不同栽培基质条件对4种行道树苗木根系生长的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201711022

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (04): 192-198.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201711022

不同栽培基质条件对4种行道树苗木根系生长的影响

严巍^{1, 3}, 杨瑞卿^{1, 3}, 胡永红^{2, 3*}

(1.上海市绿化管理指导站,上海 200020; 2.上海辰山植物园,上海 201602; 3.上海城市树木生态应用工程技术研究中心, 上海 200020)

出版日期:2019-07-22 发布日期:2019-07-22
基金资助:
收稿日期:2017-11-08 修回日期:2019-03-28 基金项目:上海市科委科技创新行动计划(17DZ2252000,18DZ1204702); 上海市绿化和市容管理局科技攻关项目(G160507)。第一作者:严巍(yanwei816@163.com),高级工程师,ORCID(0000-0002-6574-4938)。*通信作者:胡永红(huyonghong@csnbgsh.cn),教授级高级工程师,ORCID(0000-0002-9288-1452)。

Effects of different planting matrices on the root growth of four roadside trees in Shanghai

YAN Wei^{1, 3}, YANG Ruiqing^1,3, HU Yonghong^{2, 3*}

(1.Shanghai Green Management Guidance Station, Shanghai 200020,China; 2. Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai 201602,China; 3. Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Urban Trees Ecological Application, Shanghai 200020,China)

Online:2019-07-22 Published:2019-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】通过模糊函数隶属法初步筛选出适合银杏(Ginkgo biloba)、香樟(Cinnamomum camphora)、悬铃木(Platanus acerifolia)和广玉兰(Magnolia grandiflora)4种行道树根系生长的栽培基质条件,改善上海市行道树生长状况,提高城市行道树生态服务功能。【方法】采用正交设计对影响银杏、香樟、悬铃木和广玉兰 4种行道树根系生长的3个因素(填充颗粒粒径、结构土比例及土壤湿度)在4种水平上进行优化试验。【结果】不同栽培基质条件对4种行道树苗木根系生物量积累及发育的影响均达到显著水平。对银杏和广玉兰苗木根系干质量和根长影响最大的为填充颗粒粒径,其中适合银杏的最佳填充颗粒粒径分别为5 cm和1 cm,广玉兰的为5 cm和5 cm; 对香樟根系生长影响最大的是填充颗粒粒径(最佳水平为3 cm)和土壤湿度(最佳水平为60%); 对悬铃木苗木根系生长影响最大的为结构土比例(最佳水平为60%)和填充颗粒粒径(最佳水平为5 cm)。对银杏、香樟和悬铃木苗木根系生长影响最大的为结构土比例,其最佳水平均为20%; 而对广玉兰苗木根系生长影响最大的是土壤填充颗粒粒径,最佳粒径为3 cm。【结论】处理8(填充颗粒粒径3 cm、结构土比例80%、土壤湿度50%)、处理11(填充颗粒粒径1 cm、结构土比例60%、土壤湿度80%)、处理8(填充颗粒粒径3 cm、结构土比例80%、土壤湿度50%)和处理6(填充颗粒粒径3 cm、结构土比例40%、土壤湿度80%)分别为银杏、香樟、黑铃木和广玉兰作为行道树在上海种植的适合基质条件。

Abstract: 【Objective】 The aim of this study was to improve the growth and natural urban ecosystems service functions of four roadside trees in Shanghai City. 【Method】 An orthogonal design was used to study three factors(soil content diameter, proportion of structure soil, and soil moisture)under four levels that influenced the root growth of four roadside trees(Ginkgo biloba,Cinnamomum camphora, Platanus acerifolia and Magnolia grandiflora). 【Result】 The results indicated that different treatments significantly influence root expansion and biomass accumulation. The best response level of factors for the dry weight of root and root length of G. biloba and M. grandiflora was soil content diameter, the best granule diameter of soil were 5 and 1 cm for G. biloba, and 5 and 5 cm for M. grandiflora. The best response level of factors were soil granule diameter and soil moisture for C. camphora; the best levels were 3 cm and 60%, respectively. The best respond level of factors were the proportion of structure soil and soil granule diameter; the best levels were 60% and 5 cm, respectively. The best response level of factors for the root growth of G. biloba, C. camphora and P. acerifolia were the proportion of structure soil; the best level were all 20%. However, the best response level of factors for M. grandiflora was soil granule diameter at 3 cm. 【Conclusion】 Through the fuzzy membership method, appropriate substrates selected for G. biloba, C. camphora, P. acerifolia and M. grandiflora were treatment 8(granule diameter 3 cm, formula soil 80%, and soil moisture 50%), 11(granule diameter 1 cm, formula soil 60%, and soil moisture 80%), 8(granule diameter 3 cm, formula soil 80%, and soil moisture 50%), 6(granule diameter 3 cm, formula soil 40%, and soil moisture 80%), respectively.

中图分类号:

S718

严巍,杨瑞卿,胡永红. 不同栽培基质条件对4种行道树苗木根系生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(04): 192-198.

YAN Wei^{1, 3}, YANG Ruiqing, HU Yonghong^{2, 3*}. Effects of different planting matrices on the root growth of four roadside trees in Shanghai[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(04): 192-198.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201711022.

参考文献

[1] 吕先忠, 楼炉焕,李根有. 杭州市行道树现状调查及布局设想[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2000, 17(3): 309-314. Lü X Z, LOU L H, LI G Y. Street trees investigation and tree species selection in Hangzhou[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2000, 17(3): 309-314.
[2] 吴泽民,何小弟.全国高等农林院校“十一五”规划教材:园林树木栽培学 [M]. 2版.北京:中国农业出版社, 2012. WU Z M, HE X D. The Eleven-Five planning materials of national agricultural and forestry colleges: aboriculture [M]. 2nd ed. Bejing:China Agriculture Press, 2012.
[3] 卢瑛,龚子同,张甘霖.城市土壤的特性及其管理[J]. 土壤与环境, 2002, 11(2): 206-209. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2002.02.021. LU Y, GONG Z T, ZHANG G L. Characteristics and management of urban soils[J]. Soil and Environmental Sciences, 2002, 11(2): 206-209.
[4] 欧阳育林.城市土壤与园林绿化[J]. 热带林业, 2004, 32(1): 31-34. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-0938.2004.01.011. OUYANG Y L. Urban soil and landscape[J]. Tropical Forestry, 2004, 32(1): 31-34.
[5] 韩继红,李传省,黄秋萍.城市土壤对园林植物生长的影响及其改善措施[J]. 中国园林, 2003, 19(7): 74-76. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2003.07.020. HAN J H, LI C S, HUANG Q P. The influence of urban soil to the growth of landscape plant and its improvement measures[J]. Chinese Lanscape Architecture, 2003, 19(7): 74-76.
[6] 侯晓丽,丁蕴铮,王焕新,等.土壤钻孔通气法对行道树生长的改善[J]. 中国城市林业, 2005, 3(5): 48-50. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4925.2005.05.013. HOU X L, DING Y Z, WANG H X, et al. Improving growth of street trees by boring the rhizospheric soil for aeration[J]. Journal of Chinese Urban Forestry, 2005, 3(5): 48-50.
[7] MCCRACKIN M L, HARMS T K, GRIMM N B, et al. Responses of soil microorganisms to resource availability in urban, desert soils[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2008, 87(2): 143-155. DOI:10.1007/s10533-007-9173-4.
[8] IMHOFF M L, ZHANG P, WOLFE R E, et al. Remote sensing of the urban heat island effect across biomes in the continental USA[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2010, 114(3): 504-513. DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2009.10.008.
[9] 孔正红, 李树人, 李有福, 等. 不同硬化地面类型对城市悬铃木物质循环的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 1998, 32(4): 314-319. DOI:10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.1998.04.003. KONG Z H, LI S R, LI Y F, et al. Effects of different hardened grounds on the material recycling of Platanus acerifolia(Ait)wild[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 1998, 32(4): 314-319.
[10] 甄蕾. 济南市新建工程区土壤条件对园林绿化的影响[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2008. ZHEN L. The effects of landscaping under new construction zone soil conditions in Jinan[D].Jinan:Shandong University, 2008.
[11] 杨瑞卿, 王本耀, 彭红玲, 等. 不同栽植基质对上海市4种行道树表型生长和根系发育的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(4): 659-666. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.04.018. YANG R Q, WANG B Y, PENG H L, et al. Effect of planting substrate on phenotypic growth and root development of 4 street tree species in Shanghai[J]. Forest Research, 2017, 30(4): 659-666.
[12] 范伟国, 杨洪强. 不同基质对平邑甜茶幼树生长、根系形态与营养吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(4): 936-941. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.04.030. FAN W G, YANG H Q. Effects of different medium on growth, root morphology and nutrients uptake of Malus hupehensis[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(4): 936-941.
[12] LUIS V C, LLORCA M, CHIRINO E, et al. Differences in morphology, gas exchange and root hydraulic conductance before planting in Pinus canariensis seedlings growing under different fertilization and light regimes[J]. Trees, 2010, 24(6): 1143-1150. DOI:10.1007/s00468-010-0490-1.
[14] 楚秀丽, 王秀花, 张东北, 等. 基质配比和缓释肥添加量对浙江楠大规格容器苗质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(6): 67-73. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.06.013. CHU X L, WANG X H, ZHANG D B, et al. Effect of substrate ratio and slow-release fertilizer loading on the quality of large size container seedlings of Phoebe chekiangensis[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(6): 67-73.
[15] FITTER A H, STICKLAND T R. Architectural analysis of plant root systems[J]. New Phytologist,1991, 118(3): 383-389.
[16] SPEK L Y. Generation and visualization of root-like structures in a three-dimensional space[J]. Plant and Soil, 1997, 197(1): 9-18. DOI:10.1023/A:1004236626479.
[17] HO M D, MCCANNON B C, LYNCH J P. Optimization modeling of plant root architecture for water and phosphorus acquisition[J]. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 2004, 226(3): 331-340. DOI:10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.09.011.
[18] 廖红,戈振扬,严小龙.水磷耦合胁迫下植物磷吸收的理想根构型:模拟与应用[J]. 科学通报, 2001, 46(8): 641-646. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2001.08.005. LIAO H, GE Z Y, YAN X L. The optimal root structure under the deficiency of phosphorus absorption of water and phosphorus: simulation and application[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2001, 46(8): 641-646.
[19] 薛建辉, 王智, 吕祥生. 林木根系与土壤环境相互作用研究综述[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 26(3): 79-84. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2002.03.021. XUE J H, WANG Z, Lü X S. Progress on the interaction between tree roots and soil environment[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2002, 26(3): 79-84.
[20] WIJESINGHE D K, JOHN E A, BEURSKENS S, et al. Root system size and precision in nutrient foraging: responses to spatial pattern of nutrient supply in six herbaceous species[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2001, 89(6): 972-983. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2001.00618.x.
[21] 周玮,周运超.马尾松幼苗生理特性对施肥的响应[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011, 31(4): 37-41. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2011.04.007. ZHOU W, ZHOU Y C. Response of the physiologic characteristics of Pinus massoniana seedlings to different fertilizer treatments[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2011, 31(4): 37-41.
[22] 周玮, 周运超, 叶立鹏, 等. 种植密度及土壤养分对马尾松苗木根系的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(11): 18-22. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2014.11.004. ZHOU W, ZHOU Y C, YE L P, et al. Effects of planting density and soil nutrients on root system characteristics of Pinus massoniana seedlings[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(11): 18-22.

[1]	丛明珠, 刘琪璟, 孙震, 董淳超, 钱尼澎. 长白山北坡植物群落β多样性及其组分驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 99-106.
[2]	曹荔荔, 阮宏华, 李媛媛, 倪娟平, 王国兵, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 徐亚明. 不同林龄水杉人工林地表大型土壤动物群落特征比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 91-98.
[3]	张怡婷, 夏念和, 林树燕, 丁雨龙. 我国寒竹属空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 107-114.
[4]	胡衍平, 刘卫东, 张珉, 陈明皋, 程勇, 魏志恒, 庞文胜, 吴际友. 山乌桕家系叶片叶色参数和色素含量及其解剖结构研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 123-133.
[5]	王一洁, 王璐冕, 丁真慧, 钱程, 曹加杰. 城市滨水绿地空间夏季微气候效应研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 233-241.
[6]	赵国扬, 洪波, 高俊平, 赵鑫, 黄洪峰, 徐彦杰. 菊属新品种‘雀欢’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 254-255.
[7]	任佳辉, 高捍东, 陈哲楠, 李浩, 刘强, 陈澎军. 杂交新美柳苗对盐涝胁迫的生长和生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 57-66.
[8]	董亚文, 陈双林, 谢燕燕, 郭子武, 张景润, 汪舍平, 徐勇敢. 林下植被演替过程中毛竹和主要优势树种叶片建成成本变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 179-186.
[9]	徐薪璐, 孔淑鑫, 吕卓, 江帅君, 赵婉琪, 林树燕. 靓竹叶色表型叶片形态、结构与光合特性相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 145-154.
[10]	曹永慧, 陈庆标, 周本智, 葛晓改, 王小明. 不同截雨干旱时间对毛竹叶片氮含量时空分布的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 155-161.
[11]	隋夕然, 李军, 陈娟, 华军, 沈谦, 杨洪胜, 何前程, 李由, 王伟, 彭冶, 葛之葳, 张增信. 徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 171-178.
[12]	尹华康, 张晋东, 黄金燕, 蒲冠桦, 毛泽恩, 周材权, 黄耀华, 付励强. 四川马边大风顶自然保护区大熊猫主食竹空间分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 187-193.
[13]	孔凡斌, 金晨涛, 徐彩瑶. 罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 245-254.
[14]	龚霞, 吴银明, 王海峰, 曾攀, 唐亚, 温铿, 焦文献. 花椒新品种‘蜀椒1号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 265-266.
[15]	吴桐, 王贤荣, 伊贤贵, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 陈祥珍, 高书成. 樱花新品种‘胭脂雪’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 267-268.

不同栽培基质条件对4种行道树苗木根系生长的影响

Effects of different planting matrices on the root growth of four roadside trees in Shanghai

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿