苏南丘陵山区典型次生森林群落的点格局分析

薛岑; 刘茂松; 康昕; 郑阿宝; 侯嫦英; 关庆伟; 徐驰

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.02.018

薛岑,刘茂松,康昕,郑阿宝,侯嫦英,关庆伟,徐驰

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (02) : 107-112.

PDF(2022947 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(2022947 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (02) : 107-112. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.02.018

研究论文

苏南丘陵山区典型次生森林群落的点格局分析

薛岑¹,刘茂松^1*,康昕¹,郑阿宝²,侯嫦英²,关庆伟³,徐驰¹

作者信息 +

Point pattern analyses on typical secondary forest communities in the mountainous region of southern Jiangsu Province

XUE Cen¹,LIU Maosong^1*,KANG Xin¹,ZHENG Abao²,HOU Changying²,GUAN Qingwei³,XU Chi¹

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

为研究北亚热带丘陵山区次生森林在不同演替序列中群落的空间结构特征,对江苏省南京市溧水林场区域内36块30 m×30 m样地中的木本植物分布进行了详细调查。在利用典范相关分析(CCA)确定不同演替阶段典型群落类型的基础上,运用点格局分析方法对各类型群落中优势树种的空间分布格局进行研究。结果表明:研究区典型森林群落类型为马尾松-麻栎群落、冬青-马尾松群落、麻栎-栓皮栎群落和杉木-油桐群落,土壤条件是影响该地区植物群落组成差异的首要因素。各群落类型中的优势乔木树种在>3 m的空间尺度上通常都表现为均匀分布格局,推断种内竞争可能是形成这种格局特征的重要原因。主要乔木树种之间的空间关联通常表现为中性关系,而对于麻栎-栓皮栎这种功能属性相近的树种,由于受到种间竞争驱动从而表现出显著的负相关。

Abstract

To explore spatial structure of secondary forest communities at different succession series in the hilly area of northern subtropical China, we set up 36 sampling plots in the Lishui Foresty Farm, Jiangsu Province, and conducted detailed field investigations on the woody plants in these plots. We distinguished four typical community types using canonical correlation analysis(CCA)across our study plots, and then used point pattern analysis to characterize the spatial distribution patterns of the main tree species for these community types. Our results suggested that in the study area typical forest communities were represented as Pinus massoniana-Quercus acutissima community, Ilex chinensis-P. massoniana community, Q. acutissima-Q. variabilis community and Cunninghamia lanceolata-Vernicia fordii community. Soil conditions appeared to be the primary factor resulting in the difference of community composition. Most dominant tree species in the study communities showed uniform patterns on the scale of >3 m, suggesting that intraspecific competition underlies such pattern formation. Interspecific spatial association often manifested neutral patterns, except for those species such as Q. acutissima and Q. variabilis, which presented significant negative correlations. Interspecific competition due to similar functional traits of these tree species was a likely driving mechanism of such association. Our study could provide a useful reference to effective management of secondary forests in northern subtropical China.

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用

薛岑,刘茂松,康昕,郑阿宝,侯嫦英,关庆伟,徐驰. 苏南丘陵山区典型次生森林群落的点格局分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2016, 40(02): 107-112 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.02.018

XUE Cen,LIU Maosong,KANG Xin,ZHENG Abao,HOU Changying,GUAN Qingwei,XU Chi. Point pattern analyses on typical secondary forest communities in the mountainous region of southern Jiangsu Province[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition）. 2016, 40(02): 107-112 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.02.018

中图分类号： S718.5

参考文献

[1] 王磊, 丁晶晶, 季永华, 等. 江苏省森林碳储量动态变化及其经济价值评价 [J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(2): 1-5. Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2010.02.001. Wang L, Ding J J, Ji Y H, et al. The dynamic carbon storage and economic value assessment of forest in Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2010, 34(2): 1-5.
[2] 杨学军, 姜志林. 苏南丘陵区主要森林类型地被层水源涵养功能研究 [J]. 水土保持通报, 2001, 21(3): 28-31. Yang X J, Jiang Z L. Water holding function of under-forest layer of main forest types in hilly area of southern Jiangsu Province [J]. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2001, 21(3): 28-31.
[3] 杨学军, 姜志林, 戴国钦, 等. 苏南主要森林类型的生物多样性调查与比较研究 [J]. 生态学杂志, 1998,17(6): 14-17,77. Yang X J, Jiang Z L, Dai G Q, et al. The study on comparing the biodiversity of the main forest types in South Jiangsu Province [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 1998, 17(6): 14-17,77.
[4] 徐驰, 刘茂松, 张明娟, 等. 南京灵谷寺森林50年来的动态变化研究 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(5): 601-608. Xu C, Liu M S, Zhang M J, et al. Fifty years of forest change in Nanjing Spirit Valley [J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2004, 28(5): 601-608.
[5] Condit R, Ashton P S, Baker P, et al. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species [J]. Science, 2000, 288(5470): 1414-1418.
[6] 张峰, 张金屯, 张峰. 历山自然保护区猪尾沟森林群落植被格局及环境解释 [J]. 生态学报, 2003, 23(3): 421-427. Zhang F, Zhang J T, Zhang F. Pattern of forest vegetation and its environmental interpretation in Zhuweigou Lishan Mountain Natural Reserve [J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(3): 421-427.
[7] 杨洪晓, 张金屯, 李振东, 等. 毛乌素沙地油蒿(Artemisia ordosica)种群空间格局对比 [J]. 生态学报, 2008, 28(5): 1901-1910. Yang H X, Zhang J T, Li Z D, et al. Comparative study on spatial patterns of Artemisia ordosica populations in the Mu Us sandy land [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(5): 1901-1910.
[8] 张金屯. 植被数量生态学方法 [M]. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1995: 79-86. Zhang J T.Methods of quantitative vegetation ecology [M]. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press, 1995: 79-86.
[9] 张程, 张明娟, 徐驰, 等. 宁夏沙湖几种主要荒漠植物成丛性分析 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2007, 31(1): 32-39. Zhang C, Zhang M J, Xu C, et al. Analysis of aggregation in desert plant species in Sand Lake Ningxia Autonomous Region, China [J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2007, 31(1): 32-39.
[10] Diggle P J. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns [M]. London:Hodder Education Publisher,1983.
[11] Rosenberg M S, Anderson C D. PASSaGE: Pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic exegesis. Version 2 [J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2011, 2(3): 229-232.
[12] 李庆康, 马克平. 植物群落演替过程中植物生理生态学特性及其主要环境因子的变化 [J]. 植物生态学报, 2002,26(S1):9-19. Li Q K, Ma K P. Advances in plant succession ecophysiology [J].Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2002, 26(S1):9-19.
[13] 刘万德, 丁易, 臧润国, 等. 海南岛霸王岭林区低海拔热带林群落数量分类与排序 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2010, 29(8): 1526-1532. Liu W D, Ding Y, Zang R G, et al. Quantitative classification and ordination of low-altitudinal tropical forests in Bawangling Hainan Island [J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2010, 29(8): 1526-1532.
[14] Greig-Smith P.Quantitative plant ecology [M]. California:University of California Press, 1983: 54-71.
[15] 祝燕, 白帆, 刘海丰, 等. 北京暖温带次生林种群分布格局与种间空间关联性 [J]. 生物多样性, 2011, 19(2): 252-259. Zhu Y, Bai F, Liu H F, et al. Population distribution patterns and interspecific spatial associations in warm temperate secondary forests, Beijing [J]. Biodiversity Science, 2011, 19(2): 252-259.
[16] 饶米德, 冯刚, 张金龙, 等. 生境过滤和扩散限制作用对古田山森林物种和系统发育β多样性的影响 [J]. 科学通报, 2013, 58(13): 1204-1212. Rao M D, Feng G, Zhang J L, et al. Effects of environmental filtering and dispersal limitation on species and phylogenetic beta diversity in Gutianshan National Nature Reserve [J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2013, 58(13): 1204-1212.
[17] 李帅锋, 刘万德, 苏建荣, 等. 季风常绿阔叶林不同恢复阶段乔木优势种群生态位和种间联结 [J]. 生态学杂志, 2011,30(3): 508-515. Li S F, Liu W D, Su J R, et al. Niches and interspecific associations of dominant tree populations at different restoration stages of monsoonal broad-leaved evergreen forest [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2011,30(3): 508-515.

基金

收稿日期:2015-03-24 修回日期:2015-08-25
基金项目:江苏省林业三新工程项目(lysx[2012]21); 国家自然科学基金项目(41271197)
第一作者:薛岑(ivy0417@hotmail.com)。*通信作者:刘茂松(msliu@nju.edu.cn),副教授。
引文格式:薛岑,刘茂松,康昕,等. 苏南丘陵山区典型次生森林群落的点格局分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(2):107-112.