油茶林生草栽培对地表径流及氮磷流失特征的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101035

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 127-134.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101035

油茶林生草栽培对地表径流及氮磷流失特征的影响

陈隆升¹(), 梅莉²^,^*(), 陈永忠¹, 赵泽尧², 许彦明¹, 张震¹, 胡亚军³, 刘彩霞¹, 苏以荣³

1. 湖南省林业科学院,国家油茶工程技术研究中心,湖南长沙 410004
2. 华中农业大学园艺林学学院,湖北省林业信息工程技术研究中心,湖北武汉 430070
3. 中国科学院亚热带农业生态研究所,湖南长沙 410125

收稿日期:2021-01-29 接受日期:2021-07-30 出版日期:2021-11-30 发布日期:2021-12-02
通讯作者: 梅莉
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0505503);湖南省科技重大专项项目(2018NK1030)

Effects of interplanting herbage on surface runoff associated with nitrogen and phosphorus losses in Camellia oleifera plantations

CHEN Longsheng¹(), MEI Li²^,^*(), CHEN Yongzhong¹, ZHAO Zeyao², XU Yanming¹, ZHANG Zhen¹, HU Yajun³, LIU Caixia¹, SU Yirong³

1. National Engineering Research Center for Oil-tea Camellia, Hunan Academy of Forestry, Changsha 410004,China
2. College of Horticulture and Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Hubei Engineering Technology Research Center for Forestry Information, Wuhan 430070, China
3. Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125,China

Received:2021-01-29 Accepted:2021-07-30 Online:2021-11-30 Published:2021-12-02
Contact: MEI Li

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的研究间种草本植物对油茶林地表径流以及随径流流失的溶解态氮磷的影响,以期降低油茶林面源污染风险并改善下游水体环境,为油茶高效生态经营提供参考。方法选取林下植被覆盖度低的5年生油茶幼林,设计3个试验处理:无间种对照、间种百喜草和间种金鸡菊,每个试验处理面积600 m²,3次重复,同时,在每个试验样地建设水平投影为16 m×7 m的标准径流监测小区,共计9个径流监测区。经过2年的生草处理后,间种百喜草和金鸡菊的油茶林下植被覆盖度从对照的31.13%分别提高到90.47%和80.40%。在此基础上,通过土壤理化性质测定、多场次的地表径流及其氮磷含量的监测,比较各处理样地的地表径流量、土壤侵蚀量、径流溶解态氮(DN)和溶解态磷(DP)流失量的变化特征,分析南方油茶幼林生草栽培对地表径流及氮磷流失的影响。结果油茶林下间种百喜草和金鸡菊2年后,土壤有机质、全氮及全磷含量均比对照有增加趋势。2020年6—7月,在试验区共观测到5场侵蚀性降雨事件。与对照处理相比,间种百喜草和金鸡菊的处理在5场侵蚀性降雨事件中均显著降低了地表径流量和土壤侵蚀量(P<0.05)。与对照相比,间种百喜草和金鸡菊处理的地表总径流量分别减少了35.04%和33.56%,土壤累积侵蚀量分别减少了83.89%和79.85%。不同场次径流中DN和DP浓度变化趋势不一致,第1和第2场径流中DN浓度较低而DP浓度较高,第4和第5场径流中DN浓度较高而DP浓度较低。所有观测场次的径流DN和DP浓度均值超过了GB 3838—2002《地表水环境质量标准》中总氮、总磷Ⅴ类标准限值。与对照相比,间种百喜草能够显著降低径流中DN和DP浓度(P<0.05),减少量分别为4.67%和16.88%;而间种金鸡菊后径流DP浓度显著降低了16.88%(P<0.05),但DN浓度却增加了5.14%(P<0.05)。总体上,与对照处理相比,间种百喜草和金鸡菊分别降低了径流DN流失量26.66%和21.49%、径流DP流失量63.06%和50.57%。结论间种百喜草和金鸡菊的油茶林地显著降低了地表径流量和土壤侵蚀量,显著减少了径流溶解态氮磷流失量,相较而言,油茶幼林间种百喜草对林地地表径流及其可溶性氮磷流失的阻控效果比间种金鸡菊的好。

关键词: 油茶林, 金鸡菊, 百喜草, 氮、磷流失, 地表径流

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study investigated the effects of interplanting herbaceous plants on surface runoff associated with nitrogen and phosphorus losses in the Camellia oleifera plantation to reduce agricultural non-point source pollution risk and improve downstream water environments. These findings would provide solutions for the efficient ecological management of this economic orchard system.【Method】 Three treatments with three replicates were designed for this experiment: ① non-interplanting as the control (CK), ② interplanting Paspalum notatum (T1), and ③ interplanting Coreopsis basalis (T2). A 5-year-old Camellia oleifera plantation was selected as the study site, which had a high risk of soil erosion because of the low coverage of inter-row grasses. Nine independent 600 m ² plots were randomly arranged for this experiment. In each plot, a standard runoff monitoring unit with horizontally projected areas (16 m × 7 m) was established. After two years’s growth of sown grass in the C. oleifera plantation, the coverage of inter-row for P. notatum and C. basalis increased to 90.47% and 80.40%, respectively, compared with 31.13% coverage in the control treatment. Based on this background, the soil physical and chemical properties, including soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, and phosphorus, were determined. The surface runoff associated with nitrogen and phosphorus content in each plot from June to July in 2020 was monitored. The variations in surface runoff, soil erosion, runoff dissolved nitrogen (DN), and DN loss in different treatments were compared to determine which grass could provide a better protection from soil erosion and decrease the nitrogen and phosphorus loss.【Result】 After two years of sowing grasses, increasing trends in soil organic carbon, total nitrogen and phosphorus were found both in interplanting P. notatum and C. basalis treatments. Five erosive rainfall events were observed in the study area, from June to July 2020. Compared to the control treatment, both interplanting P. notatum and Coreopsis basalis significantly reduced surface runoff and soil erosion (P<0.05), with the total surface runoff decreasing by 35.04% and 33.56%, and the total soil erosion decreasing by 83.89% and 79.85%, respectively. The variation trends of DN and dissolved phosphorus (DP) concentrations in the different runoff events were not consistent. In the first and second runoff events, the concentration of DN was low and the concentration of DP was high, while in the fourth and fifth runoff events, the opposite results were observed, with high concentrations of DN and low concentrations of DP. The average values of DN and DP concentrations in all observed runoff events exceeded the Class V level of nitrogen and phosphorus in surface water according to the GB 3838-2002 Environmental Quality Standard for Surface Water. Compared with the control treatment, interplanting P. notatum significantly reduced the concentration of DN and DP by 4.67% and 16.88%, respectively (P<0.05). Interplanting C. basalis significantly reduced DP concentration by 16.88% (P<0.05), whereas DN concentration increased by 5.14% (P<0.05). In total, interplanting P. notatum and C. basalis reduced the loss of DN by 26.66% and 21.49% and DP by 63.06% and 50.57%, respectively.【Conclusion】 Both interplanting P. notatum and C. basalis significantly reduced surface runoff, soil erosion, DN and DP loss. Interplanting P. notatum was better than C. basalis for the protection from soil erosion in C. oleifera plantations.

Key words: Camellia oleifera plantation, Coreopsis basalis, Paspalum notatum, nitrogen and phosphorus loss, surface runoff

中图分类号:

S794.4

陈隆升,梅莉,陈永忠,等. 油茶林生草栽培对地表径流及氮磷流失特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 127-134.

CHEN Longsheng, MEI Li, CHEN Yongzhong, ZHAO Zeyao, XU Yanming, ZHANG Zhen, HU Yajun, LIU Caixia, SU Yirong. Effects of interplanting herbage on surface runoff associated with nitrogen and phosphorus losses in Camellia oleifera plantations[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 45(6): 127-134.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101035.

图/表 8

图1

表1

表2

图2

表3

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 26

[1]	李裕元, 李希, 孟岑, 等. 我国农村水体面源污染问题解析与综合防控技术及实施路径[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2021, 42(2):185-197.
	LI Y Y, LI X, MENG C, et al. Analysis of agricultural non-point source pollution issue in waters and technical strategy of comprehensive prevention and control in rural area of China[J]. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2021, 42(2):185-197. DOI: 10.13872/j.1000-0275.2021.0025. doi: 10.13872/j.1000-0275.2021.0025
[2]	刘宗岸. 坡地茶园集水区地表径流氮磷流失及其生态综合控制研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2013.
	LIU Z A. Studies on nitrogen and phosphorus losses in surface runoff and their ecological integrated control in watershed of hilly tea field[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang University, 2013.
[3]	李婷婷, 韦彩会, 董文斌, 等. 生草栽培与坡度对桂东北坡地果园地表径流氮磷流失的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(3):59-64.
	LI T T, WEI C H, DONG W B, et al. Effects of sod culture and slope on losses of nitrogen and phosphorus in the surface runoff of orchards of northeast Guangxi[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(3):59-64. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2021.03.009. doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2021.03.009
[4]	刘瑞, 张宇亭, 王志超, 等. 绿肥覆盖对紫色土坡耕地柑橘园氮磷流失的阻控效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(2):68-74.
	LIU R, ZHANG Y T, WANG Z C, et al. Control effect of green manure cover on nitrogen and phosphorus loss of citrus orchard on purple soil slope farmland[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 35(2):68-74. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki. stbcxb.2021.02.010. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki. stbcxb.2021.02.010
[5]	李太魁, 张香凝, 寇长林, 等. 丹江口库区坡耕地柑橘园套种绿肥对氮磷径流流失的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(2):94-98.
	LI T K, ZHANG X N, KOU C L, et al. Effects of green manure planting on nitrogen and phosphorus losses along with runoff from Citrus orchards on sloping land in the Danjiangkou Reservoir area[J]. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 25(2):94-98.DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2018.02.013. doi: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2018.02.013
[6]	李发林, 谢南松, 郑域茹, 等. 生草栽培方式对坡地果园氮磷流失的控制效果[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 43(3):304-311.
	LI F L, XIE N S, ZHENG Y R, et al. Influence of sod culture with the whole orchard on controlling the nitrogen and phosphorus erosion[J]. J Fujian Agric For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2014, 43(3):304-311. DOI: 10.13323/j.cnki.j. fafu (nat. sci.). 2014.03.015. doi: 10.13323/j.cnki.j. fafu (nat. sci.). 2014.03.015
[7]	宋楠. 基于SOFM神经网络的湖南省水土流失重点防治区划分[J]. 水利规划与设计, 2020(6):26-28.
	SONG N. Division of key prevention and control areas of soil erosion in Hunan Province based on SOFM neural network[J]. Water Resources Planning and Design, 2020(6):26-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2469.2020.06.006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2469.2020.06.006
[8]	程艳辉. 红壤区坡面径流调控关键技术与模式的适用性研究[D]. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2010.
	CHENG Y H. The study on the applicability of key techniques and models for slope runoff control in red soil region[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2010.
[9]	陈永忠, 邓绍宏, 陈隆升, 等. 油茶产业发展新论[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1):1-10.
	CHEN Y Z, DENG S H, CHEN L S, et al. A new view on the development of oil tea camellia industry[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(1):1-10. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201909033. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201909033
[10]	熊莉. 油茶林下人工生草耕作技术研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2015.
	XIONG L. The study of Camellia oleifera undergrowth artificial growing-grass tillage technology[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015.
[11]	谢庭生, 李红, 王芳, 等. 红壤油茶幼林地间种绿肥牧草的培肥效应[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(3):1-9.
	XIE T S, LI H, WANG F, et al. Fertilization effects of inter-planting green manure and forage grass in Camellia oleifera young plantation in hilly red soil region[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2019, 39(3):1-9. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.03.001. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.03.001
[12]	贾宇航, 向珞宁, 史红玉, 等. 百喜草研究及应用进展[J]. 吉林农业, 2019(24):66-68.
	JIA Y H, XIANG L N, SHI H Y, et al. Progress in research and application of bahiagrass[J]. Jilin Nongye, 2019(24):66-68. DOI: 10.14025/j.cnki.jlny.2019.24.051. doi: 10.14025/j.cnki.jlny.2019.24.051
[13]	陈隆升, 袁冬菊, 王瑞, 等. 不同间种模式对油茶幼林产量及病虫害的影响[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 41(3):152-156.
	CHEN L S, YUAN D J, WANG R, et al. Effect of different interplanting patterns on yield and occurrence of diseases and insect pests in young Camellia oleifera[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2021, 41(3):1-5. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.202002046. doi: 10.11929/j.swfu.202002046
[14]	杨琴, 蒲红梅, 赵学春, 等. 3 种人工草地不同植被覆盖度实地测量方法比较[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2021, 27(1):220-227.
	YANG Q, PU H M, ZHAO X C, et al. Comparison of different ground plant cover investigation methods for three artificial grasslands[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2021, 27(1):220-227. DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.01045. doi: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2020.01045
[15]	李吉平, 徐勇峰, 陈子鹏, 等. 洪泽湖地区麦稻两熟农田和杨树林地氮磷径流流失特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(1):98-104.
	LI J P, XU Y F, CHEN Z P, et al. Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus runoff of wheat-rice double cropping field and poplar forest land in intersection area of Hung-tse Lake[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(1):98-104. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806022. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806022
[16]	张允法, 雷明, 董文忠, 等. GB 11894—89测定水质总氮影响因素分析[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2009, 48(5):1232-1235.
	ZHANG Y F, LEI M, DONG W Z, et al. Analysis of influencing factors on water quality determination of total nitrogen by GB 11894-89[J]. Hubei Agric Sci, 2009, 48(5):1232-1235. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2009.05.066 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2009.05.066
[17]	梁巧玲, 吴银笑, 吴卓智. 碱性过硫酸钾氧化-钼酸铵分光光度法测定水中的总磷及其不确定度的评定[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2010, 35(9):148-151.
	LIANG Q L, WU Y X, WU Z Z. Alkaline potassium persulfate oxidation-ammonium molybdate spectrophotometry method to determinate total phosphorous in water and evaluation of its uncertainty[J]. Environ Sci Manag, 2010, 35(9):148-151. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2010.09.038. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1212.2010.09.038
[18]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版.北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999.
	BAO S D. Agrochemical analysis of soil[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agricultural Publishing House, 1999.
[19]	杨帆, 程金花, 张洪江, 等. 坡面草本植物对土壤分离及侵蚀动力的影响研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2016, 47(5):129-137.
	YANG F, CHENG J H, ZHANG H J, et al. Effect of herb plants on soil detachment and erosion dynamics[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach, 2016, 47(5):129-137. DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.05.018. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2016.05.018
[20]	靳仔鑫. 宁夏六盘山叠叠沟小流域植被结构对产流产沙的影响[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2020.
	JIN Z X. The effects of vegetation structure on runoff and sediment yield in the Diediegou watershed of Liupan Mountains of China, Ningxia[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2020. DOI: 10.26949/d.cnki.gblyu.2020.000791. doi: 10.26949/d.cnki.gblyu.2020.000791
[21]	谢钧宇, 曹寒冰, 孟会生, 等. 不同施肥措施及施肥年限下土壤团聚体的大小分布及其稳定性[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3):274-281,290.
	XIE J Y, CAO H B, MENG H S, et al. Effects of different fertilization regimes and fertilization ages on size distribution and stability of soil aggregates[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2020, 34(3):274-281,290. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.041. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2020.03.041
[22]	李文娟, 蔡延江, 朱同彬, 等. 土壤团聚体氧化亚氮排放及其微生物学机制研究进展[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(5):1132-1144.
	LI W J, CAI Y J, ZHU T B, et al. Release of nitrous oxide from soil aggregates and its microbial mechanism[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(5):1132-1144. DOI: 10.11766/trxb202008240311 doi: 10.11766/trxb202008240311
[23]	范亚琳, 刘贤赵, 高磊, 等. 不同培肥措施对红壤坡耕地土壤有机碳流失的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(3):638-649.
	FAN Y L, LIU X Z, GAO L, et al. Effects of fertility-building practices on soil organic carbon loss with sediment in sloping cropland of red soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2019, 56(3):638-649. DOI: 10.11766/trxb201809060451. doi: 10.11766/trxb201809060451
[24]	李博, 阎凯, 付登高, 等. 滇中地区4种覆被类型地表径流的氮磷流失特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(2):50-55.
	LI B, YAN K, FU D G, et al. Loss characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in surface runoff under 4 plant cover types in central Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2016, 30(2):50-55. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.02.009. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2016.02.009
[25]	陈洁, 雷学文, 黄俊达, 等. 花岗岩残积土边坡草本植物根固效应试验[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):104-108.
	CHEN J, LEI X W, HUANG J D, et al. Experimental research on reinforcement mechanism of herbs root system on granite residual soil solp[J]. J Soil and Water Conse, 2018, 32(1):104-108. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.01.017. doi: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.01.017
[26]	夏文建, 冀建华, 刘佳, 等. 长期不同施肥红壤磷素特征和流失风险研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018, 26(12):1876-1886.
	XIA W J, JI J H, LIU J, et al. Effect of long-term fertilization on soil phosphorus characteristics and loss risk of red soil[J]. Chinese J Eco-Agri, 2018, 26(12):1876-1886. DOI: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.180532. doi: 10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.180532

处理 treatment	地表植被覆盖度/% surface vegetation coverage
处理 treatment	样地1 plot 1	样地2 plot 2	样地3 plot 3	平均值 mean
CK	29.20±5.11	31.20±5.35	33.00±5.79	31.13±1.90
T1	90.80±2.77	91.00±3.39	89.60±3.13	90.47±0.76
T2	82.00±2.92	77.80±2.39	81.40±4.04	80.40±2.27

处理 treatment	有机质含量/ (g·kg^-1) organic matter content	全氮含量/ (g·kg^-1) total nitrogen content	全磷含量/ (mg·kg^-1) total phosphorus content
CK	8.25±0.88 a	0.96±0.14 a	286.47±36.17 b
T1	10.12±1.06 a	1.08±0.09 a	359.78±36.32 ab
T2	9.24±1.96 a	1.01±0.22 a	419.64±31.40 a

处理 treatment	总地表径流量/ (m³·hm^-2) total surface runoff	总土壤侵蚀量/ (kg·hm^-2) total soil erosion amount	溶解态氮浓度/ (μmol·L^-1) DN concentration	溶解态磷浓度/ (μmol·L^-1) DP concentration	溶解态氮流失量/ (g·hm^-2) DN loss	溶解态磷流失量/ (g·hm^-2) DP loss
CK	31.41±0.48 a	359.77±4.92 a	152.62±9.08 a	24.77±1.70 a	78.98±2.79 a	19.74±0.94 a
T1	20.40±0.60 b	57.93±1.76 c	145.60±10.94 a	20.70±1.56 b	57.92±4.20 b	7.29±0.53 c
T2	20.87±0.35 b	72.50±1.06 b	160.76±10.54 a	20.51±1.52 b	62.00±1.93 b	9.76±0.88 b

油茶林生草栽培对地表径流及氮磷流失特征的影响

Effects of interplanting herbage on surface runoff associated with nitrogen and phosphorus losses in Camellia oleifera plantations

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 26

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	胡晓龙,田绍泽,胡惠蓉. ‘晨光’大花金鸡菊花芽分化及光周期特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(04): 43-47.
[2]	彭冶,王焱,顾慧,叶建仁. 外来观赏植物大花金鸡菊在中国的潜在地理分布预测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(01): 53-58.
[3]	刘晓凯,薛建辉,吴永波. 模拟暴雨条件下杨麦复合系统氮、磷随地表径流流失特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(02): 117-120.
[4]	孔维健，周本智*，傅懋毅，李正才，谢锦忠，吴明. 不同土地利用类型水土保持特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2009, 33(04): 57-61.
[5]	张焕朝;张红爱;曹志洪. 太湖地区水稻土磷素径流流失及其Olsen磷的“突变点”[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2004, 28(05): 6-10.
[6]	刘玉洪;张一平;马友鑫;刘文杰;李红梅;沙丽清. 西双版纳橡胶人工林地表径流与地下径流的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2002, 26(01): 75-77.