干旱胁迫对红皮柳光合特性日变化及生长的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.06.007

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2016, Vol. 59 ›› Issue (06): 41-46.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.06.007

干旱胁迫对红皮柳光合特性日变化及生长的影响

姬慧娟¹, 贾会霞^{1, 2}, 章小铃¹, 胡建军^1,2*

1.林木遗传育种国家重点实验室,国家林业局林木培育重点实验室,中国林业科学研究院林业研究所,北京 100091;
2.南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京林业大学,江苏南京 210037

出版日期:2016-12-18 发布日期:2016-12-18
基金资助:
基金项目:国家高技术研究发展计划(2011AA100201); 林木遗传育种国家重点实验室基本科研业务费专项项目(TGB20130092014)
第一作者:姬慧娟(810547163@qq.com)。
*通信作者:胡建军(hujj@caf.ac.cn),研究员。
引文格式:姬慧娟, 贾会霞, 章小铃,等. 干旱胁迫对红皮柳光合特性日变化及生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2016,40(6):41-46.

Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic diurnal course and growth of Salix purpurea

JI Huijuan¹, JIA Huixia^1,2, ZHANG Xiaoling¹, HU Jianjun^1,2*

1. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China;
2. Co-Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210073, China

Online:2016-12-18 Published:2016-12-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 红皮柳(Salix purpurea)是我国西北地区重要的乡土树种,生长快、适应性强,在水土保持、防护林和生物质能源等方面发挥重要作用。以红皮柳扦插苗为研究材料,通过盆栽试验,在4种不同程度干旱胁迫处理(对照、轻度干旱、中度干旱和重度干旱胁迫)下,测定叶片的光合作用参数及生长量,分析探讨干旱胁迫对红皮柳光合特性及生长的影响。结果表明:在轻度、中度和重度干旱胁迫下,红皮柳叶片净光合速率(P_n)日均值分别比对照下降10.4%(P＞0.05)、17.9%(P＜0.05)和58.2%(P＜0.05),中度和重度干旱胁迫下P_n下降量达到显著水平; 随着干旱胁迫程度的加剧,P_n的下降伴随着蒸腾速率(T_r)和气孔导度(G_s)的显著下降,水分利用效率(E_WUE)逐渐升高,胞间CO₂浓度(C_i)先下降后上升; 轻度干旱胁迫和中度干旱胁迫下P_n的降低是由于气孔限制引起,而重度干旱胁迫下受到气孔因素与非气孔因素的共同作用。而且,红皮柳生长受到干旱胁迫的显著影响,随着干旱胁迫程度的加重,株高和基径的相对增长率下降程度增大。

Abstract: Salix purpurea, a native tree species in the northwestern China, grows fast and has strong adaptability. It plays important roles in water and soil conservation, shelter forest and bioenergy. In order to illustrate the photosynthetic mechanism and growth response of S. purpurea to soil drought stress, we studied the diurnal photosynthetic characteristics of the potted cutting plants under four different soil drougth stress(control, mild, moderate and severe drought stress). The results showed that the diurnal means of the net photosynthetic rates(P_n)reduced by 10.4%(P＞0.05), 17.9%(P＜0.05)and 58.2%(P＜0.05)under the mild, moderate and severe drought stress compared with control, respectively. And the P_n under moderate and severe drought stress reduced significantly. With the drought stress level increasing, the daily average of the net photosynthetic rates(P_n), transpiration rates(T_r), stomatal conductance(G_s)also decreased significantly, while water utilization efficiency(E_WUE)increased slightly. Unlike the above parameters, the intercellular CO₂ concentration(C_i)decreased initially and then increased. These results suggested that the decrease of P_n under mild and moderate drought stress might be caused by stomatal limitation, while the decrease under severe drought stress might be caused by stomatal and non-stomatal limitation. Furthermore, the relative growth ratio of height and ground diameter of S. purpurea cutting plants decreased significantly with the increased drought stress level.

中图分类号:

S727.2

姬慧娟,贾会霞,章小铃,等. 干旱胁迫对红皮柳光合特性日变化及生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 59(06): 41-46.

JI Huijuan, JIA Huixia, ZHANG Xiaoling, HU Jianjun. Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic diurnal course and growth of Salix purpurea [J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 59(06): 41-46.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.06.007.

参考文献 27

[1]	李燕,薛立,吴敏.树木抗旱机理研究进展 [J].生态学杂志,2007,26(11):1857-1866.
	Li Y, Xue L, Wu M. Research advances in mechanisms of tree species drought resistance [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2007, 26(11): 1857-1866.
[2]	Turnbull M H, Murthy R, Griffin K L. The relative impacts of day-time and nighttime warming on photosynthetic capacity in Populus deltoids [J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2002, 25: 1729-1737. Doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00947.x.
[3]	孙龙,彭祚登,王冲,等.干旱胁迫对两种沙地灌木能源树种光合特性的影响 [J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2014,38(2):99-104.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.02.019.
	Sun L, Peng Z D, Wang C, et al. Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics of two energy resource sandy shrubs [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2014, 38(2): 99-104.
[4]	Bloemen J, Vergeynst L L, Overlaet-Michiels L,et al. How important is woody tissue photosynthesis in poplar during drought stress?[J]. Trees, 2016, 30(1): 63-72. Doi:10.1007/s00468-014-1132-9.
[5]	Chaves M M, Flexas J, Pinheiro C. Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell [J]. Annals of Botany, 2009, 103: 551-560. Doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125.
[6]	方升佐,黄宝龙.瑞典柳能源林的研究及发展概况 [J].世界林业研究,1997,10(3):66-71.
	Fang S Z, Huang B L. A brief introduction to willow energy forest research and plantations in Sweden [J]. World Forestry Research, 1997, 10(3): 66-71.
[7]	Pegoraro E, Rey A, Bobich E G, et al. Effect of elevated CO2 concentration and vapour pressure deficit on isoprene emission from leaves of Populus deltoides during drought [J]. Functional Plant Biology, 2004, 31(12): 1137-1147. Doi:10.1007/s00442-005-0166-5.
[8]	Xu X, Peng G, Wu C, et al. Drought inhibits photosynthetic capacity more in females than in males of Populus cathayana [J]. Tree Physiology, 2008, 28(11): 1751-1759. Doi:10.1093/treephys/28.11.1751.
[9]	李彧.旱柳对干旱胁迫生理生态响应的研究 [D].哈尔滨:东北林业大学,2009.
	Li Y. Study on eco-physiological responses of Salix matsudana on drought stress [D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2009.
[10]	刘海燕,李吉跃,赵燕.干旱胁迫对5个种源沙柳(Salix psammophila)气体交换及水分利用效率的影响 [J].干旱区研究,2006,24(6):815-820.
	Liu H Y, Li J Y, Zhao Y. Influence of drought stress on gas exchange and water use efficiency of Salix psammophila growing in five places [J]. Arid Zone Research, 2006, 24(6): 815-820.
[11]	蔡海霞,吴福忠,杨万勤.干旱胁迫对高山柳和沙棘幼苗光合生理特征的影响 [J].生态学报,2011,31(9):2430-2436.
	Cai H X, Wu F Z, Yang W Q. Effects of drought stress on the photosynthesis of Salix paraqplesia and Hippophae rhamnoides seedlings [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(9): 2430-2436.
[12]	邱权,潘昕,李吉跃,等.速生树种尾巨桉和竹柳幼苗耗水特性和水分利用效率 [J].生态学报,2014,34(6):1401-1410.Doi:10.5846/stxb201210231473.
	Qiu Q, Pan X, Li J Y, et al. Water consumption characteristics and water use efficiency of Eucalyptus urophylla ×Eucalyptus grandis and bamboo-willow seedlings [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(6): 1401-1410.
[13]	赵英,张文辉,何景峰,等.瑞典能源柳引种苗期生长特性的研究 [J].西北林学院学报,2009,24(4):80-84.Doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1997.tb00680.x.
	Zhao Y, Zhang W H, He J F, et al. Growth characteristics of different clones of energy willow after introduction [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2009, 24(4): 80-84.
[14]	王贞红.瑞典能源柳不同无性系生长动态及其对干旱胁迫响应 [D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2007.
	Wang Z H. Study on the water physio characteristics and the adaptation water stress for Sweden short rotation coppice willow [D]. Yangling: North West Agriculture and Forestry University, 2007.
[15]	杜森,高祥照.土壤分析技术规范[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2006.
	Du S, Gao X Z. Technical Specification for Soil Analysis [M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006.
[16]	Nijs I, Ferris R, Blum H, et al. Stomatal regulation in a changing climate: a field study using free air temperature increase(FATI)and free air CO2 enrichment(FACE)[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 1997, 20(8): 1041-1050.
[17]	左继林,龚春,黄建建,等.夏旱期不同管理措施下高产油茶的光合特性 [J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2013,37(2):33-38.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.02.006.
	Zuo J L, Gong C, Huang J J, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of high yield Camellia oleifera during summer drought period under different treatment [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2013, 37(2): 33-38.
[18]	Mandal K J, Sinha A C. Nutrient management effects on light interception, photosynthesis, growth, dry matter production and yield of Indian mustard(Brassica juncea)[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2004, 190(2):119-129. Doi:10.1046/j.1439-037x.2003.00083.x.
[19]	Palmqvist K, Sundberg B. Light use efficiency of dry matter gain in five macro-lichens: relative impact if microclimateconditions and species-specific traits [J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2000, 23(1): 1-14. Doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00529.x.
[20]	Angelopoulos K, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C. Inhibition of photosynthesis in olive trees(Olea europaea L.)during water stress and rewatering [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1996. 47(8): 1093-1100. Doi:10.1093/jxb/47.8.1093.
[21]	靳甜甜,傅伯杰,刘国华,等.不同坡位沙棘光合日变化及其主要环境因子 [J].生态学报,2011,31(7):1783-1793.
	Jin T T, Fu B J, Liu G H, et al. Diurnal changes of photosynthetic characteristics of Hippophae rhamnoides and the relevant environment factors at different slope locations [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(7): 1783-1793.
[22]	许大全.光合作用效率 [M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2002.
[23]	Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J]. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1982,33(1): 317-345. Doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533.
[24]	付士磊,周永斌,何兴元,等.干旱胁迫对杨树光合生理指标的影响 [J].应用生态学报,2006,17(11):2016-2019.
	Fu S L, Zhou Y B, He X Y, et al. Effects of drought stress on photosynthesis physiology of Populus pseudo-simonii [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006, 17(11): 2016-2019.
[25]	芮雯奕,田云录,张纪林,等.干旱胁迫对6个树种叶片光合特性的影响 [J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2012,36(1):68-72.Doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2012.01.014.
	Rui W Y, Tian Y L, Zhang J L, et al. Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristic of six tree species [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2012, 36(1): 68-72.
[26]	Larcher W. Physiological plant ecology. Ecophsiology and stresss physiology of functional groups [M]. Berlin: Springer-Verla, 1995:57-164.
[27]	裴斌,张光灿,张淑勇,等.土壤干旱胁迫对沙棘叶片光合作用和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].生态学报,2013,33(5): 1386-1396.Doi:10.5846/stxb201209281358.
	Pei B, Zhang G C, Zhang S Y, et al. Effects of soil drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activities in Hippophae rhamnoides Linn. seedings [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(5): 1386-1396.

干旱胁迫对红皮柳光合特性日变化及生长的影响

Effect of drought stress on photosynthetic diurnal course and growth of Salix purpurea

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献 27

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	李晓储1,何小弟2,黄利斌1,蒋继宏2,余玮玮2,朱月2. 扬州古运河风光带绿化模式的生态环境效应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 49(02): 71-75.
[2]	邱治军1,2,胡海波2*. 徐淮平原杨树农田防护林的成熟龄与更新龄[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2005, 48(01): 46-50.