南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 97-106.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202002004
万雅雯1,2(), 傅华君1,2, 时培建1, 林树燕1,*()
收稿日期:
2020-02-04
接受日期:
2020-07-14
出版日期:
2021-07-30
发布日期:
2021-07-30
通讯作者:
林树燕
基金资助:
WAN Yawen1,2(), FU Huajun1,2, SHI Peijian1, LIN Shuyan1,*()
Received:
2020-02-04
Accepted:
2020-07-14
Online:
2021-07-30
Published:
2021-07-30
Contact:
LIN Shuyan
摘要:
【目的】研究变温对毛竹(Phyllostachys edulis)种子萌发及幼苗生长发育的影响,了解竹类植物种子在不同温度处理下的萌发特性,以及幼苗1~5片叶展叶时的生长发育规律,为竹类植物实生苗研究提供理论依据和实践基础。【方法】采集广西桂林市灵川县大境乡的毛竹种子,在实验室培养箱中育苗,设定7个变温处理[24 h内设置2个不同的昼夜温度(时长为12 h/12 h)组合 ]:29 ℃/15 ℃(T1),28 ℃/16 ℃(T2),27 ℃/17 ℃(T3),26 ℃/18 ℃(T4),25 ℃/19 ℃(T5),24 ℃/20 ℃(T6),23 ℃/21 ℃(T7)和1个恒温处理22 ℃/22 ℃(T8)。每隔12 h详细观测每个变温处理下每粒种子萌发时间、1~5片真叶展叶时间和叶下高,并测量叶片面积、地上部和地下部鲜(干)质量、根系形态、叶表面微形态、气孔长度和气孔密度。【结果】①在不同变温处理下,毛竹种子的萌发率均在50%以上;结合毛竹种子萌发的发芽势,发现T4—T7的种子发芽势高于30%;从T1—T8,毛竹种子的平均萌发时间逐渐缩短。②不同变温处理下的毛竹幼苗从第1片叶到第5片叶展叶时间逐渐延长;T6—T8处理下幼苗展叶时间和展叶数量都相对集中;同一培养处理下的毛竹幼苗从第1片叶至第5片叶的叶下高和展叶面积逐渐增加,温差越大毛竹幼苗叶下高越高;第3片叶后叶片的发育速率趋于稳定;温差越大,毛竹幼苗生物量也越大;根系在T3—T6处理下发育更好。③随着温差减小,毛竹叶片下表皮乳突和表皮毛数量逐渐变多,同一处理下的第1片叶到第5片叶,下表皮的乳突和表皮毛数量也逐渐变多;从T1—T8,毛竹幼苗叶下表皮气孔呈列排布,气孔表观形态虽无显著性差异,但气孔长度和气孔密度总体呈先上升后下降的趋势,气孔密度最高值主要集中在T5。【结论】26 ℃/18 ℃(T4),25 ℃/19 ℃(T5),24 ℃/20 ℃(T6)变温处理更利于促进毛竹种子发芽率和发芽势提高,综合幼苗的叶下高、叶片面积、发育速率、生物量、根系和气孔密度等各项指标,这3个组合变温处理更适宜幼苗总体生长发育。
中图分类号:
万雅雯,傅华君,时培建,等. 变温对毛竹种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4): 97-106.
WAN Yawen, FU Huajun, SHI Peijian, LIN Shuyan. Effects of variable temperatures on seed germination and seedling growth of Phyllostachys edulis[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(4): 97-106.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202002004.
表1
不同变温处理下毛竹种子的发芽情况(均值±标准误)"
处理 treatment | 温度设置/℃ temperature | 发芽率/% germination rate | 日萌发数 最高时的时间/d the time of maximum germination per day | 发芽势/% germination potential | 平均萌发 时间/d mean germination time | 初始萌发 时间/d initial germination time | 萌发完成 时间/d completed germination time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 29/15 | 55.63±1.51 c | 26 | 16.41 | 35.23±0.75 a | 6 | 74 |
T2 | 28/16 | 59.38±1.39 abc | 27 | 22.85 | 32.98±0.63 b | 9 | 73 |
T3 | 27/17 | 58.63±2.63 bc | 27 | 25.98 | 30.94±0.57 c | 10 | 67 |
T4 | 26/18 | 65.25±0.94 a | 27 | 31.25 | 30.80±0.55 c | 10 | 65 |
T5 | 25/19 | 63.88±1.47 ab | 27 | 32.03 | 29.11±0.59 d | 11 | 63 |
T6 | 24/20 | 64.38±2.96 ab | 25 | 31.05 | 27.90±0.50 de | 11 | 61 |
T7 | 23/21 | 58.63±2.82 bc | 26 | 32.62 | 27.58±0.46 de | 13 | 55 |
T8 | 22/22 | 58.01±1.12 bc | 20 | 13.48 | 26.90±0.41 e | 14 | 59 |
表2
不同变温处理下毛竹幼苗生物量的比较"
处理 treatment | 鲜质量/mg fresh weight | 干质量/mg dry weight | 地上/地下 部干质量比 aboveground and root dry weight ratio | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部 aboveground | 地下部 root | 地上部 aboveground | 地下部 root | ||
T1 | 136.39±3.34 a | 29.15±2.00 a | 37.40±1.34 a | 9.33±1.15 a | 6.45±0.48 cd |
T2 | 139.75±4.69 a | 27.15±2.04 a | 36.79±1.36 a | 6.62±0.46 b | 6.09±0.21 d |
T3 | 141.71±3.70 a | 26.74±2.01 a | 36.65±1.12 a | 6.16±0.59 bc | 7.53±0.41 bc |
T4 | 142.83±3.43 a | 24.73±2.15 a | 35.71±1.14 ab | 5.10±0.52 bcd | 9.40±0.61 a |
T5 | 142.92±4.05 a | 24.15±1.64 a | 36.92±1.24 a | 5.20±0.45 bcd | 9.13±0.55 a |
T6 | 140.39±2.42 a | 24.11±1.52 a | 35.65±1.00 ab | 4.80±0.36 cd | 9.02±0.47 a |
T7 | 139.69±3.10 a | 25.04±1.93 a | 35.38±1.28 ab | 4.30±0.34 d | 9.42±0.54 a |
T8 | 133.37±2.48 a | 23.46±1.23 a | 33.01±0.85 b | 4.36±0.25 d | 8.66±0.38 ab |
表3
不同变温处理下毛竹根系生长指标的比较"
处理 treatment | 长度/cm length | 表面积/cm2 surface area | 体积/mm3 volume | 平均直径/mm average diameter | 根尖数 root tip number | 分叉数 branch number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 13.58±1.22 a | 1.50±0.14 bc | 17.46±2.21 cd | 0.32±0.02 b | 36.53±2.40 cd | 20.42±3.64 bc |
T2 | 12.24±0.73 a | 1.43±0.09 c | 16.13±1.20 d | 0.33±0.01 b | 31.80±1.83 d | 17.35±1.84 c |
T3 | 14.47±1.25 a | 2.05±0.20 a | 29.63±3.34 a | 0.42±0.01 a | 43.35±2.92 abc | 26.26±3.29 bc |
T4 | 14.55±0.84 a | 1.96±0.09 ab | 27.08±1.25 ab | 0.41±0.01 a | 46.45±2.68 ab | 30.15±2.47 ab |
T5 | 15.02±1.68 a | 1.87±0.22 abc | 25.32±3.15 abc | 0.42±0.01 a | 48.05±3.23 a | 36.65±5.03 a |
T6 | 12.87±1.24 a | 1.59±0.16 abc | 23.05±3.29 abcd | 0.41±0.02 a | 42.30±3.76 abc | 25.85±3.45 bc |
T7 | 11.83±1.13 a | 1.38±0.15 c | 19.69±2.46 bcd | 0.39±0.02 a | 40.90±3.45 abc | 26.45±3.76 bc |
T8 | 12.27±1.15 a | 1.55±0.17 bc | 22.46±2.96 abcd | 0.41±0.02 a | 37.65±2.78 bcd | 21.70±2.51 bc |
图5
毛竹幼苗叶片微形态特征 a.上表皮(250倍) adaxial epidermis (250×); b.上表皮(500倍) adaxial epidermis(500×); c.下表皮(250倍) abaxial epidermis(250×); d.下表皮(500倍) abaxial epidermis(500×); e-f.气孔(下表皮500倍) stoma (abaxial epidermis 500×); Cc.木栓细胞cork cell;Gc.保卫细胞guard cell;Tr.表皮毛trichome;P.刺毛prickles;Pa.乳突papilla;sb.硅细胞silica cell;Sc.副卫细胞subsidiary cell;St.气孔stoma。"
表4
不同变温处理下毛竹幼苗叶片气孔长度和气孔密度的比较"
处理 treatment | 气孔长度/μm stomatal length | 气孔密度/(个·mm-2) stomatal density | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
第1片叶 the first leaf | 第2片叶 the second leaf | 第3片叶 the third leaf | 第4片叶 the fourth leaf | 第5片叶 the fifth leaf | 第1片叶 the first leaf | 第2片叶 the second leaf | 第3片叶 the third leaf | 第4片叶 the fourth leaf | 第5片叶 the fifth leaf | ||
T1 | 21.12±2.56 cd | 17.70±2.00 e | 17.38±1.99 g | 16.84±2.06 e | 15.13±1.86 e | 29.64±3.03 d | 38.55±1.32 abc | 40.57±3.45 bc | 48.34±1.50 a | 63.59±1.00 a | |
T2 | 22.61±3.95 b | 23.26±3.46 a | 25.53±4.96 a | 20.32±2.93 bc | 23.68±2.87 a | 35.97±1.00 bc | 34.53±6.91 c | 29.35±2.28 e | 31.94±1.50 d | 38.27±2.49 e | |
T3 | 25.28±3.20 a | 23.25±3.46 a | 23.72±3.30 b | 22.94±3.59 a | 20.71±2.97 c | 34.53±1.73 bc | 34.24±1.80 c | 36.25±1.73 bcd | 35.68±3.27 cd | 37.69±3.49 e | |
T4 | 21.09±3.29 cd | 20.83±2.36 c | 22.25±2.72 c | 20.27±2.15 bc | 21.40±2.46 bc | 34.24±1.80 c | 33.66±0.86 c | 35.10±1.00 d | 40.57±3.96 bc | 46.61±0.86 c | |
T5 | 21.84±2.64 bc | 20.15±3.04 c | 20.00±2.19 e | 20.07±1.74 bc | 21.26±1.86 bc | 38.27±3.03 b | 42.29±2.28 a | 46.04±4.08 a | 50.64±3.49 a | 52.08±0.50 b | |
T6 | 21.15±3.02 cd | 22.01±1.88 b | 21.10±2.88 d | 19.58±2.42 c | 21.81±2.54 b | 42.87±0.50 a | 40.28±2.77 ab | 41.43±4.49 ab | 42.58±1.99 b | 44.02±1.50 cd | |
T7 | 20.60±3.86 d | 19.11±2.16 d | 19.68±2.41e f | 20.54±2.11 b | 18.75±2.21 d | 35.39±0.86 bc | 36.54±0.50 bc | 37.40±1.32 bcd | 38.84±2.59 bc | 40.86±1.00 de | |
T8 | 18.05±2.27 e | 18.75±2.17 d | 18.86±1.99 f | 18.61±2.00 d | 18.67±1.71 d | 35.68±2.17 bc | 34.53±1.73 c | 35.68±1.99 cd | 39.42±3.49 bc | 41.14±6.24 de |
[1] |
MILLER T. Effects of emergence time on survival and growth in an early old-field plant community[J]. Oecologia, 1987, 72(2):272-278.DOI: 10.1007/BF00379278.
doi: 10.1007/BF00379278 |
[2] | 潘健, 曾繁丽, 程家寿, 等. 温度和光照对解除休眠的永瓣藤种子萌发的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020, 29(4):78-80. |
PAN J, ZENG F L, CHENG J S, et al. Effects of temperature and illumination on dormancy-broken seed germination of Monimopetalum chinense[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2020, 29(4):78-80. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2020.04.12.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2020.04.12 |
|
[3] | 王玉峰. 温度对植物种子萌发机制的影响[J]. 防护林科技, 2015(6):76-78. |
WANG Y F. Effects of temperature on seed germination mechanism[J]. Prot For Sci Technol, 2015(6):76-78.DOI: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2015.06.029.
doi: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2015.06.029 |
|
[4] | VORONTSOVA M S, CLARK L G, DRANSFIELD J, et al. World checklist of bamboos and rattans[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2017. |
[5] | 陈双林, 杨清平, 郭子武. 主要环境因素对小佛肚竹出笋、成竹和畸形秆率的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2008, 26(1):117-120. |
CHEN S L, YANG Q P, GUO Z W. Influence of principal environmental factors on shooting,growth and abnormal culm rate of Bambusa ventricosa[J]. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2008, 26(1):117-120.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2650.2008.01.025.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2650.2008.01.025 |
|
[6] | 郭龙梅, 姜仟坤, 曹帮华, 等. 浸种温度与时间对毛竹种子发芽的影响研究[J]. 世界竹藤通讯, 2016, 14(2):19-22. |
GUO L M, JIANG Q K, CAO B H, et al. Effects of soaking time and temperature on germination of moso bamboo seeds[J]. World Bamboo Rattan, 2016, 14(2):19-22.DOI: 10.13640/j.cnki.wbr.2016.02.005.
doi: 10.13640/j.cnki.wbr.2016.02.005 |
|
[7] | 杨丽芝, 潘春霞, 邵珊璐, 等. 多效唑和干旱胁迫对毛竹实生苗活力、光合能力及非结构性碳水化合物的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(6):2082-2091. |
YANG L Z, PAN C X, SHAO S L, et al. Effects of PP333 and drought stress on the activity,photosynthetic characteristics,and non-structural carbohydrates of Phyllostachys edulis seedlings[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(6):2082-2091.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201703080389.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201703080389 |
|
[8] | 叶松涛, 杜旭华, 宋帅杰, 等. 水杨酸对干旱胁迫下毛竹实生苗生理生化特征的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(11):25-31. |
YE S T, DU X H, SONG S J, et al. Effect of salicylic acid on physiological and biochemical characteristics of Phyllostachys edulis seedlings under drought stress[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2015, 51(11):25-31.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20151104.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20151104 |
|
[9] | 应叶青, 魏建芬, 解楠楠, 等. 自然低温胁迫对毛竹生理生化特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(3):133-136. |
YING Y Q, WEI J F, XIE N N, et al. Effects of natural low temperature stress on physiological and biochemical properties of Phyllostachys edulis[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2011, 35(3):133-136.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.03.028.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.03.028 |
|
[10] | 胡慧, 周明兵, 杨萍, 等. 毛竹微型颠倒重复序列转座子PhTourist1的克隆与分析[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(5):127-134. |
HU H, ZHOU M B, YANG P, et al. Cloning and analysis of miniature inverted repeat transposable elements PhTourist1 from Phyllostachys edulis[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2015, 51(5):127-134. | |
[11] | 王丽丽, 赵韩生, 孙化雨, 等. 胁迫条件下毛竹miR164b及其靶基因PeNAC1表达研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(5):605-611. |
WANG L L, ZHAO H S, SUN H Y, et al. Expression analysis of miR164b and its target gene PeNAC1 in Phyllostachys edulis under stress[J]. For Res, 2015, 28(5):605-611.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2015.05.002.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2015.05.002 |
|
[12] | 张秀芳, 石东里, 张兰. 观察植物气孔结构的简易方法[J]. 生物学通报, 2002, 37(6):42. |
ZHANG X F, SHI D L, ZHANG L. A simple way to observe the stomatal structure of plants[J]. Bull Biol, 2002, 37(6):42.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2002.06.031.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2002.06.031 |
|
[13] | 王相琴. 协青早A含芽谷种发芽率试验[J]. 湖北农业科学, 1999, 38(6):13-22. |
WANG X Q. Experiment on germination rate of seed containing bud in Xieqingzao A[J]. Hubei Agric Sci, 1999, 38(6):13-22.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.1999.06.005.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.1999.06.005 |
|
[14] | 宋兆伟, 郝丽珍, 黄振英, 等. 光照和温度对沙芥和斧翅沙芥植物种子萌发的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(10):2562-2568. |
SONG Z W, HAO L Z, HUANG Z Y, et al. Effects of light and temperature on the germination of Pugionium cornutum (L.) Gaertn.and Pugionium dolabratum Maxim.seeds[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(10):2562-2568. | |
[15] | 陆维超. 杨树茎尖小RNA组学和种子萌发技术研究[D]. 扬州:扬州大学, 2017. |
LU W C. Small RNAs of shoot meristems in Populus tomentosa and its seed germination[D]. Yangzhou:Yangzhou University, 2017. | |
[16] | 李伟成, 盛碧云, 王树东, 等. 毛竹种子萌发对温度和光照的响应[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2007, 26(4):26-29. |
LI W C, SHENG B Y, WANG S D, et al. The response of moso bamboo seeds germination to temperature and light[J]. J Bamboo Res, 2007, 26(4):26-29.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6567.2007.04.006.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6567.2007.04.006 |
|
[17] | 付顺华, 吴家森, 余永清, 等. 雷竹种子特性及苗期生长观察[J]. 山东林业科技, 2002, 32(1):11-12. |
FU S H, WU J S, YU Y Q, et al. Observation on the seed characteristics and seedling growth of Phyllostachys praecox[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol, 2002, 32(1):11-12.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2002.01.004.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2002.01.004 |
|
[18] | 周冀衡. 变温催芽对烟草种子萌发和幼苗素质的影响[J]. 种子科技, 1995, 13(4):31-32. |
ZHOU J H. Effects of variable temperature and accelerated germination on seed germination and seedling quality of tobacco[J]. Seed Sci Technol, 1995, 13(4):31-32. | |
[19] | 蔡春菊, 彭镇华, 高健, 等. 毛竹种子萌发特性研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2008, 24(12):163-167. |
CAI C J, PENG Z H, GAO J, et al. Seed germination characteristics of Phyllostachys edulis[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2008, 24(12):163-167. | |
[20] | 蔺吉祥, 张兆军, 李晓宇, 等. 羊草早期幼苗在盐、碱生境下生长与生理适应性的研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2011, 33(6):64-69. |
LIN J X, ZHANG Z J, LI X Y, et al. Study on growth and physio-logical adaptability of Leymus chinensis in early seedlings stage under salt and alkali environments[J]. Chin J Grassland, 2011, 33(6):64-69. | |
[21] |
HANLEY M E. Seedling herbivory,community composition and plant life history traits[J]. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst, 1998, 1(2):191-205.DOI: 10.1078/1433-8319-00058.
doi: 10.1078/1433-8319-00058 |
[22] | 王进, 颜霞, 李军元, 等. 蒙古扁桃(Amygdalus mongolica)种子萌发及幼苗生长对胁迫的响应[J]. 中国沙漠, 2018, 38(1):140-148. |
WANG J, YAN X, LI J Y, et al. Response of the seed germination and seedling growth of Amygdalus mongolica to stresses[J]. J Desert Res, 2018, 38(1):140-148.DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00135.
doi: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-694X.2016.00135 |
|
[23] | 何立平, 余敏芬, 李东宾, 等. 华顶杜鹃种子特性、种子萌发和幼苗生长试验研究[J]. 林业科技通讯, 2018(8):30-33. |
HE L P, YU M F, LI D B, et al. Study on seed characteristics,germination and seedling growth of Rhododendron huadingense[J]. For Sci Technol, 2018(8):30-33.DOI: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2018.08.010.
doi: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2018.08.010 |
|
[24] | 卢起建, 龚繁荣, 李俊. 甜椒耐低温弱光材料筛选方法的研究[J]. 上海农业学报, 2007, 23(4):67-71. |
LU Q J, GONG F R, LI J. Screening of sweet pepper materials tolerant to low temperature and light[J]. Acta Agric Shanghai, 2007, 23(4):67-71.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3924.2007.04.017.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3924.2007.04.017 |
|
[25] |
BENARD R B, TOFT C A. Effect of seed size on seedling perfor-mance in a long-lived desert perennial shrub (Ericameria nauseosa:Asteraceae)[J]. Int J Plant Sci, 2007, 168(7):1027-1033.DOI: 10.1086/518942.
doi: 10.1086/518942 |
[26] | 王丽娟, 李天来, 齐红岩, 等. 长期夜间亚低温对番茄生长发育及光合产物分配的影响[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006, 37(3):300-303. |
WANG L J, LI T L, QI H Y, et al. Effects of long-term sub-low temperature on growth and development and dry matter distribution in tomato[J]. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2006, 37(3):300-303.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2006.03.010.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2006.03.010 |
|
[27] |
LYNCH J. Root architecture and plant productivity[J]. Plant Physiol, 1995, 109(1):7-13.DOI: 10.1104/pp.109.1.7.
doi: 10.1104/pp.109.1.7 |
[28] | 汪洪, 金继运, 山内章. 以盒维数法分形分析水稻根系形态特征及初探其与锌吸收积累的关系[J]. 作物学报, 2008, 34(9):1637-1643. |
WANG H, JIN J Y, YAMAUCHI A. Fractal analysis of root system architecture by box-counting method and its relationship with Zn accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(9):1637-1643.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2008.09.021.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2008.09.021 |
|
[29] | 龙毅, 孟凡栋, 王常顺, 等. 高寒草甸主要植物地上地下生物量分布及退化对根冠比和根系表面积的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2015, 35(4):532-538. |
LONG Y, MENG F D, WANG C S, et al. Above-and below-ground biomass distribution of main alpine meadow plants and impact of degradation on root/shoot ratio and root area[J]. Guihaia, 2015, 35(4):532-538.DOI: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201406032.
doi: 10.11931/guihaia.gxzw201406032 |
|
[30] | 任旭琴, 缪旻珉, 陈晓明, 等. 低温逆境下辣椒根系生长及生理特性的响应[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2007(3):12-14. |
REN X Q, MIAO M M, CHEN X M, et al. Effect of low temperature on root growth and physiological characteristics of chilli pepper[J]. China Veg, 2007(3):12-14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6346.2007.03.004.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6346.2007.03.004 |
|
[31] |
高英, 郭建强, 赵金凤. 拟南芥表皮毛发育的分子机制[J]. 植物学报, 2011, 46(1):119-127.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1259.2011.00119 |
GAO Y, GUO J Q, ZHAO J F. Molecular mechanisms of Arabidopsis trichome development[J]. Bull Bot, 2011, 46(1):119-127.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1259.2011.00119.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1259.2011.00119 |
|
[32] | 张吉科, 张小民, 张国伟 中国沙棘表皮毛的形态分布和类群研究[J]. 林业科学, 1995: 408-413,481-482. |
ZHANG J K, ZHANG X M, ZHANG G W. A study on morphoiogy distribution and classification of downiness of Hippophae rhamnoides L.subsp. sinensis rousi[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 1995: 408-413,481-482. | |
[33] | HU S A, ZHAO Q L. Studies on epidermal hairs of Gossypium[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 1992, 34(4):311-314,334. |
[34] | 刘颖竹, 焦宏彬, 杨雪, 等. 野菊和神农香菊毛状体及叶片表面分泌物的比较[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(4):615-621. |
LIU Y Z, JIAO H B, YANG X, et al. Comparison of trichomes and their secretion from Dendranthema indicum and D.indicum var.aromaticum[J]. Pratacultural Sci, 2016, 33(4):615-621.DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0442.
doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0442 |
|
[35] | 张继伟, 赵杰才, 周琴, 等. 植物表皮毛研究进展[J]. 植物学报, 2018, 53(5):726-737. |
ZHANG J W, ZHAO J C, ZHOU Q, et al. Progress in research of plant trichome[J]. Bull Bot, 2018, 53(5):726-737.DOI: 10.11983/CBB17078.
doi: 10.11983/CBB17078 |
|
[36] |
WAGNER G J, WANG E, SHEPHERD R W. New approaches for studying and exploiting an old protuberance,the plant trichome[J]. Ann Bot, 2004, 93(1):3-11.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mch011.
doi: 10.1093/aob/mch011 |
[37] | 普莉, 索金凤, 薛勇彪. 植物表皮毛发育的分子遗传控制[J]. 遗传学报, 2003, 30(11):1078-1084. |
PU L, SUO J F, XUE Y B. Molecular control of plant trichome development[J]. Acta Genet Sin, 2003, 30(11):1078-1084. | |
[38] |
TIAN D, PEIFFER M, DE MORAES C M, et al. Roles of ethylene and jasmonic acid in systemic induced defense in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) against Helicoverpa zea[J]. Planta, 2014, 239(3):577-589.DOI: 10.1007/s00425-013-1997-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1997-7 |
[39] | 朱燕华, 康宏樟, 刘春江. 植物叶片气孔性状变异的影响因素及研究方法[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(1):250-256. |
ZHU Y H, KANG H Z, LIU C J. Affecting factors of plant stomatal traits variability and relevant investigation methods[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2011, 22(1):250-256.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0011.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2011.0011 |
|
[40] |
SALISBURY E J. On the causes and ecological significance of stomatal frequency,with special reference to the woodland flora[J]. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B, 1928, 216(431-439):1-65.DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1928.0001.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.1928.0001 |
[41] |
REDDY K R, ROBANA R R, HODGES H F, et al. Interactions of CO2 enrichment and temperature on cotton growth and leaf characteristics[J]. Environ Exp Bot, 1998, 39(2):117-129.DOI: 10.1016/S0098-8472(97)00028-2.
doi: 10.1016/S0098-8472(97)00028-2 |
[42] | 王秀玲, 赵明, 王启现, 等. 玉米不同基因型气孔特征和叶温差的研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2004, 19(1):71-74. |
WANG X L, ZHAO M, WANG Q X, et al. Studies on stomatal characters and leaf temperature gap of different maize genotypes[J]. Acta Agric Boreali-Sin, 2004, 19(1):71-74.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2004.01.020.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2004.01.020 |
|
[43] | 左闻韵, 贺金生, 韩梅, 等. 植物气孔对大气CO2浓度和温度升高的反应:基于在CO2浓度和温度梯度中生长的10种植物的观测[J]. 生态学报, 2005, 25(3):565-574. |
ZUO W Y, HE J S, HAN M, et al. Responses of plant stomata to elevated CO2 and temperature:observations from 10 plant species grown in temperature and CO2 gradients[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2005, 25(3):565-574.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.03.025.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2005.03.025 |
|
[44] | 杨利民, 韩梅, 周广胜, 等. 中国东北样带关键种羊草水分利用效率与气孔密度[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(1):16-24. |
YANG L M, HAN M, ZHOU G S, et al. The changes of water-use efficiency and stoma density of Leymus chinensis along northeast China transect[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(1):16-24.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.01.002.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.01.002 |
|
[45] | 李璐璐, 姜新强, 刘庆超, 等. 茶梅叶片结构对自然变温的适应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(9):2815-2822. |
LI L L, JIANG X Q, LIU Q C, et al. Adaptability of Camellia sasanqua leaf morpholo-gy during natural changes in temperature[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016, 27(9):2815-2822.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.032.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201609.032 |
[1] | 谢燕燕, 郭子武, 林树燕, 左珂怡, 杨丽婷, 徐森, 谷瑞, 陈双林. 毛竹林下植被演替过程中土壤颗粒组成与水分入渗特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 108-116. |
[2] | 李承基, 官凤英, 周潇, 张璇, 郑亚雄. 配比施肥对带状采伐毛竹林立竹数量和质量恢复的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(2): 79-85. |
[3] | 陆启帆, 林上平, 刘胜辉, 郑翔, 毕毓芳, 肖子璋, 姜姜, 王安可, 杜旭华. 施肥对毛竹林产量影响的Meta分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(1): 88-96. |
[4] | 王晓静, 王涛, 杨凯, 李潞滨. PEG和NaCl胁迫下毛竹萌发种子中环状RNA特征及其表达研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(6): 17-24. |
[5] | 郭聪聪, 沈永宝, 史锋厚. 温度对白皮松种子萌发过程中储藏物质代谢及酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(6): 25-34. |
[6] | 黄碧芸, 卓仁英, 乔桂荣. 毛竹不同类型愈伤组织比较分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(6): 141-149. |
[7] | 肖箫, 周阳, 王树梅, 郑亚雄, 官凤英. 带状采伐对新生毛竹空间结构及稳定性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(4): 139-147. |
[8] | 夏捷, 陈胜, 吴一凡, 张玮, 谢锦忠. 种植竹荪后毛竹林土壤微生物生物量和微生物熵的动态变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(4): 127-134. |
[9] | 孙开, 江建平, 丁雨龙, RAMAKRISHNAU Muthusamy, 魏强. 毛竹竹秆秆柄形态与解剖学研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(6): 40-46. |
[10] | 王树梅, 范少辉, 肖箫, 郑亚雄, 周阳, 官凤英. 带状采伐对毛竹地上生物量分配及异速生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5): 19-24. |
[11] | 张磊, 童龙, 谢锦忠, 李俞佳, 张玮. 不同灌水时间下毛竹伐桩根系化学计量及生理特性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5): 25-30. |
[12] | 邓平, 赵英, 王霞, 陈秋佑, 吴敏. 水杨酸对NaHCO3胁迫下桂西北喀斯特地区青冈栎种子萌发的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(4): 114-122. |
[13] | 杨清平, 陈双林, 郭子武, 郑进. 摘花和打顶措施对毛竹林下多花黄精块茎生物量积累特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(2): 165-170. |
[14] | 王树梅, 王波, 范少辉, 肖箫, 夏雯, 官凤英. 带状采伐对毛竹林土壤细菌群落结构及多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(2): 60-68. |
[15] | 郭雯, 漆良华, 雷刚, 胡璇, 张建, 舒琪, 商泽安. 毛竹及其变种叶片化学计量与养分重吸收效率[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1): 79-85. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||