不同修枝方法对杨树人工林生长、光合叶面积和主干饱满度的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202102013

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 137-142.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202102013

不同修枝方法对杨树人工林生长、光合叶面积和主干饱满度的影响

马永春¹(), 佘诚棋², 方升佐³^,^*()

1.安徽林业职业技术学院, 安徽合肥 230088
2.安徽省林业科技推广总站, 安徽合肥 230088
3.南京林业大学林学院, 江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2021-02-08 接受日期:2021-04-08 出版日期:2021-07-30 发布日期:2021-07-30
通讯作者: 方升佐
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0600402)

Effects of pruning methods on growth, photosynthetic leaf area and plumpness of trunk segment in poplar plantations

MA Yongchun¹(), SHE Chengqi², FANG Shengzuo³^,^*()

1. Anhui Vocational and Technical College of Forestry, Hefei 230088, China
2. Anhui Extension Station of Forestry Science and Technology, Hefei 230088, China
3. College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2021-02-08 Accepted:2021-04-08 Online:2021-07-30 Published:2021-07-30
Contact: FANG Shengzuo

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】杨树是我国长江中下游平原地区种植面积最大、木材产量最高的速生工业用材树种之一,如何在适地适无性系的基础上提高无节良材的出材率,是生产中需要解决的关键技术问题。研究不同修枝方法对杨树人工林生长、光合叶面积和主干饱满度的影响,旨在为杨树人工林的产量和质量提升提供依据。【方法】选择两种密度的无性系I-69杨人工林为研究对象,设计4种修枝处理方法,通过测量胸径、树高、枝下高、主干不同高度的直径、光合叶面积,分析不同处理对杨树胸径年均生长量、树高年均生长量、枝下高、单株材积年均生长量、叶面积指数、不同高度主干分段饱满度变化的影响,再用改进层次分析法对不同处理的修枝成效进行综合评价。【结果】3年的研究结果表明,两种密度的I-69杨林分对4种修枝方法的响应存在差异:修枝处理1(T1)和处理2(T2)有利于株行距为3 m×6 m林分胸径、树高和单株材积的生长,而对株行距为6 m×6 m的I-69杨林分生长的影响差异不显著;与对照(T4)相比,修枝显著提高了林木枝下高,并降低杨树单株叶面积和林分叶面积指数;修枝对I-69杨主干不同高度区分段饱满度影响不显著,但修枝处理2有利于提高两种密度林分主干的饱满度。【结论】综合评价分析得出,采用处理2的修枝方法[第1年4月上旬不修枝,第2年3月下旬修除冠层Ⅰ的枝条(枝龄4 a),第3年3月下旬修除冠层Ⅱ的枝条(枝龄4 a)]对I-69杨人工林的效果最好,更有利于培育通直、饱满、无节的优质胶合板材。

关键词: 杨树人工林, 修枝方法, 主干饱满度, 叶面积指数

Abstract:

【Objective】Poplar is one of the tree species with the highest yield, the largest planting areas and the most suitability in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River of China. However, how to improve the plantation yield and wood quality is the key issue to be solved in the practices.【Method】In this paper, the plantations of poplar clone I-69(Populus deltoides cv. I-69/55)with planting spacings of 3 m × 6 m and 6 m × 6 m were taken as the research object, and four pruning treatments were designed. Based on the measurements of diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height, height under branch, trunk diameter at different height and photosynthetic leaves area, the effects of different treatments on the average annual growth of DBH, the average annual growth of tree height, the height under branch, the average annual growth of tree volume, the leaf area index and the plumpness of trunk segments at different height were analyzed, while the pruning effectiveness of different treatments was comprehensively evaluated using the improved analytic hierarchy process.【Result】Based on the 3-year investigation, the results showed that the response of the two plantations with various planting spacings to the pruning treatments was different. Pruning treatments one and two could improve the plantation growth of DBH, tree height and tree volume in the 3 m × 6 m spacing, whereas no significant effect on growth was observed among the 4 pruning treatments in the 6 m × 6 m spacing. Compared with CK, pruning treatments significantly increased the height under branches, and decreased the leaf area and leaf area index. Although pruning treatments did not significantly affect the trunk plumpness, the pruning treatment two was favorable to the trunk plumpness for the plantations of two planting spacings.【Conclusion】In term of the comprehensive assesment, the pruning way of the treatment two would achieve the best effects for P. deltoides plantations, which is more beneficial to cultivating high quality plywood timber with straightness, large plumpness and no knots.

Key words: poplar plantation, pruning method, trunk plumpness, leaf area index

中图分类号:

S757

马永春,佘诚棋,方升佐. 不同修枝方法对杨树人工林生长、光合叶面积和主干饱满度的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 137-142.

MA Yongchun, SHE Chengqi, FANG Shengzuo. Effects of pruning methods on growth, photosynthetic leaf area and plumpness of trunk segment in poplar plantations[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(4): 137-142.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202102013.

图/表 5

图1

图2

表1

图3

表2

参考文献 13

[1]	吕义, 刘扬, 方升佐, 等. 南方型杨树无性系间生长性状和木材材性的遗传差异[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(6):20-26.
	LÜ Y, LIU Y, FANG S Z, et al. Genetic varia-tion in growth and wood properties for southern type poplar clones[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(6):20-26.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201804024. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201804024
[2]	ZHANG Y H, TIAN Y, DING S H, et al. Growth,carbon storage,and optimal rotation in poplar plantations:a case study on clone and planting spacing effects[J]. Forests, 2020, 11(8):842.DOI: 10.3390/f11080842. doi: 10.3390/f11080842
[3]	张秀秀, 曹帮华, 张晓文, 等. 杨树修枝理论和技术研究进展[J]. 河北林果研究, 2010, 25(3):235-239.
	ZHANG X X, CAO B H, ZHANG X W, et al. Progress in research on theory and technology of poplar pruning[J]. Hebei J For Orchard Res, 2010, 25(3):235-239.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4961.2010.03.004. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4961.2010.03.004
[4]	郭斌. 杨树修枝技术研究进展[J]. 山西林业科技, 2018, 47(4):29-31,55.
	GUO B. Research progress of pruning technology of poplar[J]. Shanxi For Sci Technol, 2018, 47(4):29-31,55.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-726X.2018.04.010. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-726X.2018.04.010
[5]	马永春, 方升佐. 欧美杨107不同冠层光合特性的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(4):39-42.
	MA Y C, FANG S Z. Research on photosynjournal characteristics in diffe-rent canopy layers of poplar clone 107 (Populus × euramericana cv.Neva)[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2011, 35(4):39-42.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.04.008. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.04.008
[6]	夏丰昌. 河南省欧美杨立木材积表的编制研究[J]. 河南林业科技, 2006, 26(2):1-3.
	XIA F C. Construction of volume tables of Euro-American poplar in Henan Province[J]. J Henan For Sci Technol, 2006, 26(2):1-3.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2630.2006.02.001. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2630.2006.02.001
[7]	章海波, 骆永明, 赵其国, 等. 香港土壤研究 Ⅵ.基于改进层次分析法的土壤肥力质量综合评价[J]. 土壤学报, 2006, 43(4):577-583.
	ZHANG H B, LUO Y M, ZHAO Q G, et al. Hong Kong soil researches Ⅵ: integrated evaluation of soil fertility quality based on the improved analytic hierarchy process[J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2006, 43(4):577-583.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2006.04.007. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2006.04.007
[8]	方升佐, 徐锡增, 严相进, 等. 修枝强度和季节对杨树人工林生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 24(6):6-10.
	FANG S Z, XU X Z, YAN X J, et al. Effects of pruning intensities and pruning seasons on the growth dynamics of the poplar plantation[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2000, 24(6):6-10.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2000.06.002. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2000.06.002
[9]	DESROCHERS A, MAURIN V, TARROUX E. Production and role of epicormic shoots in pruned hybrid poplar:effects of clone,pruning season and intensity[J]. Ann For Sci, 2015, 72(4):425-434.DOI: 10.1007/s13595-014-0443-8. doi: 10.1007/s13595-014-0443-8
[10]	王天石. 年龄轮生枝法修枝在杨树大径材培育中的应用[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2014, 20(15):110-111.
	WANG T S. Application on pruning method by age and whorled branches in cultivating large diameter wood of poplar[J]. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2014, 20(15):110-111.DOI: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2014.15.054. doi: 10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2014.15.054
[11]	邱贵福, 张旭明, 王树凯, 等. 毛白杨侧枝与主干关系的研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2005, 31(4):9-11.
	QIU G F, ZHANG X M, WANG S K, et al. Relationships between lateral branches and trunk of Populus tomentosa Carr.[J]. Inn Mong For Sci Technol, 2005, 31(4):9-11.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4066.2005.04.003. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-4066.2005.04.003
[12]	马丙尧, 邢尚军, 井大炜, 等. 不同修枝强度对杨树生长的短期影响[J]. 山东林业科技, 2014, 44(4):26-28.
	MA B Y, XING S J, JING D W, et al. Short-term effects of different pru-ning intensities on poplar growth[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol, 2014, 44(4):26-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2014.04.006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2014.04.006
[13]	MAURIN V, DESROCHERS A. Physiological and growth responses to pruning season and intensity of hybrid poplar[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 304:399-406.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.039. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.039

相关文章 15

[1]	颜铮明, 阮宏华, 廖家辉, 石珂, 倪娟平, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 丁学农, 赵小龙, 庄鑫. 不同林龄杨树人工林地表甲虫群落多样性特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 236-242.
[2]	何萍, 于颖, 范文义, 杨曦光. 基于4-Scale模型的人工林郁闭度遥感估测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 23-30.
[3]	张瑞婷, 杨金艳, 阮宏华. 树干液流对环境变化响应研究的整合分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 113-120.
[4]	崔皓, 韩建刚, 郭俨辉, 季淮, 朱咏莉, 李萍萍. 洪泽湖河湖交汇区典型杨树人工林碳通量月尺度变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 19-26.
[5]	王润松, 徐涵湄, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 阮宏华. 施用沼液对杨树人工林细根形态特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 119-124.
[6]	王润松, 孙源, 徐涵湄, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 阮宏华. 施用沼液对杨树人工林细根生物量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 123-129.
[7]	王瑞, 王国兵, 徐瑾, 徐晓. 凋落物与蚯蚓对杨树人工林土壤团聚体分布及其碳氮含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 25-29.
[8]	王国兵, 徐瑾, 徐晓, 阮宏华, 曹国华. 蚯蚓与凋落物对杨树人工林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 8-14.
[9]	杨赛兰, 耿庆宏, 许崇华, 彭凡茜, 张梦华, 徐侠. 加拿大一枝黄花入侵对杨树人工林土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 117-124.
[10]	卢伟伟, 耿慧丽, 张伊蕊, 阮宏华. 生物质炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(4): 143-150.
[11]	龙秋宁, 王润松, 徐涵湄, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 阮宏华. 沼液与生物炭联合施用对杨树人工林土壤甲螨密度的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 211-215.
[12]	王琪, 于水强, 王维枫, 詹龙飞, 王静波. 不同密度和植株配置形状的杨树人工林细根生物量特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 179-185.
[13]	张悦, 冯会丽, 王维枫, 薛建辉, 吴永波, 于水强. 洪泽湖地区杨树人工林碳水通量昼夜和季节变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 113-120.
[14]	王国兵,王瑞,徐瑾,曹国华,阮宏华. 生物炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷及其化学计量特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 1-6.
[15]	普慧梅,王艮梅. 不同经营模式下杨树人工林土壤溶解性有机碳的吸附行为[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 55-63.

处理 treatment	3 m×6 m	6 m×6 m
T1	3.36	2.26
T2	3.88	2.09
T3	4.27	2.51
T4	4.39	2.56

处理 treatment	3 m×6 m	6 m×6 m
T1	0.689	0.298
T2	0.739	0.787
T3	0.577	0.413
T4	0.472	0.331

不同修枝方法对杨树人工林生长、光合叶面积和主干饱满度的影响

Effects of pruning methods on growth, photosynthetic leaf area and plumpness of trunk segment in poplar plantations

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 13

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿