六个蓝莓品种不同发育期果实糖代谢相关特征比较分析

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202410028

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (3): 73-82.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202410028

• 专题报道Ⅱ：乡村全面振兴视域下蓝莓优新品种培育研究 • 上一篇下一篇

六个蓝莓品种不同发育期果实糖代谢相关特征比较分析

杨海燕¹(), 吴雅琼¹^,^*(), 张春红¹, 闾连飞¹, 吴文龙¹, 魏林潇², 李维林²^,^*()

1.江苏省中国科学院植物研究所(南京中山植物园), 江苏省植物资源保护与利用重点实验室,江苏南京 210014
2.南京林业大学林草学院,南方现代林业协同创新中心,林木遗传育种全国重点实验室,江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2024-10-28 接受日期:2025-03-06 出版日期:2025-05-30 发布日期:2025-05-27
通讯作者: *吴雅琼(ya_qiong@126.com),副研究员,负责试验设计指导;
李维林(wlli@njfu.edu.cn),教授,负责选题及论文修改。
作者简介:
杨海燕(haiyanyang_025@126.com),副研究员。
基金资助:
江苏省种业振兴揭榜挂帅项目(JBGS[2021]021)

A comparative analysis of sugar metabolism-related characteristics in different development stage fruits of six blueberry cultivars

YANG Haiyan¹(), WU Yaqiong¹^,^*(), ZHANG Chunhong¹, LYU Lianfei¹, WU Wenlong¹, WEI Linxiao², LI Weilin²^,^*()

1. Institute of Botany, Jiangsu Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences,Nanjing Botanical Garden Mem. Sun Yat-Sen, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Plant Resources, Nanjing 210014, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry and Grassland, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2024-10-28 Accepted:2025-03-06 Online:2025-05-30 Published:2025-05-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】分析蓝莓(Vaccinum spp.)果实发育过程中糖及其他品质指标的变化特点,探讨蓝莓果实发育过程中糖类物质积累的潜在机制,为品质改良提供理论依据。【方法】以6个蓝莓品种不同发育阶段的果实为研究对象,对其外观参数、抗氧化指标、品质指标、糖转运蛋白基因的表达,以及糖的组分和含量进行测定,并采用Pearson模型进行各指标间的相关性分析。【结果】随着果实的发育,各品种果实逐渐增大,颜色逐渐加深,在紫果期(S3),6个蓝莓品种中,‘莱克西’的单果质量和横径最大,‘中植2号’最小;在紫果期(S3)‘莱克西’的颜色指标L值最大,a^*和b^*值最小。随着果实的发育, $O 2 · -$ 的产生速率和丙二醛(MDA)含量逐渐上升,H₂O₂含量(除‘中植4号’外)和超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性均先降后升,过氧化物酶(POD)活性逐渐增加;可溶性固形物和花色苷含量逐渐上升,黄酮含量逐渐下降,鞣花酸含量先降后升,其中‘中植4号’紫果期的可溶性固形物和花色苷含量最高;3个VcSWEETs基因的表达具有明显的品种特异性和发育阶段依赖性;蔗糖、葡萄糖、果糖和总糖含量持续增加,其中葡萄糖含量在各阶段均较低,在S3时期,除‘中植1号’外总糖质量分数均大于200 mg/g。【结论】随着果实的发育,糖含量逐渐增加,S3时期‘莱克西’的总糖含量最高,其次是‘中植2号’和‘中植4号’;果实的增大、花色苷含量和POD活性的增加,以及VcSWEET1基因的上调表达均有利于糖积累。

关键词: 蓝莓, 果实发育, 糖代谢, 果实品质, 基因调控

Abstract:

【Objective】The purpose of this study is to understand the changes in sugar and other quality indexes during fruit development, to explore the potential mechanism of carbohydrate accumulation during blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) fruit development, and to establish a theoretical foundation for blueberry quality enhancement.【Method】Fruits of six blueberry cultivars at different developmental stages were used as the test materials. The morphological traits (size and color), antioxidant system-related parameters, fruit quality indexes, the expression levels of VcSWEETs genes, and sugar composition and content were determined. The correlation analysis among these parameters was performed using the Pearson correlation model.【Result】With the development of the fruit, the fruits of each cultivar gradually increased in size and deepened in color, of which the ‘Legacy’ cultivar had the largest fruit weight and transverse diameter, and ‘Zhongzhi 2’ had the smallest during the purple fruit stage (S3). In the S3 period, ‘Legacy’ showed peak L value with minimal a^* and b^* values. The generation rate of $O 2 · -$ and MDA content steadily increased, while H₂O₂ content (excluding ‘Zhongzhi 4’) and SOD activity decreased first and then increased, and POD activity gradually increased. Total soluble solids (TSS) and anthocyanin contents gradually increased, flavonoid content gradually decreased, and ellagic acid content initially decreased and then increased. Among them, ‘Zhongzhi 4’ had the highest TSS and anthocyanin content during the S3 period. The expression patterns of three VcSWEETs genes exhibited distinct cultivar specificity and developmental stage dependence. Sucrose, glucose, fructose, and total sugar accumulated continuously, though glucose maintained basal levels. In the S3 period, the total sugar contents of all cultivars were more than 200 mg/g, except for ‘Zhongzhi 1’.【Conclusion】Sugar content increased continually during fruit development, with sucrose and fructose concentrations predominating over glucose. ‘Legacy’ had the greatest total sugar content during the S3 period, followed by ‘Zhongzhi 2’ and ‘Zhongzhi 4’. The expansion of the fruit, the rise in anthocyanin content and POD activity, and the up-regulated expression of the VcSWEET1 gene were significantly correlated with sugar accumulation patterns.

Key words: Vaccinium spp. (blueberry), fruit development, carbohydrate metabolism, fruit quality, gene regulation

中图分类号:

S722

杨海燕,吴雅琼,张春红,等. 六个蓝莓品种不同发育期果实糖代谢相关特征比较分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(3): 73-82.

YANG Haiyan, WU Yaqiong, ZHANG Chunhong, LYU Lianfei, WU Wenlong, WEI Linxiao, LI Weilin. A comparative analysis of sugar metabolism-related characteristics in different development stage fruits of six blueberry cultivars[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 49(3): 73-82.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202410028.

图/表 8

表1

图1

表2

各蓝莓品种不同发育阶段果实的单果质量、横径、纵径以及果实颜色指标的变化"

品种 cultivar	发育阶段 developmental stage	单果质量/g single fruit weight	横径/mm transverse diameter	纵径/mm vertical diameter	颜色指标color index
品种 cultivar	发育阶段 developmental stage	单果质量/g single fruit weight	横径/mm transverse diameter	纵径/mm vertical diameter	L	a^*	b^*
‘中植1号’ ‘Zhongzhi 1’	S1	0.40±0.035 c	9.11±0.29 c	8.16±0.46 b	61.59±2.15 a	-7.49±0.30 c	24.52±1.25 a
	S2	0.83±0.032 b	11.07±0.43 b	8.39±0.20 b	42.73±2.98 b	12.58±0.93 a	-2.27±0.42 b
	S3	2.08±0.041 a	16.18±0.27 a	13.26±0.36 a	37.57±1.64 c	-1.27±0.16 b	-6.07±0.67 c
‘中植2号’ ‘Zhongzhi 2’	S1	0.36±0.015 c	9.27±0.16 c	7.26±0.13 c	63.76±1.98 a	-7.50±0.22 c	24.75±0.93 a
	S2	0.81±0.043 b	10.86±0.25 b	8.67±0.36 b	44.11±1.97 b	9.88±0.70 a	-5.51±0.64 b
	S3	1.29±0.091 a	12.79±0.32 a	10.16±0.59 a	38.18±0.93 c	-1.33±0.19 b	-7.11±0.63 c
‘中植3号’ ‘Zhongzhi 3’	S1	0.41±0.031 c	9.19±0.42 c	8.62±0.35 c	60.38±0.98 a	-7.54±0.53 c	22.29±1.66 a
	S2	0.84±0.040 b	11.22±0.15 b	9.29±0.29 b	40.96±2.21 b	10.18±1.45 a	-2.59±0.50 b
	S3	2.14±0.089 a	16.96±0.36 a	12.65±0.37 a	36.14±1.28 c	-1.28±0.27 b	-4.80±0.54 c
‘中植4号’ ‘Zhongzhi 4’	S1	0.44±0.026 c	9.51±0.22 c	8.65±0.38 c	60.39±1.99 a	-6.94±0.53 c	22.18±1.05 a
	S2	0.89±0.039 b	11.64±0.26 b	9.46±0.32 b	39.85±0.91 b	8.49±1.02 a	-3.79±0.66 b
	S3	2.00±0.070 a	16.04±0.15 a	13.41±0.50 a	37.89±0.79 b	-1.34±0.30 b	-6.96±0.38 c
‘瑞卡’ ‘Reka’	S1	0.42±0.025 c	9.46±0.35 c	8.14±0.60 c	56.50±1.52 a	-8.44±0.33 c	25.54±1.37 a
	S2	0.97±0.046 b	11.61±0.16 b	9.46±0.38 b	38.96±1.11 b	18.33±1.10 a	3.31±0.24 b
	S3	1.46±0.085 a	13.98±0.33 a	10.64±0.35 a	34.36±0.80 c	-1.62±0.30 b	-5.78±0.54 c
‘莱克西’ ‘Legacy’	S1	0.59±0.042 c	10.88±0.48 c	9.31±0.68 c	61.31±1.81 a	-6.92±0.32 c	21.49±1.65 a
	S2	1.77±0.055 b	15.30±0.17 b	10.90±0.30 b	45.18±2.02 b	12.08±1.09 a	-2.21±0.23 b
	S3	2.79±0.135 a	17.91±0.35 a	12.79±0.57 a	40.97±0.95 c	-1.79±0.30 b	-7.34±0.67 c

表2

图2

表3

图3

表4

图4

参考文献 25

[1]	徐艺格, 王兴东, 刘有春, 等. 蓝莓产业现状及技术发展趋势分析与展望[J]. 北方园艺, 2024(8):130-136.
	XU Y G, WANG X D, LIU Y C, et al. Analysis and prospect of blueberries industry status and technology development trend[J]. Northern Horticulture, 2024(8):130-136.DOI:10.11937/bfyy.20232984.
[2]	ZHANG C H, LI J, WANG J L, et al. Fruit quality and metabolomic analyses of fresh food accessions provide insights into the key carbohydrate metabolism in blueberry[J]. Plants, 2023, 12(18):3200.DOI: 10.3390/plants12183200.
[3]	李双双, 王德炉, 赵迪. 水肥耦合对蓝莓树体生长及果实品质的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2017, 35(3):234-238,250.
	LI S S, WANG D L, ZHAO D. Effects of water-fertilizer coupling on growth and fruit quality of blueberry trees[J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2017, 35(3):234-238,250.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2017.03.037.
[4]	XU J Y, ZHAO Y H, ZHANG X, et al. Transcriptome analysis and ultrastructure observation reveal that hawthorn fruit softening is due to cellulose/hemicellulose degradation[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016,7:1524.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01524.
[5]	SMRKE T, VEBERIC R, HUDINA M, et al. Fruit quality and yield of three highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) cultivars grown in two planting systems under different protected environments[J]. Horticulturae, 2021, 7(12):591.DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae7120591.
[6]	ZHANG S H, WANG H, WANG T, et al. Abscisic acid and regulation of the sugar transporter gene MdSWEET9b promote apple sugar accumulation[J]. Plant Physiology, 2023, 192(3):2081-2101.DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiad119.
[7]	王爱国, 罗广华. 植物的超氧物自由基与羟胺反应的定量关系[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1990, 26(6):55-57.
	WANG A G, LUO G H. Quantitative relation between the reaction of hydroxylamine and superoxide anion radicals in plants[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 1990, 26(6):55-57.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.1990.06.031.
[8]	HODGES D M, DELONG J M, FORNEY C F, et al. Improving the thiobarbituric acid-reactive-substances assay for estimating lipid peroxidation in plant tissues containing anthocyanin and other interfering compounds[J]. Planta, 1999, 207(4):604-611.DOI: 10.1007/s004250050524.
[9]	STEWART R R, BEWLEY J D. Lipid peroxidation associated with accelerated aging of soybean axes[J]. Plant Physiology, 1980, 65(2):245-248.DOI: 10.1104/pp.65.2.245.
[10]	PODGÓRSKA A, GIECZEWSKA K, LUKAWSKA-KUZMA K, et al. Long-term ammonium nutrition of Arabidopsis increases the extrachloroplastic NAD(P)H/NAD(P)+ ratio and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species level in leaves but does not impair photosynthetic capacity[J]. Plant,Cell & Environment, 2013, 36(11):2034-2045.DOI: 10.1111/pce.12113.
[11]	CHENG G W, BREEN P J. Activity of phenylalanine ammonialyase (PAL) and concentrations of anthocyanins and phenolics in developing strawberry fruit[J]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1991, 116(5):865-869.DOI: 10.21273/jashs.116.5.865.
[12]	MAAS J L, WANG S Y, GALLETTA G J. Evaluation of strawberry cultivars for ellagic acid content[J]. HortScience, 1991, 26(1):66-68.DOI: 10.21273/hortsci.26.1.66.
[13]	YANG H, WU Y Q, ZHANG C H, et al. Comprehensive resistance evaluation of 15 blueberry cultivars under high soil pH stress based on growth phenotype and physiological traits[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022,13:1072621.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1072621.
[14]	NGUYEN C T T, LEE J H, TRAN P T. Accumulation of sugars and associated gene expression in highbush blueberries differ by cultivar,ripening stage,and storage temperature[J]. Journal of Berry Research, 2021, 11(3):511-527.DOI: 10.3233/jbr-210748.
[15]	CHEN C, WU X M, PAN L, et al. Effects of exogenous α-naphthaleneacetic acid and 24-epibrassinolide on fruit size and assimilate metabolism-related sugars and enzyme activities in giant pumpkin[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(21):13157.DOI: 10.3390/ijms232113157.
[16]	严志祥, 杨海燕, 樊苏帆, 等. 黑莓果实发育过程中蔗糖磷酸合成酶基因的表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(1):179-186.
	YAN Z X, YANG H Y, FAN S F, et al. Analysis of the expression of sucrose phosphate synthase genes during the development of blackberry fruit[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46(1):179-186.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007067.
[17]	HARA M, OKI K, HOSHINO K, et al. Enhancement of anthocyanin biosynthesis by sugar in radish (Raphanus sativus) hypocotyl[J]. Plant Science, 2003, 164(2):259-265.DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00408-9.
[18]	张琼, 王红清, 冷平, 等. 草莓果实发育过程中花色苷和黄酮醇类物质的形成机制[J]. 园艺学报, 2008, 35(12):1735-1741.
	ZHANG Q, WANG H Q, LENG P, et al. Mechanism of anthocyanins and flavonols in fruit development of straw-berries[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2008, 35(12):1735-1741.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2008.12.003.
[19]	SHOJAEE F M, KAZEMI E M, NOSRATI H, et al. Evaluation of phytochemicals and the role of oxidative stress pathways during fruit development in strawberries (Fragaria × Ananassa)[J]. Turkish Journal of Botany, 2023, 47(5):342-352.DOI: 10.55730/1300-008x.2772.
[20]	梁文超, 步行, 罗思谦, 等. 氮磷钾复合肥对增温促花后‘长寿冠’海棠生理特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(5):81-88.
	LIANG W C, BU X, LUO S Q, et al. Effects of nitrogen,phosphorus and potassium compound fertilization on the physiological characteristics of Chaenomeles speciosa ‘Changshouguan’ after processing of warming in the post floral stage[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2022, 46(5):81-88.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202109025.
[21]	SADDHE A A, MANUKA R, PENNA S. Plant sugars:homeostasis and transport under abiotic stress in plants[J]. Physiologia Plantarum, 2021, 171(4):739-755.DOI: 10.1111/ppl.13283.
[22]	IM S E, NAM T G, LEE H, et al. Anthocyanins in the ripe fruits of Rubus coreanus Miquel and their protective effect on neuronal PC-12 cells[J]. Food Chemistry, 2013, 139(1/2/3/4):604-610.DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.12.057.
[23]	FLORES G, RUIZ DEL CASTILLO M L. Variations in ellagic acid,quercetin and myricetin in berry cultivars after preharvest methyl jasmonate treatments[J]. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 2015, 39:55-61.DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2014.11.007.
[24]	HU X B, LI S J, LIN X H, et al. Transcription factor CitERF16 is involved in citrus fruit sucrose accumulation by activating CitSWEET11d[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021,12:809619.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.809619.
[25]	王鸿梅, 张召聪, 刘坤, 等. 植物SWEET基因及其糖转运功能研究进展[J]. 河北科技大学学报, 2024, 45(4):406-414.
	WANG H M, ZHANG Z C, LIU K, et al. SWEET genes responsible for sugar transport in plant:a review[J]. Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology, 2024, 45(4):406-414.DOI: 10.7535/hbkd.2024yx04007.

基因名称 genes name	基因号 gene ID	正向引物 forward primer(5'-3')	反向引物 reverse primer(5'-3')
VcSWEET1	gene-Vadar_018683	CTATCTTGCTCCAGTGCCAACATT	AGAGGGTCACGGTCAACATCC
VcSWEET2	gene-Vadar_022532	GGTGTCTAAGTAGTGCTGCTCTT	AGAAGGCTGAACTCATCAAGAAGG
VcSWEET3	gene-Vadar_011068	TGTTCTTCTGTGGCACCTCCT	CATCTCTAACGACCTGTTGGCATT
GAPDH	内参基因reference gene	GGTTATCAATGATAGGTTTGGCA	CAGTCCTTGCTTGATGGACC

品种 cultivar	发育阶段 developmental stage	可溶性固形物质量分数/% soluble solid content	花色苷质量分数/(×10^-2 mg·g^-1) anthocyanin content	黄酮质量分数/ (mg·g^-1) flavonoid content	鞣花酸质量分数/ (mg·g^-1) ellagic acid content
‘中植1号’ ‘Zhongzhi 1’	S1	8.70±0.27 c	—	0.99±0.01 a	1.41±0.11 a
	S2	10.00±0.10 b	40.62±2.59 b	0.83±0.01 b	0.80±0.03 b
	S3	11.37±0.40 a	118.04±11.70 a	0.71±0.04 c	0.94±0.02 b
‘中植2号’ ‘Zhongzhi 2’	S1	8.80±010 c	—	1.18±0.04 a	1.88±0.13 a
	S2	10.73±0.25 b	44.17±0.43 b	0.76±0.02 b	0.74±0.04 c
	S3	12.57±0.06 a	149.04±12.22 a	0.53±0.05 c	1.33±0.03 b
‘中植3号’ ‘Zhongzhi 3’	S1	8.97±0.32 c	—	0.98±0.07 a	1.56±0.17 a
	S2	11.20±020 b	35.46±1.34 b	0.78±0.01 b	0.81±0.04 b
	S3	13.77±0.32 a	152.76±12.91 a	0.59±0.01 c	1.05±0.01 b
‘中植4号’ ‘Zhongzhi 4’	S1	9.20±0.20 c	—	0.92±0.04 a	0.94±0.03 b
	S2	10.83±0.06 b	40.70±1.32 b	0.70±0.04 b	0.70±0.04 c
	S3	14.00±0.32 a	185.64±5.40 a	0.56±0.03 c	1.25±0.08 a
‘瑞卡’ ‘Reka’	S1	7.93±0.31 c	—	0.82±0.03 a	1.44±0.21 a
	S2	9.13±0.25 b	36.32±2.88 b	0.56±0.01 b	0.75±0.03 c
	S3	11.93±0.15 a	101.99±2.92 a	0.42±0.03 c	1.12±0.04 b
‘莱克西’ ‘Legacy’	S1	8.50±0.10 c	—	0.90±0.03 a	1.04±0.07 b
	S2	12.17±0.25 b	36.59±1.95 b	0.62±0.02 b	0.70±0.01 c
	S3	13.97±0.06 a	109.64±4.25 a	0.49±0.03 c	1.41±0.05 a

品种 cultivar	发育阶段 developmental stage	蔗糖质量分数/ (mg·g^-1) sucrose content	葡萄糖质量分数/ (mg·g^-1) glucose content	果糖质量分数/ (mg·g^-1) fructose content	总糖质量分数/ (mg·g^-1) total sugar content
‘中植1号’ ‘Zhongzhi 1’	S1	21.71±0.93 c	9.55±0.28 c	28.60±1.23 c	59.86±1.05 a
	S2	49.01±1.73 b	20.44±0.75 b	44.85±2.17 b	114.30±4.57 b
	S3	69.37±2.34 a	32.09±2.45 a	61.19±1.67 a	162.65±2.28 c
‘中植2号’ ‘Zhongzhi 2’	S1	28.63±0.64 c	9.22±0.92 c	31.47±2.41 c	69.32±3.00 a
	S2	66.89±0.77 b	27.69±1.74 b	52.58±2.20 b	147.16±3.18 b
	S3	113.58±9.00 a	43.47±2.64 a	73.92±2.97 a	230.97±9.13 c
‘中植3号’ ‘Zhongzhi 3’	S1	43.48±3.27 c	14.10±0.18 c	40.33±0.33 c	97.91±2.91 a
	S2	84.46±4.07 b	27.64±1.42 b	60.63±3.51 b	172.73±6.26 b
	S3	114.11±1.43 a	37.76±0.53 a	74.40±7.37 a	226.27±6.36 c
‘中植4号’ ‘Zhongzhi 4’	S1	29.64±1.73 c	12.29±0.32 c	25.84±4.04 c	67.77±3.50 a
	S2	66.90±2.61 b	27.52±0.27 b	47.59±4.18 b	142.01±1.37 b
	S3	115.88±1.99 a	39.13±1.86 a	69.12±3.23 a	224.13±2.82 c
‘瑞卡’ ‘Reka’	S1	28.64±1.73 c	10.59±0.70 c	30.47±2.65 c	69.70±2.05 a
	S2	73.72±0.59 b	25.58±0.94 b	52.22±2.10 b	151.52±1.97 b
	S3	109.92±3.64 a	38.49±1.24 a	69.01±1.04 a	217.42±2.69 c
‘莱克西’ ‘Legacy’	S1	38.20±3.55 c	11.61±1.16 c	30.77±3.79 c	80.58±1.38 a
	S2	95.50±2.77 b	32.29±1.47 b	59.42±1.04 b	187.21±0.96 b
	S3	123.65±2.74 a	42.93±0.98 a	76.51±1.35 a	243.09±4.84 c

六个蓝莓品种不同发育期果实糖代谢相关特征比较分析

A comparative analysis of sugar metabolism-related characteristics in different development stage fruits of six blueberry cultivars

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	张春红, 吴雅琼, 闾连飞, 王小敏, 吴文龙, 李维林. 蓝莓新品种‘中植3号’和‘中植4号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(3): 267-269.
[2]	李学铃, 刘英, 吴文龙, 闾连飞, 张春红, 李维林, 曹福亮. 不同倍性蓝莓杂交组合的结实特性及果实感官品质研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(3): 41-51.
[3]	赵慧芳, 赵俸艺, 刘洪霞, 吴文龙, 吴雅琼, 李维林. 蓝莓46个品种的果实特性分析及综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(3): 52-62.
[4]	赵俸艺, 樊苏帆, 赵慧芳, 刘洪霞, 闾连飞, 吴文龙, 吴雅琼, 李维林. 高花色苷蓝莓品种果实品质分析与比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(3): 63-72.
[5]	李雨嫣, 敖妍, 赵磊磊, 徐向银, 陈育红, 娜日苏. 文冠果果实生长发育与内含物变化规律[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 31-37.
[6]	魏绪英, 张瑶, 马美霞, 姜雪茹, 陈慧婷, 吴靖, 杨玉, 蔡军火. 石蒜年生长周期内NSC及其代谢酶活性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 106-114.
[7]	程文强, 徐阳, 吴开云, 赵献民, 龚榜初. 3种综合评价方法在柿果品质评价中的应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 61-72.
[8]	樊瑶羽薇, 仁增朗加, 董建梅, 任媛, 葛大朋, 招雪晴, 苑兆和. 西藏野生石榴果实重要性状与综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 73-80.
[9]	宋泽君, 李培培, 袁斓方, 郭小兰, 王德炉. 土壤含水率对蓝莓叶片生理及果实品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 147-156.
[10]	唐敏, 杨开宇, 张赛男, 陈利英, 刘洋, 张雪梅, 齐国辉. 硒对核桃种仁抗氧化酶活性及果实品质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 127-134.
[11]	吴叶娇, 高源, 曹成亮, 蒋瑀霁, 闾连飞, 吴文龙, 蒋继宏, 朱泓, 李荣鹏. 不同蓝莓品种根际phoD基因相关土壤解磷细菌群落结构分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 95-102.
[12]	严志祥, 杨海燕, 樊苏帆, 吴文龙, 闾连飞, 李维林. 黑莓果实发育过程中蔗糖磷酸合成酶基因的表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 179-186.
[13]	王爱斌, 宋慧芳, 张流洋, 张明, 杨诗雯, 张凌云. 生物肥和菌肥对蓝莓苗生长及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 63-70.
[14]	杨海燕, 吴文龙, 闾连飞, 张春红, 黄正金, 王小敏, 赵慧芳, 李维林. 蓝莓新品种‘寨选7号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 227-228.
[15]	王小敏, 吴文龙, 闾连飞, 张春红, 杨海燕, 黄正金, 赵慧芳, 李维林. 蓝莓新品种‘寨选4号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 225-226.