采样间隔对城市表土剖面磁化率变化的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203060

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 61-69.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203060

所属专题：山水林田湖草一体化保护和生态修复——土壤侵蚀修复研究

• 专题报道Ⅱ：山水林田湖草一体化保护和生态修复——土壤侵蚀修复研究（执行主编张金池） • 上一篇下一篇

采样间隔对城市表土剖面磁化率变化的影响

陈明(), 刘亮()

南京林业大学林草学院、水土保持学院,南方现代林业协同创新中心, 江苏省水土保持与生态修复重点实验室, 江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2022-03-28 修回日期:2022-07-09 出版日期:2023-11-30 发布日期:2023-11-23
通讯作者: *刘亮(liuliang@njfu.edu.cn), 副研究员。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(42277352);国家自然科学基金项目(41701310)

Study on the effect of urban topsoil sampling interval on the variation pattern of magnetic susceptibility of soil profile

CHEN Ming(), LIU Liang()

College of Forestry and Grassland, College of Soil and Water Conservation, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Jiangsu Province Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Restoration, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2022-03-28 Revised:2022-07-09 Online:2023-11-30 Published:2023-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】探究采样间隔对城市土壤剖面磁化率测量精度的影响,为城市土壤质量研究及评价提供参考。【方法】以南京市及其城郊的典型林地为研究对象,选择4个代表性样地(城郊林场、城内林场、未扰动和扰动道路绿化带),分别采集0~30 cm表层土。以土壤磁化率为主要指标,设置2、5、10、15和30 cm 5种表土采样间隔,分析不同采样间隔下表土质量磁化率和百分比频率磁化率的剖面变化特征。【结果】4个样地剖面土壤低频质量磁化率(χ_lf)变幅为59.2×10^-8~1 210.0×10^-8 m³/kg,峰值出现在5~7 cm土层。各样地土壤剖面低频磁化率基本遵循先增后减和波动变化的情况。经对比,采用精细的采样间隔(如2 cm)可以更好地捕捉土壤磁化率峰值和异常值,从而发现磁性异常累积层。5 cm和10 cm的土壤采样间隔反映了土壤磁化率的大体变化趋势;15 cm的土壤采样间隔则土壤磁化率表现为单调变化;0~30 cm土壤采样间隔的混合土壤样品仅指示各样地表土磁化率的均值。【结论】本研究中,随采样精度的提升,4个样地表土磁化率数据精度逐渐提高,剖面特征逐渐明显。在分析城市表土剖面磁化率的采样过程中,应根据研究目的设置合适的采样间隔,以提高检测数据精度。

关键词: 土壤磁化率, 表土采样, 土壤剖面, 分层样品, 混合样品, 南京市

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study explored the influence of sampling interval on the measurement accuracy of urban soil magnetic susceptibility. 【Method】 Taking typical forest land in Nanjing and its suburbs as the research object, four representative sample plots (suburban forest farms, urban forest farms, undisturbed land and disturbed road green belts) were selected, and 0-30 cm topsoil samples were collected. Taking soil magnetic susceptibility as the main index, five topsoil sampling intervals (2, 5, 10, 15 and 30 cm) were set. The profile variation characteristics of surface soil mass susceptibility and percentage frequency susceptibility at different sampling intervals were analyzed. 【Result】Soil low frequency mass susceptibility (χ_lf) of the four sample plots ranged from 59.2 × 10^-8 to 1 210.0 × 10^-8 m³/kg, with a peak value of 5-7 cm. Low frequency magnetic susceptibility of soil profiles in all plots basically followed the pattern of first increasing and then decreasing and fluctuating. Fine sampling intervals (such as 2 cm) better captured the peak value and abnormal values of soil magnetic susceptibility; the 5 and 10 cm soil sampling intervals reflected the general variation trend of soil magnetic susceptibility; the soil sampling interval of 15 cm showed no detail in the soil magnetic susceptibility changes. Mixed soil samples at 0-30 cm soil sampling intervals only indicated the mean value of magnetic susceptibility of various surface soils. 【Conclusion】 During the sampling process, appropriate sampling intervals should be set according to the research purpose in order to improve the accuracy of experimental data.

Key words: magnetic susceptibility, topsoil sampling, soil profile, profile stratified samples, profile mixed samples, Nanjing City

中图分类号:

S714
X53

陈明,刘亮. 采样间隔对城市表土剖面磁化率变化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 61-69.

CHEN Ming, LIU Liang. Study on the effect of urban topsoil sampling interval on the variation pattern of magnetic susceptibility of soil profile[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(6): 61-69.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203060.

图/表 9

图1

表1

图2

图3

表2

图4

图5

表3

表4

参考文献 45

[1]	代永强, 王联国. 城市表层土壤重金属污染评价[J]. 计算机与现代化, 2019(8):105-111.
	DAI Y Q, WANG L G. Evaluation of surface soil heavy metal pollution in city[J]. Comput Mod, 2019(8):105-111.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-2475.2019.08.019.
[2]	陈秀端, 卢新卫, 杨光. 城市表层土壤磁化率与重金属含量分布的相关性研究[J]. 环境科学, 2013, 34(3):1086-1093.
	CHEN X D, LU X W, YANG G. Correlativity study of the distribution of soil magnetic susceptibility and the heavy metal contents in Xi’an City[J]. Environ Sci, 2013, 34(3):1086-1093.DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.2013.03.036.
[3]	MAGIERA T, JABLONSKA M, STRZYSZCZ Z, et al. Morphological and mineralogical forms of technogenic magnetic particles in industrial dusts[J]. Atmos Environ, 2011, 45(25):4281-4290.DOI:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.076.
[4]	MAGIERA T, LUKASIK A, ZAWADZKI J, et al. Magnetic susceptibility as indicator of anthropogenic disturbances in forest topsoil:a review of magnetic studies carried out in Central European forests[J]. Ecol Indic, 2019, 106:105518.DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105518.
[5]	李晓庆, 胡雪峰, 孙为民, 等. 城市土壤污染的磁学监测研究[J]. 土壤, 2006, 38(1):66-74.
	LI X Q, HU X F, SUN W M, et al. Magnetic techniques used for monitoring urban soil pollution[J]. Soils, 2006, 38(1):66-74.DOI:10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2006.01.012.
[6]	卢升高, 白世强. 杭州城区土壤的磁性与磁性矿物学及其环境意义[J]. 地球物理学报, 2008, 51(3):762-769.
	LU S G, BAI S Q. Magnetic characterization and magnetic mineralogy of the Hangzhou urban soils and its environmental implications[J]. Chin J Geophys, 2008, 51(3):762-769.
[7]	THOMPSON R, OLDFIELD F. Environmental magnetism[M]. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1986. DOI:10.1007/978-94-011-8036-8.
[8]	蔡云锋, 王勇, 庞新坤. 重庆市污染土壤磁化率特征研究[J]. 湖南师范大学自然科学学报, 2014, 37(3):14-18.
	CAI Y F, WANG Y, PANG X K. Study on the characteristics of the magnetic susceptibility of polluted soil in Chongqing[J]. J Nat Sci Hunan Norm Univ, 2014, 37(3):14-18.
[9]	MAGIERA T, STRZYSZCZ Z. Ferrimagnetic minerals of anthropogenic origin in soils of some Polish National Parks[J]. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2000, 124:37-48.DOI:10.1023/A:1005258125921.
[10]	MAHER B A. Magnetic properties of modern soils and Quaternary Loessic Paleosols:paleoclimatic implications[J]. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol, 1998, 137(1/2):25-54.DOI:10.1016/S0031-0182(97)00103-X.
[11]	HELLER F, STRZYSZCZ Z, MAGIERA T. Magnetic record of industrial pollution in forest soils of Upper Silesia,Poland[J]. J Geophys Res, 1998, 103(B8):17767-17774.DOI:10.1029/98jb01667.
[12]	STRZYSZCZ Z, MAGIERA T. Magnetic susceptibility and heavy metals contamination in soils of Southern Poland[J]. Phys Chem Earth, 1998, 23(9/10):1127-1131.DOI:10.1016/S0079-1946(98)00140-2.
[13]	STRZYSZCZ Z, MAGIERA T, HELLER F. The influence of industrial immissions on the magnetic susceptibility of soils in upper Silesia[J]. Stud Geophys Geod, 1996, 40(3):276-286.DOI:10.1007/BF02300743.
[14]	旺罗, 刘东生, 吕厚远. 污染土壤的磁化率特征[J]. 科学通报, 2000, 45(10):1091-1094.
	WANG L, LIU D S, LV H Y. Magnetic susceptibility characteristics of contaminated soil[J]. Chin Sci Bull, 2000, 45(10):1091-1094.
[15]	陈轶楠, 张永清, 张希云, 等. 晋南某钢厂周边土壤重金属与磁化率分布规律及其相关性研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2014, 28(1):85-91.
	CHEN Y N, ZHANG Y Q, ZHANG X Y, et al. Distributions of soil heavy metal elements and magnetic susceptibility and their correlativity around a steel factory in southern Shanxi Province[J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2014, 28(1):85-91.DOI:10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2014.01.014.
[16]	赵庆磊, 李凤全, 王天阳, 等. 金华城区表层土壤剖面磁化率变化规律[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(2):340-344.
	ZHAO Q L, LI F Q, WANG T Y, et al. Research for variation rule of magnetic susceptibility of surface soil in Jinhua City[J]. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2015, 22(2):340-344.DOI:10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2015.02.063.
[17]	LIU Y H, WANG X S, GUO Y H, et al. Association of black carbon with heavy metals and magnetic properties in soils adjacent to a cement plant,Xuzhou (China)[J]. J Appl Geophys, 2019, 170:103802.DOI:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.06.018.
[18]	WANG B, XIA D S, YU Y, et al. Source apportionment of soil-contamination in Baotou City (north China) based on a combined magnetic and geochemical approach[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 642:95-104.DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.050.
[19]	KARIMI A, HAGHNIA G H, AYOUBI S, et al. Impacts of geology and land use on magnetic susceptibility and selected heavy metals in surface soils of Mashhad plain,northeastern Iran[J]. J Appl Geophys, 2017, 138:127-134.DOI:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.01.022.
[20]	王新, 夏敦胜, 王博, 等. 西北干旱区农田土壤磁性特征及其环境意义[J]. 环境科学, 2017, 38(8):3507-3518.
	WANG X, XIA D S, WANG B, et al. Magnetic properties of farmland soils in arid regions in northwest China and their environmental implications[J]. Environ Sci, 2017, 38(8):3507-3518.DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.201701128.
[21]	YANG P G, BYRNE J M, LI H J, et al. Evaluation of semi-arid arable soil heavy metal pollution by magnetic susceptibility in the Linfen Basin of China[J]. Arid Land Res Manag, 2016, 30(3):258-268.DOI:10.1080/15324982.2015.1128013.
[22]	GÓRKA-KOSTRUBIEC B, TEISSEYRE-JELENSKA M, DYTLOW S K. Magnetic properties as indicators of Chernozem soil development[J]. CATENA, 2016, 138:91-102.DOI:10.1016/j.catena.2015.11.014.
[23]	JORDANOVA N, JORDANOVA D, PETROV P. Soil magnetic properties in Bulgaria at a national scale: challenges and benefits[J]. Glob Planet Change, 2016, 137:107-122.DOI:10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.12.015.
[24]	YURTSEVEN-SANDKER A, CIOPPA M T. Tracking the historical traces of soil pollution from an iron-sintering plant by using magnetic susceptibility in Wawa,Ontario,Canada[J]. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2016, 227(12):434.DOI:10.1007/s11270-016-3140-4.
[25]	MAGIERA T, PARZENTNY H, RÓG L, et al. Spatial variation of soil magnetic susceptibility in relation to different emission sources in southern Poland[J]. Geoderma, 2015, 255/256:94-103.DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.04.028.
[26]	王博, 夏敦胜, 余晔, 等. 典型沙漠绿洲城市表土磁性特征及环境指示意义[J]. 地球物理学报, 2014, 57(3):891-905.
	WANG B, XIA D S, YU Y, et al. Magnetic properties of urban soils from typical oasis cities and their environmental implications[J]. Chin J Geophys, 2014, 57(3):891-905.DOI:10.6038/cjg20140319.
[27]	吴丹, 欧阳婷萍, 匡耀求, 等. 佛山农业表层土壤磁化率特征及其与重金属含量的关系[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(11):1826-1831.
	WU D, OUYANG T P, KUANG Y Q, et al. Correlationship between magnetic susceptibility and the concentration of heavy metal in agricultural topsoil of Foshan City[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2014, 23(11):1826-1831.DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2014.11.011.
[28]	杜小翠, 胡江玲. 乌鲁木齐城市土壤磁化率特征及其环境意义[J]. 天津农业科学, 2014, 20(3):32-36.
	DU X C, HU J L. Characteristic and its environmental significance of soil magnetic susceptibility in Urumqi[J]. Tianjin Agric Sci, 2014, 20(3):32-36. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6500.2014.03.007.
[29]	王博, 夏敦胜, 贾佳, 等. 中国西北地区典型钢铁工业城市表土重金属污染的环境磁学响应[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2013, 43(3):962-973.
	WANG B, XIA D S, JIA J, et al. Magnetic responses of heavy metals in urban topsoil of typical steel industrial city,northwest China[J]. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed), 2013, 43(3):962-973.DOI:10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.2013.03.019.
[30]	王博, 夏敦胜, 余晔, 等. 兰州城市表层土壤重金属污染的环境磁学记录[J]. 科学通报, 2012, 57(32):3078-3089.
	WANG B, XIA D S, YU Y, et al. Environmental magnetic records of heavy metal pollution in urban surface soil of Lanzhou[J]. Chin Sci Bull, 2012, 57(32):3078-3089. DOI:10.1007/s11434-012-5404-8.
[31]	李珊, 胡雪峰, 杜艳, 等. 上海嘉定区表土磁性强度的空间分异及环境指示意义[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(1):9-17.
	LI S, HU X F, DU Y, et al. Spatial variation of magnetic intensity of topsoils in Jiading District,Shanghai and its environmental implication[J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2012, 49(1):9-17.
[32]	BAGHDADI M E, BARAKAT A, SAJIEDDINE M, et al. Heavy metal pollution and soil magnetic susceptibility in urban soil of Beni Mellal City (Morocco)[J]. Environ Earth Sci, 2012, 66(1):141-155.DOI:10.1007/s12665-011-1215-5.
[33]	陈景辉, 卢新卫. 西安城市路边土壤磁化率特征及其环境意义[J]. 陕西师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 39(5):76-82.
	CHEN J H, LU X W. The magnetic susceptibility characteristic and its environmental significance of roadside soil in Xi’an City[J]. J Shaanxi Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2011, 39(5):76-82.DOI:10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2011.05.001.
[34]	LU S G, WANG H Y, GU J L, et al. Magnetic response of heavy metals pollution in urban soils:magnetic proxy parameters as an indicator of heavy metals pollution[C]. 2010.
[35]	朱艳明, 郭小蕾, 周力平. 北京地区表土磁性特征及其环境意义[J]. 科学通报, 2010, 55(17):1717-1725.
	ZHU Y M, GUO X L, ZHOU L P. Magnetic properties of surface soils in Beijing area and their environmental implications[J]. Chin Sci Bull, 2010, 55(17):1717-1725.DOI:10.1360/972008-223.
[36]	LU S G, BAI S Q, XUE Q F. Magnetic properties as indicators of heavy metals pollution in urban topsoils:a case study from the city of Luoyang,China[J]. Geophys J Int, 2007, 171(2):568-580.DOI:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2007.03545.x.
[37]	敖红, 邓成龙. 磁性矿物的磁学鉴别方法回顾[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2007, 22(2):432-442.
	AO H, DENG C L. Review in the identification of magnetic minerals[J]. Prog Geophys, 2007, 22(2):432-442.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-2903.2007.02.015.
[38]	LU S G, BAI S Q. Study on the correlation of magnetic properties and heavy metals content in urban soils of Hangzhou City,China[J]. J Appl Geophys, 2006, 60(1):1-12.DOI:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2005.11.002.
[39]	LOURENÇO A M, SEQUEIRA E, SANT’OVAIA H, et al. Magnetic,geochemical and pedological characterisation of soil profiles from different environments and geological backgrounds near Coimbra,Portugal[J]. Geoderma, 2014, 213:408-418.DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.07.035.
[40]	俞元春, 曾曙才, 罗汝英. 江南丘陵林区森林土壤微量元素的含量与分布[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 1998, 25(2):167-173.
	YU Y C, ZENG S C, LUO R Y. Contents and distribution of microelements in soils of hilly forest area in the south of Yangzi River[J]. J Anhui Agric Univ, 1998, 25(2):167-173.
[41]	杜艳. 中国长江流域第四纪红土年代学研究及末次间冰期以来古气候演变[D]. 上海: 上海大学, 2013.
	DU Y. OSL dating of the quaternary red clay distributed in the reaches of the Yangtze River and paleoclimatic changes since the last interglacial period in mid-subtropical southeast China[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai University, 2013.
[42]	邓成龙, 袁宝印, 胡守云, 等. 环境磁学某些研究进展评述[J]. 海洋地质与第四纪地质, 2000, 20(2):93-101.
	DENG C L, YUAN B Y, HU S Y, et al. Environmental magnetism:a review[J]. Mar Geol & Quat Geol, 2000, 20(2):93-101.DOI:10.16562/j.cnki.0256-1492.2000.02.017.
[43]	卢升高, 俞劲炎, 章明奎, 等. 长江中下游第四纪沉积物发育土壤磁性增强的环境磁学机制[J]. 沉积学报, 2000, 18(3):336-340.
	LU S G, YU J Y, ZHANG M K, et al. Environmental magnetism of magnetic enhancement for soils formed on quaternary sediments in Yangtze River valley[J]. Acta Sedimentol Sin, 2000, 18(3):336-340.DOI:10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2000.03.002.
[44]	沈明洁, 胡守云, BLAHA U, 等. 北京石景山工业区附近一个污染土壤剖面的磁学研究[J]. 地球物理学报, 2006, 49(6):1665-1673.
	SHEN M J, HU S Y, BLAHA U, et al. A magnetic study of a polluted soil profile at the Shijingshan industrial area,western Beijing,China[J]. Chin J Geophys, 2006, 49(6):1665-1673.
[45]	YONG Z. Spatial variability of soil magnetic susceptibility under different scales:a case study of Xiangtan[J]. J Phys:Conf Ser, 2019, 1176:042025.DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1176/4/042025.

样地类型 sample plot type	样本量 sample size	χ_lf/(×10^-8 m³·kg^-1) massic magnetic susceptibility									χ_hf/% frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility
样地类型 sample plot type	样本量 sample size	平均值 average	最小值 min		最大值 max		标准差 SD		变异系数 CV		平均值 average	最小值 min	最大值 max	标准差 SD	变异系数 CV
城郊林地(SF)suburban forest	84	78.2		59.2		127.0		16.1		20.5	11.4	6.9	14.5	1.5	13.1
城内林地(UF) urban forest	80	523.6		177.0		1 210.0		155.8		29.8	0.9	0	4.3	0.7	79.8
道路绿化带(未扰动) (UDG)road greenbelt	84	137.9		107.4		182.4		14.4		10.4	10.2	6.8	12.8	1.4	14.1
道路绿化带(扰动)(DG) road greenbelt(disturbance)	84	150.3		102.7		230.1		21.8		14.5	8.6	3.6	12.5	2.2	25.5

样地类型 sample plot type	质量磁化率/(×10^-8 m³·kg^-1) massic magnetic susceptibility					百分比频率磁化率/% frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility
样地类型 sample plot type	2 cm	5 cm	10 cm	15 cm	30 cm	2 cm	5 cm	10 cm	15 cm	30 cm
城郊林地SF	78.9	79.0	79.1	72.3	74.0	11.4	11.6	11.3	10.3	12.4
城内林地UF	528.8	517.6	481.9	528.9	539.1	0.7	0.7	1.0	0.7	1.1
道路绿化带(未扰动)UDG	137.8	136.0	139.4	136.3	137.5	10.1	10.4	10.8	10.4	10.2
道路绿化带(扰动)DG	150.5	155.0	146.1	147.1	141.4	8.4	8.6	8.9	9.0	10.1

采样间隔对城市表土剖面磁化率变化的影响

Study on the effect of urban topsoil sampling interval on the variation pattern of magnetic susceptibility of soil profile

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 45

相关文章 12

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

研究尺度 research scale	自然林地 natural forest		潜在污染林地 potentially polluted forest		扰动道路绿化带 disturbed road green belt		未扰动道路绿化带 undisturbed road green belt
研究尺度 research scale	间隔/cm interval	深度/cm depth	间隔/cm interval	深度/cm depth	间隔/cm interval	深度/cm depth	间隔/cm interval	深度/cm depth
垂直变异性vertical variability	2、5	20	2	>50	2	>30	2、5	20
小尺度空间small scale space	10	20	5、10	30	10	30	10	20
大尺度空间large scale space	20	20	10	30	10	20	20	20

[1]	达婷, 李琰. 基于场所依恋的城市滨水公园社会连接研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 227-235.
[2]	徐振, 李鸣珂, 陈妍, 周珍琦. 基于在线地图的南京市主城区大型公园绿地骑行可达范围评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 219-226.
[3]	崔志华, 吕言洁, 杨昕雨. 南京市都市区声景观的城乡梯度演变分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 199-206.
[4]	费文君, 赵梦琴. 基于MSPA的南京市绿色基础设施网络构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 50-56.
[5]	徐晶园, 圣倩倩, 王伟希, 刘聪哲, 祝遵凌. 南京典型城市道路植物多样性与土壤因子的耦合关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 119-126.
[6]	崔志华,杨昕雨. 基于GIS的南京市中山陵景区核心区域声景观评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 121-127.
[7]	王彦超,朱一丹,徐丹丹. 基于Landsat 8影像的南京市热岛效应对植物物候的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 99-105.
[8]	张俊叶,俞菲,杨靖宇,俞元春1. 南京城市林业土壤多环芳烃累积特征及其与黑炭的相关性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(02): 75-80.
[9]	郝德君,胡海桃,陈娟,陈瑞旭,凌梦沁,陈梦义. 南京市早春访花昆虫种类及其行为研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(01): 33-38.
[10]	王艮梅,韦庆翠,袁润,张焕朝,王福好,颜开义. 不同连栽代次及龄组杨树林土壤微生物量氮动态[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(03): 69-73.
[11]	杨英宝;江南;苏伟忠. 南京城市景观空间格局的变化分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2004, 28(06): 39-42.
[12]	陈彩虹;胡锋;李辉信. 南京市城乡交错带的景观生态问题与优化对策[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2000, 24(S1): 17-23.

采样间隔/cm sampling interval	样品数量/个 sample quantity	耗时/min sampling time
2	15	30
5	6	20
10	3	12
15	2	8
20	1	4
30	1	5