不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202204006

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 81-89.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202204006

所属专题：土壤生态修复理论与技术研究

• 专题报道Ⅱ:土壤生态修复理论与技术研究(执行主编张金池) • 上一篇下一篇

不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响

杨皓¹(), 刘超¹, 庄家尧¹^,^*(), 张树同², 张文韬¹, 毛国豪¹

1.南京林业大学林学院, 南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏省水土保持与生态修复重点实验室,江苏南京 210037
2.中化学建设投资集团有限公司,北京 102308

收稿日期:2022-04-05 修回日期:2023-04-27 出版日期:2024-05-30 发布日期:2024-06-14
通讯作者: *庄家尧(nlzjiayao@njfu.edu.cn),副教授。
作者简介:杨皓(617012131@qq.com)。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFC0505500);江苏省教育厅资助项目(2019JSJG247);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

Effects of different carrier bacterial fertilizers on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and soil nutrients of Amorpha fruticosa

YANG Hao¹(), LIU Chao¹, ZHUANG Jiayao¹^,^*(), ZHANG Shutong², ZHANG Wentao¹, MAO Guohao¹

1. College of Forestry,Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China
2. China Chemical Construction Investment Group Co., Ltd.,Beijing 102308,China

Received:2022-04-05 Revised:2023-04-27 Online:2024-05-30 Published:2024-06-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究接种不同载体基质制备的粘质沙雷氏菌(Serratia marcescens N1.14,X-45)菌肥对植物生长、光合特性和土壤pH及速效养分的影响,筛选能有效替代泥炭的菌肥载体,为微生物肥料的研发提供参考。【方法】以紫穗槐(Amorpha fruticosa)幼苗为对象,分别施用泥炭载体菌肥(处理T0,CK)、单一秸秆载体菌肥(处理T1)、单一麦麸载体菌肥(处理T2)、秸秆与麦麸(体积比1∶1)载体菌肥(处理T3)、秸秆和麦麸与棉籽壳(体积比1∶1∶1)载体菌肥处理组(处理T4)、秸秆和麦麸与豆饼(体积比1∶1∶1)栽体菌肥(处理T5),对比分析不同载体菌肥的施用对紫穗槐生长特性、光合特性以及土壤养分的影响。【结果】与CK(T0)相比:①T2、T3、T4、T5处理下紫穗槐生长状况均显著提升,以T3处理最为显著;②T1、T3、T4、T5处理对紫穗槐叶片的各项光合特性指标参数均有不同程度改善效应,其中气体交换参数以T5处理改善效果最为显著,叶绿素含量以T3处理改善效果最为明显。复合菌肥载体比单一菌肥对佳士科技光合特性的改善效果更好;③T3、T4、T5处理下紫穗槐土壤养分含量有所提高。【结论】秸秆与麦麸处理、秸秆和麦麸与豆饼处理的促生菌肥可促进紫穗槐生长发育并提高其光合效率、优化土壤营养环境、提高土壤肥力,能有效替代泥炭载体菌肥发挥效能。

关键词: 微生物菌肥, 紫穗槐, 生长特性, 光合特性, 土壤养分

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study explored the effects of Serratia marcescens N1.14, X-45 bacterial fertilizer inoculated with different carrier substrates on the growth, photosynthetic characteristics, soil pH and available nutrients of Amorpha fruticosa. Based on this, bacterial fertilizer carriers that can effectively replace rare resource peat were determined in order to provide a theoretical basis for the development of microbial fertilizers.【Method】 Taking A. fruticosa seedlings as the object, the peat bacterial fertilizer (T0, CK), straw bacterial fertilizer (T1), wheat bran bacterial fertilizer (T2), straw and wheat bran as carrier bacterial fertilizer (volume ratio = 1∶1, T3), straw wheat bran and cotton seed hull as carrier bacterial fertilizer (volume ratio = 1∶1∶1, T4), and straw wheat bran and soybean cake as carrier bacterial fertilizer (volume ratio = 1∶1∶1, T5) were applied. Through comparative analysis, the effects of the application of different carrier bacterial fertilizer on the growth characteristics, photosynthetic characteristics and soil nutrients of A. fruticosa were explored, and treatment groups that can replace peat bacterial fertilizer were selected.【Result】 Compared with CK, there were three key findings. First, the growth statuses of T2, T3, T4, and T5 were significantly improved, especially T3. Second, the photosynthetic characteristic parameters of Amorpha fruticosa leaves under T1, T3, T4, and T5 improved to varying degrees. Among the gas exchange parameters, T5 had the most significant improvement effect, and T3 had the most obvious improvement effect on chlorophyll content. At the same time, the improvement effect of compound carrier bacterial fertilizer was better than that of single bacterial fertilizer. Third, the soil nutrient content of A. fruticosa under T3, T4, and T5 treatments increased.【Conclusion】 The straw, wheat bran and soybean cake as carrier bacterial fertilizers can promote the growth and development of A. fruticosa, improve photosynthetic characteristics, optimize the soil nutrient environment, improve soil fertility, and effectively replace peat carrier bacterial fertilizer.

Key words: microbial fertilizer, Amorpha fruticosa, growth characteristics, photosynthetic characteristics, soil nutrient

中图分类号:

S718.83

杨皓,刘超,庄家尧,等. 不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.

YANG Hao, LIU Chao, ZHUANG Jiayao, ZHANG Shutong, ZHANG Wentao, MAO Guohao. Effects of different carrier bacterial fertilizers on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and soil nutrients of Amorpha fruticosa[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 48(3): 81-89.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202204006.

图/表 6

表1

表2

表3

图1

图2

图3

参考文献 42

[1]	REN J H, LIU X L, YANG W P, et al. Rhizosphere soil properties,microbial community,and enzyme activities:short-term responses to partial substitution of chemical fertilizer with organic manure[J]. J Environ Manag, 2021, 299:113650.DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113650.
[2]	王景超, 于晓菲, 商姗姗. 我国微生物肥料研究现状及其在作物上的应用进展[J]. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(1):34-37.
	WANG J C, YU X F, SHANG S S. Research status of microbial fertilizer in China and its application progress in crops[J]. Agric Technol, 2022, 42(1):34-37.DOI:10.19754/j.nyyjs.20220115010.
[3]	王应兰. 解磷微生物细菌的筛选、鉴定及其制备肥料的研究[D]. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2020.
	WANG Y L. Study on screening and identification of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and preparation of fertilizers[D]. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2020.
[4]	RICE W A, LUPWAYI N Z, OLSEN P E, et al. Field evaluation of dual inoculation of alfalfa with Sinorhizobium meliloti and Penicillium bilaii[J]. Can J Plant Sci, 2000, 80(2):303-308.DOI:10.4141/p99-055.
[5]	PRAKASH J, ARORA N K. Phosphate-solubilizing Bacillus sp.enhances growth,phosphorus uptake and oil yield of Mentha arvensis L.[J]. 3 Biotech, 2019, 9(4):126.DOI:10.1007/s13205-019-1660-5.
[6]	李永兴, 匡柏健, 李久蒂. 不同载体对微生物菌剂质量的影响[J]. 土壤肥料, 1999(6):25-27.
	LI Y X, KUANG B J, LI J D. Effect of different carriers on the quality of microbial agents[J]. Soils Fertil, 1999(6):25-27.
[7]	DAZA A, SANTAMAR A C, RODRGUEZ-NAVARRO D N, et al. Perlite as a carrier for bacterial inoculants[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2000, 32(4):567-572.DOI:10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00185-6.
[8]	万永霞. 紫穗槐的价值及其繁殖[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2004, 7(1):31.
	WAN Y X. The value and propagation of Amorpha fruticosa[J]. Special Econ Animal Plant, 2004, 7(1):31.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4713.2004.01.031.
[9]	孟剑侠. 丛枝菌根真菌对紫穗槐固氮能力的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江大学, 2009.
	MENG J X. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on nitrogen fixation ability of Amorpha fruticosa[D]. Harbin: Helongjiang University, 2009.
[10]	韩华雯. 几种新型植物根际促生菌肥载体筛选及研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2013.
	HAN H W. Selection and development carrier for plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculants[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2013.
[11]	陈福明, 陈顺伟. 混合液法测定叶绿素含量的研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 1984, 4(1):19-23,36.
	CHEN F M, CHEN S W. Study on determination of chlorophyll content by mixed liquid method[J]. J Zhejiang For Sci Technol, 1984, 4(1):19-23,36.
[12]	PORRA R J, THOMPSON W A, KRIEDEMANN P E. Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents:verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Bioenerg, 1989, 975(3):384-394.DOI:10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0.
[13]	何海洋, 彭方仁, 张瑞, 等. 不同品种美国山核桃嫁接苗光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(4):19-25.
	HE H Y, PENG F R, ZHANG R, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of grafting plants of different pecan varieties[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(4):19-25.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.04.004.
[14]	季艳红, 潘平平, 窦全琴, 等. 不同泥炭替代基质对薄壳山核桃幼苗生长及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(1):145-155.
	JI Y H, PAN P P, DOU Q Q, et al. Effect of fungus-residue and other matrix formulations on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of shelled walnut seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 46(1):145-155.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202104040.
[15]	邹锦丰, 周传志. 微生物肥料研究进展及发展前景[J]. 现代农业科技, 2021(22):142-144.
	ZOU J F, ZHOU C Z. Research progress and development prospect of microbial fertilizer[J]. Mod Agric Sci Technol, 2021(22):142-144.
[16]	WANG J F, LI X L, XING S Z, et al. Bio-organic fertilizer promotes plant growth and yield and improves soil microbial community in continuous monoculture system of Chrysanthemum morifolium cv.chuju[J]. Int J Agric Biol, 2017, 19(03):563-568.
[17]	STAMFORD N P, DA SILVA E V N, OLIVEIRA W D S, et al. Benefits of microbial fertilizer in interspecific interaction with textile sludges on cowpea in a Brazilian Ultisol and on wastes toxicity[J]. Environ Technol Innov, 2020, 18:100756.DOI:10.1016/j.eti.2020.100756.
[18]	IPEK M, ARAS S, ARıKAN Ş, et al. Root plant growth promoting rhizobacteria inoculations increase ferric chelate reductase (FC-R) activity and Fe nutrition in pear under calcareous soil conditions[J]. Sci Hortic, 2017, 219:144-151.DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.02.043.
[19]	卢培娜. 菌肥与腐熟秸秆对盐碱地燕麦土壤微生态环境的调控机制[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2021.
	LU P N. Regulatory mechanism of bio-fertilizer and rotten straw on soil microecological environment of oat in a saline-alkaline land[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2021.
[20]	段志慧. 水培下复合微生物菌剂对香蕉根系诱导抗枯萎病的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2020.
	DUAN Z H. Effect of induced resistance of banana roots to Fusarium wilt disease by compound microbial agents in hydroponic culture[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2020.
[21]	BAL H B, NAYAK L, DAS S, et al. Isolation of ACC deaminase producing PGPR from rice rhizosphere and evaluating their plant growth promoting activity under salt stress[J]. Plant Soil, 2013, 366(1):93-105.DOI:10.1007/s11104-012-1402-5.
[22]	蔡琪琪, 王堽, 董寅壮, 等. 不同中性盐胁迫对甜菜幼苗光合作用和抗氧化酶系统的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022(1):130-136.
	CAI Q Q, WANG G, DONG Y Z, et al. Effects of different neutral salt stress on photosynthesis and antioxidant enzyme system of sugar beet seedlings[J]. Crops, 2022(1):130-136.DOI:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.01.019.
[23]	兰艳, 伍鑫, 王锦, 等. 施氮量对绿米稻叶绿素含量及光合特性的影响[J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 36(4):566-572.
	LAN Y, WU X, WANG J, et al. Effect of nitrogen application rates on the chlorophyll content and photosynthetic characteristics of green rice[J]. J Yunnan Agric Univ (Nat Sci), 2021, 36(4):566-572.
[24]	潘小怡. 小麦压青和生物菌肥对连作花生土壤理化性质和产量形成的影响[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2021.
	PAN X Y. Effects of wheat green manure and biological fertilizer on soil physicochemical properties and yield formation under continuous cropping peanut[D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2021.
[25]	HUANG G J, YANG Y H, ZHU L L, et al. Temperature responses of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance in rice and wheat plants[J]. Agric For Meteorol, 2021, 300:108322.DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2021.108322.
[26]	罗永忠, 成自勇. 水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿叶水势、蒸腾速率和气孔导度的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2011, 19(2):215-221.
	LUO Y Z, CHENG Z Y. Impact of water stress on leaf water potential,transpiration rate(T_r) and stomatal conductance (G_s) of alfalfa[J]. Acta Agrestia Sin, 2011, 19(2):215-221.
[27]	杨玉玲, 刘文兆, 王俊, 等. 配施钾肥、有机肥对旱地春玉米光合生理特性和产量的影响[J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(3):116-121.
	YANG Y L, LIU W Z, WANG J, et al. Effects of potassium and organic fertilizer on photosynthetic physiological characteristics and yield of spring maize in dry lands[J]. Acta Agric Boreali Occidentalis Sin, 2009, 18(3):116-121.
[28]	苑丽彩. 不同肥料配施对设施番茄生长、品质、病虫害和产量的影响[D]. 新乡: 河南科技学院, 2016.
	YUAN L C. Effects of different fertilizer application on the growth,quality,plant diseases and insect pests and yield of facility tomato[D]. Xinxiang: Henan Institute of Science and Technology, 2016.
[29]	王鹰翔. 不同土壤菌配置对紫穗槐幼苗生理生态学特性的影响[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2017.
	WANG Y X. Effects of soil bacteria inoculation in spray seeding matrix on physiological and ecological character of Amorpha fruticose[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2017.
[30]	王涛, 雷锦桂, 黄语燕, 等. 绣球菌渣复合基质对黄瓜幼苗素质及产量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(1):177-185.
	WANG T, LEI J G, HUANG Y Y, et al. Effects of Sparassis crispa residue composite substrate on quality and yield of cucumber seedlings[J]. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2020, 34(1):177-185.DOI:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.01.0177.
[31]	姚乔花, 程永龙, 王姣敏, 等. FM-生物菌肥在设施温室马铃薯微型薯生产中的应用[J]. 中国果菜, 2021, 41(12):60-65.
	YAO Q H, CHENG Y L, WANG J M, et al. Application of FM-biological bacterial fertilizer in the production of mini-potato in facility greenhouse[J]. China Fruit & Veg, 2021, 41(12):60-65.DOI:10.19590/j.cnki.1008-1038.2021.12.010.
[32]	丁伟, 辛睿滢. 莠去津土壤残留生物修复菌肥作用原理与田间应用[J]. 植物保护, 2021, 47(3):83-88.
	DING W, XIN R Y. The mechanism and field application effect of bacterial fertilizers for bioremediation of atrazine residues in soil[J]. Plant Prot, 2021, 47(3):83-88.DOI:10.16688/j.zwbh.2020391.
[33]	STENITZER E, MURER E. Impact of soil compaction upon soil water balance and maize yield estimated by the SIMWASER model[J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2003, 73(1/2):43-56.DOI:10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00098-9.
[34]	KIRCHMANN H, MATTSSON L, ERIKSSON J. Trace element concentration in wheat grain:results from the Swedish long-term soil fertility experiments and national monitoring program[J]. Environ Geochem Health, 2009, 31(5):561-571.DOI:10.1007/s10653-009-9251-8.
[35]	褚义红. 不同微生物菌肥对温室生菜生长、品质、产量及氮素积累的影响[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2014.
	CHU Y H. Effects of different microbial fertilizers on the growth,the quality,the production and the nitrogen accumulation of[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2014.
[36]	陈娜丽. 固定化固氮菌的制备及其性能的研究[D]. 兰州: 西北师范大学, 2003.
	CHEN N L. Studies on the preparation and properties of the immobilized nitrogen-fixing bacteria[D]. Lanzhou: Northwest Normal University, 2003.
[37]	赵玥. 芽孢杆菌的筛选及在复合菌肥中应用研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2020.
	ZHAO Y. Screening of Bacillus and its application in compound fertilizer[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2020.
[38]	王爱斌, 宋慧芳, 张流洋, 等. 生物肥和菌肥对蓝莓苗生长及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(6):63-70.
	WANG A B, SONG H F, ZHANG L Y, et al. Effects of bio-organic and microbial fertilizers on growth and soil nutrients of Vaccinium spp.seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(6):63-70.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201907049.
[39]	李海云, 姚拓, 韩华雯, 等. 不同载体及菌肥浸提液对苏丹草种子萌发的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(5):28-34,42.
	LI H Y, YAO T, HAN H W, et al. Effects of bio-fertilizer extract with different carriers on seed germination of Sorghum sudanense[J]. Grassland Turf, 2018, 38(5):28-34,42.DOI:10.13817/j.cnki.cyycp.2018.05.005.
[40]	成思轩, 于嘉欣, 肖析蒙, 等. 一种微生物菌肥对雷竹笋生长、土壤养分及微生物的影响[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2021, 27(1):106-109.
	CHENG S X, YU J X, XIAO X M, et al. Effects of a kind of bacterial fertilizer on the growth rate of bamboo shoots,soil nutrients and microorganisms[J]. Anhui Agric Sci Bull, 2021, 27(1):106-109.DOI:10.16377/j.cnki.issn1007-7731.2021.01.041.
[41]	施燕华. 添加巨大芽孢杆菌对于干旱胁迫下紫花苜蓿幼苗生长影响的研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2022.
	SHI Y H. Effects of Bacillus megaterium on the growth of alfalfa seedlings under drought stress[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2022.
[42]	涂保华, 符菁, 赵远, 等. 基于光合菌剂的复合微生物菌肥对土壤速效养分含量及微生物群落结构多样性的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2019, 32(12):2878-2884.
	TU B H, FU J, ZHAO Y, et al. Effects of photosynthetic fungicide based compound microbial fertilizer on soil available nutrient content and microbial community structure diversity[J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2019, 32(12):2878-2884.DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2019.12.026.

编号 No.	处理 treatment	组成(体积比) composition(V∶V)
T0	泥炭(CK)	泥炭100%
T1	秸秆	秸秆100%
T2	麦麸	麦麸100%
T3	配方1	V_秸秆∶V_麦麸(1∶1)
T4	配方2	V_秸秆∶V_麦麸∶V_棉籽壳(1∶1∶1)
T5	配方3	V_秸秆∶V_麦麸∶V_豆饼(1∶1∶1)

处理 treatment	鲜质量/g fresh weight	干质量/g dry weight	株高/cm plant height	茎粗/mm stem diameter
T0	5.24±0.16 c	3.14±0.06 d	24.75±2.07 b	5.01±0.18 b
T1	5.58±0.34 c	3.24±0.08 d	19.67±1.67 c	4.74±0.21 b
T2	6.16±0.16 b	3.55±0.11 c	27.56±3.41 b	5.15±0.36 b
T3	7.46±0.24 a	4.59±0.09 a	32.09±2.42 a	5.81±0.12 a
T4	5.56±0.26 c	3.19±0.18 d	25.45±2.38 b	5.54±0.19 a
T5	7.13±0.25 a	4.42±0.07 b	27.79±1.25 b	5.03±0.15 b

处理 treatment	根长/cm root length	根表面积/cm² root area	根体积/cm³ root volume	尖端数 tip number	分蘖数 till number	干质量/g dry weight
T0	465.67±28.49 d	84.14±8.47 d	0.98±0.09 d	2 231.33±239.44 c	3 438.67±228.52 d	1.90±0.08 d
T1	476.18±34.10 d	87.09±7.17 d	0.99±0.07 d	1 967.33±118.75 c	2 620.33±269.73 e	2.00±0.07 cd
T2	869.18±46.85 c	108.76±7.69 c	1.62±0.12 b	3 289.33±238.71 b	4 985.67±147.31 c	2.17±0.10 ab
T3	1 376.71±75.05 a	191.75±7.65 a	2.51±0.17 a	3 444.00±256.29 b	5 015.33±333.68 b	2.27±0.07 a
T4	1 166.23±46.20 b	156.07±9.30 b	1.67±0.08 b	4 142.33±262.80 a	6 690.67±221.89 a	2.24±0.06 ab
T5	881.88±62.19 c	145.81±10.87 b	1.34±0.08 c	3 448.00±301.38 b	5 212.33±159.76 b	2.09±0.10 bc

不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响

Effects of different carrier bacterial fertilizers on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and soil nutrients of Amorpha fruticosa

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 42

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 王宇浩, 陈美玲, 李涛, 刘孝武, 周悦湘, 孙连浩, 廖艺. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 90-98.
[2]	武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 99-107.
[3]	王改萍, 章雷, 曹福亮, 丁延朋, 赵群, 赵慧琴, 王峥. 红蓝光质对银杏苗木生长生理特性及黄酮积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 105-112.
[4]	赵晓龙, 沈家怡, 刘涛, 吴家胜, 胡渊渊. 当年和越年生香榧叶片的光合效率及抗氧化特性的季节性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 45-50.
[5]	魏静, 谭星, 王昌盛, 闫瑞, 李林珂, 宁月, 刘芸. 引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 97-105.
[6]	梁文超, 步行, 罗思谦, 谢寅峰, 胡加玲, 张往祥. 施肥对增温促花后‘长寿冠’海棠叶片生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 114-120.
[7]	魏亚娟, 郭靖, 党晓宏, 解云虎, 汪季, 李小乐, 吴慧敏. 吉兰泰荒漠绿洲过渡带不同生境下白刺灌丛沙堆形态特征与影响机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 172-180.
[8]	贾瑞瑞, 祝艳艳, 杨秀莲, 付钰, 岳远征, 王良桂. 不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 97-106.
[9]	贺坤, 王俊洁, 王本耀, 朱海军, 奉树成. 上海市行道树土壤肥力特征及其空间分布[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 164-172.
[10]	徐子涵, 王磊, 崔明, 刘玉国, 赵紫晴, 李嘉豪. 南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 173-181.
[11]	张银凤, 蔡洪月, 彭金根, 刘学军, 谢利娟, 张华, 王艳梅. 深圳城市公园不同栽植环境对毛棉杜鹃生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 197-204.
[12]	孔鑫, 王爱英, 郝广友, 宁秋蕊, 王淼, 殷笑寒, 周永姣. 水曲柳幼苗水力结构和光合生理对光强梯度变化的耦合响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 83-91.
[13]	李振双, 王倩, 朱媛, 杨富成, 梁俊峰, 陆俊锟. 外源信号物质对檀香幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 271-278.
[14]	苑景淇, 于忠亮, 兰雪涵, 李成宏, 田年军, 杜凤国. 遮阴对濒危植物朝鲜崖柏光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 58-66.
[15]	田梦阳, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰, 汤文华, 季艳红. 4个薄壳山核桃品种的光合特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 67-74.