21份木槿栽培品种表型多样性评价

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103038

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 117-126.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103038

21份木槿栽培品种表型多样性评价

陈含(), 王东升, 白冰, 李佳凤, 陈可心, 程蓓蓓^*()

河北科技师范学院园艺科技学院,河北省特色园艺种质挖掘与创新利用重点实验室,河北秦皇岛 066600

收稿日期:2021-03-23 接受日期:2021-07-29 出版日期:2022-05-30 发布日期:2022-06-10
通讯作者: 程蓓蓓
基金资助:
国家林木种质资源共享服务平台建设与运行服务项目(2005DKA210003);河北省级专业学位研究生培养实践基地(唐山植物园)(202018)

Phenotypic diversity of 21 Hibiscus cultivars

CHEN Han(), WANG Dongsheng, BAI Bing, LI Jiafeng, CHEN Kexin, CHENG Beibei^*()

College of Horticulture Science and Technology, Hebei Key Laboratory of Horticultural Germplasm Excavation and Innovative Utilization,Hebei Normal University of Science and Technology, Qinhuangdao 066600, China

Received:2021-03-23 Accepted:2021-07-29 Online:2022-05-30 Published:2022-06-10
Contact: CHENG Beibei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究木槿品种资源表型性状的多样性,为改良现有木槿品种、开发新品种提供理论支持。【方法】通过聚类分析、相关性分析、多样性分析,对21份木槿栽培品种的10个数量性状和24个质量性状进行分析。【结果】木槿品种资源表型多样性丰富,24个质量性状的多样性指数为4.175 8~4.392 3,10个数量性状的多样性指数为4.217 9~4.384 7;基于表型性状聚类分析,在欧氏距离为22时,可将21份木槿品种分成浅色类、深色重瓣类及单瓣类三大类型。通过主成分分析,花色数、花瓣长度、花瓣内部次色、花瓣次色的分布等9个主成分可以反映29个性状的基本特征,特征值均大于1,累计贡献率达88.960%,表明花越大、花色越艳丽的木槿品种观赏性越强。在相关性方面,花晕相对花瓣面积大小(HAS)、花瓣次色的分布(DPS)等花部性状与花瓣内部次色(ISCP)之间呈极显著正相关,相关系数均大于0.800,叶柄的长度(LP)与叶片长度(LL)、叶片长度(LL)与叶片宽度(WL)、重瓣性(PS)与花瓣具裂(PC)之间呈极显著正相关,相关系数分别为0.673、0.702、0.796。【结论】21份木槿栽培品种表型多样性丰富,花朵的外部形态与色彩是木槿分类的主要依据,树形、生长习性、叶片基部形状也对其形态分类有较大影响,这可以为木槿种质资源的保护和利用以及新品种的研究奠定基础。

关键词: 木槿品种, 表型多样性, 主成分分析, 聚类分析

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study focuses on the phenotypic diversity of germplasm resources and the upgrading of existing cultivars of Hibiscus syriacus, to provide theoretical support for developing new varieties. 【Method】 Through cluster analysis, correlation analysis and diversity analysis, ten quantitative characters and 24 quality characters were analyzed for 21 Hibiscus cultivars. 【Result】 Hibiscus cultivar resources have rich phenotypic diversity. The diversity index of 24 quality shapes is 4.175 8-4.392 3, and the diversity index of 10 quantitative characters is 4.217 9-4.384 7. Based on the cluster analysis of phenotypic characters, twenty-one Hibiscus cultivars can be divided into three types when the Euclidean distance is 22, namely light color, dark double valve and single valve. Through principal component analysis, the nine principal components, including the number of flower colors, the length of the petals, the internal secondary color of the petals, and the distribution of the secondary petal color, can reflect the basic characteristics of 29 personality traits. The eigenvalues are greater than 1, and the cumulative contribution rate is 88.960%, indicating that the larger the flowers, and the more colorful the Hibiscus cultivars, the stronger the ornamental ability. In terms of correlation, there was a significant positive correlation between flower traits such as the flower halo relative petal area size (HAS), the petal secondary color distribution (DPS), and the petal internal secondary color (ISCP), with the correlation coefficients being greater than 0.800. The length of the petiole (LP), the leaf length (LL), and leaf width (WL), there was a significant positive correlation between double petality (PS) and the petal cleft (PC), and the correlation coefficients were 0.673, 0.702 and 0.796,respectively. 【Conclusion】 There was found to be a rich phenotypic diversity in the 21 Hibiscus cultivars. The external shape and color of flowers form the basis for Hibiscus classification. Tree shapes, growth habit and leaf base shapes also had a substantial impact on its morphological classification, which laied the foundation for the protection,the use of Hibiscus germplasm resources and research into new varieties.

Key words: cultivar of Hibiscus syriacus, phenotypic diversity, principal component analysis (PCA), cluster analysis

中图分类号:

S685.99
S718

陈含,王东升,白冰,等. 21份木槿栽培品种表型多样性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 117-126.

CHEN Han, WANG Dongsheng, BAI Bing, LI Jiafeng, CHEN Kexin, CHENG Beibei. Phenotypic diversity of 21 Hibiscus cultivars[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 46(3): 117-126.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202103038.

图/表 7

表1

表2

木槿的主要形态特征及评价标准"

序号 No.	代号 code	形态性状 morphological characters	记载标准 criteria for documenting
1	GS	生长习性growth situation	直立erect=1,半直立half erect=2,开opening=3,下垂drooping =4
2	DB	枝条密集程度density of branches	稀疏sparse=1,中等moderate=2, 密集dense=3
3	CNS	当年生枝条的颜色color of new shoots	绿色green=1, 棕色brown=2, 紫色purple=3
4	LP	叶柄长度length of petiole	随机测10个叶柄长度,取平均值average length of petioles from ten leaves randomly sampled
5	LL	叶片长度length of leaves	随机测10 片叶的全叶长,取平均值average length of ten leaves randomly sampled
6	WL	叶片宽度 width of leave	随机测10 片叶的全叶宽,取平均值average width of ten leaves randomly sampled
7	AL	叶片长宽比 aspect ratio of leave	随机测10 片叶的长宽比,取平均值average aspect ratio of ten leaves randomly sampled
8	LBC	叶片基部性状 leaf base character	急尖sharp point=1,钝尖blunt point=2,圆circles=3
9	GCDL	叶片绿色着色程度 green coloring degree of leaves	淡light=1,中度medium=2,浓thick=3
10	DLC	叶片裂片深浅无 degree of leaf crack	无none=1,非常浅very shallow=2,浅shallow=3, 中medium=4,深deep=5
11	BSU	叶片表面起伏 blade surface undulation	无或很弱none or very weak=1,中medium=2,强strong=3
12	LMS	叶缘锯齿 leaf margin serration	少less=1,中medium=2, 多much=3
13	LFL	叶片是否花叶 leaves or flower leaf	是yes=1,否no=2
14	LC	叶片颜色组成 leaf color	绿色green=1,黄绿色green and yellow=2
15	LFS	花梗长度 length of flower stalk	随机测10 朵花的花梗长,取平均值average length of ten flowers stalk randomly sampled
16	PS	重瓣性 pleiopetaly state	单瓣single=1,半重瓣semidouble=2,全重瓣double=3
17	FC	花色 flower color	采用RHS标准比色卡测量(粉红pink and red=1,紫粉purple and pink=2,浅粉light pink=3,白色white=4,粉色pink=5,紫色purple=6,紫红色purple red=7,蓝紫色blue purple=8)
18	FCN	花色数 flower color number	1种one=1,2种two=2
19	PDS	雄蕊瓣化程度 petalization degree ofstamen	无瓣化none=1,少数less=2,中度general=3,重度more=4
20	SOP	最外层花瓣片的生长姿态 the shape of the outermost petals	直straight=1,开open=2, 水平horizontal=3
21	PRR	花瓣之间相对关系 petal relative relationship	严重分离serious separate=1,稍微分离light separate=2, 轻度重叠slight overlap=3,中等重叠moderate overlap=4,严重重叠erious overlap=5
22	DF	花径大小diameter of flower	随机测10 朵花的直径,取平均值average diameter of ten flowers randomly sampled
23	FH	花内是否有花晕 floral halo	无no=1,有yes=2
24	HAS	花晕相对花瓣面积大小 halo area size	无none=1,小small=2,大big=3
25	LDH	花晕密集处长度 length of the denseness of halo	随机取10 朵花,各测其中1片花瓣的花晕长度,取平均值average length of floral halo of ten flowers randomly sampled
26	LP2	花瓣长度 length of petal	随机取10朵花,测每朵花最外和最内层各1个花瓣长度,取平均值average length of outer and inner petals of ten flowers randomly sampled
27	WP	花瓣宽度 width of petal	随机取10 朵花,测每朵花最外和最内层各1个花瓣长度,取平均值average width of outer and inner petals of ten flowers randomly sampled
28	PS2	花瓣形状 petal shape	阔椭圆形broad elliptical=1,椭圆形ellipse=2,窄椭圆形narrow ellipse=3
29	MCIP	花瓣内部主色 main color inside petals	粉色pink=1,紫色purple=2, 白色white=3, 蓝紫色blue purple=4
30	ISCP	花瓣内部次色 the inner secondary color of petals	无色none=1,红色red=2,深红色oxblood red=3
31	DPS	花瓣次色的分布 the distribution of petal subchrome	没有none=1,基部base=2
32	LS	雄蕊柱长度length of stamen	随机取10 朵花,测每朵花最外和最内层各1个雄蕊长度,取平均值average length of outer and inner stamens of ten flowers randomly sampled
33	PW	花瓣呈波浪形 the petals are wavy	弱weak=1,中medium=2,强strong=3
34	PC	花瓣具裂 petals with cleft	弱weak=1,中medium=2,强strong=3

表2

表3

表4

表5

木槿品种资源表型性状间的相关系数"

性状 traits	GS	DB	CNS	LP	LL	WL	AL	LBC	GCDL	DLC	BSU	LMS	LFL	LC	LFS	PS	FC
GS	1
DB	0.335	1
CNS	-0.195	0.181	1
LP	-0.292	-0.267	-0.137	1
LL	0.031	-0.128	0.165	0.673^**	1
WL	0.142	-0.036	0.375	0.361	0.702^**	1
AL	-0.171	-0.059	-0.334	0.092	-0.090	-0.763^**	1
LBC	0.024	0.200	0.289	-0.477^*	-0.226	0.042	-0.290	1
GCDL	-0.055	-0.241	0.027	-0.350	-0.045	-0.250	0.371	0.208	1
DLC	-0.698^**	-0.100	0.179	-0.048	-0.110	-0.017	-0.077	0.099	0.132	1
BSU	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b
LMS	0.258	0.148	-0.255	0.257	0.150	0.025	0.090	-0.074	-0.295	-0.294	^b	1
LFL	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b
LC	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b	^b
LFS	-0.111	-0.223	-0.206	0.085	0.044	0.044	-0.005	-0.263	0.145	0.290	^b	0.153	^b	^b	1
PS	-0.302	0.012	0.017	0.036	-0.176	0.000	-0.125	-0.138	-0.004	0.266	^b	-0.281	^b	^b	0.231	1
FC	0.074	-0.041	0.387	-0.198	0.218	0.265	-0.206	0.336	0.324	0.062	^b	-0.079	^b	^b	0.059	0.233	1
FCN	-0.212	-0.316	-0.115	0.050	-0.019	-0.178	0.214	-0.115	0.117	0.087	^b	-0.059	^b	^b	0.134	-0.375	-0.327
PDS	-0.191	0.136	-0.006	0.107	0.000	0.124	-0.130	-0.136	-0.030	0.171	^b	-0.216	^b	^b	0.197	0.936^**	0.147
SOP	0.331	-0.068	-0.099	-0.445^*	-0.003	-0.002	0.000	-0.075	0.380	0.038	^b	-0.329	^b	^b	0.099	0.016	0.290
PRR	0.362	0.407	0.027	-0.024	0.129	0.022	0.100	0.349	0.137	-0.294	^b	0.281	^b	^b	-0.368	-0.189	-0.079
DF	-0.094	-0.204	0.082	-0.044	0.085	-0.062	0.152	-0.256	0.006	0.049	^b	-0.068	^b	^b	-0.033	-0.541^*	-0.107
FH	-0.623^**	-0.435^*	0.105	0.172	0.089	0.158	-0.138	-0.289	-0.027	0.517^*	^b	-0.309	^b	^b	0.365	0.344	0.008
HAS	-0.623^**	-0.435^*	0.105	0.172	0.089	0.158	-0.138	-0.289	-0.027	0.517^*	^b	-0.309	^b	^b	0.365	0.344	0.008
LDH	-0.546^*	-0.408	-0.006	0.148	-0.027	0.063	-0.126	-0.275	-0.227	0.418	^b	-0.120	^b	^b	0.390	0.049	-0.209
LP2	0.191	0.007	0.105	-0.262	-0.113	0.106	-0.233	0.025	-0.042	0.044	^b	0.035	^b	^b	0.242	-0.628^**	-0.343
WP	0.196	0.018	0.601^**	-0.286	0.055	0.400	-0.502^*	0.370	-0.031	-0.027	^b	-0.333	^b	^b	-0.189	-0.417	0.118
PS2	-0.184	-0.335	-0.331	0.431	0.013	-0.139	0.190	-0.017	-0.034	-0.108	^b	0.439^*	^b	^b	0.204	-0.249	-0.156
MCIP	0.345	0.225	0.073	-0.463^*	-0.113	-0.129	0.074	0.372	0.370	-0.171	^b	0.079	^b	^b	-0.040	-0.136	0.576^**
ISCP	-0.133	-0.480^*	-0.163	0.239	0.089	-0.015	0.085	-0.180	-0.017	-0.082	^b	0.100	^b	^b	0.099	-0.384	-0.321
DPS	-0.212	-0.316	-0.115	0.050	-0.019	-0.178	0.214	-0.115	0.117	0.087	^b	-0.059	^b	^b	0.134	-0.375	-0.327
LS	0.159	-0.248	-0.117	-0.157	-0.367	-0.159	-0.093	-0.009	-0.016	-0.165	^b	0.123	^b	^b	0.040	-0.051	-0.044
PW	-0.267	-0.078	0.045	0.068	0.159	0.144	-0.055	0.232	0.352	0.401	^b	0.110	^b	^b	0.389	0.303	0.579^**
PC	-0.277	0.108	0.047	0.209	0.152	0.103	0.029	-0.211	-0.096	0.189	^b	-0.263	^b	^b	0.062	0.796^**	0.073
性状 traits	FCN	PDS	SOP	PRR	DF	FH	HAS	LDH	LP2	WP	PS2	MCIP	ISCP	DPS	LS	PW	PC
FCN	1
PDS	-0.405	1
SOP	0.000	0.033	1
PRR	-0.059	-0.030	-0.152	1
DF	0.405	-0.551^**	0.276	-0.421	1
FH	0.459^*	0.249	0.099	-0.591^**	0.296	1
HAS	0.459^*	0.249	0.099	-0.591^**	0.296	1.000^**	1
LDH	0.506^*	-0.041	0.064	-0.749^**	0.507^*	0.819^**	0.819^**	1
LP2	0.280	-0.619^**	0.161	-0.227	0.528^*	-0.049	-0.049	0.346	1
WP	0.030	-0.390	0.109	-0.028	0.334	-0.158	-0.158	0.012	0.608^**	1
PS2	0.000	-0.350	-0.604^**	-0.034	-0.050	-0.132	-0.132	-0.030	0.022	-0.262	1
MCIP	-0.395	-0.164	0.188	-0.116	0.029	-0.453^*	-0.453^*	-0.328	0.055	0.159	-0.011	1
ISCP	0.854^**	-0.425	0.062	-0.133	0.348	0.392	0.392	0.552^**	0.312	0.022	0.110	-0.439^*	1
DPS	1.000^**	-0.405	0.000	-0.059	0.405	0.459^*	0.459^*	0.506^*	0.280	0.030	0.000	-0.395	0.854^**	1
LS	0.075	-0.107	-0.032	-0.289	0.109	-0.184	-0.184	0.148	0.261	0.223	0.030	0.297	0.219	0.075	1
PW	-0.099	0.212	0.043	-0.133	-0.080	0.192	0.192	0.126	-0.177	-0.155	0.142	0.378	-0.126	-0.099	0.037	1
PC	-0.408	0.888^**	-0.059	-0.096	-0.354	0.281	0.281	-0.002	-0.628^**	-0.369	-0.334	-0.145	-0.504^*	-0.408	-0.234	0.121	1

表5

图1

表6

木槿品种表型性状的主成分分析"

表型性状 phenotypic	主成分 principle component
表型性状 phenotypic	1	2	3	4	5		6	7	8	9
GS	0.017	-0.311	0.605	-0.302	0.446		0.010	0.328	-0.063	-0.206
DB	-0.313	0.087	0.226	-0.289	-0.198		-0.197	0.027	-0.528	0.336
CNS	-0.166	0.551	0.347	-0.259	-0.252		0.211	-0.094	-0.110	0.216
LP	-0.077	-0.411	-0.226	-0.624	0.299		0.009	0.019	0.267	0.412
LL	-0.082	0.060	0.162	-0.634	0.619		0.143	-0.166	0.248	0.195
WL	-0.138	0.589	-0.034	-0.689	0.221		0.185	0.090	0.211	-0.028
AL	0.097	-0.735	0.158	0.403	0.201		-0.095	-0.294	-0.032	0.208
LBC	-0.021	0.735	0.051	0.187	-0.180		0.297	0.384	-0.045	0.047
GCDL	-0.028	0.277	0.168	0.555	0.346		0.342	-0.131	0.438	0.078
DLC	-0.194	0.399	-0.205	0.214	-0.213		0.049	-0.433	-0.082	0.490
LMS	0.213	-0.232	-0.467	-0.309	0.405		0.127	0.211	-0.479	0.105
LFS	0.049	0.099	-0.675	0.144	0.413		0.153	-0.352	0.015	-0.127
表型性状 phenotypic	主成分 principle component
表型性状 phenotypic	1	2	3	4		5	6	7	8	9
PS	-0.901	-0.223	-0.138	0.177		-0.115	-0.035	0.161	0.085	0.102
FC	-0.434	0.451	0.206	0.316		0.425	0.192	0.027	-0.300	-0.177
FCN	0.828	-0.216	0.147	0.211		-0.032	0.262	0.138	0.035	0.212
PDS	-0.913	-0.273	-0.069	0.050		-0.058	-0.077	0.108	0.162	0.122
SOP	-0.084	-0.059	0.710	0.271		0.388	-0.165	-0.186	0.066	-0.046
PRR	-0.035	-0.224	0.159	-0.045		-0.216	0.869	-0.031	-0.106	0.112
DF	0.588	0.077	0.439	-0.104		0.220	-0.421	-0.223	-0.106	0.066
LDH	0.633	0.165	-0.338	-0.044		-0.005	-0.584	0.043	-0.057	0.158
LP2	0.766	0.452	-0.147	-0.115		-0.075	-0.152	-0.328	-0.002	-0.114
WP	0.324	0.749	0.307	-0.237		-0.241	0.024	-0.076	0.216	0.033
PS2	0.317	0.056	-0.838	-0.057		0.110	0.225	-0.005	0.018	-0.289
MCIP	-0.174	0.596	0.089	0.324		0.515	-0.302	0.217	-0.092	-0.001
ISCP	0.815	-0.351	0.077	0.110		0.077	0.180	0.178	0.028	0.095
DPS	0.828	-0.216	0.147	0.211		-0.032	0.262	0.138	0.035	0.212
LS	0.289	0.257	-0.276	0.282		-0.001	-0.357	0.523	0.347	0.309
PW	-0.295	0.344	-0.303	0.340		0.552	0.147	0.028	-0.226	0.345
PC	-0.838	-0.174	-0.111	-0.035		-0.124	-0.211	-0.059	0.186	0.011
特征值 eigenvalue	6.572	4.277	3.347	2.873		2.506	2.267	1.393	1.323	1.241
方差贡献率/% variance contribution rate	22.661	14.747	11.541	9.907		8.643	7.818	4.803	4.562	4.278
累计贡献率/% cumulative contribution rate	22.661	37.408	48.949	58.856		67.499	75.317	80.120	84.682	88.960

表6

参考文献 26

[1]	黄家禄. 扶桑的品类及繁殖栽培[J]. 中国花卉盆景, 1995(12):10-11.
	HUANG J L. Species and propagation of Hibiscus japonicus[J]. Chinese Flower Bonsai, 1995(12):10-11.
[2]	SHIM K K, HA Y M. Genetic resources for new cultivar breeding of selected Asian ornamentals[J]. Acta Hortic, 2003(620):389-393.DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2003.620.49. doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2003.620.49
[3]	SONG H, PARK I, LEE G J, et al. Induced mutation breeding of rose of Sharon (Hibiscus syriacus) using gamma-ray in Korea[J]. 2006, 35(10):354-360.
[4]	KWON S H, WON JL, KIM J R. Radiosensitivity and mutation frequency in soybean[J]. Korean Journal of Breeding, 1980, 43(3):134-142.
[5]	张莹, 曹玉芬, 霍宏亮, 等. 基于花表型性状的梨种质资源多样性研究[J]. 园艺学报, 2016, 43(7):1245-1256.
	ZHANG Y, CAO Y F, HUO H L, et al. Research on diversity of pear germplasm resources based on flowers phenotype traits[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2016, 43(7):1245-1256.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0936. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2015-0936
[6]	国家林业和草原局. 植物新品种特异性、一致性、稳定性测试指南·木槿和朱槿:LY/T 3209-2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
	NFGA. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness,uniformity and stability:rose of Sharon(Hibiscus syriacus L.)and China Rose(Hibiscus rosa-sinensis L.):LY/T 3209-2020: Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2020.
[7]	潘月, 叶康, 秦俊. 木槿品种在上海园林中的应用评价[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(11):116-120.
	PAN Y, YE K, QIN J. Evaluation of langscape application value of Hibiscus syriacus introduced in Shanghai[J]. Guizhou Agric Sci, 2019, 47(11):116-120.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2019.11.024. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2019.11.024
[8]	方精云, 沈泽昊, 唐志尧, 等. “中国山地植物物种多样性调查计划” 及若干技术规范[J]. 生物多样性, 2004, 12(1):5-9. doi: 10.17520/biods.2004002
	FANG J Y, SHEN Z H, TANG Z Y, et al. The protocol for the survey plan for plant species diversity of China’s mountains[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2004, 12(1):5-9.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2004.01.002. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-0094.2004.01.002
[9]	杨静, 刘海英, 钱春荣, 等. 黑龙江省水稻品种SSR标记遗传多样性分析[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2008, 39(6):1-10.
	YANG J, LIU H Y, QIAN C R, et al. Analysis on genetic diversity of rice varieties in Heilongjiang Province by using SSR[J]. J Northeast Agric Univ, 2008, 39(6):1-10.DOI: 10.19720/j.cnki.issn.1005-9369.2008.06.001. doi: 10.19720/j.cnki.issn.1005-9369.2008.06.001
[10]	赵庆勇, 张亚东, 朱镇, 等. 采用SSR标记和表型性状聚类对杂交粳稻亲本的遗传多样性研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2010, 25(4):68-74.
	ZHAO Q Y, ZHANG Y D, ZHU Z, et al. Genetic diversity of parental lines in Japonica hybrid rice based on cluster analysis of SSR markers and phenotypic characters[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2010, 25(4):68-74.DOI: 10.16267/j.cnki.1005-3956.2010.04.005. doi: 10.16267/j.cnki.1005-3956.2010.04.005
[11]	向贵生, 王其刚, 蹇洪英, 等. 云南川滇蔷薇天然居群表型多样性分析[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4):786-794.
	XIANG G S, WANG Q G, JIAN H Y, et al. Phenotypic diversity of natural population of Rosa soulieana in Yunnan[J]. J Yunnan Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 40(4):786-794.DOI: 10.7540/j.ynu.20170224. doi: 10.7540/j.ynu.20170224
[12]	张琳, 郭丽丽, 郭大龙, 等. 牡丹杂交F1代性状分离规律及混合遗传分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(6):51-60.
	ZHANG L, GUO L L, GUO D L, et al. Separation analysis and mixed genetic analysis of phenotypic traits in F1 progenies of tree peony[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(6):51-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201712034. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201712034
[13]	李叶芳, 马诗雨, 宋杰, 等. 大白花杜鹃三个天然居群的表型多样性分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2019(1):115-120.
	LI Y F, MA S Y, SONG J, et al. Phenotypic diversity of three natural populations of Rhododendron decorum[J]. North Hortic, 2019(1):115-120.DOI: 10.11937/bfyy.20181582. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20181582
[14]	索玉静, 孙鹏, 韩卫娟, 等. 柿雄花表型及花粉形态多样性研究[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2019, 24(2):48-60.
	SUO Y J, SUN P, HAN W J, et al. Study on the male flower phenotype and pollen morphology diversity of persimmon[J]. J China Agric Univ, 2019, 24(2):48-60.DOI: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2019.02.06. doi: 10.11841/j.issn.1007-4333.2019.02.06
[15]	李芳, 霍达, 王进. 西南红山茶花表型性状的变异[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2019, 47(4):84-88.
	LI F, HUO D, WANG J. Variation of phenotypic traits of Camellia pitardii flower[J]. Guizhou Agric Sci, 2019, 47(4):84-88.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2019.04.018. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2019.04.018
[16]	吴根松, 孙丽丹, 郝瑞杰, 等. 梅花种质资源表型多样性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(20):12008-12009,12012.
	WU G S, SUN L D, HAO R J, et al. Study on the phenotypic diversity of P.mume sieb.et Zucc.Germ plasm resources[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2011, 39(20):12008-12009,12012.DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2011.20.216. doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2011.20.216
[17]	曾方玉, 周丽君, 阮成江. 木槿与野西瓜苗花特征和繁育系统的比较研究[J]. 广西植物, 2008, 28(6):750-754.
	ZENG F Y, ZHOU L J, RUAN C J. Comparative study on floral traits and breeding system of Hibiscus syriacus and H.trionum[J]. Guihaia, 2008, 28(6):750-754.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2008.06.010. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2008.06.010
[18]	张艳红, 王晶. 木槿的开花特性与繁育系统的初步研究[J]. 辽东学院学报(自然科学版), 2016, 23(2):122-125.
	ZHANG Y H, WANG J. Blooming characteristics and breeding system of Hibiscus syriacus Linn[J]. J East Liaoning Univ (Nat Sci),2016, 23(2):122-125.DOI: 10.14168/j.issn.1673-4939.2016.02.08. doi: 10.14168/j.issn.1673-4939.2016.02.08
[19]	柳江群, 尹明宇, 左丝雨, 等. 长柄扁桃天然种群表型变异[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(10):1091-1102. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0104
	LIU J Q, YIN M Y, ZUO S Y, et al. Phenotypic variations in natural populations of Amygdalus pedunculata[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2017, 41(10):1091-1102.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0104. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2017.0104
[20]	张海平, 房伟民, 陈发棣, 等. 部分睡莲属植物形态性状的多样性分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2009, 32(4):47-52.
	ZHANG H P, FANG W M, CHEN F D, et al. Investigation on the morphological diversity of taxa in genus Nymphaea[J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ, 2009, 32(4):47-52.
[21]	范义昌, 柴珊珊, 张曼曼, 等. 宁夏沙枣种质资源表型多样性分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2018(23):37-43.
	FAN Y C, CHAI S S, ZHANG M M, et al. Phenotypic genetic diversity of Elaeagnus angustifolia resources from Ningxia[J]. North Hortic, 2018(23):37-43.DOI: 10.11937/bfyy.20181511. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20181511
[22]	韦晓霞, 赖瑞联, 陈瑾, 等. 橄榄种质资源花序表型性状遗传多样性研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2019, 27(1):1-10.
	WEI X X, LAI R L, CHEN J, et al. Studies on genetic diversity on inflorescence phenotypic characteristics of Canarium album germplasm resource[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2019, 27(1):1-10.DOI: 10.11926/jtsb.3940. doi: 10.11926/jtsb.3940
[23]	陈恒新, 刘连芬, 钱关泽, 等. 海棠(Malus spp.)品种分类研究进展[J]. 聊城大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 20(2):57-61.
	CHEN H X, LIU L F, QIAN G Z, et al. Advances in classification for cultivars of crabapple(Malus spp.)[J]. J Liaocheng Univ (Nat Sci Ed),2007, 20(2):57-61.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6634.2007.02.017. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6634.2007.02.017
[24]	肖芬, 王晓红, 王玉勤, 等. 27个木槿品种的数量分类和主成分分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(2):59-64.
	XIAO F, WANG X H, WANG Y Q, et al. Numerical classification and principal component analysis of 27 Hibiscus syriacus cultivars[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2019, 39(2):59-64.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.02.010. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.02.010
[25]	刘龙昌, 向其柏. 桂花品种数量分类研究[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2004, 24(3):233-236.
	LIU L C, XIANG Q B. Study on numerical taxonomy of sweet Osmanthus cultivars[J]. J Fujian Coll For, 2004, 24(3):233-236.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.2004.03.010. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.2004.03.010
[26]	唐东芹. 桂花品种数量分类研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1998, 22(1):233-236.
	TANG D Q. A study on numerical classification of the cultivars of sweet Osmanthus [Osmanthus fragrans (Thunb.) Lour.][J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1998, 22(1):233-236.

编号 No.	品种名 name of cultivar	编号 No.	品种名 name of cultivar	编号 No.	品种名 name of cultivar
1	‘白花单瓣’ ‘Totus Albus’	8	‘红心’ ‘Red heart’	15	‘雪纺’ ‘Chiffon’
2	‘黛安娜’ ‘Diana’	9	‘蓝莓冰沙’ ‘Blueberry moothie’	16	‘薰衣草雪纺’ ‘Lavandula chiffon’
3	‘弗洛鲁’ ‘Floru’	10	‘玫瑰’ ‘Rose’	17	‘胭脂红’ ‘Carmine’
4	‘粉色巨人’ ‘Pink giant’	11	‘牡丹’ ‘Paeoniflorus’	18	‘长苞’ ‘Longibracteatus’
5	‘粉色雪纺’ ‘Pink chiffon’	12	‘木桥’ ‘Woodbridge’	19	‘紫色法国酒馆’ ‘Purple French Cabaret’
6	‘汉帛’ ‘Hanbo’	13	‘千丝绊’ ‘Qiansiban’	20	‘紫玉’ ‘Shigyoku’
7	‘红色法国酒馆’ ‘Red French Cabaret’	14	‘柔粉红心’ ‘Soft pink’	21	‘紫柱’ ‘Purple pillar’

序号 No.	性状 character	代号 code	平均值 mean	最小值 min	最大值 max	标准偏差 SD	变异系数/% CV	H'
1	叶柄长度	LP	2.319	0.800	5.150	1.004	43.295	4.269 0
2	叶片长度	LL	7.033	5.390	8.600	0.741	10.536	4.384 7
3	叶片宽度	WL	4.482	3.380	5.870	0.708	15.797	4.375 2
4	叶片长宽比	AL	1.610	1.290	1.880	0.169	10.497	4.384 6
5	花梗长度	LFS	1.804	1.100	2.630	0.418	23.171	4.355 6
6	花径大小	DF	8.302	5.160	12.150	1.822	21.947	4.360 1
7	花晕密集处长度	LDH	1.284	0.000	2.500	0.521	40.576	4.217 9
8	花瓣长度	LP2	4.653	3.500	6.590	1.038	22.308	4.359 0
9	花瓣宽度	WP	3.083	2.170	6.050	0.825	26.760	4.349 5
10	雄蕊柱长度	LS	4.060	2.650	5.650	0.884	21.773	4.358 9
	平均值mean					0.813	23.666	4.341 5

序号 No.	代号 code	不同级别表型分布频率phenotypic degree								H'
序号 No.	代号 code	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	H'
1	FC	0.095	0.190	0.190	0.143	0.048	0.190	0.095	0.048	4.198 0
2	GS	0.714	0.095	0.190	—	—	—	—	—	4.211 6
3	DB	0.143	0.571	0.286	—	—	—	—	—	4.324 5
4	CNS	0.905	0.095	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.349 7
5	LBC	0.571	0.381	0.048	—	—	—	—	—	4.284 7
6	GCDL	0.190	0.667	0.143	—	—	—	—	—	4.326 7
7	DLC	0.140	0.240	0.330	0.190	0.100	—	—	—	4.265 2
8	BSU	1.000	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.392 3
9	LMS	0.190	0.670	0.140	—	—	—	—	—	4.326 7
10	LFL	—	1.000	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.392 3
11	LC	1.000	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.392 3
12	PS	0.430	0.190	0.380	—	—	—	—	—	4.234 7
13	FCN	0.330	0.670	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.329 3
14	PDS	0.380	0.100	0.140	0.380	—	—	—	—	4.175 8
15	SOP	0.100	0.710	0.190	—	—	—	—	—	4.286 3
16	PRR	0.190	0.670	0.140	—	—	—	—	—	4.364 4
17	FH	0.100	0.900	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.371 9
18	HAS	0.100	0.900	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.371 9
19	PS2	0.430	0.430	0.140	—	—	—	—	—	4.273 7
20	MCIP	0.430	0.380	0.140	0.050	—	—	—	—	4.241 0
21	ISCP	0.330	0.480	0.190	—	—	—	—	—	4.284 9
22	DPS	0.330	0.670	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.329 3
23	PW	0.290	0.520	0.190	—	—	—	—	—	4.296 4
24	PC	0.570	0.430	—	—	—	—	—	—	4.306 9

21份木槿栽培品种表型多样性评价

Phenotypic diversity of 21 Hibiscus cultivars

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	赵金满, 韩馨悦, 程瑞明, 张志东. 塞罕坝自然保护区华北落叶松和樟子松人工林健康评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 199-206.
[2]	赵志强, 许晓龙, 袁青, 吴妍. 哈尔滨段松花江湿地景观格局演变及驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 219-226.
[3]	程文强, 徐阳, 吴开云, 赵献民, 龚榜初. 3种综合评价方法在柿果品质评价中的应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 61-72.
[4]	张金光, 宋安琪, 夏天禹, 赵兵. 社区生活圈视角下城市公园绿地暴露水平测度[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 191-198.
[5]	徐慧, 姚霞珍, 佟珂珂, 邢震, 李垚. 3种牡丹花器官不同部位挥发性成分分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 63-69.
[6]	王芝懿, 李振芳, 彭婵, 陈英, 张新叶. 基于荧光SSR标记的紫薇遗传多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 61-69.
[7]	季琳琳, 陈素传, 吴志辉, 常君, 陶汝鹏, 周米生, 蔡新玲. 山核桃果实主要经济性状和养分含量的差异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 131-137.
[8]	张恒, 崔孟然, 单延龙, 王飞. 中蒙边境典型草原草本可燃物燃烧性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 171-177.
[9]	吴红, 燕丽萍, 李成忠, 夏群, 周霞, 赵宝元. 槭树属常见树种翅果性状多样性与风传播特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 103-110.
[10]	白文玉, 冯茂松, 铁烈华, 汪亚琳, 高嘉翔, 赖娟, 戴晓康. 不同无性系四川桤木嫁接苗生物量及其分配特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 87-95.
[11]	冯园园, 李清莹, 黄均华, 胡绍庆. 25个彩叶桂无性系(品种)的数量分类研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 107-115.
[12]	陈玉华, 姚丹, 吴海楠, 陶申童, 吴吉妍, 杨文国, 童春发. 美洲黑杨与小叶杨杂交F₁代扦插无性系苗生长性状动态分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 45-52.
[13]	王爱斌, 宋慧芳, 张流洋, 张明, 杨诗雯, 张凌云. 生物肥和菌肥对蓝莓苗生长及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 63-70.
[14]	张怡文, 郭傲东, 吴海龙, 袁宏武, 董云春. 基于PCA-BP神经网络的PM_2.5季节性预测方法研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 231-238.
[15]	乐志, 应天慧, 马群. 园林历史研究中的量化及分析算法研究——以南京明、清杏花村地块为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 25-33.