采用环刀法测定了流溪河流域常绿阔叶林、毛竹林和荔枝林的0~60 cm土壤水分物理性质。结果表明:(1)3种林分的土壤密度都是随着土层深度的增加而增加,其大小分别为荔枝林1.45 g/cm3、阔叶林1.22 g/cm3、竹林1.11 g/cm3。(2)3种林分0~60 cm土壤孔隙度随着土层深度的增加而减少。竹林土壤的总孔隙度和毛管孔隙度最大,荔枝林和阔叶林的总孔隙度相差不大;非毛管孔隙度分别为阔叶林11.51 %、竹林7.38 %、荔枝林5.91 %。(3)3种林分0~60 cm土壤的蓄水能力大小分别为阔叶林63.39 mm、竹林41.86 mm、荔枝林33.96 mm;3种林分的排水能力大小分别为阔叶林65.44 mm、竹林43.59 mm、荔枝林34.68 mm。因此,流溪河流域不同林分的土壤水分物理性质存在明显的差异:竹林在密度、总孔隙度和毛管孔隙度指标上优于阔叶林和荔枝林,而阔叶林则在土壤蓄水、排水指标上优于竹林、荔枝林。
Abstract
In order to understand ecohydrology effect of forest soil in Liuxihe small watershed, soil physical characteristics and water conservation characteristics of evergreen broadleaf forest, bamboo forest and litchi forest in Liuxihe small watershed were measured by cutting ring method. The test results showed that: (1)soil bulk density of three types of forest increased with soil layer depth. Soil bulk densities 0—60 cm depth were ranked in the order of litchi forest (1.45 g/cm3), broadleaf forest(1.22 g/cm3), bamboo forest (1.11 g/cm3). (2)Porosity of three types of forest decreased with the soil depth. In 0—60 cm depth, total porosity and capillary porosity of bamboo forest were the max in three types of forest, and total porosity of litchi forest and evergreen broadleaf forest were almost the same. Noncapillary porosities in 0—60 cm depth were ranked in the order of broadleaf forest (11.51 %), bamboo forest(7.38 %), and litchi forest(5.91 %). (3) Water storage capacity in 0—60 cm depth were ranked in the order of broadleaf forest (63.39 mm), bamboo forest(41.86 mm), and litchi forest(33.96 mm). Water draught capacity of 0—60 cm soil depth were ranked in the order of broadleaf forest (65.44 mm), bamboo forest(43.59 mm), and litchi forest(34.68 mm). Therefore, forest of Liuxihe watershed had good effect on soil physical characteristics, and the water conservation capacity of broadleaf forest was better than that of bamboo and litchi forest.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]张雷燕,刘常富,王彦辉,等. 宁夏六盘山地区不同森林类型土壤的蓄水和渗透能力比较[J]. 水土保持学报,2007,21(1):95-98
[2]党宏忠,周泽福,赵雨森,等. 祁连山水源涵养林土壤水文特征研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2006(1):39-44.
[3]马雪华. 四川米亚罗地区高山冷杉林水文作用的研究[J]. 林业科学,1987,23(3):253-265.
[4]李德生,张萍,张水龙,等. 黄前库区经济林土壤水文效益研究[J]. 水土保持研究,2004,11(1):141-143.
[5]张光灿,夏江宝,王贵霞,等. 鲁中花岗山区人工林土壤水分物理性质[J]. 水土保持学报,2005,19(6):44-48.
[6]李伟烈. 广东省水资源问题及可持续利用对策[J]. 生态环境,2004,13(2):284-286.
[7]付春风,张贵. 广州流溪河国家森林公园森林景观稳定性研究[J]. 福建林业科技,2008,35(8):176-201.
[8]郭志华,肖文发,周云龙. 广州流溪河常绿阔叶林的植物区系地理分析[J]. 林业科学研究,2003,16(5):622-627
[9]林业部科技司. 森林生态系统定位研究方法[M]. 北京:科学技术出版社,1994.
[10]宋吉红,张洪江,姜广翔. 缙云山自然保护区4种森林类型林地土壤的持水特性研究[J]. 西部林业科学,2007,36(4):26-33.
[11]蒋俊明,费世民,和献峰,等. 攀枝花干热河谷四种人工植被类型土壤水源涵养特征分析[J]. 四川林业科技,2006,27(6):19-23.
[12]骆土寿,李意德,陈德祥,等. 广东白盆珠水库水源林土壤水源涵养能力研究[J]. 生态科学,2007,26(2):159-164.
[13]王燕,王兵,赵广东,等. 江西大岗山3种林型土壤水分物理性质研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2008,22(1):151-153,173.
[14]雷云飞,张卓文,苏开君,等. 流溪河森林各演替阶段凋落物层的水文特性[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2007,27(6):38-43. (责任编辑郑琰燚)
基金
收稿日期:2009-07-17修回日期:2010-01-25基金项目:科技部国际合作项目(2007DFA31070);广州市林业局科技项目作者简介:邱治军(1974—),助理研究员,博士。Email: qzhijun@126.com。引文格式:邱治军,曾震军,周光益,等. 流溪河小流域3种林分的土壤水分物理性质[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(3):62-66.