Retrieval of meteorological data for the calculation of the equilibrium moisture content［J］.Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2010,150:861-870.
[16]胡海清,刘菲.30种树叶的点燃含水率与蔓延含水率［J］.林业科学,2006,42(11):81-86.
基金
收稿日期：2010-09-07修回日期：2010-12-20基金项目：江苏省农业三项工程项目(013010068)作者简介：江津凡(1984—),硕士生。*万福绪(通信作者),教授。Email:fxwan@njfu.edu.cn。
PDF(1389685 KB)
