红皮云杉体胚发生体系优化和超低温保存技术研究

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007029

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 100-108.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007029

红皮云杉体胚发生体系优化和超低温保存技术研究

高芳¹^,²(), 陈士刚¹, 秦彩云¹, 才巨锋¹, 王聪慧³, 董环宇¹, 陶晶¹^,^*()

1.吉林省林业科学研究院林业生物技术研究所,吉林长春 130033
2.林木遗传育种国家重点实验室(东北林业大学),黑龙江哈尔滨 150040
3.吉林省林木种苗管理站,吉林长春 130022

收稿日期:2020-07-15 修回日期:2020-11-27 出版日期:2021-05-30 发布日期:2021-05-31
通讯作者: 陶晶
基金资助:
吉林省林业重大科技攻关计划项目(2015-002)

Optimization of somatic embryogenesis system and cryopreservation of Picea koraiensis

GAO Fang¹^,²(), CHEN Shigang¹, QIN Caiyun¹, CAI Jufeng¹, WANG Conghui³, DONG Huanyu¹, TAO Jing¹^,^*()

1. Jilin Provincial Academy of Forestry Sciences, Institute of Biotechnology, Changchun 130033, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding (Northeast Forestry University), Harbin 150040, China
3. Jilin Forest Tree and Seeding Management Station, Changchun 130022, China

Received:2020-07-15 Revised:2020-11-27 Online:2021-05-30 Published:2021-05-31
Contact: TAO Jing

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】通过对红皮云杉(Picea koraiensis)体细胞胚胎发生条件的筛选和超低温保存技术研究, 建立其完整的体胚发生体系及超低温保存条件,为红皮云杉优良种质资源的大量繁殖及保存提供基础。【方法】以红皮云杉合子胚为外植体,以两种基本培养基、6种植物生长调节剂组合为培养条件,筛选胚性愈伤组织诱导的适宜条件。并将获得的胚性愈伤组织进行超低温保存和体胚发育与成熟萌发试验,以3种脱落酸(ABA)和Gelrite浓度以及4种基本培养基为培养条件,筛选出体胚成熟和萌发的适宜培养条件。【结果】①两种基本培养基相比较,改良RJW(诱导率为30.00%)优于1/2 LV(诱导率为22.50%)基本培养基。当萘乙酸(NAA)质量浓度为3.0 mg/L、6-苄氨基腺嘌呤(6-BA)质量浓度为0.5 mg/L时胚性愈伤组织诱导率最高为50.00%;② 胚性愈伤组织增殖培养3个月后进行超低温保存试验,经恢复培养10 d 左右可以清晰地观察到成活的胚性愈伤组织,3个细胞系的胚性愈伤组织均可成活;③ 体胚发育阶段,改良RJW培养基添加Gelrite 6.0 g/L和ABA 20 mg/L时,3个细胞系体胚数量均较高,但是畸形胚比例也偏高,特别是HY-1细胞系畸形胚比例高达77.14%;当Gelrite质量浓度增加到8.0 g/L时,3个细胞系畸形胚比例均降低, 其中HY-2细胞系体胚数量为396.00个/g,畸形胚比例为10.33%;④ 红皮云杉体胚成熟培养两个月进行体胚萌发,在1/2 LM上体胚萌发能力最弱,其次是LM基本培养基,改良RJW体胚萌发能力最佳。不同细胞系体胚萌发能力也不同,体胚萌发能力最高为65.00%。【结论】① 胚性愈伤组织诱导的适宜培养基为改良RJW基本培养基,适宜的激素组合为NAA 3.0 mg/L + 6-BA 0.5 mg/L;② 本试验进行超低温保存的细胞系均可成活;③ 体胚发育与成熟适宜的ABA质量浓度为20 mg/L,适宜Gelrite质量浓度为8.0 g/L;④ 体胚萌发的适宜基本培养基为改良RJW基本培养基。本研究建立了红皮云杉体胚发生体系并成功进行胚性愈伤组织的超低温保存条件,该技术体系可用于红皮云杉优良种质的快速繁殖。

关键词: 红皮云杉, 胚性愈伤组织, 体细胞胚, 超低温保存, 基本培养基, 再生植株

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aimed to establish a complete somatic embryogenesis system and optimal cryopreservation conditions to provide a basis for the breeding and preservation of Picea koraiensis (Korean spruce) planting resources. We screened somatic embryogenesis conditions and the cryopreservation of Korean spruce. 【Method】We explanted zygote embryos in two basal culture media with six plant growth regulators to define the optimal culture conditions in which the embryogenic mass was introduced. The embryogenic mass was cryopreserved, and the somatic embryo maturation and germination were assessed. We screened three abscisic acid (ABA) and Gelrite concentrations and four basic culture media to assess the optimal conditions for the somatic embryo maturation and germination. 【Result】①The two basal culture media were compared, and the modified induction ratio in RJW medium was 30.00% which was greater than that of 1/2 LV (induction ratio, 22.50%) basal culture medium. The highest induction ratio was 50.00% in the proliferation medium containing 3.0 mg/L of 1-naphthalacetic acid (NAA) and 0.5 mg/L of N6-benzyladenine (6-BA). ②The embryogenic mass was cultured for 3 months, then cryopreservation was assessed. The cryopreserved embryogenic mass from three cell lines survived after 10 days of restoration. ③The numbers of somatic embryos in the three cell lines were higher, but the ratio of abnormal HY-1 somatic embryos was 77.14% in the maturation medium containing Gelrite (6.0 g/L) and ABA (20 mg/L). Increasing the Gelrite concentration to 8.0 g/L decreased the ratio of abnormal somatic embryos in all three cell lines; the number of HY-2 somatic embryos was 396.00 per gram, and the ratio of abnormal somatic embryos was 10.33%. ④The somatic embryos of Korean spruce matured for two months in the germination medium. The amount of somatic embryo germination was the lowest on 1/2 LM, followed by on LM medium and was the highest on RJW medium. The germination ability of the cell lines differed, with a somatic germination ratio of 65.00%.【Conclusion】①The optimal basal culture medium for the embryogenic mass induction was modified RJW, and the appropriate plant growth regulator concentration was NAA 3.0 mg/L + 6-BA 0.5 mg/L. ②The embryogenic mass obtained survived cryopreservation. ③The optimal ABA and Gelrite concentrations for somatic embryo maturation were 20 mg/L and 8.0 g/L, respectively. ④Also, the optimal basal culture medium for somatic embryo germination was modified RJW. We established the ideal conditions for the regeneration, cryopreservation, and somatic embryogenesis of Korean spruce. This technique can be applied to propagate the best planting resources and to establish multi-varietal forestry by using Korean spruce.

Key words: Picea koraiensis(Korean spruce), embryonic mass, somatic embryo, cryopreservation, basic culture medium, regeneration plant

中图分类号:

S722.3

高芳,陈士刚,秦彩云,等. 红皮云杉体胚发生体系优化和超低温保存技术研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 100-108.

GAO Fang, CHEN Shigang, QIN Caiyun, CAI Jufeng, WANG Conghui, DONG Huanyu, TAO Jing. Optimization of somatic embryogenesis system and cryopreservation of Picea koraiensis[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(3): 100-108.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007029.

图/表 9

图1

图2

表1

图3

表2

表3

表4

表5

图4

参考文献 37

[1]	HUMÁNEZ A, BLASCO M, BRISA C, et al. Somatic embryogenesis from different tissues of Spanish populations of maritime pine[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC), 2012,111(3):373-383.DOI: 10.1007/s11240-012-0203-0. doi: 10.1007/s11240-012-0203-0
[2]	甄艳, 陈金慧, 施季森. 植物体细胞胚发生胚性潜势恢复的研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(6):147-152.
	ZHEN Y, CHEN J H, SHI J S. Research progress on the reacquisition of embryogenic potentiality in plant somatic embryogenesis[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013,37(6):147-152.
[3]	GÓNGRA-CASTILLOE, NIC-CAN G I, GALAZ-AVALOS R M, et al. Elaboration of: transcriptome during the induction of somatic embryogenesis[J]. Plant Cell Culture Protoc, 2018,7(7) 411-427. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8594-4_29.
[4]	ELHITI M, STASOLLA C. The use of zygotic embryos as explants for in vitro propagation: an overview[M]//TREVOR A T, EDWARD C Y. Plant embryo culture methods and protocols. New York, Humana Press, 2011: 229-255.DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61737-988-8_17.
[5]	SALAJ T, MATUSOVA R, SALAJ J. Conifer somatic embryogenesis an efficient plant regeneration system for theoretical studies and mass propagation[J]. Dendrobiology, 2015,74(1):69-76. DOI: 10.12657/denbio.074.007. doi: 10.12657/denbio.074.007
[6]	HERINGER A S, SANTA-CATARINA C, SILVEIRA V. Insights from proteomic studies into plant somatic embryogenesis[J]. Proteomics, 2018,18(5/6):e1700265.DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201700265.
[7]	MOREL A, TRONTIN J F, CORBINEAU F, et al. Cotyledonary somatic embryos of Pinus pinaster Ait.most closely resemble fresh,maturing cotyledonary zygotic embryos:biological,carbohydrate and proteomic analyses[J]. Planta, 2014,240(5):1075-1095.DOI: 10.1007/s00425-014-2125-z. doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2125-z
[8]	AHN C H, CHOI Y E. Erratum to:in vitro clonal propagation and stable cryopreservation system for Platycladus orientalis via somatic embryogenesis[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC), 2017,131(3):525.DOI: 10.1007/s11240-017-1307-3. doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1307-3
[9]	刘宝光, 李成浩, 张含国. 红皮云杉球状胚诱导影响因子分析[J]. 北华大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,11(3):247-250.
	LIU B G, LI C H, ZHANG H G. Analysis of the factors affecting globular embryos induction of Picea koraiensis[J]. J Beihua Univ (Nat Sci), 2010,11(3):247-250.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4822.2010.03.015.
[10]	周磊, 吴慧, 王树力. 不同林分红皮云杉针叶养分含量及生态化学计量特征研究[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020,29(3):19-25,33.
	ZHOU L, WU H, WANG S L. Study on nutrient contents and ecological stoichiometric characteristics in needles of Picea koraiensis in different stands[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2020,29(3):19-25,33.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2020.03.03.
[11]	刘宝光, 李成浩, 张含国. 红皮云杉胚性愈伤组织保持与增殖阶段影响因子的筛选与分析[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010,38(7):56-60.
	LIU B G, LI C H, ZHANG H G. Screening of influence factors on maintenance and proliferation of embryogenic callus of Picea koraiensis[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2010,38(7):56-60.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2010.07.028.
[12]	陈少瑜. 丽江云杉体胚发生体系优化及体胚发育过程蛋白质组分析[D]. 昆明:云南大学, 2010.
	CHEN S Y. Optimization of somatic embryogenesis in Picea likiangensis (Franch.) Pritz and proteomic analysis on somatic embryos at developmental stages[D]. Kunming:Yunnan University, 2010.
[13]	孙敬爽, 贾桂霞. 北美蓝云杉体细胞胚发生技术研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010,32(1):44-51.
	SUN J S, JIA G X. Somatic embryogenesis of Picea pungens Engelmann[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2010,32(1):44-51. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2010.01.018.
[14]	LI C H, LIU B G, KIM T D, et al. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in elite genotypes of Picea koraiensis[J]. Plant Biotechnol Rep, 2008,2(4):259-265.DOI: 10.1007/s11816-008-0073-4. doi: 10.1007/s11816-008-0073-4
[15]	刘宝光, 李成浩, 王伟达, 等. 红皮云杉胚性愈伤组织诱导技术研究[J]. 植物研究, 2009,29(1):69-73.
	LIU B G, LI C H, WANG W D, et al. Induction technique of Picea koraiensis nakai embryogenic callus[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2009,29(1):69-73.
[16]	孙婷玉, 王艳丽, 沈李元, 等. 培养基成分对黑松体胚发育成熟的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019,55(4):178-186.
	SUN T Y, WANG Y L, SHEN L Y, et al. Impact of medium components on somatic embryo maturation in Pinus thunbergii[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019,55(4):178-186. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190419.
[17]	高芳, 沈海龙, 刘春苹, 等. 红松成熟胚愈伤组织诱导外植体选择及培养条件优化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(3):43-50.
	GAO F, SHEN H L, LIU C P, et al. Optimization of culture conditions and selection of suitable explants for callus induction from mature embryo of Pinus koraiensis[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017,41(3):43-50.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201605034.
[18]	PULLMAN G S, BUCALO K. Pine somatic embryogenesis using zygotic embryos as explants[C]//TREVOR A T, EDWARD C Y. Method in molecular biology. New York: Humana Press, 2011: 267-291. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61737-988-8_19.
[19]	季孔庶, 王潘潘, 王金铃, 等. 松科树种的离体培养研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,39(1):142-148.
	JI K S, WANG P P, WANG J L, et al. Review on in vitro culture of tree species in Pinaceae[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015,39(1):142-148. DOI: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-2006.2015.01.026.
[20]	汪小雄, 杨映根. 日本落叶松体细胞胚胎发生的研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010,38(4):2118-2121,2180.
	WANG X X, YANG Y G. Study on the somatic embryogenesis of Larix leptolepis[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2010,38(4):2118-2121,2180.DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2010.04.138.
[21]	RUDUS I, WEILER E W, KEPCZYNSKA E. Do stress-related phytohormones,abscisic acid and jasmonic acid play a role in the regulation of Medicago sativa L.somatic embryogenesis?[J]. Plant Growth Regul, 2009,59(2):159-169.DOI: 10.1007/s10725-009-9399-3. doi: 10.1007/s10725-009-9399-3
[22]	PULLMAN G S, BUCALO K. Pine somatic embryogenesis:analyses of seed tissue and medium to improve protocol development[J]. New For, 2014,45(3):353-377.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-014-9407-y. doi: 10.1007/s11056-014-9407-y
[23]	崔凯荣, 戴若兰. 植物体细胞胚发生的分子生物学:生命科学专论[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2000.
	CUI K R, DAI R L. Molecular biology of plant somatic embryogenesis [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2000.
[24]	KONG L S, ADERKAS P. A novel method of cryopreservation without a cryoprotectant for immature somatic embryos of conifer[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC), 2011,106(1):115-125.DOI: 10.1007/s11240-010-9899-x. doi: 10.1007/s11240-010-9899-x
[25]	BRETON D, HARVENGT L, TRONTIN J F, et al. Long-term subculture randomly affects morphology and subsequent maturation of early somatic embryos in maritime pine[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2006,87(1):95-108.DOI: 10.1007/s11240-006-9144-9. doi: 10.1007/s11240-006-9144-9
[26]	LI Q F, DENG C, ZHU T Q, et al. Dynamics of physiological and miRNA changes after long-term proliferation in somatic embryogenesis of Picea balfouriana[J]. Trees, 2019,33(2):469-480.DOI: 10.1007/s00468-018-1793-x. doi: 10.1007/s00468-018-1793-x
[27]	LINEROS Y, BALOCCHI C, MUÑOZ X, et al. Cryopreservation of Pinus radiata embryogenic tissue:effects of cryoprotective pretreatments on maturation ability[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC), 2018,135(2):357-366.DOI: 10.1007/s11240-018-1469-7. doi: 10.1007/s11240-018-1469-7
[28]	GALE S, JOHN A, BENSON E E. Cryopreservation of Picea sitchensis (sitka spruce) embryogenic suspensor masses[J]. Cryo Letters, 2007,28(4) : 225-239.
[29]	KLIMASZEWSKA K, HARGREAVES C, LELU-WALTER M A, et al. Advances in conifer somatic embryogenesis since year 2000[M]//GERMENA M A, LAMBARDI M. In vitro embryogenesis in higher plants. New York: Springer, 2016: 131-166. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3061-6_7.
[30]	VON ARNOLD S, SABALA I, BOZHKOV P, et al. Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2002,69(3):233-249.DOI: 10.1023/A:1015673200621. doi: 10.1023/A:1015673200621
[31]	KONG L S, ADERKAS P, OWEN S J, et al. Comparison of endogenous cytokinins,ABA and metabolites during female cone bud differentiation in low and high cone-producing genotypes of lodgepole pine[J]. Trees, 2011,25(6):1103-1110.DOI: 10.1007/s00468-011-0585-3. doi: 10.1007/s00468-011-0585-3
[32]	BOZHKOV P V, FILONOVA L H, VON ARNOLD S. A key developmental switch during Norway spruce somatic embryogenesis is induced by withdrawal of growth regulators and is associated with cell death and extracellular acidification[J]. Biotechnol Bioeng, 2002,77(6):658-667.DOI: 10.1002/bit.10228. doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0290
[33]	ZHANG H, HAN W, DE SMET I, et al. ABA promotes quiescence of the quiescent centre and suppresses stem cell differentiation in the Arabidopsis primary root meristem[J]. Plant J, 2010,64(5):764-774.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04367.x. doi: 10.1111/tpj.2010.64.issue-5
[34]	ZHANG J H, ZHANG S G, LI S G, et al. Regulation of synchronism by abscisic-acid-responsive small noncoding RNAs during somatic embryogenesis in larch (Larix leptolepis)[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC), 2014,116(3):361-370.DOI: 10.1007/s11240-013-0412-1. doi: 10.1007/s11240-013-0412-1
[35]	LITVAY J D, VERMA D C, JOHNSON M A, et al. Influence of a loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) culture medium and its components on growth and somatic embryogenesis of the wild carrot (Daucus carota L.)[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 1985,4(6):325-328. DOI: 10.1007/BF00269890. doi: 10.1007/BF00269890
[36]	GARIN É, BERNIER-CARDOU M, ISABEL N, et al. Effect of sugars,amino acids,and culture technique on maturation of somatic embryos of Pinus strobus on medium with two gellan gum concentrations[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2000,62(1):27-37.DOI: 10.1023/A:1006402215457. doi: 10.1023/A:1006402215457
[37]	MOREL A, TEYSSIER C, TRONTIN J F, et al. Early molecular events involved in Pinus pinaster Ait. somatic embryo development under reduced water availability: transcriptomic and proteomic analyses[J]. Physiol Plant, 2014,152(1):184-201. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12158. doi: 10.1111/ppl.12158

指标 index	细胞系 cell lines	平方和 squares	自由度 df	平均值平方 MS	F检验 F-test	P
体胚数量 somatic embryo number	HY-1	335 646.923	2	167 823.462	76.877	0.000
	HY-2	397 716.667	2	198 858.333	71.091	0.000
	HY-3	41 116.667	2	20 558.333	49.340	0.000
畸形胚比例 abnormal somatic embryos percentage	HY-1	5 622.699	2	2 811.349	3.745	0.061
	HY-2	1 780.193	2	890.097	1.654	0.244
	HY-3	3 733.557	2	1 866.778	15.018	0.001

细胞系 cell lines	ABA质量浓度/ (mg·L^-1) ABA concentration	体胚数量/ (个·g^-1) somatic embryo number	畸形胚比例/% abnormal somatic embryos	细胞系 cell lines	Gelrite质量浓度/ (g·L^-1) gelrite concentration	体胚数量/ (个·g^-1) somatic embryo number	畸形胚比例/% abnormal somatic embryos
HY-1	10	122.50±21.75 a	31.79±4.31 b	HY-1	8	354.00±17.20 a	12.31±3.27 a
HY-2		157.50±22.50 b	48.69±10.57 a	HY-2		396.00±22.72 a	10.33±1.30 a
HY-3		57.50±6.29 b	36.90±8.50 a	HY-3		46.00±5.10 a	7.33±4.52 b
HY-1	20	382.00±28.18 a	77.14±4.53 a	HY-1	10	186.00±19.90 b	26.12±2.81 a
HY-2		460.00±38.94 a	68.75±4.62 a	HY-2		212.00±30.07 b	22.09±5.12 a
HY-3		142.50±16.52 a	37.91±4.58a	HY-3		24.00±5.10 b	25.00±11.18 a
HY-1	30	7.50±4.79 a	37.50±23.94 b	HY-1	12	12.00±5.83 c	23.33±14.53 a
HY-2		25.00±8.66 c	39.58±16.45 a	HY-2		4.00±2.45 c	20.00±20.00 a
HY-3		0.00±0.00 c	0.00±0.00 b	HY-3		0.00±0.00 c	0.00±0.00 b

指标 index	细胞系 cell lines	平方和 SS	自由度 df	平均值平方 mean squares	F检验 F-test	P
体胚数量 somatic embryo number	HY-1	292 440.000	2	146 220.000	120.843	0.000
	HY-2	384 640.000	2	192 320.000	80.920	0.000
	HY-3	5 293.333	2	2 646.667	30.538	0.000
畸形胚比例 abnormal somatic embryos percentage	HY-1	532.759	2	266.380	0.696	0.518
	HY-2	393.655	2	196.828	0.276	0.764
	HY-3	1651.481	2	825.741	3.406	0.067

处理 treatment	基本培养基 basic medium	不同细胞系体胚萌发百分比/% germination percentage
处理 treatment	基本培养基 basic medium	HY-1	HY-2	HY-3
1	改良RJW	60.00±5.77 a	65.00±6.71 a	56.67±4.94 a
2	1/2改良RJW	54.00±6.00 ab	52.00±6.70 ab	52.00±5.83 a
3	LM	40.00±7.07 b	42.00±4.90 b	44.00±8.12 a
4	1/2 LM	21.67±5.43 c	41.67±6.01 b	46.67±4.94 a

红皮云杉体胚发生体系优化和超低温保存技术研究

Optimization of somatic embryogenesis system and cryopreservation of Picea koraiensis

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

质量浓度/(mg·L^-1) concentration		外植体总数 total explants	胚性愈伤组织诱导率/% embryogenic mass induction percentage
6-BA	NAA	外植体总数 total explants	胚性愈伤组织诱导率/% embryogenic mass induction percentage
0.5	2	40	10.00±5.77 b
0.5	3	40	50.00±5.77 a
0.5	5	40	15.00±9.57 b
1.0	2	40	25.00±5.00 b
1.0	3	40	25.00±9.57 b
1.0	5	40	5.00±5.00 b

[1]	孙旭高, 陶家璐, 谢微, 石洁, 张宝津, 邓小梅. 米老排优树组培技术体系优化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 69-78.
[2]	国颖, 杨港归, 吴雨涵, 何杰, 何玉洁, 廖浩然, 薛良交. DNA甲基化调控植物组织培养过程的分子机制研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 1-8.
[3]	程方, 孙婷玉, 叶建仁. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松未成熟合子胚胚性愈伤组织的诱导[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 175-182.
[4]	马娟娟, 吴琴霞, 陈颖, 王瑞敏, 袁斌龄, 胡宇辰, 曹福亮. 银杏胚乳不同发育时期生理代谢变化与其胚性感受态的相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 68-76.
[5]	邓小梅,吴乔娜,李蕊萍,赵梦秋,林洁莹,奚如春1,2. 壳斗科植物组织培养研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(04): 171-180.
[6]	许建秀,吴静,叶建仁,吴小芹. 抗松材线虫病赤松胚性愈伤组织的维持与稳定增殖[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(01): 49-54.
[7]	季孔庶,王潘潘,王金铃,阮倩倩,潘婷,朱沛煌,郭天玮,刘靖. 松科树种的离体培养研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(01): 142-148.
[8]	吴静,朱丽华,许建秀,吴小芹,叶建仁. 抗松材线虫病赤松胚性愈伤组织的诱导及增殖[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(01): 17-21.
[9]	陈容,张丽,曹颖,卢学琴,胡尚连,段宁. 低温胁迫下梁山慈竹再生植株叶绿素荧光特性和耐寒转录因子的表达[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 38(04): 39-44.
[10]	刘伟东,陈金慧,周艳威,赵亚琦,施季森. 湿加松胚性愈伤组织的程序降温技术研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(06): 1-5.
[11]	程方,安会翠,刘戈,叶建仁. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松组培再生植株生长性状观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(02): 69-72.
[12]	陈金慧，张艳娟，李婷婷，王鹏凯，王光萍施季森*. 杂交鹅掌楸体胚发生过程的起源及发育过程[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(01): 16-20.
[13]	安会翠,叶建仁*,吴小芹,刘戈,朱丽华. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松组培苗生根条件的优化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 35(06): 59-62.
[14]	张启香，，胡恒康，方炎明. 铁线莲‘MultiBlue’体细胞胚诱导和植株再生[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 34(06): 18-22.
[15]	周楠楠，方炎明，马成涛. 红桤木花粉生活力及其贮藏方法的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 34(05): 34-38.