弗吉尼亚栎种子化学成分特征及其对立地土壤条件的响应

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012017

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 111-118.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012017

弗吉尼亚栎种子化学成分特征及其对立地土壤条件的响应

李庆杨(), 王树凤, 吴书天, 王若辉, 施翔, 莫润宏, 刘毅华^*()

中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所,浙江杭州 311400

收稿日期:2020-12-10 接受日期:2021-07-12 出版日期:2021-11-30 发布日期:2021-12-02
通讯作者: 刘毅华
基金资助:
中国林科院中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CAFYBB2018SZ001);浙江省“十三五”农业(林木新品种选育重大科技专项)(2016C02056-9);浙江省“十三五”农业(林木新品种选育重大科技专项)(2016C02056-11)

Chemical compositions of Quercus virginiana seeds and their responses to soil property

LI Qingyang(), WANG Shufeng, WU Shutian, WANG Ruohui, SHI Xiang, MO Runhong, LIU Yihua^*()

Research Institute of Subtropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Hangzhou 311400, China

Received:2020-12-10 Accepted:2021-07-12 Online:2021-11-30 Published:2021-12-02
Contact: LIU Yihua

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究不同立地条件下弗吉尼亚栎(Quercus virginiana)种子中多个化学成分含量, 揭示弗吉尼亚栎种子化学成分特点, 以及土壤因子对其影响, 为弗吉尼亚栎的开发利用提供科学依据。方法以弗吉尼亚栎种子为实验材料, 采用分光光度法、GC-FID、ICP-MS法等测定种子中淀粉、脂肪酸、矿质元素等, 运用方差分析比较地区间弗吉尼亚栎种子化学成分的差异, 进一步基于相关性分析法揭示不同土壤立地条件对种子成分的影响效应。结果弗吉尼亚栎种子淀粉含量(质量分数)为56.59%~68.59%, 支链淀粉(61.74%)占比显著高于直链淀粉(38.26%),单宁含量平均为30.14 mg/mL;种子油脂含量(质量分数)最高可达11.36%, 共含有10种脂肪酸, 其中油酸是主要的不饱和脂肪酸(含量超过50%), 维生素E含量平均为358.44 mg/kg, 以γ-V_E构型为主(97%); 每100 g种子中检测出的15种氨基酸总量为4 250.00~4 723.17 mg;种子中富含K、Ca、P等大量矿质元素,K的含量最高,平均达到6 460.20 mg/kg,微量元素中Na含量最高,为40.87 mg/kg;种子成分中单宁、含油率、必需氨基酸等地理有分布差异,其中单宁含量和含油率对立地土壤的响应最明显, 复相关系数分别为0.937、0.941;土壤因子中主要表现为土壤盐度的影响最广,与种子中单宁、含油率、饱和脂肪酸等多个成分都有显著的相关性。结论弗吉尼亚栎种子含油率较其他栎树种子的高, 且富含淀粉、不饱和脂肪酸、氨基酸、矿质元素等, 具有良好的工业开发利用前景;种子中单宁等成分对不同立地土壤的响应较为显著,主要受土壤中盐度的影响。本研究结果可对弗吉尼亚栎的种植选址、多功能利用以及弗吉尼亚栎种子的精深加工提供一定的理论参考。

关键词: 弗吉尼亚栎, 种子, 化学成分, 立地土壤条件

Abstract:

【Objective】 To provide a theoretical basis for the development and utilization of Quercus virginiana, the chemical compositions of Q. virginiana seeds collected from different regions of China were investigated and the responses of these compositions to various soil site conditions were also studied. 【Method】 The chemical compositions of seeds from Q. virginiana were analyzed by spectrophotometry, GC-FID, ICP-MS, and so on. The differences in chemical compositions among the different regions were compared based on the variance analysis. In addition, the effects of site conditions on the chemical compositions were also revealed by the correlation analysis. 【Result】 The results showed that the starch content of Q. virginiana seeds ranged from 56.59% to 68.59% and that the proportion of amylopectin (61.74%) was significantly higher than that of amylose (38.26%). The average tannin was 30.14 mg/mL. The oil content of Q. virginiana seeds was as high as 11.36%. In addition, 10 fatty acids were found in the oil, among which oleic acid was dominant (more than 50%). The average vitamin E amount was 358.44 mg/kg, and γ-V_E was the main configuration (more than 97%). The total contents of 15 amino acids ranged from 4 250.00 to 4 723.17 mg per 100 g. Moreover, the seeds contained abundant microelements including K, Ca and P, the content of K was 6 460.20 mg/kg, while microelements such as Cu, Fe and Na, among them, the content of Na is the hightest, which was 40.87 mg/kg. The coefficients of variation of the chemical compositions among different regions, in which tannin and the oil content showed a relatively notable response to the site conditions, with complex correlation coefficients of 0.937 and 0.941, respectively. Soil factors mainly show that soil salinity has the most extensive influence and is significantly correlated with tannin, oil content, saturated fatty acid, and other components in Q. virginiana seeds. 【Conclusion】 The oil content of Q. virginiana seeds was higher than that of other seeds found in the literature. On the other hand, these seeds were rich in starch, unsaturated fatty acids, amino acids, and mineral elements, which allow for the broad exploitation and utilization prospects of Q. virginiana seeds. Some chemical compositions in the seeds, especially tannins, had significant responses to site conditions. The response effects were mainly due to the salinity of the soil. This study provides a theoretical basis for the selection of planting area, multi-functional utilization, and precise processing of Q. virginiana seeds.

Key words: Quercus virginiana, seed, chemical composition, soil property

中图分类号:

S722

李庆杨,王树凤,吴书天,等. 弗吉尼亚栎种子化学成分特征及其对立地土壤条件的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 111-118.

LI Qingyang, WANG Shufeng, WU Shutian, WANG Ruohui, SHI Xiang, MO Runhong, LIU Yihua. Chemical compositions of Quercus virginiana seeds and their responses to soil property[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(6): 111-118.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012017.

图/表 5

表1

表2

图1

图2

表3

参考文献 32

[1]	CHAO B, LIU R, ZHANG X, et al. Tannin extraction pretreatment and very high gravity fermentation of acorn starch for bioethanol production[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2017, 241:900-907.DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.026. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.026
[2]	VINHA A F, COSTA A S G, BARREIRA J C M, et al. Chemical and antioxidant profiles of acorn tissues from Quercus spp.:potential as new industrial raw materials[J]. Ind Crops Prod, 2016, 94:143-151.DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.027. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.08.027
[3]	ÖZCAN T. Characterization of Turkish Quercus L.taxa based on fatty acid compositions of the acorns[J]. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 2007, 84(7):653-662.DOI: 10.1007/s11746-007-1087-8. doi: 10.1007/s11746-007-1087-8
[4]	陈益泰, 王树凤, 陈雨春, 等. 弗吉尼亚栎种子产量、脱落过程与种子形态特征的变异及稳定性[J]. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(4):524-530.
	CHEN Y T, WANG S F, CHEN Y C, et al. Variation and stability of seed yield,fall-off process,seed size and form in live oak[J]. For Res, 2015, 28(4):524-530.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2015.04.011. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2015.04.011
[5]	靳微, 杨预展, 孙海菁, 等. 弗吉尼亚栎母树林外生菌根的真菌多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(1):120-132.
	JIN W, YANG Y Z, SUN H J, et al. Diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungi a seed collecting forest of Quercus virginiana[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2020, 56(1):120-132.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200112. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200112
[6]	戎国增, 裘龙联. 弗吉尼亚栎种子育苗和无性繁育技术[J]. 林业科技开发, 2009, 23(5):112-114.
	RONG G Z, QIU L L. Study on seedling and cutting propagation of Quercus virginiana[J]. China For Sci Technol, 2009, 23(5):112-114.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2009.05.031. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2009.05.031
[7]	王树凤, 孙海菁, 陈益泰, 等. 模拟干旱胁迫下弗吉尼亚栎苗木叶片相关生理参数的分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(6):6-10.
	WANG S F, SUN H J, CHEN Y T, et al. Analysis of physiological indexes of Quercus virginiana under drought stress[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2011, 35(6):6-10.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.06.002. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.06.002
[8]	WU S, ZHENG Y, LI X, et al. Risk assessment and prediction for toxic heavy metals in chestnut and growth soil from China[J]. J Sci Food Agric, 2019, 99(8):4114-4122.DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.9641. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9641
[9]	李旭晖, 梁志宏. 板栗产地长哨营乡土壤微量元素有效态含量及其与pH的相关性[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(21):72-78.
	LI X H, LIANG Z H. Soil available microelement contents in Changshaoying Township and its correlation with pH[J]. North Hortic, 2019(21):72-78.DOI: 10.11937/bfyy.20190635. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20190635
[10]	王树凤, 胡韵雪, 李志兰, 等. 盐胁迫对弗吉尼亚栎生长及矿质离子吸收、运输和分配的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(17):4609-4616.
	WANG S F, HU Y X, LI Z L, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on growth and mineral ion uptake,transportation and distribution of Quercus virginiana[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(17):4609-4616.
[11]	陈益泰, 陈雨春, 黄一青, 等. 抗风耐盐常绿树种弗吉尼亚栎引种初步研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2007, 20(4):542-546.
	CHEN Y T, CHEN Y C, HUANG Y Q, et al. Preliminary study on Quercus virginiana introduction in eastern China[J]. For Res, 2007, 20(4):542-546.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2007.04.020. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2007.04.020
[12]	叶珊, 王为宇, 周敏樱, 等. 不同采收成熟度和堆沤方式对香榧种子堆沤后熟品质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(11):43-51.
	YE S, WANG W Y, ZHOU M Y, et al. Effects of different harvest maturity and after-ripening ways on the harvested quality of Torreya grandis ‘Merrillii’ seeds[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2017, 53(11):43-51.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20171105. doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20171105
[13]	张晨, 江海, 孙明, 等. 双波长法分析测定汉中莲菜支链淀粉和直链淀粉的含量[J]. 北方农业学报, 2018, 46(2):112-116.
	ZHANG C, JIANG H, SUN M, et al. Determination of amylopectin and amylose content in lotus root from Hanzhong by dual-wavelength spectrophotometry[J]. J North Agric, 2018, 46(2):112-116.
[14]	WU S T, NI Z L, WANG R H, et al. The effects of cultivar and climate zone on phytochemical components of walnut (Juglans regia L.)[J]. Food Energy Secur, 2020, 9(2):e196.DOI: 10.1002/fes3.196. doi: 10.1002/fes3.196
[15]	DE MAGALHÃES B E A, DE SANTANA D D A, SILVA I M D J, et al. Determination of phenolic composition of oilseed whole flours by HPLC-DAD with evaluation using chemometric analyses[J]. Microchem J, 2020, 155:104683.DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104683. doi: 10.1016/j.microc.2020.104683
[16]	NI Z L, TANG F B, YU Q, et al. Determination of trace elements in Camellia oil by Vortex-assisted extraction followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry[J]. Food Anal Methods, 2016, 9(5):1134-1141.DOI: 10.1007/s12161-015-0281-9. doi: 10.1007/s12161-015-0281-9
[17]	HAN Y, NI Z, LI S, et al. Distribution,relationship,and risk assessment of toxic heavy metals in walnuts and growth soil[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2018, 25(18):17434-17443.DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-1896-3. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-1896-3
[18]	MARRO N, COFRÉ N, GRILLI G, et al. Soybean yield,protein content and oil quality in response to interaction of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and native microbial populations from mono-and rotation-cropped soils[J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2020, 152:103575.DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103575. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103575
[19]	杨舒婷. 我国壳斗科淀粉资源植物的研究与开发利用[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(5):324-327.
	YANG S T. Research, development and utilization of starch resources plants of Fagaceae in China[J]. Jiangsu Agric Sci, 2014, 42(5):324-327.DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2014.05.004. doi: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2014.05.004
[20]	姚亚林, 黄治国, 邓霖, 等. 不同五粮配方的成分解析及其酿造特性对比研究[J]. 中国酿造, 2020, 39(7):89-94.
	YAO Y L, HUANG Z G, DENG L, et al. Comparison of composition and brewing characteristics of different five-grain formulas[J]. China Brew, 2020, 39(7):89-94.DOI: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2020.07.018. doi: 10.11882/j.issn.0254-5071.2020.07.018
[21]	张宁, 蒋剑春, 李翔宇, 等. 我国非粮燃料乙醇产业发展现状及前景展望[J]. 生物质化学工程, 2011, 45(4):47-50.
	ZHANG N, JIANG J C, LI X Y, et al. The state of the art of fuel ethanol production from non-grain crops in China[J]. Biomass Chem Eng, 2011, 45(4):47-50.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5854.2011.04.009. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5854.2011.04.009
[22]	郝乘仪, 于蕾, 胡杨. 我国橡子开发利用现状与前景[J]. 吉林医药学院学报, 2017, 38(5):361-363.
	HAO C Y, YU L, HU Y. Development and utilization status and prospect of acorns in China[J]. J Jilin Med Univ, 2017, 38(5):361-363.DOI: 10.13845/j.cnki.issn1673-2995.2017.05.018. doi: 10.13845/j.cnki.issn1673-2995.2017.05.018
[23]	吴晶晶, 郎春秀, 王伏林, 等. 我国食用植物油的生产开发现状及其脂肪酸组成改良进展[J]. 中国油脂, 2020, 45(5):4-10.
	WU J J, LANG C X, WANG F L, et al. Production and development status of edible vegetable oils and improvement progresses of their fatty acid compositions in China[J]. China Oils Fats, 2020, 45(5):4-10.DOI: 10.12166/j.zgyz.1003-7969/2020.05.002. doi: 10.12166/j.zgyz.1003-7969/2020.05.002
[24]	MIRALIAKBARI H, SHAHIDI F. Antioxidant activity of minor components of tree nut oils[J]. Food Chem, 2008, 111(2):421-427.DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.008. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.008
[25]	AHMED I A M, AL-JUHAIMI F Y, ÖZCAN M M, et al. Effects of cold-press and soxhlet extraction systems on antioxidant activity,total phenol contents,fatty acids,and tocopherol contents of walnut kernel oils[J]. J Oleo Sci, 2019, 68(2):167-173.DOI: 10.5650/jos.ess18141. doi: 10.5650/jos.ess18141
[26]	TOMASZEWSKA E, DOBROWOLSKI P, WINIARSKA-MIECZAN A, et al. The effect of tannic acid on bone mechanical and geometric properties,bone density,and trabecular histomorphometry as well as the morphology of articular and growth cartilages in rats co-exposed to cadmium and lead is dose dependent[J]. Toxicol Ind Heal, 2017, 33(11):855-866.DOI: 10.1177/0748233717718973. doi: 10.1177/0748233717718973
[27]	孙慧珍, 高禾, 蔡春菊, 等. 哈尔滨市4种阔叶树树干重金属含量动态变化及富集特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(6):64-68.
	SUN H Z, GAO H, CAI C J, et al. Dynamic variation and accumulation characteristics of heavy metals in four broadleaved tree rings in Harbin City[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013, 37(6):64-68. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.06.013. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.06.013
[28]	黄霄, 王化坤, 薛松, 等. 枇杷不同器官及栽植土壤中矿质元素含量变化及其相关性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020, 29(1):8-17.
	HUANG X, WANG H K, XUE S, et al. Changes of mineral element contents in different organs and cultivating soil of Eriobotrya japonica and their correlation analysis[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2020, 29(1):8-17.
[29]	ZIHAD S M N K, GUPT Y, UDDIN S J, et al. Nutritional value,micronutrient and antioxidant capacity of some green leafy vegetables commonly used by southern coastal people of Bangladesh[J]. Heliyon, 2019, 5(11):e02768.DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02768. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02768
[30]	刘伟, 陈世品, 陈辉, 等. 土壤养分与油茶产量与种仁含油率的相关性研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(3):59-63.
	LIU W, CHEN S P, CHEN H, et al. Study on corelation between soil nutrient and yield and oil content of Camellia oleifera[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2015, 35(3):59-63.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.03.012. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.03.012
[31]	ZHENG Y W, SHEN D Y, WU S T, et al. Uptake effects of toxic heavy metals from growth soils into jujube and persimmon of China[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2018, 25(31):31593-31602.DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018-2959-1. doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-2959-1
[32]	张磊, 张晓煜, 亢艳莉, 等. 土壤肥力对酿酒葡萄品质的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2008, 30(2):226-229,234.
	ZHANG L, ZHANG X Y, KANG Y L, et al. Relationship between soil fertilily and quality of wine grape[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2008, 30(2):226-229,234.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2008.02.009. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2008.02.009

指标index	SY	WJ	WL
盐度/% salinity	0.337±0.098 a	0.012±0.002 b	0.014±0.001 b
pH	7.422±0.223 a	5.274±0.651 b	8.014±0.195 a
c(OM)/(g·kg^-1)	23.183±1.948 b	28.034±3.222 a	20.542±4.168 b
c(Al)/(mg·kg^-1)	42 626.78±5 574.26 a	40 217.71±6 491.92 a	46 185.97±2 757.26 a
c(K)/(mg·kg^-1)	18 433.32±1 924.28 b	16 975.46±575.94 b	29 717.68±581.29 a
c(Fe)/(mg·kg^-1)	33 012.99±2 067.33 b	31 944.93±1 201.92 b	49 158.69±1 297.49 a
c(Na)/(mg·kg^-1)	15 769.16±1 795.44 b	17 853.79±1 201.10 a	12 246.02±65.18 c
c(Mg)/(mg·kg^-1)	10 633.55±5 473.40 b	8 371.17±308.53 b	27 458.59±1 266.41 a
c(Ca)/(mg·kg^-1)	13 044.60±2 549.75 b	11 810.02±1 585.09 b	52 293.46±7 809.92 a
c(Ti)/(mg·kg^-1)	4 178.73±150.61 b	4 014.79±167.50 b	4 835.76±167.59 a
c(P)/(mg·kg^-1)	799.31±127.15 a	764.32±96.71 a	900.24±70.35 a
c(Mn)/(mg·kg^-1)	349.61±52.22 b	318.61±29.93 b	1191.26±49.36 a
c(B)/(mg·kg^-1)	279.05±73.87 a	120.08±28.96 b	213.82±108.44 ab
c(Ba)/(mg·kg^-1)	419.26±19.43 b	423.92±14.75 b	460.63±19.74 a
c(Ni)/(mg·kg^-1)	26.39±0.36 b	24.66±1.00 c	45.08±0.71 a
c(Cu)/(mg·kg^-1)	19.70±1.92 b	15.33±1.60 c	32.10±1.05 a

成分 component	不饱和脂肪酸组成/% UFA			成分 component	饱和脂肪酸组成/% SFA			成分 component	V_E含量/(mg·kg^-1) V_E content
成分 component	SY	WJ	WL	成分 component	SY	WJ	WL	成分 component	SY	WJ	WL
UFA	70.81±1.14 c	77.79±0.94 b	79.37±0.66 a	SFA	29.01±1.13 a	21.81±0.92 b	20.40±0.59 b	V_E	293.64±47.89 b	426.96±49.83 a	354.73±34.28 b
C16:1	0.18±0.02 b	0.33±0.08 a	0.23±0.04 b	C14:0	0.31±0.05 a	0.11±0.01 b	0.10±0.01 b	α-V_E	5.94±1.10 b	8.28±1.02 a	4.91±0.38 b
C18:1	42.68±5.24 c	54.48±2.31 b	58.77±0.29 a	C16:0	25.51±0.86 a	19.89±0.95 b	18.44±0.63 c	β-V_E	0.35±0.12 ab	0.37±0.07 a	0.22±0.05 b
C18:2	23.31±3.59 a	20.97±2.03 ab	18.29±0.83 b	C18:0	1.96±0.35 a	1.43±0.11 b	1.51±0.17 b	γ-V_E	284.49±46.93 b	415.94±49.93 a	345.29±33.81 ab
C18:3	3.44±0.93 a	1.34±0.38 b	1.51±0.01 b	C20:0	1.23±0.26 a	0.39±0.03 b	0.36±0.02 b	δ-V_E	2.86±0.47 b	2.37±0.45 b	4.32±0.37 a
C20:1	0.75±0.05 a	0.41±0.08 b	0.39±0.03 b
C22:2	0.46±0.06 a	0.26±0.06 b	0.17±0.00 c

因子 factor	复相关系数和相关性multi-correlation coefficient and correlation
因子 factor	淀粉 starch	单宁 tannin	含油率 oil content	SFA	UFA	V_E	TAA	EAA	K	P	Ca	Mg	Mn	Ba	Al	Ti	B	Fe	Cr	Cu	Na	Ni
土壤因子 soil factors	0.698^**	0.937^**	0.941^**	0.863^**	0.880^**	0.646^**			0.753^**	0.723^**	0.689^**	0.778^**	0.584^*	0.828^**	0.708^**	0.616^*	0.651^*	0.766^**	0.536^*		0.741^**	0.892^**
Al	+	+	-	+	+	-	-	+	+	-	-	-	--	-	-	--	-	-	-	-	+	-
B	+	+++	++	++	--	--	--	-	-	---	++	+	-	-	+	+	++	-	-	--	+++	--
Ba	+	-	--	-	+	+	+	+	++	+	--	-	-	-	--	--	-	-	-	+	-	-
Ca	++	+	--	--	++	+	-	-	+++	+	-	-	---	---	--	--	-	-	+	+	-	-
Cr	++	+	-	-	+	-	-	-	+++	+	-	+	---	--	--	--	-	-	+	-	-	-
Cu	+++	+	-	-	+	-	-	-	+++	+	+	+	---	--	--	--	-	--	+	-	-	--
Fe	++	+	-	-	+	-	-	-	+++	+	-	-	---	--	--	--	-	-	+	-	-	-
K	++	+	-	-	+	-	-	-	++	+	-	-	---	--	-	--	-	--	+	-	-	-
Mg	++	+	-	-	+	-	-	-	++	+	-	-	---	--	-	-	-	--	+	-	-	-
Mn	++	+	--	--	++	+	-	-	+++	+	-	-	---	---	--	--	-	-	+	+	-	-
Na	--	-	+	+	-	+	+	+	--	-	-	-	++	++	++	+	-	+	-	+	+	++
Ni	++	+	-	-	+	-	-	-	+++	+	-	-	---	--	--	--	-	-	+	-	-	-
P	+	+	-	-	+	+	--	--	+	+	+	+	-	-	+	-	+	-	+	-	+	-
Ti	++	+	-	-	+	-	+	+	++	+	-	+	---	--	--	-	-	-	+	-	-	--
盐度 salinity	+	+++	+++	+++	---	--	-	+	-	-	+++	+++	+	+	-	+	+++	-	-	--	+++	--
pH	++	+++	+	+	-	--	-	+	+	-	+	++	---	--	--	-	++	-	-	--	+	---
OM	--	--	-	-	+	+	-	--	--	+	-	-	+++	+++	+	+	-	+	+	+	-	++

弗吉尼亚栎种子化学成分特征及其对立地土壤条件的响应

Chemical compositions of Quercus virginiana seeds and their responses to soil property

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 32

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	王飞, 谢瞰, 杨亚晋, 刘莉莉, 陈粉粉, 李恩良, 郭爱伟. 基于广泛靶向代谢组学技术的勃氏甜龙竹竹叶化学成分分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 241-246.
[2]	王晓静, 王涛, 杨凯, 李潞滨. PEG和NaCl胁迫下毛竹萌发种子中环状RNA特征及其表达研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 17-24.
[3]	郭聪聪, 沈永宝, 史锋厚. 温度对白皮松种子萌发过程中储藏物质代谢及酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 25-34.
[4]	王章荣, 季孔庶, 徐立安, 邹秉章, 林能庆, 林景泉. 马尾松实生种子园营建技术、现实增益及多世代低成本经营新模式探讨[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 9-16.
[5]	周群. 三角梅新品种‘中闽2号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 268-270.
[6]	杨素芝, 段磊, 张丽, 冯昭辉, 陆昕, 韩立华, 白玉茹, 乌志颜. 文冠果新品种‘蒙冠1号’和‘蒙冠2号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 262-264.
[7]	黄梓良, 徐子恒, 孙操稳. 青钱柳种子雨的季节动态及土壤种子库特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 18-26.
[8]	孙荣喜, 潘昕昊, 仲小茹, 李桂盛. 不同种源米槠种子形态特征与营养成分变异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 27-34.
[9]	刘相泉, 赵仁菲, 朱艳芳, 邓仕明, 李吉涛, 邓志军. 复羽叶栾树植冠种子库种子活力变化机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 35-41.
[10]	柳苗, 高捍东, 高燕, 薛晓明. 休眠解除过程中紫楠种子生理生化特征的变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 9-17.
[11]	王浩宇, 高云鹏, 朱铭玮, 吴洋, 徐林桥, 李淑娴. 内源抑制物对加拿大紫荆种子萌发的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 104-112.
[12]	袁鸣, 朱铭玮, 侯静, 朱莹莹, 李淑娴. 利用低场核磁共振技术检测刺槐种子吸水过程水分的变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 135-142.
[13]	陈林, 潘婷婷, 吕笑冬, 汪章沛, 程林. 江西省种子植物分布新资料[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 232-234.
[14]	邹雨婷, 朱铭玮, 李永荣, 翟金庭, 李淑娴. ‘凤丹’种子发育及其营养物质含量和相关酶活性的动态变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 62-70.
[15]	邓平, 赵英, 王霞, 陈秋佑, 吴敏. 水杨酸对NaHCO₃胁迫下桂西北喀斯特地区青冈栎种子萌发的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 114-122.