喜马拉雅山亚东段蚂蚁群落研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.016

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 58 ›› Issue (03): 85-90.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.016

喜马拉雅山亚东段蚂蚁群落研究

莫福燕,徐正会^*,宋扬,李春良,和秋菊

西南林业大学林学院,云南省森林灾害预警与控制重点实验室,云南昆明 650224

出版日期:2015-05-30 发布日期:2015-05-30
基金资助:
收稿日期:2014-08-20 修回日期:2014-12-22
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(31260521)
第一作者:莫福燕,硕士生。*通信作者:徐正会,教授。E-mail: xuzhenghui1962@163.com。
引文格式:莫福燕,徐正会,宋扬,等. 喜马拉雅山亚东段蚂蚁群落研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(3):85-90.

Ant communities in Yadong section of Mt. Himalaya

MO Fuyan, XU Zhenghui^*, SONG Yang, LI Chunliang, HE Qiuju

Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory of Forest Disaster Warning and Control, College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China

Online:2015-05-30 Published:2015-05-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了揭示喜马拉雅山蚂蚁多样性规律,采用样地调查法研究了喜马拉雅山亚东段蚂蚁群落。在北坡、山间谷地和南坡采集蚂蚁标本12 354头,隶属于2亚科8属12种。北坡和山间谷地蚂蚁群落的优势种均为光亮黑蚁(Formica candida Smith),而南坡的优势种为史密西红蚁(Myrmica smythiesii Forel)。亚东段不同海拔样地蚂蚁群落多样性指数中Fisher α指数为0～0.95,Shannon-Wiener指数为0～0.98,显示该地段物种多样性非常低。利用EstimateS 9.1.0程序对该地区蚂蚁物种丰富度进行估计并绘制物种累积曲线,结果表明蚂蚁物种实际观察值接近该地区蚂蚁丰富度估计值。南北坡蚂蚁物种丰富度随海拔升高先增加后降低,丰富度垂直分布格局符合“中域效应”假说。相似性系数分析表明,该地段蚂蚁群落组成和分布受植被类型和海拔影响。

Abstract: In order to reveal ant diversity law of Mt. Himalaya, ant communities in Yadong section were investigated using sample-plot method. Total 12 354 individuals collected from north slope, mountain valley and south slope belong to 2 subfamilies 8 genera and 12 species of Formicidae. Formica candida Smith was dominant species in ant communities in north slope and mountain valley, but Myrmica smythiesii Forel was dominant species in south slope. In the ant communities from different altitude sample-plots of Yadong section, the Fisher α indexes range from 0 to 0.95, and the Shannon-Wiener indexes range from 0 to 0.98, it showed extremely low species diversity. Ant species richness was estimated with the help of EstimateS 9.1.0 software and species accumulation curves were drawn, it showed that observed and estimated numbers of species were very similar. Ant species richness first increased then decreased as altitude increased both on north and south slopes, it means ant species richness patterns along elevational gradient conform to the mid-domain effect hypothesis. According to similarity coefficients, ant community composition and distribution of Yadong section were influenced by vegetation types and altitude.

中图分类号:

S76
Q959.1

莫福燕,徐正会,宋扬,等. 喜马拉雅山亚东段蚂蚁群落研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 58(03): 85-90.

MO Fuyan, XU Zhenghui, SONG Yang, LI Chunliang, HE Qiuju. Ant communities in Yadong section of Mt. Himalaya[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 58(03): 85-90.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.03.016.

参考文献

[1] 唐觉,李参.膜翅目:蚁科[C]//中国科学院青藏高原综合科学考察队.西藏昆虫.北京:科学出版社, 1982:371-374.
[2] 周善义. 膜翅目: 蚁科[C]//杨星科.西藏雅鲁藏布大峡谷昆虫. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 2004:115-120.
[3] 于娜娜, 徐正会, 张成林, 等. 藏东南色季拉山蚂蚁物种的分布格局[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2011, 33(5): 75-80.Yu N N, Xu Z H, Zhang C L, et al. Distribution patterns of ant species from Mount Sejila, Southeastern Tibet [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2011, 33(5): 57-80.
[4] 张成林,徐正会,杨比伦,等.藏东南色季拉山蚂蚁群落的物种组成及多样性[J].东北林业大学学报,2011,39(7):79-82.Zhang C L, Xu Z H, Yang B L, et al. Species composition and diversity of ant communities in Mount Sejila in Southeastern Tibet [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2011, 39(7): 79-92.
[5] 刘霞, 徐正会, 周雪英, 等. 藏东南德姆拉山西坡及波密河谷蚂蚁群落研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(4): 458-463.Liu X, Xu Z H, Zhou X Y, et al. Ant communities of west slope of Mount Demula and Bomi Valley in Southeastern Tibet [J]. Forest Research, 2011, 24(4): 458-463.
[6] 刘霞, 徐正会, 张成林, 等. 藏东南德姆拉山西坡及波密河谷蚂蚁分布格局[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(4): 77-82.Liu X, Xu Z H, Zhang C L, et al. Distribution patterns of ants from west slope of Mount Demula and Bomi Valley in Southeastern Tibet [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2012, 27(4): 77-82.
[7] Collingwoood C A. Humalyan ants of the genus Lasius(Hymenoptera: Formicidea)[J]. Systematic Entomology, 1982(7): 283-296.
[8] Radchenko A G, Elmes G W. A taxonomic revision of the ant genus Myrmica Latreille, 1804 from the Himalaya(Hymenoptera,Formicidae)[J]. Entomological Basiliensia, 2001, 23:237-276.
[9] Radchenko A G, Elmes G W. Myrmica ants(Hymnenoptera: Formicidae)of the old Word[Z]. Warsaw: Nature Optima Dux Foundation, 2010:789.
[10] 徐正会. 西双版纳自然保护区蚁科昆虫生物多样性研究[M]. 昆明:云南科技出版社,2002:12.
[11] 吴坚, 王常禄. 中国蚂蚁[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1995.
[12] 马克平. 生物多样性的测度方法[C]//中国科学院生物多样性委员会.生物多样性研究的原理与方法.北京:中国科学技术出版社, 1994: 141-165.
[13] 李巧,陈又清,徐正会.蚂蚁群落研究方法[J].生态学杂志,2009,28(9):1862-1870.Li Q, Chen Y Q, Xu Z H. Research methods on ant community[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(9):1862-1870.
[14] Longino J T. What to do with the data[C]// Agosti D. Ants: Standard Methods for Measuring and monitoring Biodiversity. Washington and London: Smithsonia Institution Press, 2000:186-203.
[15] 李巧, 陈又清, 王思铭, 等. 普洱市亚热带季风常绿阔叶林区蚂蚁多样性[J]. 生物多样性, 2009, 17(3): 233-239.Li Q, Chen Y Q, Wang S M, et al.Diversity of ants in subtropical evergreen broad leaved forest in Pu’er City,Yunnan [J].Biodiversity Science, 17(3):233-229
[16] Guénard B, Dunn R R. A checklist of the ants of China [J]. Zootaxa, 2012, 3558: 1-77.
[17] Bharti H, Sharma Y P. Diversity and abundance of ants along an elevational gradient in Jammu-Kashmir Himalaya-1 [J]. Halteres, 2009, 1(1): 10-24.
[18] 徐正会, 李继乖, 付磊, 等. 高黎贡山自然保护区西坡垂直带蚂蚁群落研究[J]. 动物学研究, 2001, 22(1): 58-63.Xu Z H, Li J G, Fu L, et al. A study on the ant communities on west slope at different elevation of Gaoligongshan Mountain Nature Reserve in Yunnan China[J]. Zoological Research, 2001, 22(1): 58-63.
[19] Brühl C A, Maryati M M, Linsenmair K E. Altitudinal distribution of leaf litter ants along a transect in primary forests on Mount Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia [J]. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 1999, 15: 265-267.
[20] Araújo L M, Fernandes W. Altitudinal patterns in a tropical ant assemblage and variation in species richness between habitats [J]. Lundiana, 2003, 4(2): 103-109.
[21] Malsch A K F, Fiala B, Maschwitz U, et al. An analysis of declining ant species richness with increasing elevation at Mount Kinabalu, Sabah, Borneo[J]. Asian Myrmecology, 2008, 2: 33-49.
[22] Fisher B L. Ant diversity patterns along elevational gradients in the Réserve Naturelle Integrale d’Andringitra, Madagascar [J]. Fieldiana Zoology, 1999, 85: 93-108.
[23] Colwell R K, Rahbek C, Gotelli N J. The mid-domain effect and species richness pattern: What have we learned so far?[J]. The American Naturalist, 2004, 163(3):1-23.
[24] Sanders N J. Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport’s rule [J].Ecography, 2002, 25:25-32.
[25] Sanders N J, Moss J, Wagner D. Patterns of ant species richness along elevational gradients in an arid ecosystem [J]. Global Ecology & Biogeography, 2003, 12(2): 93-102.
[26] Grytnes J A, McCain C M. Elevational trends in biodiversity[J]. Encyclopedia of Biodiversity, 2007, 5: 1-8.
[27] Longino J T, Colwell R K. Density compensation, species composition, and richness of ants on a neotropical elevational gradient[J].Ecosphere, 2011, 2:1-20.
[28] Rahbek C. The elevational gradients of species richness: a uniform pattern?[J] Ecography, 1995, 18(2):200-205.
[29] Bharti H, Sharma Y P, Bharti M, et al. Ant species richness, endemicity and functional group, along an elevational gradient in the Himalayas [J]. Asian Myrmecology, 2013, 5: 79-101.
[30] Alonso L E. Ant as Indicators of diversity[C]// Agosti D, Majer J D. Ant: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Washington, London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2000:80-88.
[31] Andersen A N, Fisher A, Hoffman B D, et al. Use of terrestrial invertebrates for biodiversity monitoring in Australian rangelands, with particular reference to ants [J]. Austral Ecology, 2004, 29: 87-92.

相关文章 15

[1]	方静, 张书曼, 严善春, 武帅, 赵佳齐, 孟昭军. 两种丛枝菌根真菌复合接种对青山杨叶片抗美国白蛾的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 144-154.
[2]	祝艳艳, 贾瑞瑞, 付钰, 常林, 岳远征, 杨秀莲, 王良桂. 不同楸树品种对茎腐病的抗性差异研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 155-165.
[3]	张馨方, 王广鹏, 张树航, 李颖, 郭燕. 不同抗螨性板栗差异次生代谢物筛选与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 234-240.
[4]	赵亚楠, 孙天骅, 王利峰, 许强, 刘军侠, 高宝嘉, 周国娜. 油松抗性相关激素与代谢物对油松毛虫取食与剪叶刺激的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 219-226.
[5]	张丞慧, 祖国浩, 王海洋, 薛昊. 蝇克跳小蜂属1中国新记录种(膜翅目:跳小蜂科)[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 214-218.
[6]	孙凯丽, 贺春玲, 胡俊杰, 方全博, 栾科, 任迎丰, 肖治术. 岩田蜾蠃𧎥在黄喙蜾蠃腹部的寄生习性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 243-250.
[7]	程方, 孙婷玉, 叶建仁. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松未成熟合子胚胚性愈伤组织的诱导[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 175-182.
[8]	于赐刚, 郭晓平, 马月, 张振华, 刘燕, 董姗姗, 孙硕. 浙江松阳县鸟类群落结构和多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 231-236.
[9]	刘佳磊, 白润娥, 张锴, 文才艺, 闫凤鸣. 我国桂花树上常见粉虱种类记述[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 237-244.
[10]	张文文, 王劲, 王秋华, 张曦妍, 曹恒茂, 龙腾腾. 基于MODIS的云南省2001—2020年林火发生时空特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 73-79.
[11]	杨乐, 黄晓君, 包玉海, 包刚, 佟斯琴, 苏都毕力格. 无人机航高对落叶松毛虫虫害遥感监测精度的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 13-22.
[12]	高家军, 张旭, 郭颖, 刘昱坤, 郭安琪, 石蒙蒙, 王鹏, 袁莹. 融合Swin Transformer的虫害图像实例分割优化方法研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 1-10.
[13]	杨堃, 范习健, 薄维昊, 刘婕, 王俊玲. 基于视觉加强注意力模型的植物病虫害检测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 11-18.
[14]	王立超, 陈凤毛, 董晓燕, 田成连, 王洋. 松墨天牛取食和产卵特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 219-224.
[15]	石慧敏, 叶建仁, 王焱, 陆蓝翔, 史纪武. 响应面优化贝莱斯芽孢杆菌(Bacillus velezensis)菌株YH-18产芽孢培养基和培养条件[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 209-218.

喜马拉雅山亚东段蚂蚁群落研究

Ant communities in Yadong section of Mt. Himalaya

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿