生物炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷及其化学计量特征的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803022

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (02): 1-6.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803022

生物炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷及其化学计量特征的影响

王国兵¹, 王瑞¹, 徐瑾¹, 曹国华², 阮宏华¹

(1.南京林业大学,南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏南京 210037; 2.江苏省东台林场,江苏东台 224200)

出版日期:2019-03-30 发布日期:2019-03-30
基金资助:
收稿日期:2018-03-14 修回日期:2018-10-25
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0600204); 江苏省高等学校自然科学研究重大项目(18KJA220001); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)。
第一作者:王国兵(wangguobing81@aliyun.com),副教授,博士,ORCID(0000-0001-8362-9186)。

Effects of biochar application on microbial biomass C, N, P and stoichiometry characteristics of poplar plantation soil

WANG Guobing¹, WANG Rui¹, XU Jin¹, CAO Guohua², RUAN Honghua¹

(1.Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2.Dongtai Forest Farm of Jiangsu Province, Dongtai 224200, China)

Online:2019-03-30 Published:2019-03-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】揭示林分尺度下添加生物炭对土壤微生物生物量碳(SMBC)、土壤微生物生物量氮(SMBN)、土壤微生物生物量磷(SMBP)含量及其化学计量特征的影响,深入了解生物炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物群落结构与功能的影响,系统阐明生物炭调控人工林C、N、P生物地球化学循环的土壤微生物学机理,为在平原地区人工林生态系统中安全推广生物炭固碳增汇技术提供理论依据。【方法】以江苏省东台林场的杨树人工林为对象,设置生物炭添加量低(T1,40 t/hm²)、中(T2,80 t/hm²)、高(T3,120 t/hm²)3种处理及对照(不添加CK),测定SMBC、SMBN、SMBP含量及其化学计量特征(土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷含量比,即m(SMBC)/m(SMBN)、m(SMBC)/m(SMBP)、m(SMBN)/m(SMBP),文后简写为SMBC/SMBN、SMBC/SMBP、SMBN/SMBP)在不同处理间的差异,及其与土壤理化性质之间的关系。【结果】①与对照样地相比,3种生物炭添加处理均提高了SMBC、SMBN和SMBP含量。T1、T2、T3处理样地SMBC含量分别为对照样地的1.08、1.15、1.19倍; SMBN含量分别为对照样地的1.12、1.24、1.34倍; SMBP含量分别为对照样地的1.11、1.26、1.41倍; ②T1处理样地的SMBC/SMBN、SMBC/SMBP、SMBN/SMBP分别为15.7、85.0、5.4,T2处理样地的分别为15.1、78.6、5.2,T3处理样地的分别为14.3、73.3、5.1。与对照相比,3种生物炭添加处理均显著降低了SMBC/SMBN和SMBC/SMBP,且不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05),但仅T2、T3处理显著降低了SMBN/SMBP(P<0.05); ③SMBC、SMBN、SMBP含量均具有显著的季节变异,其中在植物休眠季节(2014年12月及2015年3月),SMBC、SMBN及SMBP的含量均维持在较高水平,而在植物生长的旺盛季节(2015年7月及2015年10月),其含量下降至较低水平,但SMBC/SMBN、SMBC/SMBP、SMBN/SMBP的季节变化与此完全相反; ④添加生物炭提高了土壤可溶性有机碳、硝态氮、速效磷、全氮和总有机碳含量,增加了土壤pH和含水率,但是降低了土壤密度和铵态氮含量; ⑤相关性分析表明,SMBC含量与土壤可溶性有机碳(DOC)、pH、含水率(SMC)、硝态氮(NO^-₃-N)和速效磷(AP)呈极显著正相关关系(P<0.01),与铵态氮(NH⁺₄-N)呈极显著负相关关系(P<0.01),而与土壤密度、全氮(TN)和总有机碳(TOC)相关性不显著(P≥0.05); SMBN与SMBP的含量表现较为一致,均与DOC、pH、SMC、NO^-₃-N、AP、TN呈极显著正相关关系(P<0.01),与NH⁺₄-N呈极显著负相关关系(P<0.01),而与土壤密度和TOC相关性不显著(P≥0.05)。【结论】添加生物炭能够显著提升SMBC、SMBN、SMBP含量,并有效降低SMBC/SMBN、SMBC/SMBP和SMBN/SMBP,有利于促进土壤微生物对N、P养分的固持与周转,进而改善土壤对N、P养分的供应。研究还发现,研究区杨树人工林生长可能存在N、P养分限制现象。

Abstract: 【Objective】This study aimed to reveal the effects of biochar application on soil microbial biomass C, N and P and its stoichiometry characteristics under a poplar plantation. In addition, we aimed to thoroughly understand the effects of biochar application on the structure and function of the soil microbial community and to systematically elucidate the soil microbiological mechanism behind biochar regulation of the biogeochemical cycle of C, N and P in poplar plantations. Ultimately, results of this study will provide important information for safely using biochar application as a carbon sequestration technology in plantation ecosystems. 【Method】Soil microbial biomass C, N, P(i.e. SMBC, SMBN and SMBP)and physicochemical properties(such as soil total organic carbon, total nitrogen, soluble organic carbon, nitrate nitrogen, ammonium nitrogen, available phosphorus, soil density, pH and moisture content)were examined in a poplar plantation in the Dongtai Forest Farm of Jiangsu Province. Four different treatments were used in this study: low biochar addition(T1, 40 t/hm²), middle biochar addition(T2, 80 t/hm²), high biochar addition(T3, 120 t/hm²), and no biochar addition(Control). 【Result】The SMBC, SMBN and SMBP all increased in the three biochar addition treatments relative to the control. SMBC increased by 687.2, 727.0 and 752.6 mg/kg in T1, T2 and T3 treatments, respectively, which was 1.08, 1.15 and 1.19 times higher than that in the control. SMBN increased by 44.1, 48.7 and 52.9 mg/kg in T1, T2 and T3 treatments, respectively, which was 1.12, 1.24, and 1.34 times greater than that in the control. SMBP increased by 8.2, 9.3 and 10.4 mg/kg in T1, T2 and T3 treatments, respectively, which was 1.11, 1.26 and 1.41 times greater than that in the control. SMBC/SMBN, SMBC/SMBP and SMBN/SMBP ratios in T1 were 15.7, 85.0 and 5.4, respectively. SMBC/SMBN, SMBC/SMBP and SMBN/SMBP ratios in T2 were 15.1, 78.6 and 5.2, respectively. SMBC/SMBN, SMBC/SMBP and SMBN/SMBP ratios in T3 were 14.3, 73.3 and 5.1, respectively. Both SMBC/SMBN and SMBC/SMBP ratios were significantly reduced in the three biochar addition treatments and significant differences were observed among treatments(P<0.05), but SMBN/SMBP ratio was only significantly reduced in T2 and T3(P<0.05). SMBC, SMBN, SMBP showed significant seasonal variation. C, N and P levels were higher in plant dormancy season(December 2014 and March 2015)and lower in the vigorous growing season(July 2015 and October 2015). However, seasonal variation of SMBC/SMBN, SMBC/SMBP and SMBN/SMBP ratios showed opposite trends. Biochar addition increased the contents of soluble organic carbon(DOC), nitrate nitrogen(NO^-₃-N), available phosphorus(AP), total nitrogen(TN), and total organic carbon(TOC). Biochar addition also increased soil pH and soil moisture content(SMC)and reduced soil density and ammonium nitrogen(NH⁺₄-N). Correlation analysis showed that SMBC had a highly significant positive correlation with soil DOC, pH, SMC, NO^-₃-N and AP, while it had a highly significant negative correlation with NH⁺₄-N(P<0.01). No significant correlation was observed for soil density, TN or TOC(P≥0.05). SMBN and SMBP had highly significant positive correlations with DOC, pH, SMC, NO^-₃-N, AP and TN and highly significant negative correlations with NH⁺₄-N(P<0.01). No significant correlations were observed for soil density or TOC(P≥0.05). 【Conclusion】Our results provide preliminary evidence that biochar application is useful for promoting soil N and P and supporting poplar growth due to the increase in SMBC, SMBN, SMBP and its optimized stoichiometry characteristics. Growth may be limited by N and P in poplar plantations in this region.

中图分类号:

S714

王国兵,王瑞,徐瑾,等. 生物炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷及其化学计量特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 1-6.

WANG Guobing, WANG Rui, XU Jin, CAO Guohua, RUAN Honghua. Effects of biochar application on microbial biomass C, N, P and stoichiometry characteristics of poplar plantation soil[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(02): 1-6.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803022.

参考文献

[1] LEHMANN J, RILLIG M C, THIES J, et al. Biochar effects on soil biota: a review[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2011, 43(9): 1812-1836. DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022.
[2] MARRIS E. Putting the carbon back: black is the new green[J]. Nature, 2006, 442(7103): 624-626. DOI:10.1038/442624a.
[3] LEHMANN J. A handful of carbon[J]. Nature, 2007, 447(7141):143-144. DOI: 10.1038/447143a.
[4] LEHMANN J, RONDON M. Biochar soil management on highly weathered soils in the humid tropics[C]//UPHOFF N.Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2006:517-530. DOI:10.1201/9781420017113.ch36.
[5] SOHI S, LOPEZ-CAPEL E, KRULL E, et al. Biochar, climate change and soil: a review to guide future research[R]. CSIRO Land and Water Science Report, 2009. DOI: 10.1139/Z03-132.
[6] BAMMINGER C, POLL C, MARHAN S. Offsetting global warming-induced elevated greenhouse gas emissions from an arable soil by biochar application[J]. Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(1): e318-e334. DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13871.
[7] TAN Z, LIN C S K, JI X, et al. Returning biochar to fields: a review[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2017, 116: 1-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.03.017.
[8] JONES D L, ROUSK J, EDWARDS-JONES G, et al. Biochar-mediated changes in soil quality and plant growth in a three year field trial[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012, 45: 113-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.10.012.
[9] LAIRD D A, FLEMING P, DAVIS D D. Impact of biochar amendments on the quality of a typical midwestern agricultural soil[J]. Geoderma, 2010, 158(3): 443-449. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma. 2010.05.013.
[10] LIANG B, LEHMANN J, SOLOMON D, et al. Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2006, 70(5): 1719-1730. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0383.
[11] CASTALDI S, RIONDINO M, BARONTI S, et al. Impact of biochar application to a Mediterranean wheat crop on soil microbial activity and greenhouse gas fluxes[J]. Chemosphere, 2011, 85(9): 1464-1471. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.08.031.
[12] JINDO K, SÁNCHEZ-MONEDERO M A, HERNÁNDEZ T, et al. Biochar influences the microbial community structure during manure composting with agricultural wastes[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2012, 416: 476-481. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.009.
[13] PIETIKÄINEN J, KIIKKILÄ O, FRITZE H, et al. Charcoal as a habitat for microbes and its effect on the microbial community of the underlying humus[J]. Oikos, 2000, 89: 231-242. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890203.x.
[14] ATKINSON C J, FITZGERALD J D, HIPPS N A. Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review[J]. Plant and Soil, 2010, 337(1): 1-18. DOI: 10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5.
[15] BROOKES P C, LANDMAN A, PRUDEN G, et al. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1985, 17(6): 837-842. DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0.
[16] VANCE E D, BROOKS P C, JENKINSON D S. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1987, 19(6): 703-707.DOI: 10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6.
[17] 吴金水, 肖和艾, 陈佳秋, 等. 旱地土壤微生物磷测定方法研究[J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40(1): 70-78. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2003.01.010.
WU J S, XIAO H A, CHEN J Q, et al. Measurement of microbial biomass-P in upland soils in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2003, 40(1): 70-78.
[18] HE D M,RUAN H H. Long term effect of land reclamation from lake on chemical composition of soil organic matter and its mineralization[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(6): e99251. DOI: 10. 1371/journal. pone. 0099251.
[19] 陈书信, 王国兵, 阮宏华, 等. 苏北沿海不同土地利用方式冬季土壤氮矿化速率比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(1):41-46. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.01.08.
CHEN S X, WANG G B, RUAN H H, et al. Effect of different land uses on soil nitrogen mineralization in a coastal area of northern Jiangsu Province, China, in winter[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2014, 38(1):41-46.
[20] 倪雪, 张焕朝, 杨秀莲, 等. 覆盖物对土壤性质及微生物生物量碳氮的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(1): 89-95. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.014.
NI X, ZHANG H C, YANG X L, et al. Effects of mulching on soil property and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(1):89-95.
[21] SOHI S P, KRULL E, LOPEZ-CAPEL E. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2010, 105: 47-82. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(10)05002-9.
[22] KOLB S E, FERMANICH K J, DORNBUSH M E, et al. Effect of charcoal quantity on microbial biomass and activity in temperate soils[J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 2009, 73(4): 1173-1181. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2008.0232.
[23] WARDLE D A, NILSSON M C, ZACKRISSON O, et al. Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus[J]. Science, 2008, 320(5876): 629. DOI: 10.1126/science.1154960.
[24] LIANG B, LEHMANN J, SOHI S P, et al. Black carbon affects the cycling of non-black carbon in soil[J]. Organic Geochemistry, 2010, 41(2): 206-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem. 2009.09.007.
[25] ANDERS E, WATZINGER A, REMPT F, et al. Biochar affects the structure rather than the total biomass of microbial communities in temperate soils[J]. Agricultural & Food Science, 2013, 22(4): 404-423. DOI: 10.23986/afsci.8095.
[26 ]ZHANG Q Z, DIJKSTRA F A, LIU X R, et al. Effects of biochar on soil microbial biomass after four years of consecutive application in the north China Plain[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(7): e102062. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102062.
[27] ZHANG H, VORONEY R P, PRICE G W. Effects of biochar amendments on soil microbial biomass and activity[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2014, 43(6): 2104-2114. DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.03.0132.
[28] O'NEILL B, GROSSMAN J, TSAI M T, et al. Bacterial community composition in Brazilian anthrosols and adjacent soils characterized using culturing and molecular identification[J]. Microbial Ecology, 2009, 58(1): 23-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00248-009-9515-y.
[29] CHAN K Y, VAN ZWIETEN L, MESZAROS I, et al. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 2007, 45(8): 629-634. DOI: 10.1071/sr07109.
[30] RONDON M A, LEHMANN J, RAMÍREZ J, et al. Biological nitrogen fixation by common beans(Phaseolus vulgaris L.)increases with biochar additions[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2007, 43(6): 699-708. DOI: 10.1007/s00374-006-0152-z.
[31] DELUCA T H, MACKENZIE M D, GUNDALE M J, et al. Wildfire-produced charcoal directly influences nitrogen cycling in ponderosa pine forests[J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal, 2006, 70(2): 448-453. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2005.0096.
[32] 钟晓晓, 王涛, 原文丽, 等. 生物炭的制备、改性及其环境效应研究进展[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2017, 40(5): 44-50. DOI: 10.7612/j.issn.1000-2537.2017.05.007.
ZHONG X X, WANG T, YUAN W L, et al. Progress of the preparation, modification and environmental effects of biochar[J]. Journal of Natural Science of Hunan Normal University, 2017, 40(5): 44-50.

生物炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷及其化学计量特征的影响

Effects of biochar application on microbial biomass C, N, P and stoichiometry characteristics of poplar plantation soil

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	谢燕燕, 郭子武, 林树燕, 左珂怡, 杨丽婷, 徐森, 谷瑞, 陈双林. 毛竹林下植被演替过程中土壤颗粒组成与水分入渗特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 108-116.
[2]	武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 99-107.
[3]	左壮, 张韫, 崔晓阳. 火烧对兴安落叶松林土壤氮形态和含量的初期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 147-154.
[4]	孙劲伟, 王圣燕, 范弟武, 朱咏莉. C源与NP添加对Cd胁迫下林地土壤呼吸作用的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 140-146.
[5]	陈明, 刘亮. 采样间隔对城市表土剖面磁化率变化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 61-69.
[6]	张相, 丁鸣鸣, 林杰, 李卓远, 崔琳琳, 郭赓, 杨皓. 水蚀作用下红壤丘陵区土壤特性的空间分异特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 77-84.
[7]	杨瑞, 吴朝明, 朱骊, 胡海波. 苏南丘陵区坡面经济林土壤侵蚀特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 70-76.
[8]	徐子涵, 王磊, 崔明, 刘玉国, 赵紫晴, 李嘉豪. 南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 173-181.
[9]	杜志琦, 孟庆繁, 冯立超, 葛佳荣, 黄劲斌, 史晶晶, 李洪锐, 岑祖才. 冷藏条件下土样保存时间对甲螨(甲螨亚目)和跳虫(弹尾纲)类物种分离的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 213-218.
[10]	卢伟伟, 胡嘉欣, 陈思桦, 陈玮铃, 冯思宇. 苏北滨海土壤无机碳含量的测定方法比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 76-82.
[11]	杨永超, 段文标, 陈立新, 曲美学, 王亚飞, 王美娟, 石金永, 潘磊. 模拟氮磷沉降和凋落物处理对两种林型红松林土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 57-66.
[12]	薛建辉, 周之栋, 吴永波. 喀斯特石漠化山地退化土壤生态修复研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 135-145.
[13]	林杰, 张相, 姜姜, 蒯杰, 郭赓, 孟苗婧, 李肖. 水力侵蚀过程中土壤有机碳循环研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 187-194.
[14]	李惠芝, 关庆伟, 赵家豪, 李俊杰, 王磊, 李凤凤, 左兴平, 陈斌. 地形对麻栎人工林土壤肥力质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 161-168.
[15]	赵凯歌, 周正虎, 金鹰, 王传宽. 长期氮添加对落叶松和水曲柳人工林土壤碳、氮、磷含量和胞外酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 177-184.