塞罕坝自然保护区华北落叶松和樟子松人工林健康评价

赵金满; 韩馨悦; 程瑞明; 张志东

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202204058

赵金满, 韩馨悦, 程瑞明, 张志东

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3) : 199-206.

PDF(1695 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(1695 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3) : 199-206. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202204058

研究论文

塞罕坝自然保护区华北落叶松和樟子松人工林健康评价

作者信息 +

Health assessment of Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in Saihanba Nature Reserve

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】了解自然保护区人工林健康状况,指导森林经营和保护区建设。【方法】以河北省塞罕坝自然保护区华北落叶松(Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii)和樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)人工林为研究对象,基于分层随机取样法,设置36块样地,选取生产力、林分结构、物种多样性、土壤质量和稳定性等5个方面17个指标,建立森林健康评价指标体系。运用主成分分析法计算森林健康指数、K均值聚类法划分森林健康等级、Fisher判别分析法验证聚类结果的准确性。【结果】研究区森林健康指数范围在-1.02~1.46;土壤质量和林分结构是影响研究区森林健康的最主要因素;森林健康等级所占面积比例从大到小依次为:中健康(50%)>不健康(25%)>亚健康(19%)>健康(6%);在中龄林(20~30 a)和近熟林(>30 a)中,华北落叶松林健康状况均优于樟子松林;随着林分密度的增加,华北落叶松林和樟子松林的森林健康指数呈降低趋势。【结论】塞罕坝自然保护区人工林主要处于中健康和不健康状态,亟须采取有效经营活动改善森林健康状态。

Abstract

【Objective】 The study aimed to understand the health status of plantations in nature reserves for forest management and the construction of nature reserves. 【Method】 A total of 36 sample plots were surveyed in the pure Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in the Saihanba Nature Reserve of Hebei Province using the stratified random sampling method. A total of 17 indicators, including the five aspects of productivity, stand structure, species diversity, soil quality, and stability, were selected to establish an indicator system for assessing forest health. The forest health index was calculated by principal component analysis, and the forest health grades were classified using the K-means clustering method. The accuracy of the clustering results was verified by Fisher’s discriminant analysis. 【Result】 The forest health index of the study area ranged between -1.02 and 1.46. The soil quality and stand structure were the most important indicators that influenced forest health in the study area. The proportionate areas were in the following order: mid-health (50%) > unhealthy (25%) > sub-health (19%) > healthy (6%). The health status of L. gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii forests was better than that of P. sylvestris var. mongolica forests for middle-aged (20-30 a) and near-mature (> 30 a) stands. The forest health indices of L. gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii and P. sylvestris var. mongolica forests tended to decrease with increasing stand density. 【Conclusion】 The plantations in the Saihanba Nature Reserve were primarily in the mid-health and non-health states. Therefore, the findings revealed that effective management strategies are urgently necessary for improving forest health in the study area.

导出引用

赵金满, 韩馨悦, 程瑞明, 等. 塞罕坝自然保护区华北落叶松和樟子松人工林健康评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2024, 48(3): 199-206 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202204058

ZHAO Jinman, HAN Xinyue, CHENG Ruiming, et al. Health assessment of Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in Saihanba Nature Reserve[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2024, 48(3): 199-206 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202204058

中图分类号： S757

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	刘建泉, 孙建忠. 东大河林区青海云杉林健康评价[J]. 草业科学, 2012, 29(4):624-628. LIU J Q, SUN J Z. Health assessment of Picea classifolia forest in the Dongdahe forest region[J]. Pratacultural Sci, 2012, 29(4):624-628. 本文引用 [1]

[2]	LU S S, LI J P, GUAN X L, et al. The evaluation of forestry ecological security in China: developing a decision support system[J]. Ecol Indic, 2018, 91: 664-678. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.088. 本文引用 [1]

[3]

刘世荣, 杨予静, 王晖. 中国人工林经营发展战略与对策:从追求木材产量的单一目标经营转向提升生态系统服务质量和效益的多目标经营[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(1): 1-10.

LIU

S R

, YANG

Y J

, WANG

. Development strategy and management countermeasures of planted forests in China: transforming from timber-centered single objective management towards multi-purpose management for enhancing quality and benefits of ecosystem services[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(1): 1-10. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201712072201.

本文引用 [1]

[4]	TRUMBORE S, BRANDO P, HARTMANN H. Forest health and global change[J]. Science, 2015, 349(6250): 814-818.DOI:10.1126/science.aac6759. 本文引用 [1]

[5]	郑学良, 陈丽华, 李洪洋, 等. 基于水源涵养功能的辽东防护林体系健康评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(2): 102-110. ZHENG X L, CHEN L H, LI H Y, et al. Health assessment of Liaodong shelterbelt system based on water conservation[J]. Sci of Soil Water Conserv, 2020, 18(2): 102-110. DOI: 10.16843/j.sswc.2020.02.013. 本文引用 [2]

[6]	XIAO F J, OUYANG H, ZHANG Q, et al. Forest ecosystem health assessment and analysis in China[J]. J Geogr Sci, 2004, 14(1): 18-24. DOI: 10.1007/BF02873086. 本文引用 [1]

[7]	MENG Y, CAO B H, DONG C, et al. Mount Taishan forest ecosystem health assessment based on forest inventory data[J]. Forests, 2019, 10(8): 657. DOI: 10.3390/f10080657. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	董灵波, 刘兆刚. 森林健康评价及其多尺度转换方法[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(3): 206-216. DONG L B, LIU Z G. Forest health assessments and multi-scale conversion methods[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(3): 206-216. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201911007. 本文引用 [1]

[9]	闫晋升, 王永东, 娄泊远, 等. 哈萨克斯坦首都努尔苏丹人工林健康评价[J]. 干旱区研究, 2021, 38(5): 1474-1483. YAN J S, WANG Y D, LOU B Y, et al. Health assessment of plantations in Nursultan, capital of Kazakhstan[J]. Arid Zone Res, 2021, 38(5): 1474-1483. DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2021.05.30. 本文引用 [1]

[10]	LU S S, ZHOU Y, SUN H S, et al. Examining the influencing factors of forest health, its implications on rural revitalization: a case study of five forest farms in Beijing[J]. Land Use Policy, 2021, 102: 105265. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105265. 本文引用 [1]

[11]

赵勇钧, 谢阳生, 王建军, 等. 基于多元统计分析的马尾松人工林健康评价研究:以广西热带林业实验中心为例[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(7): 100-107.

ZHAO

Y J

, XIE

Y S

, WANG

J J

, et al. Health assessment of Pinus massoniana plantation on multivariate statistical analysis: a case study of Guangxi Tropical Forestry Experimental Center[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2019, 39(7): 100-107. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.07.014.

本文引用 [3]

[12]	谷鑫鑫, 司剑华. 基于层次分析法的西宁市油松人工林健康评价[J]. 青海大学学报, 2020, 38(3): 34-43. GU X X, SI J H. Health evaluation of Pinus tabuliformis Carr. plantation in Xining City based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. J Qinghai Univ, 2020, 38(3): 34-43. DOI: 10.13901/j.cnki.qhwxxbzk.2020.03.005. 本文引用 [1]

[13]	王玮玮, 许彦红, 杨俊灵, 等. 纳板河流域国家级自然保护区主要森林植被类型健康评价研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(26): 32-39. WANG W W, XU Y H, YANG J L, et al. Health evaluation of main forest vegetation types in Naban River Nature Reserve[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2021, 37(26): 32-39.DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0755. 本文引用 [1]

[14]	贾大鹏, 王新杰, 刘雨. 金沟岭林场森林健康评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(8): 47-52,57. JIA D P, WANG X J, LIU Y. Forest health assessment of Jingouling Forest Farm[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2019, 47(8): 47-52,57. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.08.009. 本文引用 [1]

[15]	TAO N, LIU D, WU J. Assessment of forest ecosystem health based on fuzzy evaluation method: a case study of forest ecosystem in Liangshui Natural Reserve[J]. Rev Int Contam Ambie, 2019, 35(esp01): 159-164. DOI: 10.20937/rica.2019.35.esp01.15. 本文引用 [1]

[16]	ZHANG F, ZHANG J Q, WU R N, et al. Ecosystem health assessment based on DPSIRM framework and health distance model in Nansi Lake, China[J]. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess, 2016, 30(4):1235-1247. DOI: 10.1007/s00477-015-1109-2. 本文引用 [1]

[17]	王秋燕, 陈鹏飞, 李学东, 等. 森林健康评价方法综述[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(2): 177-183. WANG Q Y, CHEN P F, LI X D, et al. Review of forest health assessment methods[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(2): 177-183. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703105. 本文引用 [1]

[18]	ZHU J J, TAN H, KANG H Z, et al. Comparison of foliar nutrient concentrations between natural and artificial forests of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica on sandy land, China[J]. J For Res, 2006, 17(3): 177-184. DOI: 10.1007/s11676-006-0042-0. 本文引用 [1]

[19]

扈梦梅, 田龙, 吴亚楠, 等. 塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林间伐和混交改造对大型土壤动物群落结构的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(11): 153-162.

M M

, TIAN

, WU

Y N

, et al. Influences of thinning and mixed transformation of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations on the community structure of soil macro faunal in Saihanba area[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019, 55(11): 153-162. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191117.

本文引用 [1]

[20]

牛小云, 孙晓梅, 陈东升, 等. 辽东山区不同林龄日本落叶松人工林土壤微生物、养分及酶活性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(9):2663-2672.

NIU

X Y

, SUN

X M

, CHEN

D S

, et al. Soil microorganisms, nutrients and enzyme activity of Larix kaempferi plantation under different ages in mountainous region of eastern Liaoning Province, China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2015, 26(9):2663-2672. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20150630.014.

本文引用 [1]

[21]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000. LU R K. Methods of soil agrochemical analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Scientech Press, 2000. 本文引用 [1]

[22]	潘湘海. 塞罕坝樟子松人工林二元立木材积表的研制[J]. 河北林业科技, 2010(6): 20. PAN X H. Compilation of binary standing volume tables of Pinus sylvestris forest in Saihanba area[J]. J Hebei For Sci Technol, 2010(6): 20. DOI:10.16449/j.cnki.issn1002-3356.2010.06.023. 本文引用 [2]

[23]	张菲, 张岩. 塞罕坝地区华北落叶松人工林二元立木材积表编制研究[J]. 河北林果研究, 2016, 31(2): 128-131. ZHANG F, ZHANG Y. Compilation of binary standing volume tables of Larix principis-rupprechtii forest in Saihanba area[J]. Hebei J For Orc Res, 2016, 31(2): 128-131.DOI:10.13320/j.cnki.hjfor.2016.0025. 本文引用 [2]

[24]	杜秀芳, 汤孟平, 潘建勇, 等. 临安区不同森林类型竞争指数比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(12): 4064-4072. DU X F, TANG M P, PAN J Y, et al. Study on competition index of different typical forest types on Lin’an Region[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(12): 4064-4072. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201901240181. 本文引用 [3]

[25]

潘磊磊, SEMYUNG

, 刘艳书, 等. 沙地樟子松天然林南缘分布区林木竞争、空间格局及其更新特征[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(10): 3687-3699.

PAN

L L

, SEMYUNG

, LIU

Y S

, et al. Tree competition, spatial pattern, and regeneration of a Mongolian pine natural forest in the southern geographical edge[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(10): 3687-3699. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201804270955.

本文引用 [2]

[26]	喻泓, 杨晓晖. 地表火干扰时间序列上樟子松林竞争强度的变化[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(1): 79-85. YU H, YANG X H. Variation of competition intensity across a chronosequence in surface firemediated Mongolian pine forest[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(1): 79-85. 本文引用 [2]

[27]	胡艳波, 惠刚盈. 优化林分空间结构的森林经营方法探讨[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19(1): 1-8. HU Y B, HUI G Y. A discussion on forest management method optimizing forest spatial structure[J]. For Res, 2006, 19(1): 1-8. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2006.01.001. 本文引用 [2]

[28]

姜雨, 黄选瑞, 时田雨, 等. 不同间伐强度对自然保护区人工林植被多样性及分布格局的影响:以河北省塞罕坝机械林场为例[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 42(12):68-81.

JIANG

, HUANG

X Y

, SHI

T Y

, et al. Effects of tending thinning on the vegetation diversity and distribution pattern of artificial forests in nature reserves: a case study of Saihanba Mechanical Forest Farm in Hebei Province[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2022, 42(12):68-81.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2022.12.008.

本文引用 [2]

[29]	徐梅, 关庆伟. 徐州侧柏人工林健康评价研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2014, 34(2):39-43,54. XU M, GUAN Q W. Health assessment of Platycladus orientalis plantation in Xuzhou[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2014, 34(2):39-43,54. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2014.02.008. 本文引用 [2]

[30]	曹小玉, 委霞, 赵文菲, 等. 基于结构方程模型的森林健康评价[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(8): 2635-2647. CAO X Y, WEI X, ZHAO W F, et al. Evaluation of forest health based on structural equation model[J]. Chin J of Ecol, 2021, 40(8): 2635-2647. DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202108.018. 本文引用 [1]

[31]	DU C, XU C Y, JIAN J S, et al. Seasonal dynamics of bacterial communities in a Betula albosinensis forest[J]. Eur J Soil Sci, 2018, 69(4):666-674.DOI: 10.1111/ejss.12568. 本文引用 [1]

[32]	LIU T, WU X H, LI H W, et al. Soil organic matter, nitrogen and pH driven change in bacterial community following forest conversion[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2020, 477: 118473. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118473. 本文引用 [1]

[33]	QU Z L, LIU B, MA Y, et al. Differences in bacterial community structure and potential functions among Eucalyptus plantations with different ages and species of trees[J]. Appl Soil Ecol, 2020, 149:103515.DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103515. 本文引用 [1]

[34]

刘慧敏, 韩海荣, 程小琴, 等. 不同密度调控强度对华北落叶松人工林土壤质量的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(6): 50-59.

LIU

H M

, HAN

H R

, CHENG

X Q

, et al. Effects of different density regulation intensities on soil quality in Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2021, 43(6): 50-59. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200322.

本文引用 [1]

[35]	BOLAT İ. The effect of thinning on microbial biomass C, N and basal respiration in black pine forest soils in Mudurnu, Turkey[J]. Eur J For Res, 2014, 133(1): 131-139. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-013-0752-8. 本文引用 [1]

[36]	刘怡青, 田育红, 宋含章, 等. 胸径和林分密度决定内蒙古东部落叶松林种内竞争[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(3):847-853. LIU Y Q, TIAN Y H, SONG H Z, et al. DBH and stand density regulate intraspecific competition of Larix gmelinii in eastern Inner Mongolia[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2018, 37(3): 847-853.DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201803.016. 本文引用 [1]

[37]

董雪婷, 张静, 张志东, 等. 树种相互作用、林分密度和树木大小对华北落叶松生产力的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(8):2722-2728.

DONG

X T

, ZHANG

Z D

, et al. Effects of tree species interaction,stand density,and tree size on the productivity of Larix principis-rupprechtii[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2021, 32(8): 2722-2728.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202108.006.

本文引用 [2]

[38]	PRETZSCH H, SCHÜTZE G. Tree species mixing can increase stand productivity,density and growth efficiency and attenuate the trade-off between density and growth throughout the whole rotation[J]. Ann Bot, 2021, 128(6):767-786.DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcab077. 本文引用 [1]

[39]

王杰, 陆景星, 王相震, 等. 华北落叶松人工林间伐后9-10年林下天然更新研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(12):17-28.

WANG

, LU

J X

, WANG

X Z

, et al. Natural regeneration of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations in nine to ten years after thinning[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2021, 43(12):17-28. DOI:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20200371.

本文引用 [1]

[40]	徐雪蕾, 孙玉军, 周华, 等. 间伐强度对杉木人工林林下植被和土壤性质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(3):1-12. XU X L, SUN Y J, ZHOU H, et al. Effects of thinning intensity on understory growth and soil properties in Chinese fir plantation[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019, 55(3):1-12.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190301. 本文引用 [1]

[41]	朱柱, 杨海龙, 黄乾, 等. 青海高寒黄土区典型水源涵养林健康评价[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(6):1166-1173. ZHU Z, YANG H L, HUANG Q, et al. Health evaluation of typical water conservation forests in the alpine loess area of Qinghai[J]. J Zhejiang A F Univ, 2019, 36(6):1166-1173. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.06.014. 本文引用 [1]

[42]

安佳怡, 冯仲科, 马天天, 等. 基于GIS格网的重庆合川区森林火险等级区划[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(9):91-101.

J Y

, FENG

Z K

, MA

T T

, et al. Zoning of forest fire risk levels in Hechuan District of Chongqing based on GIS grid[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2022, 42(9):91-101. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2022.09.011.

本文引用 [1]

[43]

常旭, 邱新彩, 刘欣, 等. 塞罕坝华北落叶松纯林和混交林土壤肥力质量评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(8): 50-59.

CHANG

, QIU

X C

, LIU

, et al. Soil fertility quality evaluation of pure and mixed Larix principis-rupprechtii forests in Saihanba, Hebei Province of northern China[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2021, 43(8): 50-59. DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210189.

本文引用 [1]