缓释肥施氮量对4种国外栎苗木质量及移栽成活率的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201909002

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 53-60.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201909002

缓释肥施氮量对4种国外栎苗木质量及移栽成活率的影响

魏宁¹(), 李国雷¹^,^*(), 蔡梦雪¹, 史文辉², 刘文³, 薛柳³, 李进宇⁴

1.北京林业大学,省部共建森林培育与保护重点试验室,北京 100083
2.浙江农林大学,省部共建亚热带森林培育国家重点实验室,浙江杭州 311300
3.北京市西山试验林场,北京 100093
4.北京市园林科学研究院,北京 100102

收稿日期:2019-09-02 修回日期:2020-04-08 出版日期:2021-05-30 发布日期:2021-05-31
通讯作者: 李国雷
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2017PT02)

Effects of slow-release fertilization rates on seedling quality and field survival rates of four exotic oaks

WEI Ning¹(), LI Guolei¹^,^*(), CAI Mengxue¹, SHI Wenhui², LIU Wen³, XUE Liu³, LI Jinyu⁴

1. Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Beijing Forestry University,Beijing 100083, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A & F University,Hangzhou 311300, China
3. Xishan Experimental Forest Farm of Beijing, Beijing 100093, China
4. Beijing Institute of Landscape Architecture, Beijing 100102, China

Received:2019-09-02 Revised:2020-04-08 Online:2021-05-30 Published:2021-05-31
Contact: LI Guolei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究缓释肥施氮(N)量对4种国外栎苗木生长、矿质养分和非结构性碳水化合物积累及移栽成活率的影响,以期得出4种国外栎1年生容器苗最佳施N量,为培育高品质苗木提供指导。【方法】以夏栎(Quercus robur)、猩红栎(Q. coccinea)、北美红栎(Q. rubra)和沼生栎(Q. palustris)1年生容器苗为试验对象,采用单因素完全随机试验设计,在苗圃期使用缓释肥设置5个水平施N量处理:25、100、150、200和400 mg/株。第1个生长季末测定苗高、地径、生物量、矿质养分及非结构性碳水化合物含量,翌年春季移栽至大田,移栽1 a后测定苗木成活率。【结果】夏栎在施N量200 mg/株时,苗木规格、矿质养分含量和非结构性碳水化合物含量均达到最大值,400 mg/株时生物量显著下降。猩红栎在施N量为150 mg/株时,苗高、地径、生物量和可溶性糖含量最大;200 mg/株时矿质养分积累和淀粉含量最大。北美红栎苗高、地径、生物量和非结构性碳水化合物含量在各处理间均无显著差异,N含量、磷(P)含量随施N量增加而增加。沼生栎地径随施N量增加显著增加,施N量大于100 mg/株后苗高和生物量不再增加,矿质养分含量仍然增加,各处理间非结构性碳水化合物含量差异不显著。移栽1 a后沼生栎的成活率最高(95.0%)、猩红栎的不足30.0%、夏栎和北美红栎的分别为55.0%和45.0%。【结论】夏栎1年生容器苗缓释肥最佳施N量为200 mg/株;猩红栎1年生容器苗缓释肥最佳施N量为150~200 mg/株;北美红栎和沼生栎1年生容器苗缓释肥最佳施N量大于400 mg/株。沼生栎移栽成活率最高,苗圃期适当施肥能增加夏栎、猩红栎和沼生栎容器苗规格和养分贮存,北美红栎养分含量得以提升,但苗圃期施肥对4种国外栎移栽成活率没有显著改善。

关键词: 夏栎, 猩红栎, 北美红栎, 沼生栎, 缓释肥, 苗木质量, 成活率

Abstract:

【Objective】Oaks are widely distributed species which have high ornamental values. This study analyzes the effects of nitrogen rates on seedling growth, nutrient storage, non-structural carbon (NSC) content, and survival rates of four exotic oaks seedlings to explore the optimum nitrogen rate. These information is important for cultivating high quality seedlings of these four oaks. 【Method】 During the first growing season, Quercus robur, Q. coccinea, Q. rubra, Q. palustris seedlings were produced by applying five N fertilization application rates (25, 100, 150, 200 and 400 mg per seedling) by using a slow-release fertilizer. Seedling height, root-collar diameter (RCD), biomass, nutrient content and NSC content were measured at the end of the first growing season. At the beginning of the second growing season, seedlings were transplanted into the field and the survival rate was measured one year later. 【Result】 The height, RCD, biomass, nutrient content, starch content, and soluble sugar content of Q. robur seedlings reached a maximum with 200 mg per seedling applied, while the seedling biomass reduced with 400 mg per seedling applied. For Q. coccinea, height, RCD, biomass and soluble sugar content reached highest values with 150 mg per seedling applied while the nutrient content and starch content reached highest values with 200 mg per seedling applied. For Q. rubra, the nutrient content increased with the increasing of N applied and no significant difference showed in height, RCD, biomass and NSC content. For Q. palustris, RCD content increased significantly with the increasing of the fertilization rate. Height and biomass had no longer increase when N applied more than 100 mg per seedling. The nutrient content increased significantly among the fertilization treatments and no significant difference showed in NSC content. One year after transplantation, the highest survival rates of Q. palustris, Q. coccinea, Q. robur and Q. rubra were 95.0%, 30.0%, 55.0%, and 45.0%, respectively. 【Conclusion】 Based on the results at the first growing season, the optimum N rate for Q. robur one-year-old container seedling is 200 mg per seedling, while 150-200 mg per seedling for Q. coccinea. For Q. rubra and Q. palustris, the optimum N rates are higher than 400 mg per seedling. The survival rates of the four species were not affected by the fertilization treatments.

Key words: Quercus robur, Q. coccinea, Q. rubra, Q. palustris, slow-release fertilizer, seedling quality, survival rate

中图分类号:

S714

魏宁,李国雷,蔡梦雪,等. 缓释肥施氮量对4种国外栎苗木质量及移栽成活率的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 53-60.

WEI Ning, LI Guolei, CAI Mengxue, SHI Wenhui, LIU Wen, XUE Liu, LI Jinyu. Effects of slow-release fertilization rates on seedling quality and field survival rates of four exotic oaks[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(3): 53-60.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201909002.

图/表 5

表1

图1

图2

表2

不同施氮量处理对4种栎组织淀粉和可溶性糖含量的影响"

树种 species	施N量/ (mg·株^-1) nitrogen application rate		淀粉含量/mg starch content						可溶性糖含量/mg soluble sugar content
树种 species	施N量/ (mg·株^-1) nitrogen application rate		茎stem		根root		整株total		茎stem		根root	整株total
夏栎 Q. robur	25	43.78±3.07 a		173.29±26.85 a		217.07±27.99 ab		64.02±3.46 ab		176.28±21.62 ab		240.30±23.31 ab
	100	53.33±0.84 a		235.86±42.11 a		289.18±42.71 ab		47.06±4.12 a		215.53±20.41 b		262.58±19.25 b
	150	44.33±4.91 a		232.34±14.69 a		276.67±11.74 ab		61.56±6.55 ab		190.28±16.84 ab		251.85±14.00 b
	200	51.44±5.00 a		275.00±51.37 a		326.44±49.59 b		91.08±13.31b		227.28±25.96 b		318.35±21.06 b
	400	42.94±9.53 a		131.81±20.64 a		174.75±25.01 a		39.66±7.82 a		123.44±5.25 a		166.06±8.92 a
猩红栎 Q. coccinea	25	22.44±1.50 a		197.29±14.44 a		219.73±14.89 a		43.17±8.99 a		218.33±25.38 ab		261.49±33.35 ab
	100	30.66±3.95 a		227.88±40.91 a		258.53±43.96 a		41.40±5.10 a		258.18±23.24 b		299.58±27.83 b
	150	30.99±4.00 a		222.72±42.96 a		253.71±46.34 a		40.64±3.36 a		300.44±46.35 b		341.08±43.81 b
	200	21.13±1.89 a		249.77±48.67 a		270.89±48.22 a		39.69±1.03 a		199.16±46.35 ab		228.84±26.83 ab
	400	20.95±0.93 a		128.95±22.97 a		149.89±23.49 a		32.92±4.14 a		127.55±19.33 a		160.48±21.63 a
北美红栎 Q. rubra	25	52.06±7.41 a		209.34±37.06 a		269.44±46.65 a		59.16±13.02 a		292.34±58.47 a		351.51±53.96 a
	100	47.53±7.15 a		201.78±42.98 a		249.32±47.48 a		45.10±4.77 a		169.43±30.02 a		204.53±34.34 a
	150	46.90±3.02 a		190.43±23.53 a		237.33±21.04 a		67.14±22.02 a		238.95±62.58 a		249.67±59.67 a
	200	52.93±3.49 a		190.47±19.50 a		259.78±20.89 a		56.12±6.91 a		268.39±38.64 a		324.51±35.99 a
	400	47.92±6.36 a		250.51±35.84 a		298.43±39.05 a		48.67±4.34 a		210.61±22.46 a		259.27±24.75 a
沼生栎 Q. palustris	25	34.52±3.29 a		123.05±3.69 a		157.56±2.79 a		42.23±6.95 a		130.92±22.01 a		173.15±24.13 a
	100	47.30±7.39 a		141.42±14.93 a		190.88±24.74 a		75.30±4.49 b		175.93±33.59 a		251.22±34.44 a
	150	40.37±3.26 a		138.72±7.66 a		179.09±6.56 a		57.03±6.68 ab		192.49±42.89 a		249.52±38.94 a
	200	39.78±1.00 a		116.66±5.70 a		156.44±5.09 a		55.22±1.38 ab		131.04±6.55 a		186.26±6.92 a
	400	49.73±5.40 a		141.61±21.12 a		191.34±24.41 a		63.36±4.86 ab		177.21±32.17 a		240.57±32.66 a

表2

表3

参考文献 37

[1]	VILLAR-SALVADOR P, PEÑUELAS J, NICOLÁS-PERAGÓN J, et al. Is nitrogen fertilization in the nursery a suitable tool for enhancing the performance of Mediterranean oak plantations?[J]. New For, 2013,44(5):733-751.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-013-9374-8. doi: 10.1007/s11056-013-9374-8
[2]	SCHMAL J, JACOBS D, O’REILLY C.Nitrogen budgeting and quality of exponentially fertilized Quercus robur seedlings in Ireland[J]. Eur J For Res, 2011,130(4):557-567.DOI: 10.1007/s10342-010-0443-7. doi: 10.1007/s10342-010-0443-7
[3]	TRUBAT R, CORTINA J, VILAGROSA A. Nursery fertilization affects seedling traits but not field performance in Quercus suber L.[J]. J Arid Environ, 2010,74(4):491-497.DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.10.007. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.10.007
[4]	LANDIS T D. Mineral nutrients and fertilization in the container tree nursery manual [R]. Washington D C: Department of Agricultural, 1989.
[5]	FOLK R, CROSSNICKLE S C. Determining field performance potential with the use of limiting environmental conditions[J]. New For, 1997,13(1/3):121-138.DOI: 10.1023/a:1006514805052. doi: 10.1023/A:1006514805052
[6]	GROSSNICKLE S C, MACDONALD J E. Why seedlings grow: influence of plant attributes[J]. New For, 2018,49(1):1-34.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-017-9606-4. doi: 10.1007/s11056-017-9606-4
[7]	USCOLA M, VILLAR-SALVADOR P, GROSS P, et al. Fast growth involves high dependence on stored resources in seedlings of Mediterranean evergreen trees[J]. Ann Bot, 2015,115(6):1001-1013.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcv019. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv019
[8]	VILLAR-SALVADOR P, PLANELLES R, ENRQUEZ E, et al. Nursery cultivation regimes,plant functional attributes,and field performance relationships in the Mediterranean oak Quercus ilex L.[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2004,196(2/3):257-266.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.061. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.061
[9]	李国雷, 刘勇, 祝燕, 等. 国外容器苗质量调控技术研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2012,48(8):135-142.
	LI G L, LIU Y, ZHU Y, et al. A review on the abroad studies of techniques in regulating quality of container seedling[J]. Sci Silva Sin, 2012,48(8):135-142.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20120822.
[10]	OLIET J, PLANELLES R, SEGURA M L, et al. Mineral nutrition and growth of containerized Pinus halepensis seedlings under controlled-release fertilizer[J]. Sci Hortic, 2004,103(1):113-129.DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2004.04.019. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2004.04.019
[11]	OLIET J A, PLANELLES R, ARTERO F, et al. Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions:relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition[J]. New For, 2009,37(3):313-331.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3. doi: 10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3
[12]	MALIK V, TIMMER V R. Biomass partitioning and nitrogen retranslocation in black spruce seedlings on competitive mixedwood sites:a bioassay study[J]. Can J For Res, 1998,28(2):206-215.DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-28-2-206. doi: 10.1139/x97-207
[13]	SALIFU K F, TIMMER V R. Optimizing nitrogen loading of Picea mariana seedlings during nursery culture[J]. Can J For Res, 2003,33(7):1287-1294.DOI: 10.1139/x03-057. doi: 10.1139/x03-057
[14]	李国雷, 刘勇, 祝燕, 等. 苗木稳态营养加载技术研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,35(2):117-123.
	LI G L, LIU Y, ZHU Y, et al. Study of techniques for steady-state nutrition supply of seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2011,35(2):117-123.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.02.025.
[15]	刘欢, 王超琦, 吴家森, 等. 氮素指数施肥对杉木无性系苗生长及养分含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(10):3123-3128.
	LIU H, WANG C Q, WU J S, et al. Effects of exponential N fertilization on the growth and nutrient content in clonal Cunninghamia lanceolata seedlings[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016,27(10):3123-3128.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201610.027.
[16]	林平, 邹尚庆, 李国雷, 等. 油松容器苗生长和氮吸收对指数施肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(3):23-28.
	LIN P, ZOU S Q, LI G L, et al. Response of growth and N uptake of Pinus tabulaeformis container seedlings to exponential fertilization[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2013,37(3):23-28.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.03.005.
[17]	JOHNSON P S, SHIFLEY S R, ROGERS R. The ecology and silviculture of oaks[M]. Wallingford:CABI, 2009.DOI: 10.1079/9781845934743.0000.
[18]	黄利斌. 北美栎树引种栽培技术研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2007.
	HUANG L B. Studies on introduction and planting of north American oak[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2007.
[19]	陈益泰, 孙海菁, 王树凤, 等. 5种北美栎树在我国长三角地区的引种生长表现[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013,26(3):344-351.
	CHEN Y T, SUN H J, WANG S F, et al. Growth performances of five north American oak species in Yangzi River Delta of China[J]. For Res, 2013,26(3):344-351.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1498.2013.03.013.
[20]	李国雷, 祝燕, 蒋乐, 等. 指数施肥对栓皮栎容器苗生长和氮积累的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012,40(11):6-9.
	LI G L, ZHU Y, JIANG L, et al. Effect of exponential fertilization on growth and nitrogen storage of containerized Quercus variabilis seedlings[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2012,40(11):6-9.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2012.11.002.
[21]	USCOLA M, SALIFU K F, OLIET J A, et al. An exponential fertilization dose-response model to promote restoration of the Mediterranean oak Quercus ilex[J]. New Forest, 2015,46(5/6):795-812.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-015-9493-5. doi: 10.1007/s11056-015-9493-5
[22]	姚光刚, 李国雷, 郑永林, 等. 缓释肥施用量对槲栎容器苗苗木质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(1):69-75.
	YAO G G, LI G L, ZHENG Y L, et al. Effects of slow-release fertilizer rate on the quality of Quercus aliena container seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2019,43(1):69-75.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201801025.
[23]	SALIFU K F, JACOBS D F. Characterizing fertility targets and multi-element interactions in nursery culture of Quercus rubra seedlings[J]. Ann For Sci, 2006,63(3):231-237.DOI: 10.1051/forest:2006001. doi: 10.1051/forest:2006001
[24]	BIRGE Z K D, SALIFU K F, JACOBS D F. Modified exponential nitrogen loading to promote morphological quality and nutrient storage of bareroot-cultured Quercus rubra and Quercus alba seedlings[J]. Scand J For Res, 2006,21(4):306-316.DOI: 10.1080/02827580600761611. doi: 10.1080/02827580600761611
[25]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[26]	程中倩, 李国雷. 氮肥和容器深度对栓皮栎容器苗生长、根系结构及养分贮存的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2016,52(4):21-29.
	CHENG Z Q, LI G L. Effects of nitrogen supply and container size on seedling growth,root characteristics,and nutrient status in Quercus variabilis container seedlings[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2016,52(4):21-29.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20160403.
[27]	SALIFU K F, JACOBS D F, BIRGE Z K D. Nursery nitrogen loading improves field performance of bareroot oak seedlings planted on abandoned mine lands[J]. Restor Ecol, 2009,17(3):339-349.DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00373.x. doi: 10.1111/rec.2009.17.issue-3
[28]	李国雷, 祝燕, 李庆梅, 等. 红松苗龄型对苗木质量和造林效果的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2012,48(1):35-41.
	LI G L, ZHU Y, LI Q M, et al. Effect of seedling age on the seedling quality and field performance of Pinus koraiensis[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2012,48(1):35-41.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20120107.
[29]	祁鲁玉, 吴峰, 吴瑞雪, 等. 遮阴和不同形态氮素施肥对红松幼苗生长的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2019,35(4):1-5.
	QI L Y, WU F, WU R X, et al. Effects of shading and different forms of nitrogen fertilization on the growth of Pinus koraiensis seedlings[J]. Forest Engineering, 2019,35(4):1-5.
[30]	胡丁猛, 臧真荣, 王开芳, 等. 不同水肥对猩红栎轻基质容器苗生长的影响[J]. 山东农业科学, 2012,44(12):54-56.
	HU D M, ZANG Z R, WANG K F, et al. Effects of different fertilization and irrigation treatments on seedling growth of Quercus coccinea in containers with light substrates[J]. Shandong Agric Sci, 2012,44(12):54-56.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4942.2012.12.015.
[31]	MILLARD P, GRELET G A. Nitrogen storage and remobilization by trees:ecophysiological relevance in a changing world[J]. Tree Physiol, 2010,30(9):1083-1095.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpq042. doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpq042
[32]	梁建萍, 贾小云, 刘亚令, 等. 干旱胁迫对蒙古黄芪生长及根部次生代谢物含量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016,36(14):4415-4422.
	LIANG J P, JIA X Y, LIU Y L, et al. Effects of drought stress on seedling growth and accumulation of secondary metabolites in the roots of Astragalus membranaceus var. mongholicus[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016,36(14):4415-4422.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201412162507.
[33]	段世宇. 施氮对毛白杨生长及养分含量的影响[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2019,46(4):9-12.
	DUAN S Y. Effects of different nitrogen application rates on the growth and nutrient content of Populus tomentosa Carrière[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2019,46(4):9-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.04.002.
[34]	VILLAR-SALVADOR P, USCOLA M, JACOBS D F. The role of stored carbohydrates and nitrogen in the growth and stress tolerance of planted forest trees[J]. New For, 2015,46(5/6):813-839. DOI: 10.1007/s11056-015-9499-z. doi: 10.1007/s11056-015-9499-z
[35]	RAMÍREZ-VALIENTE J, ARANDA I, SANCHÉZ-GÓMEZ D, et al. Increased root investment can explain the higher survival of seedlings of ‘Mesic’Quercus suber than ‘Xeric’Quercus ilex in sandy soils during a summer drought[J]. Tree Physiol, 2019,39(1):64-75.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpy084.
[36]	于德林, 王冬, 刘晓菊, 等. 熊岳树木园栎类树种引种栽培及育苗技术[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2017,(6):62-65.
	YU D L, WANG D, LIU X J, et al. Introduction and cultivation techniques of oaks in Xiongyue Arboretum[J]. Liaoning For Sci Technol, 2017(6):62-65.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2017.06.019.
[37]	杨振亚, 台秀国, 曹振玉, 等. 4个引种栎类树种苗期抗寒性初步研究[J]. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2016,51(5):43-47,60.
	YANG Z Y, TAI X G, CAO Z Y, et al. A preliminary study on cold resistance of four introduced oaks seedlings[J]. J Shandong Univ Nat Sci, 2016,51(5):43-47,60.DOI: 10.6040/j.issn.1671-9352.0.2015.573.

施N量/ (mg·株^-1) nitrogen application rate	夏栎Q. robur		猩红栎Q. coccinea		北美红栎Q. rubra		沼生栎Q. palustris
施N量/ (mg·株^-1) nitrogen application rate	苗高/cm height	地径/mm root-collar diameter	苗高/cm height	地径/mm root-collar diameter	苗高/cm height	地径/mm root-collar diameter	苗高/cm height	地径/mm root-collar diameter
25	16.7±0.42 a	4.22±0.11 a	13.9±0.41 a	3.40±0.08 a	18.9±0.49 a	4.28±0.14 a	27.3±0.50 a	3.99±0.13 a
100	16.7±0.29 a	4.54±0.11 ab	16.0±0.47 b	3.80±0.11 abc	19.3±0.53 a	4.49±0.13 a	32.1±0.52 b	4.33±0.09 ab
150	18.4±0.42 b	4.66±0.16 b	16.0±0.54 b	4.14±0.10 c	18.3±0.47 a	4.46±0.13 a	32.8±0.85 b	4.57±0.10 bc
200	19.0±0.49 b	4.69±0.13 b	15.8±0.42 b	3.83±0.10 bc	19.8±0.42 a	4.55±0.15 a	31.6±0.55 b	4.50±0.16 bc
400	17.5±0.38 ab	4.25±0.11 a	16.0±0.44 b	3.68±0.12 ab	20.0±0.53 a	4.38±0.14 a	32.7±0.51 b	4.83±0.13 c

施N量/ (mg·株^-1) nitrogen application rate	成活率/% survival rate
施N量/ (mg·株^-1) nitrogen application rate	夏栎 Q. robur	猩红栎 Q. coccinea	北美红栎 Q. rubra	沼生栎 Q. palustris
25	40.0 a	20.0 a	45.0 a	75.0 a
100	50.0 a	20.0 a	20.0 a	95.0 a
150	55.0 a	10.0 a	35.0 a	95.0 a
200	40.0 a	15.0 a	35.0 a	95.0 a
400	35.0 a	25.0 a	35.0 a	90.0 a

缓释肥施氮量对4种国外栎苗木质量及移栽成活率的影响

Effects of slow-release fertilization rates on seedling quality and field survival rates of four exotic oaks

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	王振猛, 杜振宇, 王霞, 王洪永, 高嘉, 马丙尧. 栎类新品种‘传奇’和‘鸿运当头’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 281-283.
[2]	刘泽茂, 晏昕, 吴文, 张于卉, 喻方圆. 竹炭添加对大叶榉树容器苗生长和营养状况的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 111-118.
[3]	吴丽君, 游云飞, 陈达, 陈文荣, 李文芳. ‘黄樽’薄叶金花茶组培苗生根与移栽技术研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 117-122.
[4]	李娜, 朱培林, 丰采, 温敏学, 方升佐, 尚旭岚. 青钱柳嫁接愈合过程中砧穗生理特性及其与亲和性的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 13-20.
[5]	储冬生, 郑旭, 秦盛华, 沈树祥, 沈海萍, 唐罗忠. 苏北淤泥质海岸土壤盐分特征及其对杨树生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 140-146.
[6]	李峰卿, 王秀花, 楚秀丽, 张东北, 吴小林, 周生财, 叶明. 缓释肥N/P比及加载量对5种珍贵树种1年生苗生长和养分库构建的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 72-80.
[7]	潘平平, 窦全琴, 汤文华, 谢寅峰. 缓释肥用量对薄壳山核桃容器苗生长及养分含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 163-168.
[8]	姚光刚,李国雷,郑永林,薛敦孟,李世安,袁启华. 缓释肥施用量对槲栎容器苗苗木质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(01): 69-75.
[9]	吴丽君,高楠,陈达,陈文荣. 金花茶杂交种子无菌苗的组培快繁研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(05): 32-38.
[10]	宋协海,郭欢欢,刘勇,贺国鑫,薛敦孟,李成. 黄连木容器苗生长对缓释肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(03): 117-122.
[11]	万芳芳,刘勇,李国雷,孙巧玉,蒋乐,史文辉,滕飞,张劲. 底部渗灌下缓释肥对华北落叶松容器苗生长和氮积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(01): 75-81.
[12]	楚秀丽,王秀花,张东北,吴小林,王艺,周志春. 基质配比和缓释肥添加量对浙江楠大规格容器苗质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(06): 67-73.
[13]	胡嘉伟,刘勇,马履一,李国雷,贾忠奎,王琰,娄军山,杨晓辉. 园林废弃物堆肥替代油松容器苗基质材料的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(05): 81-86.
[14]	林平,邹尚庆,李国雷,黄冬辉,祝燕,蒋乐,史文辉. 油松容器苗生长和氮吸收对指数施肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(03): 23-28.
[15]	祝燕,李国雷,李庆梅,刘勇,邹尚庆,蒋乐. 持续供氮对长白落叶松播种苗生长及抗寒性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(01): 44-48.