北京冬奥会延庆赛区施工作业对野生动物的影响分析

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202111039

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (1): 219-225.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202111039

北京冬奥会延庆赛区施工作业对野生动物的影响分析

夏凡¹(), 鲍伟东¹^,^*(), 盖立新²^,^*(), 巨龙飞¹, 黄文华³, 蒋健², 哈希博²

1.北京林业大学生物科学与技术学院,北京 100083
2.北京松山国家级自然保护区管理处,北京 102115
3.北京市延庆区珍珠泉乡生态环境管理中心,北京 102107

收稿日期:2021-11-15 接受日期:2022-06-24 出版日期:2023-01-30 发布日期:2023-02-01
通讯作者: 鲍伟东,盖立新
基金资助:
北京市科技计划项目(Z181100005318004)

Effects of infrastructure and stadium construction on wildlife in Yanqing competition area of Beijing 2022 Olympic Winter Games

XIA Fan¹(), BAO Weidong¹^,^*(), GAI Lixin²^,^*(), JU Longfei¹, HUANG Wenhua³, JIANG Jian², HA Xibo²

1. College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
2. Beijing Songshan National Nature Reserve Administration, Beijing 102115, China
3. Zhenzhuquan Township Ecological Environment Management Center of Yanqing District of Beijing Municipality, Beijing 102107, China

Received:2021-11-15 Accepted:2022-06-24 Online:2023-01-30 Published:2023-02-01
Contact: BAO Weidong,GAI Lixin

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】 探究冬奥会室外赛事场地建设对野生动物的影响,以利于制定有针对性的保护政策和措施,为落实绿色奥运理念和提升野生动物保护成效提供科学参考。【方法】 于2019年4月至2020年3月,在2022年北京冬奥会延庆赛区内布设红外相机进行野生动物丰富度和活动节律监测,通过与2013年的监测数据对比,分析场地施工作业对野生动物种群和活动节律的影响。【结果】 利用红外相机工作4 193相机日,获取有效照片5 961份,发现9目23科38种野生动物,其中,兽类13种、鸟类25种。与之前的调查数据相比,赛区内兽类物种减少3种,貉(Nyctereutes procyonoides)、赤狐(Vulpes vulpes)、蒙古兔(Lepus tolai)未在本次监测中发现;鸟类减少22种。经威尔科克森符号秩(Z)检验,豹猫(Prionailurus bengalensis)(Z=-2.981, P<0.01)、亚洲狗獾(Meles leucurus)(Z=-2.578, P<0.05)、猪獾(Arctonyx collaris)(Z=2.197, P<0.05)和野猪(Sus scrofa)(Z=-2.310, P<0.05)的相对多度指数均有显著差异。在施工影响下,豹猫和亚洲狗獾的月活动高峰提前,猪獾和岩松鼠的活动高峰下降。施工前后5种兽类的日活动节律具有显著差异(P<0.05),豹猫、亚洲狗獾、猪獾的日间活动减少、夜间活动增多,野猪则相反,岩松鼠表现出更少和更平衡的日间活动。【结论】 施工作业对2022年北京冬奥会延庆赛区野生动物产生了一定影响,动物种类减少、活动节律和行为模式发生改变。同时,现有保护措施在一定程度上减少了施工作业对野生动物的干扰。

关键词: 野生动物监测, 北京2022年冬奥会, 施工干扰, 相对多度, 活动节律

Abstract:

【Objective】 Exploring the impact of large-scale venue construction on wildlife will help formulate targeted protection policies and measures for implementing the Green Olympics and improving the efficiency of biodiversity conservation.【Method】Wildlife richness and activity rhythms were monitored using the camera trapping method from April 2019 to March 2020 and compared with previous data from 2013 to analyze the effects of infrastructure construction on wildlife in the Yanqing competition area during the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympic Games. 【Result】 A total of 4 193 camera trapping days were collected with 5 961 effective photos that captured 13 species of mammals and 25 species of birds belonging to nine orders and 23 families. The number of mammals decreased by three species compared to the recordings in 2013; raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), and Tolai hare (Lepus tolai) were not detected, and the number of bird species decreased by 22. The relative abundance index of leopard cat (Prionailurus bengalensis)(Z=-2.981, P<0.01), Asian badger(Meles leucurus)(Z=-2.578, P<0.05), hog badger(Arctonyx collaris)(Z=2.197, P<0.05), and wild boar(Sus scrofa)(Z=-2.310, P<0.05)were significantly different for the two surveys. An analysis of monthly activity rhythms showed that the activity of leopards and Asian badgers peaked earlier due to construction, while the activity peaks of hog badgers and rock squirrels(Sciurotamias davidianus)decreased, resulting in activity patterns that remained mostly uniform throughout the year. Furthermore, the activity peak of the wild boar was prolonged. There were significant differences(P<0.05)in the daily activity rhythm of the five mammals before and after construction. Leopards, Asian badgers, and hog badgers showed less daytime activity and more night activity, while wild boar showed the opposite trend, and the rock squirrel showed less and more balanced daytime activity. 【Conclusion】 Construction work had a certain impact on wild animals, with a decrease in species diversity and changes in activity rhythm and behavioral patterns. Meanwhile, the results also showed that existing protection measures played a positive role in reducing construction interference on wildlife. This study provides scientific and technological support for practicing the Green Olympics and carrying out ecological and environmental protection during the Beijing 2022 Olympic Winter Games.

Key words: wildlife monitoring, Beijing 2022 Olympic Winter Games, construction interference, relative abundance, activity rhythm

中图分类号:

Q958.1
S718

夏凡,鲍伟东,盖立新,等. 北京冬奥会延庆赛区施工作业对野生动物的影响分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 219-225.

XIA Fan, BAO Weidong, GAI Lixin, JU Longfei, HUANG Wenhua, JIANG Jian, HA Xibo. Effects of infrastructure and stadium construction on wildlife in Yanqing competition area of Beijing 2022 Olympic Winter Games[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(1): 219-225.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202111039.

图/表 4

参考文献 30

[1]	蒋志刚. 野生动物的价值与生态服务功能[J]. 生态学报, 2001, 21(11):1909-1917.
	JIANG Z G. Values and ecological service functions of wildlife[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2001, 21(11):1909-1917.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2001.11.022. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2001.11.022
[2]	BERNARDO-MADRID R, CALATAYUD J, GONZÁLEZ-SUÁREZ M, et al. Human activity is altering the world’s zoogeographical regions[J]. Ecol Lett, 2019, 22(8):1297-1305.DOI:10.1111/ele.13321. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108706
[3]	TORRES-ROMERO E J, GIORDANO A J, CEBALLOS G, et al. Reducing the sixth mass extinction:understanding the value of human-altered landscapes to the conservation of the world’s largest terrestrial mammals[J]. Biol Conserv, 2020, 249:108706.DOI:10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108706.
[4]	GAYNOR K M, HOJNOWSKI C E, CARTER N H, et al. The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality[J]. Science, 2018, 360(6394):1232-1235.DOI:10.1126/science.aar7121. doi: 10.1126/science.aar7121 pmid: 29903973
[5]	张跃, 雷开明, 张语克, 等. 植被、海拔、人为干扰对大中型野生动物分布的影响:以九寨沟自然保护区为例[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(13):4228-4235.
	ZHANG Y, LEI K M, ZHANG Y K, et al. Effects of vegetation,elevation and human disturbance on the distribution of large-and medium-sized wildlife:a case study in Jiu-zhaigou Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(13):4228-4235.DOI:10.5846/stxb201106090768. doi: 10.5846/stxb201106090768
[6]	陈立军, 肖文宏, 肖治术. 物种相对多度指数在红外相机数据分析中的应用及局限[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(3):243-248. doi: 10.17520/biods.2018327
	CHEN L J, XIAO W H, XIAO Z S. Limitations of relative abundance indices calculated from camera-trapping data[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2019, 27(3):243-248.DOI:10.17520/biods.2018327. doi: 10.17520/biods.2018327
[7]	BLOWES S A, CHASE J M, DI FRANCO A, et al. Mediterranean marine protected areas have higher biodiversity via increased evenness,not abundance[J]. J Appl Ecol, 2020, 57(3):578-589.DOI:10.1111/1365-2664.13549. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13549
[8]	MORI E, CICERO M, LOVARI S, et al. Occupancy and activity rhythms of the Siberian roe deer[J]. Biologia, 2021, 76(10):2991-2999.DOI:10.1007/s11756-021-00790-1. doi: 10.1007/s11756-021-00790-1
[9]	刘佳, 李生强, 汪国海, 等. 喀斯特生境中白鹇的活动节律、时间分配及集群行为[J]. 广西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 37(3):156-165.
	LIU J, LI S Q, WANG G H, et al. Activity rhythm,time budgets and flocking behavior of silver pheasant(Lophura nycthemera) in the Karst habitat[J]. J Guangxi Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 37(3):156-165.DOI:10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2019.03.018. doi: 10.16088/j.issn.1001-6600.2019.03.018.
[10]	穆君, 王娇娇, 张雷, 等. 贵州习水国家级自然保护区红外相机鸟兽监测及活动节律分析[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(6):683-688. doi: 10.17520/biods.2018347
	MU J, WANG J J, ZHANG L, et al. Field monitoring using infrared cameras and activity rhythm analysis on mammals and birds in Xishui National Nature Reserve,Guizhou,China[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2019, 27(6):683-688.DOI:10.17520/biods.2018347. doi: 10.17520/biods.2018347
[11]	张源笙, 蒋健, 蒋万杰, 等. 北京松山国家级自然保护区兽类活动节律初步研究[J]. 四川动物, 2017, 36(4):460-467.
	ZHANG Y S, JIANG J, JIANG W J, et al. Activity patterns of mammals in Beijing Songshan National Nature Reserve[J]. Sichuan J Zool, 2017, 36(4):460-467.DOI:10.11984/j.issn.1000-7083.20170108. doi: 10.11984/j.issn.1000-7083.20170108.
[12]	尚玉昌. 动物的行为节律[J]. 生物学通报, 2006, 41(10):8-10.
	SHANG Y C. Behavioral rhythms in animals[J]. Microbiol China, 2006, 41(10):8-10.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2006.10.004. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2006.10.004
[13]	段利娟. 王朗自然保护区大熊猫及其同域物种活动节律及栖息地利用研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2014.
	DUAN L J. Study on activity and habitat use of giant Panda and its sympatric species in Wanglang Nature Reserve[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2014.
[14]	崔海鸥, 单宏臣. 北京松山国家级自然保护区脊椎动物区系初报[J]. 四川动物, 2006, 25(4):776-778.
	CUI H O, SHAN H C. Preliminary report on vertebrate fauna in Songshan National Nature Reserve,Beijing[J]. Sichuan J Zool, 2006, 25(4):776-778.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7083.2006.04.021. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7083.2006.04.021
[15]	WESTERMAN M. Are the games really green?[J]. E Environ Mag, 2010, 21(1):14-16.
[16]	PAQUETTE J, STEVENS J, MALLEN C. The interpretation of environmental sustainability by the International Olympic Committee and Organizing Committees of the Olympic Games from 1994 to 2008[J]. Sport Soc, 2011, 14(3):355-369.DOI:10.1080/17430437.2011.557272. doi: 10.1080/17430437.2011.557272
[17]	徐宇华, 林显鹏. 冬季奥运会可持续发展管理研究:国际经验及对我国筹备2022年冬奥会的启示[J]. 北京体育大学学报, 2016, 39(1):13-19.
	XU Y H, LIN X P. Sustainable development management of winter olympics:international experience and its revelation to China’s preparation for 2022 Winter Olympics[J]. J Beijing Sport Univ, 2016, 39(1):13-19.DOI:10.19582/j.cnki.11-3785/g8.2016.01.003. doi: 10.19582/j.cnki.11-3785/g8.2016.01.003
[18]	刘芳, 李迪强, 吴记贵. 利用红外相机调查北京松山国家级自然保护区的野生动物物种[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(3):730-739.
	LIU F, LI D Q, WU J G. Using infra-red cameras to survey wildlife in Beijing Songshan National Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2012, 32(3):730-739.DOI:10.5846/stxb201109071312. doi: 10.5846/stxb201109071312
[19]	杜连海, 王小平, 陈峻崎, 等. 北京松山自然保护区综合科学考察报告[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2012.
	DU L H, WANG X P, CHEN J Q, et al. Comprehensive scientific investigation report of Beijing Songshan Nature Reserve[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2012.
[20]	范雅倩, 安菁, 梁晨. 北京市松山国家级自然保护区典型植被群落的土壤微生物群落结构特征[J]. 北方园艺, 2021(1):81-86.
	FAN Y Q, AN J, LIANG C. Soil microbial structure characte-ristics of typical vegetation communities in Beijing City Songshan National Nature Reserve[J]. North Hortic, 2021(1):81-86.DOI:10.11937/bfyy.20200341. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20200341
[21]	PERIS A, CLOSA-SEBASTIÀ F, MARCO I, et al. Baiting improves wild boar population size estimates by camera trapping[J]. Mamm Biol, 2019, 98:28-35.DOI:10.1016/j.mambio.2019.07.005. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2019.07.005
[22]	AZLAN J M, SHARMA D S K. The diversity and activity patterns of wild felids in a secondary forest in Peninsular Malaysia[J]. Oryx, 2006, 40(1):36-41.DOI:10.1017/s0030605306000147. doi: 10.1017/s0030605306000147
[23]	肖治术. 红外相机技术在我国自然保护地野生动物清查与评估中的应用[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(3):235-236. doi: 10.17520/biods.2018329
	XIAO Z S. Application of camera trapping to species inventory and assessment of wild animals across China’s protected areas[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2019, 27(3):235-236.DOI:10.17520/biods.2018329. doi: 10.17520/biods.2018329
[24]	RIDOUT M S, LINKIE M. Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data[J]. J Agric Biol Environ Stat, 2009, 14(3):322-337.DOI:10.1198/jabes.2009.08038. doi: 10.1198/jabes.2009.08038
[25]	MEREDITH M, RIDOUT M. Overlap:estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns.2014[CP/OL]. https://rdrr.io/cran/overlap/.
[26]	ROWCLIFFE J M,KAYS R,KRANSTAUBER B, et al.Quantifying levels of animal activity using camera trap data[J].Methods Ecol Evol, 2014, 5(11):1170-1179.DOI:10.1111/2041-210X.12278. doi: 10.3390/ani10020356
[27]	蒋志刚, 江建平, 王跃招, 等. 中国脊椎动物红色名录[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(5):500-551. doi: 10.17520/biods.2016076
	JIANG Z G, JIANG J P, WANG Y Z, et al. Red list of China’s vertebrates[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2016, 24(5):500-551.DOI:10.17520/biods.2016076. doi: 10.17520/biods.2016076
[28]	PADALINO B, BARRASSO R, TULLIO D, et al. Protection of animals during transport:analysis of the infringements reported from 2009 to 2013 during on-road inspections in Italy[J]. Animals (Basel), 2020, 10(2):356.DOI:10.3390/ani10020356.
[29]	范庭兴. 高速公路对大熊猫栖息地的影响及保护措施[J]. 公路, 2020, 65(1):265-274.
	FAN T X. Environmental impact of highway on habitat of panda and protective measures[J]. Highway, 2020, 65(1):265-274.
[30]	田泽薇, 张云伟, 陈瑶. 基于双路径网络的四足动物运动参数提取方法[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2022, 38(2):403-413.
	TIAN Z W, ZHANG Y W, CHEN Y. Extraction of quadruped motion parameters based on dual path network[J]. Jiangsu J Agr Sci, 2022, 38(2):403-413.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.02.014. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2022.02.014

物种 species	保护级别 protection category	有效照片数量 number of valid photos	相对多度指数 relative abundance index
豹猫Prionailurus bengalensis	Ⅱ	113	2.69
亚洲狗獾Meles leucurus	2	130	3.10
猪獾Arctonyx collaris	2	382	9.11
野猪Sus scrofa	2	101	2.41
岩松鼠Sciurotamisa davidianus		715	17.05

北京冬奥会延庆赛区施工作业对野生动物的影响分析

Effects of infrastructure and stadium construction on wildlife in Yanqing competition area of Beijing 2022 Olympic Winter Games

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 4

参考文献 30

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿