硼锌微肥施用下枣果实综合品质的评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.007

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (02): 40-46.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.007

硼锌微肥施用下枣果实综合品质的评价

韩志强,袁德义^*,陈文涛,李承想,谢凯瑶

中南林业科技大学,经济林育种与栽培国家林业局重点实验室,经济林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,湖南长沙 410004

出版日期:2015-03-31 发布日期:2015-03-31
基金资助:
收稿日期:2014-03-05 修回日期:2014-06-06
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201204407)
第一作者:韩志强,硕士生。*通信作者:袁德义,教授。E-mail: yuan-deyi@163.com。
引文格式:韩志强,袁德义,陈文涛,等. 硼锌微肥施用下枣果实综合品质的评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(2):40-46.

Synthetical evaluation of the fruit quality of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. under different combinations of boron,zinc microelement fertilizer

HAN Zhiqiang, YUAN Deyi^*, CHEN Wentao, LI Chengxiang, XIE Kaiyao

Key Laboratory of Non-wood Forest Products of State Forestry Administration, Key Laboratory of Cultivation and Protection for Non-Wood Forest Trees, Ministry of Education, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China

Online:2015-03-31 Published:2015-03-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了对硼锌微肥单施及配施下枣(Ziziphus jujuba Mill.)果实综合品质进行评价,并确定适宜的施用量,以‘金丝4号’枣果实为试材,通过硼锌微肥单施及配施共16种处理,将各处理下果实品质性状指标数据通过隶属函数转化后进行因子分析与聚类分析。结果表明:①隶属函数法转化后的数据经因子分析后,抽取出5个特征根>1的公因子,累计贡献率为80.559%,将因子得分与相应权重之积累加得到综合分值并进行排序可知,适当施用硼锌微肥可以提高枣果实的综合品质,硼锌微肥单施或者配施的量较大对枣果实综合品质的提高作用不显著甚至会降低枣果实综合品质。②利用聚类分析将果实品质数据进行聚类可知,当硼肥单施时,以22.5 kg/hm²标准按穴均施对枣果实综合品质的提高作用显著,减少或者增加用量对枣果实综合品质没有明显影响; 当锌肥单施时,以不大于22.5 kg/hm²标准按穴均施对枣果实综合品质的提高作用显著; 硼锌微肥配施时,以15 kg/hm²或者22.5 kg/hm²标准等量按穴均施对枣果实品质的提高作用最为显著。③硼锌微肥以15 kg/hm²标准按1:1比例配施对枣果实综合品质的提高作用最明显,并可以最大限度地减少施用量。

Abstract: In order to establish an applicable synthetical evaluation method of fruit quality of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. under the application of single and different combinations of boron and zinc microelement fertilizer, and to determine appropriate proportion and amount of the boron and zinc microelement fertilizer,fruits of Z. jujuba Mill.cv.Jinsi 4 were treated with 16 different combinations of boron and zinc microelement fertilizer in this experiment. The data matrix in this study was converted by the method of subordinate function for factor and duster analyses. Results showed that:①Five factors(eigenvalue>1)were extracted from the converted data matrix. Their cumulative contribution approximated to 80.559%. The synthetical score was the accumulation of the product of the score of each factor multiplied by the corresponding weight value of each factor. Based on the sort of synthetical score, it was proposed that appropriate application of boron, zinc micronutrient fertilizer could improve the comprehensive fruit quality, but the greater amount of the boron, zinc microelement fertilizer could not improve the comprehensive quality of fruit.②According to the result of cluster analysis on fruit quality data, when boron fertilizer with 22.5 kg/hm² was applied individually, the improvement of fruit quality was the most effective and reducing or increasing application amount had no significant effect on fruit quality. When zinc fertilizer with no more than 22.5 kg/hm² was applied alone, the improvement of fruit quality was the most effective. When microelement fertilizers combinated with 15 kg/hm² of boron plus zinc in equal amount or 22.5 kg/hm² of boron plus zinc in equal amount were applied individually, the effect of microelement fertilizer on improvement of fruit quality was the most significant.③When micronutrient fertilizer combinated with 15 kg/hm² of boron plus zinc in ratio of 1:1 was applied, the improvement of fruit quality was the most effective, and the amount of boron and zinc micronutrient fertilizer was minimized.

中图分类号:

S143

韩志强,袁德义,陈文涛,等. 硼锌微肥施用下枣果实综合品质的评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(02): 40-46.

HAN Zhiqiang, YUAN Deyi, CHEN Wentao, LI Chengxiang, XIE Kaiyao. Synthetical evaluation of the fruit quality of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. under different combinations of boron,zinc microelement fertilizer[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(02): 40-46.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.02.007.

参考文献

[1] 冯宏祖, 支金虎, 蒋先龙, 等.不同微肥追肥模式下红枣产量和品质的效应分析[J],新疆农业科学, 2011,48(12):2240-2244.Feng H Z, Zhi J H, Jiang X L,et al. Effects analysis of Chinese dates yield and quality under different spraying mode of trace element fertilizers[J]. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 48(12):2240-2244.
[2] 鲍江峰, 夏仁学, 彭抒昂, 等. 湖北省纽荷尔脐橙园土壤营养状况及其对果实品质的影响[J]. 土壤, 2006, 38(1):75-80.Bao J F, Xia R X, Peng X A, et al. Research on the fruit quality of Newhall navel orange of Hubei Province[J]. Soils, 2006, 38(1):75-80.
[3] 李保国, 齐国辉, 郭素平, 等. 太行山片麻岩区新垦苹果园土壤营养与果实品质的关系研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2002, 10(3): 17-20.Li B G, Qi G H, Guo S P, et al. Study on the relation-ship between the soil nutrient elements and the apple fruit quality of the newly reclaimed apple orchard in Taihang Mountain gneiss area[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2002, 10(3): 17-20.
[4] 秦煊南. 喷施硼锌镁对提高锦橙产量和果实品质的影响[J]. 西南农业大学学报,1996, 18(1): 40-45.Qing X N. Leaf spraying with boron,zinc and magnesium and their effects on the fruit production and quality of JING CHEN oranges(Citrus sinensis Osbeck)[J]. Journal of Southwest Agricultural University, 1996, 18(1): 40-45.
[5] 魏钦平, 程述汉, 丁殿东. 苹果品质评价因素的选择[J]. 中国果树, 1997(4): 14-15.Wei Q P, Cheng S H, Ding D D. Selection of factors for evaluating apple(Malus pumila Mill.)fruit quality[J]. China Fruits, 1997(4): 14-15.
[6] 聂继云, 李明强, 张桂芬, 等. 白梨品质评价指标的聚类分析[J]. 中国果树, 2000(2): 16-17.Nie J Y, Li M Q, Zhang G F, et al. Cluster analysis of quality evaluation indices in White pear[J]. China Fruits, 2000(2):16-17.
[7] 韩雅珊. 食品化学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1996.
[8] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2000.
[9] Kurtanjek Z, Horvat D, Magdic D, et al. Factor analysis and modelling for rapid quality assessment of croatian wheat cultivars with different gluten characteristics[J]. Food Technology and Biotechnology,2008, 46: 270-277.
[10] 阮敏. 主成分方法在经济管理综合评价应用中的误区[J]. 统计与决策, 2005(4): 23-24. Ruan M. The Errors of using principal componentmethod in the comprehensive evaluation of economic management[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2005(4): 23-24.
[11] 陈文涛, 袁德义, 张日清, 等. 鲜食枣品质的综合评价[J]. 湖南农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2014, 40(1):32-36.Chen W T, Yuan D L, Zhang R Q,et al. Factor analysis and comprehensive assessment on quality characters of fresh jujube cultivars[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University:Natural Sciences, 2014, 40(1):32-36.
[12] 马庆华, 李永红, 梁丽松, 等. 冬枣优良单株果实品质的因子分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(12):2491-2499.Ma Q H, Li Y H, Liang L S, et al. Factor analysis and synthetical evaluation of the fruit quality of Dongzao(Ziziphus jujuba Mill.‘Dongzao’)Advanced Selections[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(12): 2491-2499.
[13] Pestana M, Beja P, Correia P J, et al. Relationships between nutrient composition of flowers and fruit quality in orange trees grown in calcareous soil[J]. Tree Physiology, 2005, 25(6): 761-767.
[14] Chaib J, Devaux M F, Grotte M G, et al. Physiological relationships among physical, sensory,and morphological attributes of texture in tomato fruits[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2007, 58(6): 1915-1925.
[15] 陶爱芬, 祁建民, 林培青, 等. 红麻优异种质产量和品质性状主成分聚类分析与综合评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9): 2859-2867.Tao A F, Qi J M, Lin P Q, et al. Cluster analysis and evaluation of elite kanaf germplasm based on principal components[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008, 41(9): 2859-2867.
[16] 李丹丹, 司龙亭, 牛海臣, 等. 黄瓜耐弱光性的多元统计分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2009, 36(4): 501-506.Li D D, Si L T, Niu H C, et al. Multiple statistics analysis of low light tolerance in cucumber(Cucum issativus L.)[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2009, 36(4): 501-506.
[17] 刘坚, 苏军. 因子分析在综合素质评价中的应用[J]. 华东交通大学学报, 2004, 21(5): 145-149.Liu J, Su J. An application of factor analysis to the synthetic evaluation of quality education[J]. Journal of East China Jiaotong University, 2004, 21(5): 145-149.
[18] 宇传华. SPSS与统计分析[M]. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2007.
[19] 张振文, 姚庆群. 主成分分析法在芒果贮藏特性分析中的应用[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2005, 34(2): 25-28.Zhang Z W, Yao Q Q. Application of the principle component analysis on mango storage characteristics [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2005, 34(2): 25-28.
[20] 聂继云, 张红军, 马智勇, 等. 聚类分析在我国果树研究中的应用及问题分析[J]. 果树科学, 2000, 17(2): 128-130.Nie J Y, Zhang H J, Ma Z Y, et al. The application of cluster analysis in the fruit research and its problems[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2000, 17(2): 128-130.
[21] 魏钦平, 程述汉, 丁殿东. 苹果品质评价因素的选择[J]. 中国果树, 1997(4): 14-15.Wei Q P, Cheng S H, Ding D D. Selection of factors for evaluating apple(Malus pumila Mill.)fruit quality[J]. China Fruits, 1997(4): 14-15.
[22] 鲍江峰, 夏仁学, 邓秀新, 等. 用主成分分析法选择纽荷尔脐橙品质的评价因素[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2004,23(6):663-666.Bao J F, Xia R X, Deng X X, et al. The quality evaluation factors selection of of Newhall orange by the principal component analysis[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2004, 23(6): 663-666.
[23] 樊保国, 李月梅, 李登科. 鲜食枣品质性状的综合评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(2): 79-82.Fan B G, Li Y M, Li D K. Comprehensive assessment of the quality characters of fresh-jujube cultivars[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2012, 27(2): 79-82.
[24] 樊保国, 李登科. 制干枣品种品质性状的因子分析与综合评价制干枣品种品质性状的因子分析与综合评价[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12(5): 716-720.Fan B G, Li D K. Factor analysis and comprehensive assessment on quality characters of dry-jujube cultivars [J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2011, 12(5): 716-720.
[25] 石磊, 杨玉华, 徐芳森, 等. 硼对作物细胞膜功能影响的研究进展[J].华中农业大学学报,2002,21(4):39-400.Shi L, Yang Y H, Xu F S, et al. Effects of boron on the function of plant membrane[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2002, 21(4): 394-400.

硼锌微肥施用下枣果实综合品质的评价

Synthetical evaluation of the fruit quality of Ziziphus jujuba Mill. under different combinations of boron,zinc microelement fertilizer

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿