基于层次分析法对柳树观赏性及适应性的综合评价

郭佳惠, 教忠意, 何旭东, 诸葛强, 周洁

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 169-176.

PDF(1557 KB)
PDF(1557 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 169-176. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202106002
研究论文

基于层次分析法对柳树观赏性及适应性的综合评价

作者信息 +

A comprehensive evaluation of ornamental characteristics and adaptability of willows based on analytic hierarchy processes

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

目的 对柳树落叶后枝条颜色、观赏性状、适应性、育性等进行综合评价,为观赏柳树种质资源筛选和新品种选育提供参考依据。方法 选择20个枝条颜色丰富的柳树无性系作为试验材料,根据层次分析法(AHP),设置观赏性、适应性2个目标层,在此基础上设置11个因子层,对各指标进行量化打分,确定各评价指标的权重值和赋值,初步建立基于柳树枝条皮色、树形、育性等的观赏性状和保存率、萌芽性等适应性的评价层次结构模型,以筛选出观赏性状优良、适应性好的柳树新品种。结果 因子层中各指标对总目标的权重大小排序为:主干颜色(F3)>小枝颜色(F4)>株高(F1)>雌雄花的育性(F7)>抗病性(F9)>生长保存率(F8)>干型(F2)>萌芽早晚(F10)>分枝数(F6)>分枝角度(F5)>开花早晚(F11)。主干颜色(F3)、小枝颜色(F4)、株高(F1)对柳树的观赏性贡献较大,权重值分别为0.281 3、0.193 0、0.127 7,是综合评价柳树观赏性状的主要指标。参试无性系中,宫布氏柳77、78、85、80观赏价值高,可选为红黄色系彩枝柳树品种。结论 本研究对宫布氏柳、杞柳、黄花柳、钻石柳、花叶柳、欧洲红皮柳等优良柳树无性系进行综合评价,利用层次分析法构建结构模型,筛选的优良彩枝柳树对观赏柳树的品种选育及遗传改良可提供重要参考价值。

Abstract

【Objective】The color of willow branches is diverse, but the branches of cultivated willows are dark in winter, and the floating catkins, while necessary for reproduction, are troublesome to handle. Therefore, the comprehensive evaluation of ornamental traits, such as branch color after leaves have fallen, adaptability, and fertility, serves as an important basis for the selection of ornamental willow germplasm resources and the selection of new varieties. 【Method】 Twenty willow clones with various branch colors and ornamental values were selected as experimental materials. According to the analytic hierarchy process, two target layers were set: ornamental and adaptability. On this basis, 11 factor layers were set up. Indicators were scored quantitatively, and the weight value and assignment of each evaluation indicator were determined. The preliminary establishment of the evaluation hierarchy model (based on differences in observation characteristics such as stem type, branch color, fertility, adaptability, preservation rate, and germination) was used to evaluate new willow clones with stable ornamental characteristics and good adaptability in Yancheng City, Jiangsu Province, China.【Result】 The weight ranking of each index in the factor layer to the total target was as follows: trunk color (F3)> twig color (F4)> plant height (F1)> catkin fertility (F7)> disease and insect resistance index (F9)> growth preservation rate (F8)> stem style (F2)> germination time (F10)> branch number (F6)> branch angle (F5)> flowering time (F11). Trunk color (F3), twig color (F4), and plant height (F1) contributed significantly to the ornamental properties of willow clones, with weights of 0.281 3, 0.193 0, and 0.127 7, respectively; these are the main indicators for the comprehensive evaluation of ornamental traits. The results showed that Salix miyabeana 78, 77, 85 and 80 clones can be selected as red-yellow color-branched willow clones, which have high ornamental values.【Conclusion】 In this study, we used the analytic hierarchy process to construct a structural model to comprehensively evaluate superior willow clones such as Salix miyabeana, S. integra, S. caprea, S. eriocephala, S. integra, S. integra ‘Hakuro Nishiki’, and S. purpurea. The selected colorful willow trees have an important reference basis for the genetic improvement of ornamental willow clones.

关键词

灌木柳 / 观赏性状 / 层次分析法 / 宫布氏柳 / 钻石柳

Key words

shrub willow / ornamental characteristic / analytic hierarchy process / Salix miyabeana / Salix eriocephala

引用本文

导出引用
郭佳惠, 教忠意, 何旭东, . 基于层次分析法对柳树观赏性及适应性的综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2021, 45(6): 169-176 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202106002
GUO Jiahui, JIAO Zhongyi, HE Xudong, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of ornamental characteristics and adaptability of willows based on analytic hierarchy processes[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(6): 169-176 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202106002
中图分类号: S687;S718   

参考文献

[1]
王战. 中国植物志:第20卷第2分册[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1984.
WANG Z. Flora of China: Volume 20, Sub-Volume 2 [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1984.
[2]
潘明建. 柳树的遗传改良及栽培技术[J]. 林业科技开发, 2004, 18(3):3-7.
PAN M J. Genetic improvement and cultivation technique of Salix[J]. China For Sci Technol, 2004, 18(3):3-7.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2004.03.001.
[3]
施士争, 王红玲, 周洁. 观赏柳树资源多样性及应用展望[J]. 林业科技开发, 2015, 29(2):1-6.
SHI S Z, WANG H L, ZHOU J. Diversity and application prospect of ornamental willow resources[J]. China For Sci Technol, 2015, 29(2):1-6.DOI: 10.13360/j.issn.1000-8101.2015.02.001.
[4]
刘兆刚, 李凤日. 樟子松人工林树冠内一级枝条空间的分布规律[J]. 林业科学, 2007, 43(10):19-27.
LIU Z G, LI F R. Modeling of spatial distribution of primary branches within the crowns of Pinus sylvestris stands[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2007, 43(10):19-27.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2007.10.004.
[5]
张莉. 植物内源激素对杨树枝条分枝角度的影响[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2016.
ZHANG L. The effect of endogenous hormones on the branch angle of poplar[D]. Taian:Shandong Agricultural University, 2016.
[6]
刘丽. 基于叶、枝特性的柳树观赏性评判及倍性鉴定研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2016.
LIU L. Ornamental evaluation of willow based on leaf and branch characteristics and identification of ploidy[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2016.
[7]
SAATY T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York: Mcgraw Hill Inc., 1980: 298-305.
[8]
SURYANANARAYANA R M. Indian laburnum: an ornamental avenue tree[J]. Indian Horticulture, 1996(40):25.
[9]
臧德奎, 金荷仙, 于东明. 我国植物专类园的起源与发展[J]. 中国园林, 2007, 23(6):62-65.
ZANG D K, JIN H X, YU D M. The origin and development of special categorized plants gardens in China[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2007, 23(6):62-65.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2007.06.019.
[10]
熊亚运, 夏文通, 王晶, 等. 基于观赏价值和种球再利用的郁金香品种综合评价与筛选[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2015, 37(1):107-114.
XIONG Y Y, XIA W T, WANG J, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and screening of tulip cultivars based on their ornamental value and reuse of bulbs[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2015, 37(1):107-114.DOI: 10.13332/j.cnki.jbfu.2015.01.010.
[11]
吴燕燕, 白岳峰, 林夏斌, 等. 武夷山地区观赏荷花品种引种价值综合评价[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(1):106-113.
WU Y Y, BAI Y F, LIN X B, et al. Evaluation of the introduction value of ornamental Lotus varieties in Wuyishan[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2016, 36(1):106-113.DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.01.018.
[12]
杨祎凡, 周婷, 范俊俊, 等. 基于切花应用的观赏海棠品种评价与筛选[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(4):70-76.
YANG Y F, ZHOU T, FAN J J, et al. Cultivar evaluation and selection in ornamental crabapple for cut flower application[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(4):70-76.
[13]
马婉茹, 房伟民, 王海滨, 等. 多头切花菊品种茎、枝特性评价体系构建与品种评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(14):2515-2524.
MA W R, FANG W M, WANG H B, et al. Establishment of appraisal system for the stem and branch characteristics and varieties evaluation of spray cut Chrysanthemum[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2019, 52(14):2515-2524.DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.14.010.
[14]
宋兴荣, 袁蒲英, 何相达, 等. AHP法构建不同用途蜡梅品种评价体系研究[J]. 中国园林, 2020, 36(S1):55-59.
SONG X R, YUAN P Y, HE X D, et al. Study on constructing evaluation system of wintersweet varieties for different uses[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2020, 36(S1):55-59.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2020.S1.0055.
[15]
禹霖, 严佳文, 李建挥, 等. 长沙地区18个桃花品种的观赏性评价[J]. 经济林研究, 2021, 39(1):191-200.
YU L, YAN J W, LI J H, et al. Investigation and comprehensive evaluation on ornamental characters of flowering peach cultivars in Changsha[J]. Non Wood For Res, 2021, 39(1):191-200.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2021.01.023.
[16]
邵锋, 宁惠娟, 包志毅, 等. 城市道路植物景观综合评价模型构建与应用[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(5):111-114,128.
SHAO F, NING H J, BAO Z Y, et al. Construction and application of comprehensive evaluation model of plant landscape for urban roads[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2011, 39(5):111-114,128.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2011.05.040.
[17]
李碧洳, 翁殊斐, 冯嘉仪, 等. 基于AHP法构建龙船花属植物园林应用综合评价体系[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2016, 45(2):167-171.
LI B R, WENG S F, FENG J Y, et al. Establishment of Ixora plants comprehensive assessment model in landscape application using analytic hierarchy process[J]. Subtrop Plant Sci, 2016, 45(2):167-171.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2016.02.015.
[18]
赵焕臣, 和金生, 许树柏. 层次分析法在科技管理中的应用[J]. 科学学与科学技术管理, 1985, 6(6):23-25.
ZHAO H C, HE J S, XU S B. Application of analytic hierarchy process in science and technology management[J]. Sci Sci Manag S & T, 1985, 6(6):23-25.
[19]
李周园, 刘艳红, 戴腾飞, 等. 应用层次分析法建立北京市引种乔木评价体系[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010, 32(S1):100-104.
LI Z Y, LIU Y H, DAI T F, et al. Evaluation system for exotic trees in Beijing with the analytic hierarchy process[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2010, 32(S1):100-104.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2010.s1.030.
[20]
刘孟霞, 张延龙, 牛立新, 等. 运用层次-关联分析法综合评价加拿大引种草本花卉[J]. 西北农业学报, 2009, 18(4):261-266.
LIU M X, ZHANG Y L, NIU L X, et al. The comprehensive evaluation of the ornamental flower plants introduced from Canada by the application of hierarchy-relation analysis[J]. Acta Agric Boreali Occidentalis Sin, 2009, 18(4):261-266.
[21]
芦建国, 杜毅. 层次分析法在高速公路缀花草地评价中的应用[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 34(3):161-164.
LU J G, DU Y. Application of analytic hierarchy process for evaluating flower meadow in expressway greening[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2010, 34(3):161-164.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2010.03.033.
[22]
蒋艾平, 刘军, 姜景民, 等. 基于层次分析法的乐东拟单性木兰优良种源选择[J]. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(1):50-54.
JIANG A P, LIU J, JIANG J M, et al. Excellent provenance selection of Parakmeria latungensis by analytic hierarchy process[J]. For Res, 2015, 28(1):50-54.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2015.01.008.
[23]
董筱昀, 黄利斌, 蒋泽平, 等. 基于层次分析法榉树无性系生长特性综合评价[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2019, 46(3):34-38.
DONG X Y, HUANG L B, JIANG Z P, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of growth characteristics of beech clones based on analytic hierarchy process[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol, 2019, 46(3):34-38.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2019.03.008.
[24]
宛谓敏, 刘秀珍. 中国物候观测方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979.
WAN W M, LIU X Z. Phenological observation methods in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1979.
[25]
戴中武, 沈立明, 吴小倩, 等. 基于层次分析法对十六种独蒜兰属植物观赏价值综合评价[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(5):73-79.
DAI Z W, SHEN L M, WU X Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on the ornamental value of sixteen Pleione species based on AHP method[J]. North Hortic, 2020(5):73-79.DOI: 10.11937/bfyy.20191504.
[26]
费英杰. 柳树优良无性系在北京地区的观赏和用材价值评价[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2014.
FEI Y J. The ornamental and timber value evaluation of willow excellent clones in Beijing[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2014.
[27]
林秋金, 林秀香, 苏金强, 等. 16种野牡丹科植物观赏性及适应性综合评价[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2010, 30(5):33-37.
LIN Q J, LIN X X, SU J Q, et al. Comprehensive appraisal on ornamental characteristics and adaptability of plants in family Melastomataceae[J]. J Southwest For Coll, 2010, 30(5):33-37.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2010.05.008.
[28]
苏梓莹, 李斓, 张茜莹, 等. 广东省特有兰科植物观赏性状综合评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2020, 41(8):1560-1565.
SU Z Y, LI L, ZHANG X Y, et al. Ornamental evaluation of endemic orchids from Guangdong Province[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2020, 41(8):1560-1565.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.08.008.
[29]
张少伟, 翟飞飞, 费英杰, 等. 8个柳树无性系的观赏价值与适应性研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2017, 37(4):41-46.
ZHANG S W, ZHAI F F, FEI Y J, et al. Ornamental value and adaptability of 8 willow clones[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2017, 37(4):41-46.DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2017.04.007.

基金

江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目(CX203042)
江苏省林业科技创新与推广项目(LYKJ[2020]03)

编辑: 王国栋

版权

版权所有,未经授权,不得转载、摘编本刊文章,不得使用本刊的版式设计。
PDF(1557 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/