从宁常高速公路生态边坡选择8种灌木,研究其根系垂直分布和对边坡的影响。结果表明:在固土效益方面,有灌木覆盖土壤的有机质含量和水稳性指数均大大提高,增强了边坡的稳定性。综合比较表现较好的有紫穗槐、伞房决明和海桐,月季、金丝桃表现其次,红叶石楠、木芙蓉和狭叶十大功劳的固土护坡能力稍低。在根系吸收效益方面,海桐细根表现最好,其次为金丝桃、狭叶十大功劳、伞房决明和木芙蓉,紫穗槐、月季及红叶石楠表现稍差。因此,在较陡的高速公路生态边坡,宜选择固土护坡能力较强紫穗槐、伞房决明、海桐等,在较缓的高速公路边坡,可以结合防护功能和景观功能进行灌木的选择和配置,在较为贫瘠的边坡选择具有较好吸收效益的海桐、金丝桃、狭叶十大功劳、伞房决明等灌木,能一定程度上提高护坡的综合效益。
Abstract
Eight species shrubs were chosen from the ecological slope of Ningchang Highway to study the vertical distribution of these shrubs roots and their effect on the slope. From firm soil effectiveness aspect, it showed that the organic contents and moisture stability index of the soil with shrubs increased significantly, which improved stability of the slope. Amorpha fruticosa, Cassia corymbosa and Pittosporum tobira performed relative better compared with other species; followed by Rosa chinensis, Hypericum chinensi. Photinia×fraseri, Hibiscus mutabilis, and Mahonia fortunei had relative poor capabilities of stabilization. From root absorption effectiveness aspect, Pittosporum tobira were the most outstanding, followed by H. chinensis, M. fortunei, C. corymbosa, and H. mutabilis. The performance of A. fruticosa, R. chinensis, Photinia×fraseri were the worst. Therefore, in the steep ecological slope of highway, its good to choose A. fruticosa, C. corymbosa and P. tobira which have great ability of firming soil; while in the moderate slope of highway, shrubs selection and configuration can be combined with protection and landscape features. In the more barren highway slope, shrubs like P. tobira, H. chinensis; M. fortunei, and C. corymbosa with high absorption effectiveness can be picked up. They can use moisture and nutrients well from the soil of the highway slope, as a result it is benefit to improve the overall efficiency of the slope.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]景春,杜培明.宁杭高速公路植物选择与配置研究[J].现代农业科技,2007(12):18-19.
[2]芦建国,杜培明,裴正伟.宁杭高速公路路堑边坡植被营建与防护技术[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2007,31(4):107-109.
[3]芦建国,于冬梅.宁杭高速公路边坡生态防护研究[C]//全国工程绿化技术交流研讨会论文集.贵阳:中国水土保持学会,2008.
[4]杨国华.南京植被性质初探[J].南京师大学报:自然科学版,1982,(4):4-16.
[5]梁同江,芦建国,孔凡海.高速公路生态边坡灌木根系垂直分布特征[J].林业科技开发,2011,25(2):62-65.
[6]王进鑫,王迪海,刘广全.刺槐和侧柏人工林有效根系密度分布规律研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(12):2208-2214.
[7]江玉林.公路水土保持[M].北京:科学出版社,2008.
[8]张洪江.土壤侵蚀原理[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2003.
[9]王芳.六种灌木根系的空间分布特征及其在土壤生物工程中的应用[D].北京:北京林业大学,2006.
[10]李鹏,李占斌,赵忠.渭北黄土高原不同立地上刺槐根系分布特征研究[J].水土保持通报,2002,22(5):15-19.
[11]秦玲,魏钦平,李嘉瑞,等.成龄苹果树形改造对根系生长分布的影响[J].果树学报,2006,23 (7):705-707.
[12]张治军.重庆酸雨区马尾松生物量和根系空间分布特征研究[D].石家庄:河北农业大学,2006.
[13]吴国玺.毛乌索沙地臭柏-油蒿根系分布特征与细根动态[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2006.
[14]张芸香.华北落叶松幼苗根系动态及其影响因素研究[D].太谷:山西农业大学,2005.
基金
收稿日期:2010-05-09修回日期:2011-03-09 作者简介:芦建国(1960—),教授。Email: jglu@njfu.edu.cn。