基于AHP的县级森林综合效益最优目标规划

徐达,刘安兴,翁卫松,温小荣,谭莹

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05) : 70-74.

PDF(1433280 KB)
PDF(1433280 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (05) : 70-74. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.05.014
研究论文

基于AHP的县级森林综合效益最优目标规划

  • 徐达1,刘安兴1,翁卫松1,温小荣2,谭莹1
作者信息 +

Study on optimal goal programming of the countylevel forest comprehensive benefit based on AHP

  • XU Da1,LIU Anxing1,WENG Weisong1,WEN Xiaorong2,TAN Ying1
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为了探讨县级森林综合效益最优目标规划问题,构建了森林综合效益递阶结构模型,运用层次分析法(AHP)的指数标度法确定各层次因子间的判断矩阵,并对各个判断矩阵进行了检验,验证了森林综合效益递阶测度结构的一致性。根据森林综合效益最高原则,以大生态效益大于经济效益为约束条件,构建了有约束的线性最优目标规划模型,并对该模型符合实际问题的各个最优可行解进行了分析。结果表明:当严格保护等级和重点保护等级所占比例之和一定时,随着严格保护等级所占比例的增加,森林综合效益呈递增状态;当严格保护、重点保护、保护经营和集约经营等级之间所占比例为0.3∶0.1∶0.25∶0.35时,森林系统的综合效益目标达到最优。

Abstract

In order to explore the optimal goal programming of the countylevel forest comprehensive benefit, the hierarchical structure model of forest comprehensive benefit was established by using the exponential scale method of AHP for determing the judgment matrix, so that the hierarchy single ranking and general ranking could be inquired after consistency check of the matrix. A linear optimal goal programming model was constructed, according to the principle of achieving the highest forest comprehensive benefit and considering the large ecological benefit that was more important than economic benefit as the constraint condition. Furthermore, multiple optimal feasible solutions which conform to practical problems was also explored. The results also showed that the forest comprehensive benefit increased with the increase of proportion of strict protection when the total proportion of strict protection and emphasis protection is constant. The best optimal goal is achieved when the proportion among strict protection,emphasis protection,protection management and intensive management is 0.3∶0.1∶0.25∶0.35 respectively.

引用本文

导出引用
徐达,刘安兴,翁卫松,温小荣,谭莹. 基于AHP的县级森林综合效益最优目标规划[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2013, 37(05): 70-74 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.05.014
XU Da,LIU Anxing,WENG Weisong,WEN Xiaorong,TAN Ying. Study on optimal goal programming of the countylevel forest comprehensive benefit based on AHP[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2013, 37(05): 70-74 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.05.014
中图分类号: S750   

参考文献

[1]贺万才,覃雷.从林业生态工程角度浅析森林综合效益[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2007,30(3):9-11. He W C,Tan L. The initial analysis about comprehensive benefits of forest from the perspectives of forestry ecological engineering[J].Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design,2007,30(3):9-11.
[2]刘长乐,李树江,聂维良,等.森林生态系统三大效益评估技术的研究[J].林业科技,2004,29(3):20-22. Liu C L,Li S J,Nie W L,et al. Study on the evaluation technology of three effects of forest ecosystem[J]. Forestry Science & Technology,2004,29(3):20-22.
[3]杨丽,李龙梅,刘俊芬,等.森林资源综合评价指标体系的探讨[J].内蒙古林业调查设计,2006,29(1):59-60. Yang L,Li L M,Liu J F, et al. Study on the evaluation technology of three effects of forest ecosystem[J]. Inner Mongolia Forestry Investigation and Design,2006,29(1):59-60.
[4]于辉,熊跃军.森林效益研究进展[J].林业勘查设计,2011(1):11-12. Yu H,Xiong Y J. Study progress of forest benefits[J]. Forest Investigation Design,2011(1):11-121.
[5]Saty T L. The Analytic Hierachy Process[M]. New York:Hill,1980.
[6]许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,1986.
[7]吕跃进,覃菊莹.层次分析法建模中的结构问题[J].广西大学学报:自然科学版,2003,28(S):58-61. Lv Y J,Tan J Y. The problem in setting up a hierarchy process by using AHP[J].Journal of Guangxi University:Natural Science Edition,2003,28(S):58-61.
[8]储敏.层次分析法中判断矩阵的构造问题[D].南京:南京理工大学,2005. Chu M. The structural problems of judgment matrix in Analytic Hierarchy Process[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing University of Science and Technology,2005.
[9]Miller G A. The magical number seven,plus or minus two:Some limits on our capacity for processing information[J].The Psychological Review,1956, 63:81-97.
[10]宋和平,宋建和,李丽华,等.基于指数标度的层次分析法在馆藏分析中的应用[J].现代情报,2010,30(10):26-29. Song H P, Song J H, Li L H, et al. The application of AHP based on index scale in the analysis of librarys collection structure[J]. Journal of Modem Information, 2010, 30(10):26-29.
[11]张文鸽,黄强.层次分析法(AHP)的标度分析及其在水利工程评价中的应用[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2006,34(3):152-156. Zhang W G, Huang Q. Scale analysis of AHP and its application in evaluating water conservancy engineering [J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University:Natural Science Edition, 2006, 34(3):152-156.
[12]吕跃进,张维.指数标度在AHP标度系统中的重要作用[J].系统工程学报,2013,18(5):452-456. Lü Y J, Zhang W. Kemel function of index scale in AHP scale system[J]. Journal of System Engineering, 2003, 18(5):452-456.
[13]王立民,杨振宇,白汉斌,等.层次分析法中的指数型标度问题研究[J].无线电工程,2010,40(8):62-64. Wang L M,Yang Z Y,Bai H B, et al. Research on scale selection in Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Radio Engineering of China,2010,40(8):62-64.
[14]骆正清,杨善林.层次分析法中几种标度的比较[J].系统工程理论与实践,2004,9(9):51-60. Luo Z Q, Yang S L.Comparative study on several scales in AHP[J].Systems EngineeringTheory & Practice,2004,9(9):51-60.
[15]朱建军.层次分析法的若干问题研究及应用[D].沈阳:东北大学,2005. Zhu J J.Study on some problems and application of Analytic Hierarchy Process[D].Shenyang:Northeastern University,2005
[16]洪志国,李焱,范植华,等.层次分析法中高阶平均随机一致性指标(RI)的计算[J].计算机工程与应用,2002,38(12):45-47. Hong Z G, Li Y, Fan Z H, et al.Calculation on highranked RI of Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. Computer Engineering and Applications,2002,38(12):45-47.
[17]胡运权,郭耀煌.运筹学教程[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998.

基金

收稿日期:2013-03-26修回日期:2013-06-28 基金项目:国家林业局“948”项目(2013-4-13) 第一作者:徐达,工程师。 Email: xdnbblnfu@163.com。 引文格式:徐达,刘安兴,翁卫松,等. 基于AHP的县级森林综合效益最优目标规划[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(5):70-74.

PDF(1433280 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/