长三角风景名胜区空间分布与可达性研究

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107010

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 294-303.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107010

所属专题：南京林业大学120周年校庆特刊

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

长三角风景名胜区空间分布与可达性研究

许浩(), 黄婷, 刘伟, 王浩

南京林业大学风景园林学院,江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2021-07-06 修回日期:2022-08-19 出版日期:2022-11-30 发布日期:2022-11-24
基金资助:
江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX20_0870)

Research on spatial distributions and accessibility of scenic areas in the Yangtze River Delta

XU Hao(), HUANG Ting, LIU Wei, WANG Hao

College of Landscape Architecture,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2021-07-06 Revised:2022-08-19 Online:2022-11-30 Published:2022-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】长三角地区以其丰富的自然与人文景观形成了众多的风景名胜区,在长三角生态保护格局构建和区域绿色一体化发展中担任重要角色。定量分析长三角风景名胜区的分布与可达性特征,构建区域尺度下的风景区空间分布和可达性的研究框架,整体分析长三角区域风景区体系的空间结构,有助于合理利用风景名胜资源,促进区域可持续发展。【方法】以长三角地区123处风景名胜区为对象,在综合考虑多种服务半径及风景区级别与类型属性的前提下,利用ArcGIS平台和数学模型分析其空间分布与可达性。【结果】 ①长三角风景名胜区整体上具有“南密北疏、一片多点式”、随机趋向于离散的分布特征。②长三角风景名胜区可达性分布差异化显著,3种搜索半径下呈现不同程度的空间极化现象,可达性等级随半径阈值增加整体呈提升趋势;3种搜索半径下县域可达性聚集程度均较高,热点区主要分布在黄山、宣城、丽水、杭州、金华、苏州、无锡等地,冷点区出现在上海及其周边地区。③不同等级中,国家级风景名胜区可达性优于省级风景名胜区;不同类型中,独立型风景名胜区可达性优于城景结合型风景名胜区。④可达性受不同客观因素影响,相关程度从强到弱依次为:风景名胜区分布密度>人口分布>路网密度。【结论】长三角地区风景名胜区分布与可达性呈现出明显的地域差异。本研究可为长三角风景名胜区资源整合梳理、系统化管理以及区域旅游开发提供参考。

关键词: 风景名胜区, 长江三角洲地区, 空间分布, 可达性

Abstract:

【Intention】The Yangtze River Delta has formed many scenic areas with its rich natural and cultural landscapes, which impacts the construction of ecological protection patterns and the development of regional green integration. The quantitative analysis of the distribution and accessibility characteristics of scenic spots in the Yangtze River Delta, the construction of a research framework on the spatial distribution and accessibility of scenic spots at the regional scale, and the overall analysis of the spatial structure of the scenic spots system in the Yangtze River Delta region will help rationalize the use of scenic resources and promote the sustainable development of the region. 【Method】The spatial distribution and accessibility of 123 scenic areas in the Yangtze River Delta were analyzed using ArcGIS platform and mathematical models considering the multi service radius and the level as well as the type of scenic areas.【Result】(1) The Yangtze River Delta scenic areas are “dense in the south and sparse in the north” and range from random to dispersed. (2) The discrepancy of accessibility distribution is significant, and the spatial polarization varies under three search radius. With the increase of the radius threshold, the accessibility level has an overall upward trend. In addition, the accessibility aggregation characteristics of counties are higher under the three radii, and the hot areas are mainly distributed in Huangshan, Xuancheng, Lishui, Hangzhou, Jinhua, Suzhou and Wuxi, while the cold areas appear in Shanghai and its surrounding areas. (3) Among the different levels, the accessibility of national scenic areas is better than that the of provincial scenic areas. The accessibility of independent scenic areas is better than the combined urban and scenic areas. (4) Accessibility is affected by different objective factors, and the degree of correlation is in the order of: distribution density of scenic areas > population distribution > road network density. 【Conclusion】The distribution and accessibility of scenic areas in the Yangtze River Delta show significant regional differences. This research provides a reference for the integration of resources, systematic management and regional tourism development in the scenic areas in the Yangtze River Delta.

Key words: scenic area, the Yangtze River Delta, spatial structure, accessibility

中图分类号:

TU985

许浩,黄婷,刘伟,等. 长三角风景名胜区空间分布与可达性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 294-303.

XU Hao, HUANG Ting, LIU Wei, WANG Hao. Research on spatial distributions and accessibility of scenic areas in the Yangtze River Delta[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 46(6): 294-303.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107010.

图/表 10

图1

图2

表1

长三角风景区分布的近邻指数"

项目 item	风景区等级/类型 scenic areas level/type	$d i$ /km	$d -$ /km	I_NNI	Z	P	分布类型 distribution type
等级level	国家级national	50.50	47.93	1.05	0.64	0.52	随机
	省级provincial	32.98	32.46	1.02	0.28	0.78	随机
类型type	城景结合型combined urban and landscape	44.59	44.62	0.99	-0.01	0.99	随机
	独立型independent	35.75	33.67	1.06	1.05	0.29	随机
	风景区scenic area	29.00	26.87	1.08	1.69	0.09	随机→离散

表1

图3

表2

图4

表3

图5

图6

表4

参考文献 37

[1]	中华人民共和国国务院办公厅. 国务院令第474号:风景名胜区区条例[EB/OL].(2006-09-29)[2021-06-15]. http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2016/content-5139422.htm.
[2]	LIU M J, ZHAO L G, ZHANG Y. Analysis on competitiveness in development of eco-logical tourism in north scenic area of Changbai Mountain[C]// Proceedings of 2nd international conference on contemporary education, social sciences and humanities (ICCESSH 2017), 2017: 124. DOI:10.2991/iccessh-17.2017.184.
[3]	ZHOU W Q, HUANG G L, CADENASSO M L. Does spatial configuration matter? Understanding the effects of land cover pattern on land surface temperature in urban landscapes[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2011, 102(1):54-63.DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.03.009.
[4]	PATHAK V, TRIPATHI B D, MISHRA V K. Evaluation of anticipated performance index of some tree species for green belt development to mitigate traffic generated noise[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2011, 10(1):61-66.DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2010.06.008.
[5]	NUNKOO R, GURSOY D. Residents’ support for tourism[J]. Ann Tour Res, 2012, 39(1):243-268.DOI:10.1016/j.annals.2011.05.006.
[6]	许浩, 李欢欣, 刘伟. 近15年南京都市圈区域绿地变化研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(5):215-222.
	XU H, LI H X, LIU W. Evolution of regional green space in Nanjing metropolitan area in the past 15 years[J]. J Northwest For Unive, 2021, 36(5):215-222. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2021.05.33.
[7]	毛齐正, 罗上华, 马克明, 等. 城市绿地生态评价研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(17):5589-5600.
	MAO Q Z, LUO S H, MA K M, et al. Research advances in ecological assessment of urban greenspace[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(17):5589-5600.DOI:10.5846/stxb201112141912.
[8]	WANG L, CAO X S, LI T, et al. Accessibility comparison and spatial differentiation of Xi’an scenic spots with different modes based on Baidu real-time travel[J]. Chin Geogr Sci, 2019, 29(5):848-860.DOI:10.1007/s11769-019-1073-8.
[9]	HANSEN W G. How accessibility shapes land use[J]. J Am Inst Plan, 1959, 25(2):73-76.DOI:10.1080/01944365908978307.
[10]	HILLS T L, LUNDGREN J. The impact of tourism in the Caribbean[J]. Ann Tour Res, 1977,4(5):248-267.DOI:10.1016/0160- 7383(77)90098-6.
[11]	TVERIJONAITE E, ÓLAFSDÓTTIR R, THORSTEINSSON T. Accessibility of protected areas and visitor behaviour:a case study from Iceland[J]. J Outdoor Recreat Tour, 2018, 24:1-10.DOI:10.1016/j.jort.2018.09.001.
[12]	BATABYAL A A. Accessibility,vulnerability,and resilience in a stochastic model of sustainable ecotourism[J]. Transp Res D Transp Environ, 2016, 43:71-81.DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.004.
[13]	CARVALHO A C, PASCHOALIN R F, CASTAÑON J A. Mobility and accessibility in historic cities[J]. Work (Read Mass),2012, 41(S1):5874-5876.DOI:10.3233/WOR-2012-0979-5874.
[14]	BIFULCO G N, LEONE S. Exploiting the accessibility concept for touristic mobility[J]. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 2014, 111:432-439.DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.076.
[15]	SHEN X J, HUANG R H, ZHANG J S. U.S.national parks accessibility and visitation[J]. J Mt Sci, 2019, 16(12):2894-2906.
[16]	谢敏慧, 石惠春, 赵鹏霞, 等. 基于路网交通的旅游景点可达性研究:以西北五省为例[J]. 现代城市研究, 2020, 35(3):81-87.
	XIE M H, SHI H C, ZHAO P X, et al. An analysis of accessibility of scenic spots based on land traffic network:a case study of five provinces of northwest China[J]. Mod Urban Res, 2020, 35(3):81-87.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2020.03.012.
[17]	潘竟虎. 中国国家森林公园空间可达性测度[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(9):1180-1187.
	PAN J H. Measurements for spatial accessibility of national forest parks in China[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2013, 22(9):1180-1187.
[18]	GU X K, TAO S Y, DAI B. Spatial accessibility of country parks in Shanghai,China[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2017, 27:373-382.DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2017.08.006.
[19]	潘竟虎, 徐柏翠. 中国国家级自然保护地的空间分布特征与可达性[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2018, 27(2):353-362.
	PAN J H, XU B C. Spatial distribution characteristics and accessibility of protected areas in China[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2018, 27(2):353-362.DOI:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201802014.
[20]	王绍博, 郭建科. 中国风景名胜区交通可达性及市场潜力空间测度[J]. 地理研究, 2016, 35(9):1714-1726.
	WANG S B, GUO J K. Spatial measure of traffic accessibility and market potential of the national scenic areas[J]. Geogr Res, 2016, 35(9):1714-1726.DOI:10.11821/dlyj201609010.
[21]	曹芳东, 黄震方, 吴江, 等. 国家级风景名胜区旅游效率测度与区位可达性分析[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(12):1686-1697.
	CAO F D, HUANG Z F, WU J, et al. The relationship between tourism efficiency measure and location accessibility of Chinese national scenic areas[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2012, 67(12):1686-1697.
[22]	杜鹏, 韩增林, 王利, 等. 辽宁省国家级风景名胜区旅游效率与可达性研究[J]. 辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 38(2):248-255.
	DU P, HAN Z L, WANG L, et al. Study on tourism efficiency and accessibility of national scenic spots in Liaoning Province[J]. J Liaoning Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 38(2):248-255.DOI:10.11679/lsxblk2015020248.
[23]	程海峰. 九华山风景区可达性研究[J]. 合肥师范学院学报, 2018, 36(2):50-54.
	CHENG H F. A study of Jiuhuashan scenic area accessibility[J]. J Hefei Norm Univ, 2018, 36(2):50-54.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-2273.2018.02.011.
[24]	MOLITOR G. The next 1000 years: the “big five” engines of economic growth[J]. Futurist, 1999, 33(1): 6-14.
[25]	WANG F Y, WANG K Y. Measuring spatial accessibility to ecological recreation spaces in the Pearl River Delta region:an improved two-step floating catchment area method[J]. J Spatial Sci, 2018, 63(2):279-295.DOI:10.1080/14498596.2018.1488633.
[26]	张金光, 赵兵. 基于可达性的城市公园选址及布局优化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(6):151-158.
	ZHANG J G, ZHAO B. Location and layout optimization of urban parks based on accessibility[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(6):151-158. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201710022.
[27]	LUO W, WANG F H. Measures of spatial accessibility to healthcare in a GIS environment:synthesis and a case study in Chicago region[J]. Environ Plann B: Plann Des, 2003, 30(6):865-884.DOI:10.1068/b29120.
[28]	周公宁. 试论我国风景名胜区的定义及类型划分[J]. 中国园林, 1993, 9(3):30-33.
	ZHOU G N. On the definition and classification of scenic spots in China[J]. J Chin Landsc Archit, 1993, 9(3):30-33.
[29]	吴志远. 城市近郊型风景名胜区规划研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2012.
	WU Z Y. Research on the planning of suburban scenic areas[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2012.
[30]	王赞赞. 五台山风景区国内客源结构及游客行为研究[D]. 临汾: 山西师范大学, 2018.
	WANG Z Z. Study on the structure of domestic tourists and behavior in Wutai Mountain scenic area[D]. Linfen: Shanxi Normal University, 2018.
[31]	李凤, 汪德根, 刘昌雪, 等. 中国自驾车房车营地空间分布特征及其驱动机制[J]. 资源科学, 2017, 39(2):288-302.
	LI F, WANG D G, LIU C X, et al. Spatial distribution characteristics and mechanistic drivers of self-driving and RV camping in China[J]. Resour Sci, 2017, 39(2):288-302.DOI:10.18402/resci.2017.02.11.
[32]	代婷婷, 许铭, 徐雁南. 乡村聚落时空分布特征及驱动因素分析——以安徽黟县为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(5):155-162.
	DAI T T, XU M, XU Y N. Spatio-temporal distribution characteristics and driving factors of rural settlements: a case study in Yixian,Anhui Province[J]. J Nanjing Fore Univ (Nat Sci Ed),2018, 42(5): 155-162. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201712026.
[33]	RADKE J, MU L. Spatial decompositions,modeling and mapping service regions to predict access to social programs[J]. Ann GIS, 2000, 6(2):105-112.DOI:10.1080/10824000009480538.
[34]	陶卓霖, 程杨. 两步移动搜寻法及其扩展形式研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2016, 35(5):589-599.
	TAO Z L, CHENG Y. Research progress of the two-step floating catchment area method and extensions[J]. Prog Geogr, 2016, 35(5):589-599.DOI:10.18306/dlkxjz.2016.05.006.
[35]	刘瑜, 龚俐, 童庆禧. 空间交互作用中的距离影响及定量分析[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 50(3):526-534.
	LIU Y, GONG L, TONG Q X. Quantifying the distance effect in spatial interactions[J]. Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekin, 2014, 50(3):526-534.DOI:10.13209/j.0479-8023.2014.051.
[36]	黄泰, 席建超, 葛全胜. 高铁对长三角区域旅游一体化影响计量研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2017, 26(9):1311-1322.
	HUANG T, XI J C, GE Q S. Impact of high-speed rail on regional tourism integration in the Yangtze River Delta[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2017, 26(9):1311-1322.DOI:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201709003.
[37]	吴威, 曹有挥, 梁双波. 20世纪80年代以来长三角地区综合交通可达性的时空演化[J]. 地理科学进展, 2010, 29(5):619-626.
	WU W, CAO Y H, LIANG S B. Temporal and spatial evolution of integrated transport accessibility in the Yangtze River Delta:1986-2005[J]. Prog Geogr, 2010, 29(5):619-626.DOI:10.11820/dlkxjz.2010.05.015.

搜索半径 search radius	可达性 accessibility	值域 range	区/县数量 number of districts/ counties	均值 mean	标准差 SD
	好	≥16.36~38.82	3	33.79	5.11
	较好	≥8.41~16.36	7	12.56	2.10
1h	一般	≥3.16~8.41	13	5.12	1.19
	较差	≥1.06~3.16	32	2.01	0.56
	差	≥0.00~1.06	252	0.17	0.25
	好	≥10.95~42.32	1	43.32	0.00
	较好	≥5.25~10.95	8	7.82	1.73
3h	一般	≥2.75~5.25	17	3.93	0.76
	较差	≥0.98~2.75	72	1.67	0.48
	差	≥0.00~ 0.98	209	0.27	0.27
	好	≥6.35~10.78	2	10.26	0.52
	较好	≥2.95~6.35	15	4.16	0.93
5h	一般	≥1.30~ 2.95	48	1.82	0.44
	较差	≥0.52~ 1.30	116	0.80	0.20
	差	≥0.03~ 0.52	126	0.23	0.14

搜索半径search radius	Moran’I	Z
1h	0.199	5.93
3h	0.132	5.06
5h	0.351	9.88

搜索半径 search radius	风景名胜区分布密度 density of distribution of scenic areas	路网密度 road density	人口分布 population distribution
1h	0.195^**	-0.130^*	-0.166^*
3h	0.167^**	-0.138^*	-0.196^*
5h	0.319^**	-0.092	-0.227^**

长三角风景名胜区空间分布与可达性研究

Research on spatial distributions and accessibility of scenic areas in the Yangtze River Delta

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 37

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	刘澜, 邱冰, 蔡润晖, 熊星, 汤鹏. 山水格局对传统村镇聚落分布的影响机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 165-171.
[2]	杨赫, 米锋. 社会经济地位下城市绿地可达性对居民心理健康的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 248-256.
[3]	吴妍, 李若楠, 赵志强. 黑龙江省国家级森林公园空间分布特征研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 189-196.
[4]	唐晓岚, 王忆梅, 周孔飞. 基于生态安全格局的山岳型风景区景观资源保护利用研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 178-186.
[5]	李俊冬, 查禄慧, 马国强, 肖剑平, 李育武, 李旭. 云南楚雄小百草岭鸟类多样性空间格局[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 225-233.
[6]	阎雄飞, 程鑫辉, 郝哲, 王庭昊, 秦富林, 李刚. 枣瘿蚊幼虫在设施枣树上的空间分布型及抽样技术[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 201-208.
[7]	张建国, 葛扬. 国家森林城市与国家园林城市空间分布及其影响因素比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 41-49.
[8]	龚茂佳, 王娟, 付小勇, 寇卫利, 鲁宁, 王秋华, 赖虹燕. 云南广西蒜头果适生区预测及环境影响因子[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 44-52.
[9]	赵梦蕾, 姚正阳, 毛达. 基于i2SFCA的新乡市主城区公园绿地空间步行可达性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 227-232.
[10]	董灵波, 刘兆刚. 森林健康评价及其多尺度转换方法[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 206-216.
[11]	王磊, 刘强, 杨俊杰, 雷宇, 祁天法. 基于卫星跟踪的钳嘴鹳家域研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 33-38.
[12]	张卓然, 唐晓岚. 环太湖地区历史村落的环境适应性及特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 17-24.
[13]	纪烨琳, 苏喜友, 于治军. 基于随机森林模型的美国白蛾在中国的潜在生境预测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(6): 121-128.
[14]	刘凯舟,曹霞,巨云为,翟敏,严晓茹,王笑石,周际丰. 山核桃透翅蛾幼虫空间分布型及抽样技术[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(03): 23-27.
[15]	陈霞,袁在翔,金雪梅,朱军,徐海兵,赵宸,陈斌,关庆伟. 紫金山针阔混交林主要树种空间分布格局及种间关联性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 84-90.