间伐对马尾松人工林土壤酶活性的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.010

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2013, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (04): 51-56.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.010

间伐对马尾松人工林土壤酶活性的影响

郝俊鹏,凌宁,李瑞霞,王东,闵建刚,彭婷婷,刘娜,关庆伟^*

南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院,江苏南京 210037

出版日期:2013-08-18 发布日期:2013-08-18
基金资助:
收稿日期:2012-06-25 修回日期:2013-01-07
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201104075); 国家重点基础研究发展计划(2012CB416904)
第一作者:郝俊鹏,硕士。*通信作者:关庆伟,教授。E-mail: guanjapan999@yahoo.com.cn。
引文格式:郝俊鹏,凌宁,李瑞霞,等. 间伐对马尾松人工林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(4):51-56.

Effects of thinning on the soil enzyme activity in the Pinus massoniana Lamb. plantation

HAO Junpeng, LING Ning, LI Ruixia, WANG Dong, MIN Jiangang, PENG Tingting, LIU Na, GUAN Qingwei^*

College of Forest Resources and Environment,Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037,China

Online:2013-08-18 Published:2013-08-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以南京溧水林场25年生马尾松(Pinus massoniana)林为对象,对6年前实施了弱度(25%)、中度(45%)、强度(65%)间伐的各处理样地土壤酶活性进行了调查。结果表明:间伐对土壤酶活性有一定的提升作用,但不同间伐强度对土壤酶的提升效果不同。弱度间伐在10月和12月对土壤蔗糖酶活性提升效果最明显,在12月对碱性磷酸酶活性提升效果最明显,其余以中度间伐的提升效果较为明显。对25年生马尾松人工林而言,中度间伐可提高林地土壤酶活性,促进马尾松对林地养分的利用。

Abstract: The soil enzyme activities were studied in 25 years old Pinus massoniana plantation at Lishui Forest Farm in Nanjing which were imposed light(25%), moderate(45%)and strong(65%)intensity thinning treatments six years ago. The result showed that thinning had an ascending function on soil enzyme activities, but the effects varied under different thinning intensity. Light thinning intensity enhanced invertase and hydrogen peroxide activities mostly in October and December, and increased alkaline phosphatase activity mostly in December. The effects of moderate intensity were more obvious in the other period. As to 25-year-old P.massoniana plantation, soil enzyme activity could be improved with middle intensive thining, therefore, utilization of soil nutrient in P.massoniana plantation could be increased.

中图分类号:

S714

郝俊鹏,凌宁,李瑞霞,等. 间伐对马尾松人工林土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(04): 51-56.

HAO Junpeng, LING Ning, LI Ruixia, WANG Dong, MIN Jiangang, PENG Tingting, LIU Na, GUAN Qingwei. Effects of thinning on the soil enzyme activity in the Pinus massoniana Lamb. plantation[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2013, 37(04): 51-56.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.010.

参考文献

[1] Kumar R, Dahiya J S, Singh D, et al. Production of endo-1,4-β-glucanase by a biocontrol fungus Cladorrhinum foecundissimum[J]. Biore Technol,2000,75(1):95-97.
[2] Gramss G, Voigt K D, Kirsche B. Oxidoreductase enzymes liberated by plant roots and their effects on soil humic material[J]. Chemosphere,1999,38(7):1481-1494.
[3] Dick W A, Juma N G, Tabatabai M A. Effects of soils on acid phosphatase and inorganic pyrophosphatase of corn roots[J]. Soil Sci,1983,136(1):19-25.
[4] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:农业出版社, 1986.
[5] 周礼恺,张志明,陈恩凤. 黑土的酶活性[J].土壤学报, 1981, 18(2):158-165. Zhou L K, Zhang Z M, Chen E F. Enzymatic activities in black soils[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 1981,18(2): 158-165.
[6] 毛志宏,朱教君,刘足根,等. 间伐对落叶松人工林内草本植物多样性及其组成的影响[J].生态学杂志,2006, 25(10): 1201-1207. Mao Z H, Zhu J J, Liu Z G, et al. Effects of thinning on species diversity and composition of understory herbs in a larch plantation[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2006, 25(10): 1201-1207.
[7] 何艺玲,傅懋毅. 人工林林下植被的研究现状[J].林业科学研究,2002,15(6):727-733. He Y L, Fu M Y. Review of studies on understorey of plantations[J]. Forest Research, 2002, 15(6): 727-733.
[8] 徐昕,马履一,李春义. 间伐措施对北京山区幼龄侧柏人工林土壤碱性磷酸酶活性的短期影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2008, 36(1): 51-57. Xu X, Ma L Y, Li C Y. Short-term effects of thinning on alkaline phosphatase activity in the soils of young plantation of Platycladus orientalis in Beijing mountainous areas[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2008, 36(1): 51-57.
[9] 刘勇,李国雷,李瑞生, 等.密度调控对油松人工林土壤肥力的影响[J].西北林学院学报, 2008,23(6):18-23. Liu Y, Li G L, Li R S, et al. Effected of tree density on soil fertility in Pinus tabulaeformis plantations[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2008, 23(6): 18-23.
[10] Maassen S, Fritze H,Wirth S. Response of soil microbial biomass, activities, and community structure at a pine stand in northeaster Germany 5 years after thinning[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2006,36(6):1427-1434.
[11] Boerner R E J, Waldrop T A, Shelburne V B. Wildfire mitigation strategies affect soil enzyme activity and soil organic carbon in loblolly pine(Pinus taeda)forests[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,2006,36(12):3148-3154.
[12] Quilchano C, Maranon T. Dehydrogenase activity in Mediterranean forest soils[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2002, 35(2):102-107.
[13] Rietl A J, Jackson C R. Effects of the ecological restoration practices of prescribed burning and mechanical thinning on soil microbial enzyme activities and leaf litter decomposition[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2012,50:47-57.
[14] 严昶升.土壤肥力研究方法[M].北京:农业出版社,1988.
[15] 闫颍, 袁星, 樊宏娜, 等.五种农药对土壤转化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国环境科学,2005, 24(5):588-591. Yan Y, Yuan X, Fan H N. Influence of five pesticides on invertase activity in soil[J]. China Environmental Science, 2005, 24(5): 588-591.
[16] 周世萍, 段昌群, 韩青辉, 等. 毒死蜱对土壤蔗糖酶活性的影响[J]. 生态环境, 2005, 14(5): 672-674. Zhou S P, Duan C Q, Han Q H, et al. Effect of chlorpyrifos on soil sucrase activity[J]. Ecology and Environment, 2005, 14(5): 672-674.
[17] Barbara Krajewska. Ureases I. Functional, catalytic and kinetic properties:A review[J]. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B:Enzymatic, 2009,59(1-3): 9-21.
[18] 鲁萍,郭继勋,朱丽.东北羊草草原主要植物群落土壤过氧化氢酶活性的研究[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(6):675-679. Lu P, Guo J X, Zhu L. Soil catalase activity of main plant communities in Leymus chinensis grassland in northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(6): 675-679.
[19] 李春义, 马履一, 徐昕. 抚育间伐对森林生物多样性的影响研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2006,19(6): 27-32. Li C Y, Ma L Y, Xu X. Reviews on research progress of effect of tending on forest biodiversity[J]. World Forestry Research, 2006, 19(6): 27-32.
[20] Olof Widenfalk, Jan Weslien. Plant species richness in managed boreal forests:Effects of stand succession and thinning[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009,257(5):1386-1394.
[21] Christopher M McGlone, Judith D Springer, Daniel C Laughlin. Can pine forest restoration promote a diverse and abundant understory and simultaneously resist nonnative invasion[J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2009, 258(12):2638-2646.
[22] 胡建伟, 朱成秋. 抚育间伐对森林环境的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 1999, 27(3):65-67. Hu J W, Zhu C Q. The impacts of intermediate felling on forest environment[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 1999, 27(3): 65-67.
[23] 万忠梅,吴景贵. 土壤酶活性影响因子研究进展[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2005,33(6):87-92. Wan Z M, Wu J G. Study progress on factors affecting soil enzyme activity[J]. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry:Natural Science Edition, 2005, 33(6): 87-92.
[24] 李国雷, 刘勇, 甘敬, 等. 飞播油松林地土壤酶活性对间伐强度的季节响应[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2008, 30(2): 82-88. Li G L, Liu Y, Gan J, et al. Seasonal response of soil enzyme activity to thinning intensity in aerial seeding Pinus tabulaeformis stands[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2008, 30(2): 82-88.
[25] Yao X H, Min H, Lu Z H, et al. Influence of acetamiprid on soil enzymatic activities and respiration[J].European Journal of Soil Biology, 2006, 42(2):120-126.
[26] Jimenez M D, de la Horra A M, Pruzzo L, et al. Soil quality:a new index based on microbiological and biochemical parameters[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2002,35(4):302-306.

相关文章 15

[1]	谢燕燕, 郭子武, 林树燕, 左珂怡, 杨丽婷, 徐森, 谷瑞, 陈双林. 毛竹林下植被演替过程中土壤颗粒组成与水分入渗特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 108-116.
[2]	武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 99-107.
[3]	左壮, 张韫, 崔晓阳. 火烧对兴安落叶松林土壤氮形态和含量的初期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 147-154.
[4]	孙劲伟, 王圣燕, 范弟武, 朱咏莉. C源与NP添加对Cd胁迫下林地土壤呼吸作用的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 140-146.
[5]	陈明, 刘亮. 采样间隔对城市表土剖面磁化率变化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 61-69.
[6]	张相, 丁鸣鸣, 林杰, 李卓远, 崔琳琳, 郭赓, 杨皓. 水蚀作用下红壤丘陵区土壤特性的空间分异特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 77-84.
[7]	杨瑞, 吴朝明, 朱骊, 胡海波. 苏南丘陵区坡面经济林土壤侵蚀特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 70-76.
[8]	徐子涵, 王磊, 崔明, 刘玉国, 赵紫晴, 李嘉豪. 南水北调水源区不同植被恢复模式的土壤化学计量特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 173-181.
[9]	杜志琦, 孟庆繁, 冯立超, 葛佳荣, 黄劲斌, 史晶晶, 李洪锐, 岑祖才. 冷藏条件下土样保存时间对甲螨(甲螨亚目)和跳虫(弹尾纲)类物种分离的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 213-218.
[10]	卢伟伟, 胡嘉欣, 陈思桦, 陈玮铃, 冯思宇. 苏北滨海土壤无机碳含量的测定方法比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 76-82.
[11]	杨永超, 段文标, 陈立新, 曲美学, 王亚飞, 王美娟, 石金永, 潘磊. 模拟氮磷沉降和凋落物处理对两种林型红松林土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 57-66.
[12]	薛建辉, 周之栋, 吴永波. 喀斯特石漠化山地退化土壤生态修复研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 135-145.
[13]	林杰, 张相, 姜姜, 蒯杰, 郭赓, 孟苗婧, 李肖. 水力侵蚀过程中土壤有机碳循环研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 187-194.
[14]	李惠芝, 关庆伟, 赵家豪, 李俊杰, 王磊, 李凤凤, 左兴平, 陈斌. 地形对麻栎人工林土壤肥力质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 161-168.
[15]	赵凯歌, 周正虎, 金鹰, 王传宽. 长期氮添加对落叶松和水曲柳人工林土壤碳、氮、磷含量和胞外酶活性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 177-184.

间伐对马尾松人工林土壤酶活性的影响

Effects of thinning on the soil enzyme activity in the Pinus massoniana Lamb. plantation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿