抗松针褐斑病湿地松组培再生植株生长性状观察

程方,安会翠,刘戈,叶建仁

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (02) : 69-72.

PDF(1129327 KB)
PDF(1129327 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (02) : 69-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.02.014
研究论文

抗松针褐斑病湿地松组培再生植株生长性状观察

  • 程 方,安会翠,刘 戈,叶建仁*
作者信息 +

Observation of growth traits on tissue culture plantlets of slash Pinus elliottii

  • CHENG Fang, AN Huicui, LIU Ge, YE Jianren*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

对移栽至南京林业大学南大山苗圃的湿地松组培再生植株进行了苗高、地径、干形的比较。结果表明,各家系及无性系的生长状态存在差异。组培苗与实生苗间苗高差异较大,组培苗在早期生长速度不及实生苗,且抗病的家系不及普通的家系,抗病的8#和32#家系苗高差异不显著; 实生苗、组培苗斜生现象严重; 继代次数对组培苗的苗高、地径生长影响不大; 组培苗年龄越大,苗高生长势越好,地径差异小; 8#家系组培苗各无性系间苗高差异显著,地径差异不显著。

Abstract

In this paper, height, ground diameter and stem form between tissue-culture plantlets and seedlings of Pinus elliottii were compared. Differences of growth traits among different families and clones were found. The height of seedlings were significantly higher those of plantlets. Seedlings of common family grow fasters than those of disease resistant family. However, little difference found within 8# and 32# disease resistant family. Both seedlings and tissue-culture plantlets severely grow in an oblique way. The generation of the plantlets affects little to the growth of height and ground diameter. Positive correlation occurred between the plantlets age and the plantlets height. Different clones of 8# had significantdifference of height, however little difference was found in ground diameter.

引用本文

导出引用
程方,安会翠,刘戈,叶建仁. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松组培再生植株生长性状观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2012, 36(02): 69-72 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.02.014
CHENG Fang, AN Huicui, LIU Ge, YE Jianren. Observation of growth traits on tissue culture plantlets of slash Pinus elliottii[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2012, 36(02): 69-72 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.02.014
中图分类号: Q944   

参考文献

[1] 李传道,韩正敏,叶建仁,等.松针褐斑病在湿地松幼林中的发展.南京林业大学学报,1987,11(1):1-7.
[2] 叶建仁,韩正敏,李传道,等.湿地松抗褐斑病无性系种子园营建技术研究[J ].南京林业大学报,1991,15(2):23-29.
[3] 何月秋.湿地松抗病家系组培繁殖技术研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2003.
[4] 朱丽华,张艺,吴小芹.湿地松的组织培养及植株再生[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2004,28(6):47-51.
[5] 程方.抗性湿地松组培技术研究及再生植株性状评价[D].南京:南京林业大学,2010.
[6] Frampton L J, Isik K. Comparison of field growth among loblolly pine seedlings and three plant types produced in vitro[J]. Tappi J,1987(70): 119-123.
[7] Leach G N. Growth in soil of plantlets produced by tissue culture, loblolly pine[J]. Tappi J, 1979(62): 59-61.
[8] Monteuuis O, Dumas E. Morphological features as indicators of maturity in acclimatized Pinus pinaster from different in vitro origins[J]. Can J For Res, 1992, 22(9): 1417-1421.
[9] Hargreaves C L, Grace L J, Mass V, et al. Comparative in vitro and early nursery performance of adventitious shoots from cryopreserved cotyledons and axillary shoots from epicotyls of the same zygotic embryo of control-pollinated Pinus radiate [J]. Can J For Res, 2005(35): 2629-2641.
[10] McKeand S E. Expression of mature characteristics by tissue culture plantlets derived from embryos of loblolly pine[J]. J Am Soc Hortic Sci, 1985(110): 619-623.
[11] 朱丽华.黑松、赤松组培繁殖技术研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2007.
[12] 戴培培.湿地松组培快繁体系优化及再生植株性状表现[D].南京:南京林业大学,2008.

基金

收稿日期:2010-11-12 修回日期:2011-08-30 基金项目:国家林业局“948”项目(2011-4-69); 江苏省高校优势学科建设工程资助项目 第一作者:程方,硕士。*通信作者:叶建仁,教授。E-mail: jrye@njfu.edu.cn。引文格式:程方,安会翠,刘戈,等. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松组培再生植株生长性状观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(2):69-72.

PDF(1129327 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/