基于卫星跟踪的钳嘴鹳家域研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202004061

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 33-38.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202004061

所属专题：野生动物保护与疫病防控专题

• 专题报道（执行编委鲁长虎） • 上一篇下一篇

基于卫星跟踪的钳嘴鹳家域研究

王磊(), 刘强^*(), 杨俊杰, 雷宇, 祁天法

西南林业大学湿地学院,国家高原湿地研究中心,云南昆明 650224

收稿日期:2020-04-30 修回日期:2020-08-05 出版日期:2020-11-30 发布日期:2020-12-07
通讯作者: 刘强
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31460166)

Home ranges of Asian openbill(Anastomus oscitans) determined using satellite tracking

WANG Lei(), LIU Qiang^*(), YANG Junjie, LEI Yu, QI Tianfa

National Plateau Wetlands Research Center, College of Wetlands, Southwest Forestry, Kunming 650224, China

Received:2020-04-30 Revised:2020-08-05 Online:2020-11-30 Published:2020-12-07
Contact: LIU Qiang

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】钳嘴鹳(Anastomus oscitans)是近年来在国内出现的新分布种,也是高致病性禽流感病毒H5N1的宿主。掌握钳嘴鹳空间活动分布及变化规律,揭示其与家禽养殖区的空间关系,为家禽管理和禽流感防控提供依据。【方法】2016—2018年,在云南蒙自捕捉11只钳嘴鹳并为其佩戴了卫星跟踪器,采用动态布朗桥模型对其中5只符合数据分析要求的钳嘴鹳进行了家域计算,并在ArcGIS中通过叠加分析探究钳嘴鹳家域和养鸭场的空间关系。【结果】①钳嘴鹳的家域主要位于长桥海和大屯海两个湖泊周边区域,核心区域(核域)主要集中于长桥海的南部和东南部以及大屯海的南部和西北部区域;②钳嘴鹳(n=5)年平均家域和核域面积分别为(45.65±17.57)km²和(1.98±1.19)km²,核域仅占家域面积的4.34%;③家域和核域面积在个体间差异均较大,年家域面积最大为70.93 km²,最小仅为22.16 km²;年核域面积最大为3.67 km²,最小为0.51 km²;④单因素方差分析表明,钳嘴鹳家域面积季节间差异性不显著(F=2.607,df=3,P>0.05);核域亦不存在显著季节性差异(F=1.832,df=3,P>0.05),但夏季明显大于其他季节;⑤所有养鸭场均分布于钳嘴鹳家域范围内,有3处养鸭场和钳嘴鹳的核域在空间上高度重合,表明在研究区域内存在极大的禽流感传播风险。【结论】建议当地养殖方式由开放式放养转为封闭式圈养。今后应加强钳嘴鹳的种群监测工作,系统开展钳嘴鹳卫星跟踪研究,从而全面了解国内钳嘴鹳的分布和扩散动态,提高禽流感防控能力。

关键词: 钳嘴鹳, 家域, 核域, 动态布朗桥模型, H5N1, 空间分布, 云南蒙自

Abstract:

【Objective】Anastomus oscitans is a newly recorded bird species in China. It is also a host for the highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1. Understanding the spatial distribution and variation patterns of A. oscitans and elucidating its spatial relationship with poultry farms are important for the poultry management and avian influenza control and prevention.【Method】From 2016 to 2018, 11 A. oscitans were captured and fitted using satellite tracking devices in Mengzi, Yunnan. The dynamic Brownian bridge movement model was used to calculate the home ranges of five A. oscitans that met the data analysis requirements. The spatial relationship between home ranges and duck farms was explored using the overlay analysis in ArcGIS.【Result】The home ranges of A. oscitans were mainly located in the areas around Changqiao and Datun Lakes; the core areas were mainly concentrated in south and southeast of Changqiao Lake, and south and northwest of Datun Lake. The average annual home ranges and the core area of A. oscitans (n=5) were (45.65±17.57) km² and (1.98±1.19) km², respectively; the core area only accounted for 4.34% of the home ranges. The home ranges and core areas varied greatly among the individuals. The largest annual home range was 70.93 km², whereas the smallest was 22.16 km². The largest annual core area was 3.67 km², whereas the smallest was 0.51 km². One-way ANOVA showed no significant seasonal difference in the A. oscitans(n=5) home ranges (F=2.607, df=3, P>0.05). The core areas also showed no significant seasonal difference (F=1.832, df=3, P>0.05). However, the core areas in summer were significantly larger than those in the other seasons. All duck farms were distri-buted within the A. oscitans home ranges, and three duck farms highly overlapped with the core areas. This indicates a high risk of avian influenza transmission.【Conclusion】We recommend that the local duck farming mode be changed from being free to captive. The population monitoring and satellite tracking of A. oscitans should be reinforced to completely understand its distribution and expansion dynamics in China and improve the prevention and control of avian influenza.

Key words: Anastomus oscitans, home range, core area, dynamic Brownian bridge movement model, H5N1, spatial distribution, Mengzi of Yunnan Province

中图分类号:

Q958.11
S718

王磊,刘强,杨俊杰,等. 基于卫星跟踪的钳嘴鹳家域研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 33-38.

WANG Lei, LIU Qiang, YANG Junjie, LEI Yu, QI Tianfa. Home ranges of Asian openbill(Anastomus oscitans) determined using satellite tracking[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 44(6): 33-38.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202004061.

图/表 5

表1

图1

图2

表2

表3

参考文献 39

[1]	LIU Q, BUZZARD P, LUO X. Rapid range expansion of Asian openbill Anastomus oscitans in China[J]. Forktail, 2015, ( 31):141-143.
[2]	韩联宪, 韩奔, 梁丹, 等. 亚洲钳嘴鹳在中国西南地区的扩散[J]. 四川动物, 2016,35(1):149-153.
	HAN L X, HAN B, LIANG D, et al. Range expansion of Asian open-billed storks in southwest China[J]. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 2016,35(1):149-153. DOI: 10.11984/j.issn.1000-7083.20150130.
[3]	郑光美. 中国鸟类分类与分布名录[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 101.
	ZHENG G M. A checklist on the classification and distribution of the birds of China Checklist on the classification and distribution of the birds of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 101.
[4]	雷宇. 钳嘴鹳在中国的种群现状及扩散趋势模拟[D]. 昆明: 西南林业大学, 2017.
	LEI Y. Population status and dispersal trend simulation of Asian openbill in China[D]. Kunming: Southwest Forestry University, 2017.
[5]	雷宇, 韦国顺, 刘强, 等. 贵州草海保护区钳嘴鹳种群动态[J]. 动物学杂志, 2017,52(2):203-209.
	LEI Y, WEI G S, LIU Q, et al. Population dynamics of Asian openbill(Anastomus oscitans) in Caohai Nature Reserve, Guizhou, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2017,52(2):203-209. DOI: 10.13859/j.cjz.201702003.
[6]	杨旭, 刘强, 雷宇, 等. 云南蒙自长桥海钳嘴鹳时间分配与活动节律[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2018,38(3):214-219.
	YANG X, LIU Q, LEI Y, et al. Time budget and activity rhythm of Anastomus oscitans at changqiao, Mengzi in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2018,38(3):214-219. DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2018.03.032.
[7]	杨俊杰, 杨旭, 雷宇, 等. 云南蒙自钳嘴鹳夜栖地利用及夜栖树选择[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(14):5371-5377.
	YANG J J, YANG X, LEI Y, et al. Nocturnal roost use and roosting tree selection of Asian openbill(Anastomus oscitans) in Mengzi, Yunnan,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019,39(14):5371-5377. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201810292329.
[8]	WANGCHAREANSAK T, THITITHANYANONT A, CHUAKHEAW D, et al. A novel approach to identify molecular binding to the influenza virus H5N1: screening using molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs)[J]. Medicinal Chemistry Communications, 2014,5(5):617-621. DOI: 10.1039/c3md00272a.
[9]	SCHADUANGRAT N, PHANICH J, RUNGROTMONGKOL T, et al. The significance of naturally occurring neuraminidase quasispecies of H5N1 avian influenza virus on resistance to oseltamivir: a point of concern[J]. Journal of General Virology, 2016,97(6):1311-1323. DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000444.
[10]	RATANAKORN P, SUWANPAKDEE S, WIRIYARAT W, et al. Satellite telemetry tracks flyways of Asian openbill storks in relation to H5N1 avian influenza spread and ecological change[J]. BMC Veterinary Research, 2018,14(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1683-x.
[11]	杨岚, 李恒. 云南湿地[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2010: 152-153.
	YANG L, LI H. Wetlands of Yunnan[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2010: 152-153.
[12]	LIU Q, LI F S, BUZZARD P, et al. Migration routes and new breeding areas of black-necked cranes[J]. Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 2012,124(4):704-712. DOI: 10.1676/1559-4491-124.4.704.
[13]	KRANSTAUBER B, KAYS R, LAPOINT S D, et al. A dynamic Brownian bridge movement model to estimate utilization distributions for heterogeneous animal movement[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2012,81(4):738-746. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.01955.x.
[14]	POWELL R A. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators[M]. New York: Columbia University Press, 2000: 64-110.
[15]	程雅畅. 基于GPS遥测的江西鄱阳湖越冬白枕鹤(Grus vipio)活动区和栖息地选择研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2015.
	CHENG Y C. Home range and habitat selection of wintering white-naped crane Grus vipio through GPS telemetry in Poyang Lake, China[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015.
[16]	CIROVIC D, DE GABRIEL HERNANDO M, PAUNOVIC M, et al. Home range, movements, and activity patterns of a brown bear in Serbia[J]. Ursus, 2015,26(2):79-85. DOI: 10.2192/ursus-d-15-00010.
[17]	何久娣, 罗泽, 苏锦河, 等. 基于高斯模型的T-LoCoH候鸟家域估计算法研究及应用[J]. 科研信息化技术与应用, 2015,6(6):56-64.
	HE J D, LUO Z, SU J H, et al. A T-LoCoH birds home range estimation algorithm based on gaussian model[J]. e-Science Technology & Application, 2015,6(6):56-64. DOI: 10.11871/j.issn.1674-9480.2015.06.007.
[18]	宋亚统, 罗泽, 郑若冰. 青海湖地区赤麻鸭家域和栖息地选择的研究[J]. 科研信息化技术与应用, 2016,7(4):38-45.
	SONG Y T, LUO Z, ZHENG R B. Home range and habitat selection of ruddy shelduck in Qinghai Lake region[J]. e-Science Technology & Application, 2016,7(4):38-45. DOI: 10.11871/j.issn.1674-9480.2016.04.005.
[19]	STIER A, RICARDOU A, URIOT S, et al. Breeding season home range and migration of the agami heron (Agamia agami)[J]. Waterbirds, 2017,40(3):289-296. DOI: 10.1675/063.040.0310.
[20]	ZURELL D, VON WEHRDEN H, ROTICS S, et al. Home range size and resource use of breeding and non-breeding white storks along a land use gradient[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2018,6:79. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2018.00079.
[21]	龙博, 陈忠, 李玉春. 不同因素对动物家域面积的影响[J]. 海南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,24(4):439-443.
	LONG B, CHEN Z, LI Y C. Effects of different factors on animal home range size[J]. Journal of Hainan Normal University (Natural Science), 2011,24(4):439-443. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-4942.2011.04.021.
[22]	李保国, 刘安宏. 灵长类家域的研究[J]. 生态学杂志, 1994,13(2):61-65.
	LI B G, LIU A H. Home range study of Primates[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 1994,13(2):61-65. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.1994.0030.
[23]	宋延龄, 曾治高, 张坚, 等. 秦岭羚牛的家域研究[J]. 兽类学报, 2000,20(4):241-249.
	SONG Y L, ZENG Z G, ZHANG J, et al. Home range of golden takin (Budorcas taxicolor bedfordi) in Foping Nature Reserve, Shaanxi, China[J]. Acta Theriologica Sinica, 2000,20(4):241-249. DOI: 10.16829/j.slxb.2000.04.001.
[24]	张晋东, HULL V, 欧阳志云. 家域研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2013,33(11):3269-3279.
	ZHANG J D, HULL V, OUYANG Z Y. A review of home range studies[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013,33(11):3269-3279. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201201050017.
[25]	马强, 吴巍, 汤臣栋, 等. 崇明东滩湿地互花米草治理对鸟类及底栖动物多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(1):009-14.
	MA Q, WU W, TANG C D, et al. Effects of habitat restoration on the diversity of bird and marcobenthos in the Chongming Dongtan wetland[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2017,41(1):9-14. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.002.
[26]	HARA Y, YAMAJI K, YOKOTA S, et al. Dynamic wetland mosaic environments and Asian openbill habitat creation in peri-urban Bangkok[J]. Urban Ecosystem, 2018,21(2):305-322. DOI: 10.1007/s11252-017-0718-6.
[27]	XU J L, ZHANG X H, SUN Q H, et al. Home range, daily movements and site fidelity of male reeves’s Pheasants Syrmaticus reevesii in the Dabie Mountains, central China[J]. Wildlife Biology, 2009,15(3):338-344. DOI: 10.2981/08-032.
[28]	DYKSTRA C R, DANIEL F B, HAYS J L, et al. Correlation of red-shouldered hawk abundance and macrohabitat characteristics in Southern Ohio[J]. Condor, 2001,103(3):652-656. DOI: 10.1093/condor/103.3.652.
[29]	范元英. 唐家河川金丝猴(Rhinopithecus roxellana)的家域利用及栖息地选择[D]. 南充: 西华师范大学, 2017.
	FAN Y Y. Home range use and habitat selection of Sichuan snub-nosed monkeys(Rhinopithecus roxellana) in Tangjiahe National Nature Reserve[D]. Nanchong: China West Normal University, 2017.
[30]	KOEHLER G M, PIERCE D J. Black bear home-range sizes in Washington: climatic, vegetative, and social influences[J]. Journal of Mammalogy, 2003,84(1):81-91. DOI: 10.1644/1545-1542(2003)084<0081:BBHRSI>2.0.CO;2.
[31]	ELCHUK C L, WIEBE K L. Home-range size of northern flickers(Colaptes auratus) in relation to habitat and parental attributes[J]. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2003,81(6):954-961. DOI: 10.1139/z03-077.
[32]	李明阳, 张称意, 吴军, 等. 扎龙湿地丹顶鹤繁殖生境变化驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,36(6):76-80.
	LI M Y, ZHANG C Y, WU J, et al. Driver analysis of breeding habitat change of red-crowned crane(Grus japonensis) in Zhalong wetland[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2012,36(6):76-80. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.06.015.
[33]	李旭, 刘钊, 周伟, 等. 云南楚雄恐龙河保护区绿孔雀春季栖息地选择和空间分布[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,40(3):87-93.
	LI X, LIU Z, ZHOU W, et al. Habitat selection and spatial distribution of green peafowl(Pavo muticus) in Konglonghe Natural Reserve of Chuxiong, Yunnan Province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2016,40(3):87-93. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.03.015.
[34]	李锋, 丁长青, 雷富民. 禽流感与野鸟[J]. 动物学杂志, 2004, 39(2): 103, 99.
	LI F, DING C Q, LEI F M. Avian influenza with wild birds[J]. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2004, 39(2): 103, 99. DOI: 10.13859/j.cjz.2004.02.030.
[35]	张太翔, 李峰, 田国华, 等. 家禽和野鸟中高致病性禽流感的风险分析[J]. 中国动物检疫, 2009,26(2):66-67.
	ZHANG T X, LI F, TIAN G H, et al. Risk analysis of highly pathogenic avian influenza in poultry and wild birds[J]. China Journal of Animal Health Inspection, 2009,26(2):66-67. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-944X.2009.02.036.
[36]	李井春, 赵凤菊, 于学武, 等. 野鸟在禽流感流行病学中的作用研究进展[J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2010,37(7):178-180.
	LI J C, ZHAO F J, YU X W, et al. Research progress on the roles of wild fowls in the epidemiology of avian influenza[J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2010,37(7):178-180.
[37]	AUEWARAKUL P. The past and present threat of avian influenza in Thailand[M] //Emerging Infections in Asia. Boston: Springer, 2008: 31-44.
[38]	CHAICHOUN K, WIRIYARAT W, PHONAKNGUEN R, et al. Susceptibility of openbill storks (Anastomius oscitans) to highly pathogenic avian influenza virus subtype H5N1[J]. Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine & Public Health, 2013,44(5):799-809. pmid: 24437315
[39]	杨俊杰, 杨旭, 雷宇, 等. 云南红河发现泰国环志钳嘴鹳[J]. 动物学杂志, 2019, 54(2): 269, 297.
	YANG J J, YANG X, LEI Y, et al. Thailand banded Asian openbill (Anastomus oscitans) recovered in Honghe, Yunnan[J]. Chinese Journal of Zoology, 2019, 54(2): 269, 297. DOI: 10.1385.9/j.cjz.201902021.

钳嘴鹳编号 No.	跟踪器工作时间 (年-月) working time of GPS trackers	定位频率/ (个·h^-1) locate frequency	获得位点数 number of GPS positions
0095	2016-05—2017-06	0.50	4 777
1164	2016-11—2018-12	0.50	7 980
8114	2017-07—2018-08	0.25	2 216
2029	2017-08—2018-08	1.00	1 988
2074	2017-12—2018-05	0.50	1 897

钳嘴鹳编号 No.	时段 period	家域面积/km² home range	核域面积/km² core area	栖息地利用类型 habitats use type
0095	2016-05—2017-04	22.16	2.53	浅水沼泽、稻田、林地 shallow swamp, paddy field, woodland
1164	2016-11—2017-10	44.80	3.67	稻田、浅水沼泽、林地 paddy field, shallow swamp, woodland
1164	2017-11—2018-10	49.77	1.81	浅水沼泽、稻田、石榴园 shallow swamp, paddy field, pomegranate orchard
2029	2017-08—2018-07	40.59	0.51	浅水沼泽、林地、石榴园 shallow swamp, woodland, pomegranate orchard
8114	2017-07—2018-08	70.93	1.38	稻田、林地、浅水沼泽 paddy field, woodland, shallow swamp

季节 season	核域面积/km² core area size	家域面积/km² home range size	n
春季 spring	1.38 ± 0.82	34.56 ± 3.06	6
夏季 summer	7.16 ± 3.86	49.91 ± 15.09	5
秋季 autumn	1.38 ± 0.71	27.56 ± 7.96	5
冬季 winter	0.76 ± 0.23	19.84 ± 6.24	6

基于卫星跟踪的钳嘴鹳家域研究

Home ranges of Asian openbill(Anastomus oscitans) determined using satellite tracking

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	吴妍, 李若楠, 赵志强. 黑龙江省国家级森林公园空间分布特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 189-196.
[2]	李俊冬, 查禄慧, 马国强, 肖剑平, 李育武, 李旭. 云南楚雄小百草岭鸟类多样性空间格局[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 225-233.
[3]	许浩, 黄婷, 刘伟, 王浩. 长三角风景名胜区空间分布与可达性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 294-303.
[4]	阎雄飞, 程鑫辉, 郝哲, 王庭昊, 秦富林, 李刚. 枣瘿蚊幼虫在设施枣树上的空间分布型及抽样技术[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 201-208.
[5]	张建国, 葛扬. 国家森林城市与国家园林城市空间分布及其影响因素比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 41-49.
[6]	龚茂佳, 王娟, 付小勇, 寇卫利, 鲁宁, 王秋华, 赖虹燕. 云南广西蒜头果适生区预测及环境影响因子[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 44-52.
[7]	董灵波, 刘兆刚. 森林健康评价及其多尺度转换方法[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 206-216.
[8]	张卓然, 唐晓岚. 环太湖地区历史村落的环境适应性及特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 17-24.
[9]	纪烨琳, 苏喜友, 于治军. 基于随机森林模型的美国白蛾在中国的潜在生境预测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(6): 121-128.
[10]	刘凯舟,曹霞,巨云为,翟敏,严晓茹,王笑石,周际丰. 山核桃透翅蛾幼虫空间分布型及抽样技术[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(03): 23-27.
[11]	陈霞,袁在翔,金雪梅,朱军,徐海兵,赵宸,陈斌,关庆伟. 紫金山针阔混交林主要树种空间分布格局及种间关联性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 84-90.
[12]	张景路,张绘芳,地力夏提·包尔汉,朱雅丽,雷亚君. 基于Landsat数字影像的阿尔泰山乔木林空间分布[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(04): 153-158.
[13]	秦鹏,顾琪,王舒悰,曹俊杰,王福升,时培建. 4种地被竹大个体空间分布的点格局分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(04): 39-45.
[14]	周梅,李春干,代华兵. 红树林空间分布遥感监测精度的影响因素及应对措施Symbol[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(01): 163-168.
[15]	白卫国,徐惠玲,吴庆标,李铁华,李加博,廖国勇. 广西雅长林区铁坚油杉种群结构分布研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(03): 71-76.