丹江口库区主要植被类型水源涵养功能综合评价

刘学全,唐万鹏,崔鸿侠

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2009, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01) : 59-63.

PDF(746897 KB)
PDF(746897 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2009, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (01) : 59-63. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2009.01.012
研究论文

丹江口库区主要植被类型水源涵养功能综合评价

  • 刘学全,唐万鹏,崔鸿侠
作者信息 +

A comprehensive evaluation of water conservation capacity of main vegetation types in Danjiangkou reservoir area

  • LIU Xuequan, TANG Wanpeng, CUI Hongxia
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

以坡耕地作为对照,对丹江口库区栎类阔叶林、马尾松林、松柏混交林、柑桔园、灌木林6个主要植被类型的水源涵养功能采用层次分析法(AHP)进行了定量分析和综合评价。结果表明:不同类型林冠截留率平均为2064%;林地凋落物持水量平均185mm;林地土壤总蓄水量平均87978t/hm2;地表径流平均为2519mm;土壤侵蚀量平均为1040t/hm2。综合评价结果表明栎类阔叶林的水源涵养功能最强,其后依次是松柏混交林、马尾松林、柑桔园、灌木林和坡耕地。

Abstract

The sloping land was used as control, and the water conservation capacity of broadleaf forest , Pinus massoniana forest, pine and cypress mixed forest, citrus orchard and shrub was studied in Danjiangkou reservoir area. Then we used the method of analytic hierarchy process(AHP) to evaluate the water conservation capacity of six vegetation types. The results showed that the average canopy percentage of interception was 20.64%; the average waterholding capacity of litter form was 1.85mm; the average waterholding capacity of soil was 879.78t/hm2; the average surface runoff was 251.9mm; the average soil erosion was 10.40t/hm2. The water conservation capacity of six vegetation types was in order that broadleaf forest was the best, followed by pine and cypress mixed forest, P. massoniana forest, citrus orchard, shrub and sloping land.

引用本文

导出引用
刘学全,唐万鹏,崔鸿侠. 丹江口库区主要植被类型水源涵养功能综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2009, 33(01): 59-63 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2009.01.012
LIU Xuequan, TANG Wanpeng, CUI Hongxia. A comprehensive evaluation of water conservation capacity of main vegetation types in Danjiangkou reservoir area[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2009, 33(01): 59-63 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2009.01.012
中图分类号: S718   

参考文献

[1]万师强,陈灵芝.东灵山地区大气降水特征及树干茎流[J].生态学报,2001,20(1):6167.
[2]宋轩,李树人,姜凤岐,等.长江中游栓皮栎林水文生态效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2001,6(2):7679.
[3]崔鸿侠,张卓文,陈玉生,等.三峡库区莲峡河小流域马尾松水文生态效应[J].中南林学院学报,2005,25(2):4649.
[4]Hall R L, Calder E R N. Interception loss as a function of rainfall and forest types: stochastic modeling for tropical canopies revisited [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2003, 280: ll2.
[5]张洪江,程金花,史玉虎,等.三峡库区三种林下枯落物储量及其持水特性[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(3):5558.
[6]陈玉生,张卓文,韩兰,等.连峡河小流域不同森林类型凋落物持水特性研究[J].华中农业大学学报,2005,24(2):207212.
[7]刘培娟,杨吉华,李申安.山里庄水库上游水源涵养林不同林分枯落物水容量研究[J].水土保持研究,2007,14(1):239242.
[8]陈光升,胡庭兴,黄立华,等.华西雨屏区人工竹林凋落物及表层土壤的水源涵养功能研究[J],水土保持学报,2008,22(1):159162.
[9]宫渊波,麻泽龙,陈林武,等.嘉陵江上游低山暴雨区不同水土保持林结构模式水源涵养效益研究[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(3):2836.
[10]吴秉礼,石建忠,谢忙义,等.甘肃水土流失区防护效益森林覆盖率研究[J].生态学报,2003,23(6):11251137.
[11]崔向慧,王兵,邓宗富.江西大岗山常绿阔叶林水文生态效应的研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2004,26(5):660665.
[12]李元寿,王根绪,沈永平,等.长江源区不同植被覆盖下产流产沙效应初步研究[J].冰川冻土,2005,27(6):869875.

[13]秦嘉海,金自学,王进,等.祁连山不同林地类型对土壤理化性质和水源涵养功能的影响[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(1):9295.
[14]韩春华,赵雨森,杨俊,等.阿什河上游几种林分水源涵养能力比较[J].东北林业大学学报,2008,36(6):1618.
[15]张复兴.五台山不同林分类型水源涵养功能研究[J].中国农学通报,2008,24(7):136139.
[16]袁嘉祖.模糊数学及其在林业上的应用[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1986.
[17]李世荣,李文忠,李福源,等.青海省大通县退耕还林生态功能综合评价[J].水土保持通报,2006,26(2):6568.

基金

收稿日期:2007-09-17修回日期:2008-03-20 基金项目:湖北省科技厅“十五”科技攻关计划(2004AA204B01) 作者简介:刘学全(1966—),研究员,研究方向为森林生态学。Email:cuihxia@tom.com 引文格式:刘学全,唐万鹏,崔鸿侠.丹江口库区主要植被类型水源涵养功能综合评价[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(1):5963.

PDF(746897 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/