洪泽湖7条入湖河流的水质动态及其关联分析

doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.04.007

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2012, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (04): 36-40.doi: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.04.007

洪泽湖7条入湖河流的水质动态及其关联分析

张少威¹,刘茂松^1*,徐驰¹,马向东²,李爱民²,冯开宇 ²,何孔忠³

1.南京大学生命科学学院,江苏南京 210093; 2.泗洪县环境保护局,江苏泗洪 223900; 3.泗洪县气象局,江苏泗洪 223900

出版日期:2012-07-07 发布日期:2012-07-07
基金资助:
收稿日期:2011-03-14 修回日期:2012-04-28 基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(200904001); 国家自然科学基金项目(40801068,30870433) 第一作者:张少威,硕士生。*通信作者:刘茂松,副教授。E-mail: msliu@nju.edu.cn。引文格式:张少威,刘茂松,徐驰,等. 洪泽湖7条入湖河流的水质动态及其关联分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(4):36-40.

The dynamics and spatial correlation of water quality of seven rivers of Hongze Lake in Sihong county

ZHANG Shaowei¹, LIU Maosong^1*, XU Chi¹, MA Xiangdong², LI Aimin², FENG Kaiyu², HE Kongzhong³

1. School of Life Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China; 2. Environmental Protection Agency of Sihong, Sihong 223900, China; 3. Meteorological Bureau of Sihong, Sihong 223900, China

Online:2012-07-07 Published:2012-07-07

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 根据1996—2008年江苏省泗洪县境内洪泽湖7条入湖河流的水质监测数据,应用综合污染指数、灰色关联分析等方法,研究了入湖河流的水质变化规律及水质指标的空间关联特征。结果表明:(1)研究区河流按区位及水系特征可分为西部河流、东部河流、中部河流。1996—2008年间,在研究区西部较短的输水性河流水质呈现显著恶化,但中部和东部的河流水质恶化趋势不显著。(2)区内的水污染主要属有机污染,但不同区位的主要污染物不同。中部河流主要污染负荷为全氮(TN)、氨氮,西部河流主要为石油类、化学需氧量(COD),东部河流主要为石油类、TN; 污染负荷存在一定的区位差异。(3)石油类、 BOD₅、COD、挥发酚和汞等属于相对广域性的水质指标,总体上其变化过程具有较高的区域一致性; 而氨氮、TN等多为局域性水质指标。

Abstract: Changes and spatial correlations of the water quality of 7 rivers of Hongze Lake were studied based on bi-monthly monitoring data from 15 sites distributed in the 7 rivers in Sihong county from 1996 to 2008. The rivers in the study area could be divided into 3 classes; the eastern rivers were mainly for irrigation and flood drainage, the western rivers mainly acted as the channel for the upper rivers to the Hongze Lake, while the central rivers went through the urban area of Sihong county. The results showed that:(1)Water quality of the western rivers was significantly deteriorated, and that in the central and eastern rivers was slightly deteriorated.(2)The main pollutants in the study area were organic pollutants, the main pollutants in the central rivers across the urban area were TN and ammonia nitrogen; the main pollutants of the western rivers were petroleum and COD, while petroleum and TN were the main pollutants of the eastern rivers. The pollution load had regional differentiation.(3)BOD₅, COD, volatile phenols, mercury and petroleum showed similar dynamics in all three areas, while ammonia nitrogen and TN showed diverse dynamics comparatively.

中图分类号:

X824

张少威,刘茂松,徐驰,等. 洪泽湖7条入湖河流的水质动态及其关联分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(04): 36-40.

ZHANG Shaowei, LIU Maosong, XU Chi, MA Xiangdong, LI Aimin, FENG Kaiyu, HE Kongzhong. The dynamics and spatial correlation of water quality of seven rivers of Hongze Lake in Sihong county[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 36(04): 36-40.DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.04.007.

参考文献

[1] Isermann K. Share of agriculture in nitrogen and phosphorus emissions into the surface water of western Europe against the background of their eutrophication[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1990, 26(1-3): 253-269.
[2] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA). National Water Quality Inventory: 2004 Report to Congress, EPA 841-R-08-001 [R]. Washington: Office of Water, USEPA, 2009.
[2] 金相灿.湖泊富营养化控制和管理技术[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2001.
[4] Guo H Y, Zhu J G, Wang X R, et al. Case study on nitrogen and phosphorus emissions from paddy field in Taihu Region [J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2004, 26(2): 209-219.
[5] 全为民,严力蛟.农业面源污染对水体富营养化的影响及其防治措施[J].生态学报,2002,22(3):291-299.
[6] 徐海,刘兆普,焦佳国,等.太湖上游不同类型过境水氮素污染状况[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(1):43-49.
[7] Corwin D L, Vaughan P J, Logue K. Modeling nonpoint source pollutants in the vadose zone with GIS[J]. Environmental Science and Technology, 1996, 31(8): 2157-2175.
[8] Absalon D, Matysik M. Changes in water quality and runoff in the Upper Oder River Basin [J]. Geomorphology, 2007, 92(3-4): 106-118.
[9] 陈静生.河流水质原理及中国河流水质[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.
[10] Behrendt H, Opitz D. Retention of nutrients in river systems: dependence on specific runoff and hydraulic load [J]. Hydrobiologia, 2002, 410: 111-122.
[11] 毛战坡,尹澄清,王雨春,等.污染物在农田溪流生态系统中的动态变化[J].生态学报,2003,23(12):2614-2623.
[12] 国家环境保护总局《水和废水监测分析方法》编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].4版.北京:中国环境科学出版社,2006.
[13] 刘瑞祥,常慧丽,任嘉红.浊漳河主要污染物的时空变化特征[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(6):174-177.
[14] 张龙军,夏斌,桂祖胜,等.2005年夏季环渤海16条主要入海河流的污染状况[J].环境科学,2007,28(11):2409-2415.
[15] 郭鹏,陈晓玲,刘影.鄱阳湖湖口、外洲、梅港三站水沙变化及趋势分析(1955—2001年)[J].湖泊科学,2006,18(5):458- 463.
[16] Loukas A. Surface water quantity and quality assessment in Pinios River, Thessaly, Greece [J]. Desalination, 2010, 250(1): 266-273.
[17] 秦昌波,郑丙辉,秦延文,等.渤海湾天津段海岸带水环境质量灰色关联度评价[J].环境科学研究,2006,19(6):94-99.
[18] 岳隽,王仰麟,李贵才,等.深圳市西部库区景观格局与水质的关联特征[J].应用生态学报,2008,19(1):203-207.
[19] Ip W C, Hu B O, Wong H, et al. Applications of grey relational method to river environment quality evaluation in China [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2009, 379: 284-290.
[20] 焦少俊,胡夏民,潘根兴,等.施肥对太湖地区青紫泥水稻土稻季农田氮磷流失的影响[J].生态学杂志,2007,26(4):495- 500.
[21] Wang D J, Liu Q, Lin J H, et al. Optimum nitrogen use and reduced nitrogen loss for production of rice and wheat in the Yangztse Delta Region [J]. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2004, 26(2): 221-227.
[22] 白军红,欧阳华,邓伟,等.湿地氮素传输过程研究进展[J].生态学报,2005,25(2):326-333.
[23] 杨林章,周小平,王建国,等.用于农田非点源污染控制的生态拦截型沟渠系统及其效果[J].生态学杂志,2005,24 (11):1371-1374.
[24] 郗敏,吕宪国,刘红玉.人工沟渠的生态环境效应研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2005,24(12):1471-1476.
[25] Jha M K, Schilling K E, Gassman P W, et al. Targeting land-use change for nitrate-nitrogen load reductions in an agricultural watershed [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 65(6): 342-352.
[26] 金洋,李恒鹏,李金莲.太湖流域土地利用方式对非点源污染负荷量的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2007,26(4):1214- 1218.

洪泽湖7条入湖河流的水质动态及其关联分析

The dynamics and spatial correlation of water quality of seven rivers of Hongze Lake in Sihong county

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿