不同林龄杨树人工林土壤有效氮对
模拟氮沉降的初期响应

王文娟; 赵超; 杨鑫; 于水强; 曹国华

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.01.003

不同林龄杨树人工林土壤有效氮对模拟氮沉降的初期响应

王文娟,赵超,杨鑫,于水强,曹国华

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (01) : 15-21.

PDF(2502854 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(2502854 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (01) : 15-21. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.01.003

专题报道

不同林龄杨树人工林土壤有效氮对模拟氮沉降的初期响应

王文娟¹,赵超¹,杨鑫¹,于水强^1*,曹国华²

作者信息 +

The short-term responses of soil available nitrogen to simulated nitrogen deposition in Populus plantations at different ages

WANG Wenjuan¹, ZHAO Chao¹, YANG Xin¹, YU Shuiqiang^1*, CAO Guohua²

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为了解森林生态系统对持续氮增长和快速氮循环的响应模式及反馈机制,选择3种林龄杨树人工林作为试验样地,设置N₀(0 g/(m²·a))、N₁(5 g/(m²·a))、N₂(10 g/(m²·a))、N₃(15 g/(m²·a))、N₄(30 g/(m²·a))共5个不同浓度进行模拟氮沉降实验,探讨3种林龄杨树人工林土壤有效氮含量及对模拟氮沉降的响应。结果表明:①幼龄林、中龄林和过熟林的铵态氮占总有效氮含量的比例分别为18.50%～28.81%、23.14%～34.52%和32.60%～49.92%; ②随着外源氮浓度的不断增加,3种林龄土壤硝态氮含量都呈显著的增加趋势,且高氮处理对有效氮的影响高于低氮处理,而铵态氮只在幼龄林和中龄林中高氮处理(N₃和N₄)之间差异显著; ③幼龄林土壤硝态氮含量对不同浓度的氮沉降响应比中龄林和过熟林更为敏感,而铵态氮在3种林龄之间无显著规律; ④3种林龄土壤表层(0～10 cm)的铵态氮、硝态氮含量对氮沉降响应更加敏感。

Abstract

In order to understand the response model and feedback mechanisms of the forest ecosystem to continued increasing of nitrogen and rapid nitrogen cycle, simulating nitrogen deposition by using five treatments including N₀(0 g/(m²·a)), N₁(5 g/(m²·a)), N₂(10 g/(m²·a)), N₃(15 g/(m²·a)), N₄(30 g/(m²·a))in the field, we conducted a field-based experiment to examine the soil available nitrogen(N)contents and its response to nitrogen deposition in Populus plantation with different stand ages(6, 10 and 16 years old)in the coastal plain of Dongtai, Jiangsu Province. The results showed that: ① In the young, middle-aged and over mature plantation, ammonium nitrogen(NH⁺_<sub>4-N)contents accounted for 18.50%-28.81%, 23.14%-34.52% and 32.60%-49.92% of total available nitrogen, respectively. ② Soil nitrate nitrogen(NO^-₃-N)contents in three plantations presented a significant increasing trend with the increasing of exogenous nitrogen, moreover, the impact of NO₃^--N in the high nitrogen treatment was higher than that in the low nitrogen treatment. The NH⁺₄-N contents had significant difference in high nitrogen(N₃ and N₄)only between young and middle age plantation. ③ The responses of the soil NO^-₃-N contents in young plantation were more sensitive to nitrogen deposition than that in middle age and over mature plantations, while NH⁺₄-N had no significant regularity among different forest ages.④ The responses of soil NH⁺₄-N and NO^-₃-N contents in the soil surface layer(0-10 cm)to nitrogen deposition were more sensitive than that in deeper layers.

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用

王文娟,赵超,杨鑫,于水强,曹国华. 不同林龄杨树人工林土壤有效氮对模拟氮沉降的初期响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2016, 40(01): 15-21 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.01.003

WANG Wenjuan, ZHAO Chao, YANG Xin, YU Shuiqiang, CAO Guohua. The short-term responses of soil available nitrogen to simulated nitrogen deposition in Populus plantations at different ages[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2016, 40(01): 15-21 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.01.003

中图分类号： S714

参考文献

[1] 陈浩, 莫江明, 张炜,等. 氮沉降对森林生态系统碳吸存的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(21): 6864-6879. Chen H, Mo J M, Zhang W, et al. The effects of nitrogen deposition on forest carbon sequestration: a review[J]. Acta ecologica sinica, 2012,32(21): 6864-6879.
[2] Galloway J N, Townsend A R, Erisman J W, et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: recent trends, questions, and potential solutions[J]. Science, 2008, 320(5878): 889-892.
[3] Liu X J, Duan L, Mo J M, et al. Nitrogen deposition and its ecological impact in China: an overview[J]. Environmental pollution, 2011, 159(10): 2251-2264.
[4] 吕超群,田汉勤,黄耀. 陆地生态系统氮沉降增加的生态效应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2007,31(2): 205-218. Lü C Q, Tian H Q, Huang Y. Ecological effects of increased nitrogen deposition in terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Journal of plant ecology, 2007,31(2): 205-218.
[5] Grandy A S, Sinsabaugh R L, Neff J C, et al. Nitrogen deposition effects on soil organic matter chemistry are linked to variation in enzymes, ecosystems and size fractions[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2008, 91(1): 37-49.
[6] Tonitto C, Goodale C L, Weiss M S, et al. The effect of nitrogen addition on soil organic matter dynamics: a model analysis of the Harvard forest chronic nitrogen amendment study and soil carbon response to anthropogenic N deposition[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2014, 117(2-3): 431-454.
[7] Ochoa-Hueso R, Arróniz-Crespo M, Bowker M A, et al. Biogeochemical indicators of elevated nitrogen deposition in semiarid Mediterranean ecosystems[J]. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2014, 186(9): 5831-5842.
[8] Bragazza L, Tahvanainen T, Kutnar L, et al. Nutritional constraints in ombrotrophic Sphagnum plants under increasing atmospheric nitrogen deposition in Europe[J]. New phytologist, 2004, 163(3): 609-616.
[9] Matson P, Lohse K A, Hall S J. The globalization of nitrogen deposition: consequences for terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Ambio, 2002, 31(2): 113-119.
[10] Hertel O, Geels C, Frohn L M, et al. Assessing atmospheric nitrogen deposition to natural and semi-natural ecosystems-experience from danish studies using the DAMOS[J]. Atmospheric environment, 2013, 66: 151-160.
[11] 方运霆,莫江明, 周国逸,等. 南亚热带森林土壤有效氮含量及其对模拟氮沉降增加的初期响应[J]. 生态学报, 2004,24(11): 2353-2359. Fang Y T, Mo J M, Zhou G Y, et al. The short-term responses of soil available nitrogen of Dinghushan forests to simulated N deposition in subtropical China[J]. Acta ecologica sinica, 2004,24(11): 2353-2359.
[12] 胡艳玲,韩士杰,李雪峰,等. 长白山原始林和次生林土壤有效氮含量对模拟氮沉降的响应[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2009,37(5): 36-38,42. Hu Y L, Han S J, Li X F, et al. Responses of soil available nitrogen of natural forest and secondary forest to simulated N deposition in Changbai Mountain[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2009,37(5): 36-38,42.
[13] 陈立新,段文标. 模拟氮沉降对温带典型森林土壤有效氮形态和含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(8): 2005-2012. Chen L X, Duan W B. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on soil available nitrogen forms and their contents in typical temperate forest stands[J]. Chinese journal of applied ecology, 2011, 22(8): 2005-2012.
[14] 莫江明,彭少麟,方运霆,等. 鼎湖山马尾松针阔叶混交林土壤有效氮动态的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(3): 492-497. Mo J M, Peng S L, Fang Y T, et al.A preliminary study on the dynamics of bio-available nitrogen in soils of pine-broadleaf mixed forest in Dinghuashan Biosphere Reserve[J]. Acta ecologica sinica, 2001, 21(3): 492-497.
[15] 涂利华,胡庭兴,张健,等. 模拟氮沉降对华西雨屏区苦竹林土壤有机碳和养分的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(2): 125-136. Tu L H, Hu T X, Zhang J, et al. Response of soil organic carbon and nutrients to simulated nitrogen deposition in Pleioblastus amarus plantation, rainy area of west China[J]. Chinese journal of plant ecology, 2011, 35(2): 125-136.
[16] 赵瑞芬,于志勇,程滨,等. 不同前处理条件对土壤NO₃-N、NH₄-N含量影响的研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009,25(10): 174-177. Zhao R F, Yu Z Y, Cheng B, et al. Effects of pretreatment on content of soil NO^-₃-N,NH⁺₄-N [J]. Chinese agricultural science bulletin, 2009,25(10): 174-177.
[17] 宋歌,孙波,教剑英. 测定土壤硝态氮的紫外分光光度法与其他方法的比较[J]. 土壤学报, 2007, 44(2): 288-293. Song G, Sun B, Jiao J Y. Comparison between ultraviolet spectrophotometry and other methods in determination of soil nitrate N[J]. Acta pedologica sinica, 2007, 44(2): 288-293.
[18] 方运霆,莫江明,Per G,等. 森林土壤氮素转换及其对氮沉降的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(7): 1523-1531. Fang Y T, Mo J M, Per G, et al. Nitrogen transformations in forest soils and its responses to atmospheric nitrogen deposition: a review[J]. Acta ecologica sinica, 2004, 24(7): 1523-1531.
[19] 苏波,韩兴国,渠春梅,等. 森林土壤氮素可利用性的影响因素研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志, 2002, 21(2): 40-46. Su B, Han X G, Qu C M, et al. Factors affecting soil N availability in forest ecosystems: a literature review[J]. Chinese journal of ecology, 2002, 21(2): 40-46.
[20] 邓仁菊,杨万勤,胡建利,等. 亚高山针叶林土壤有机层有效氮动态及其对外源C、N增加的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(5): 2716-2724. Den R J, Yang W Q, Hu J L, et al. Dynamics on soil available nitrogen in organic layer and its responses to carbon and nitrogen supply in two subalpine coniferous forests of western Sichuan[J]. Acta ecologica sinica, 2009,29(5): 2716-2724.
[21] Vitousek P M, Aber J, Howarth R W, et al. Human alteration of the global nitrogen cycle: causes and consequences[J]. Ecological applications, 1997(3): 737-750.
[22] Tian H Q, Wang S Q, Liu J Y, et al. Patterns of soil nitrogen storage in China[J]. Global biogeochemical cycles, 2006, 20(1):1-9.
[23] Throop H L, Holland E A, Parton W J, et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition and insect herbivory on patterns of ecosystem-level carbon and nitrogen dynamics: results from the century model[J]. Global change biology, 2004(7):1092-1105.
[24] Fenn M E, Poth M A, Aber J D, et al. Nitrogen excess in north American ecosystems: predisposing factors, ecosystem responses, and management strategies[J]. Ecological applications,1998, 8(3): 706-733.
[25] Aber J, Mcdowell W, Nadelhoffer K. Nitrogen saturation in temperate forest ecosystems[J]. Bio science 1998, 48(11): 921-934.
[26] 袁颖红,樊后保,王强,等. 模拟氮沉降对杉木人工林土壤有效养分的影响[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2007, 24(4): 437-444. Yuan Y H, Fan H B, Wang Q, et al. Available nutrients with increased N deposition in soils of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2007, 24(4): 437-444.
[27] Magill A H, Aber J D, Currie W S, et al. Ecosystem response to 15 years of chronic nitrogen additions at the Harvard Forest LTER, Massachusetts, USA[J]. Forest ecology and management, 2004, 196(1): 7-28.
[28] Bobbink R, Hicks K, Galloway J, et al. Global assessment of nitrogen deposition effects on terrestrial plant diversity: a synthesis[J]. Ecological applications, 2010, 20(1): 30-59.

基金

收稿日期:2015-01-20 修回日期:2015-05-16
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31270489); 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB416904); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
第一作者:王文娟(782476326@qq.com)。*通信作者:于水强(ysqiang_7@163.com),副教授。
引文格式:王文娟,赵超,杨鑫,等. 不同林龄杨树人工林土壤有效氮对模拟氮沉降的初期响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(1):15-21.