毛竹、麻竹光合途径类型分析

杨丽,娄永峰,彭镇华,高志民

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (05) : 169-173.

PDF(1482797 KB)
PDF(1482797 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (05) : 169-173. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.05.028
研究简报

毛竹、麻竹光合途径类型分析

  • 杨 丽1,娄永峰1,彭镇华1,2,高志民1*
作者信息 +

A preliminary study on the type of photosynthetic pathway in Phyllostachys edulis and Dendrocalamus latiflorus

  • YANG Li1, LOU Yongfeng1, PENG Zhenhua1,2, GAO Zhimin1*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

为了研究竹子速生的特点与光合作用途径关系,以典型的散生竹毛竹(Phyllostachys edulis)和丛生竹麻竹(Dendrocalamus latiflorus)为材料,通过研究其叶片形态结构及叶绿素荧光特性来探究竹子的光合途径。石蜡切片观察显示,毛竹和麻竹叶片解剖结构均不具有典型的“花环”结构,但含有泡状细胞,明显区别于C4植物玉米(Zea mays)和高粱(Sorghum vulgare)的叶片结构,而与C3植物小麦(Triticum aestivum)和水稻(Oryza sativa)的相似。同时,叶绿素荧光参数测定结果表明,毛竹和麻竹的实际光量子效率Y(Ⅱ)平均值与C3植物水稻、小麦的相近,但显著高于C4植物玉米、高粱的Y(Ⅱ)(P<0.01); 毛竹和麻竹的qN值(0.77)显著低于C4植物玉米、高粱的qN值(P<0.05),与C3植物水稻的qN值(0.76)相近。相关分析表明,C3植物水稻、小麦的Fv/Fm、Y(Ⅱ)、qN之间存在显著或者极显著正相关,而C4植物玉米、高粱的叶绿素荧光参数相关性不显著; 毛竹和麻竹的Fv/Fm、Y(Ⅱ)之间存在显著正相关。由此表明,毛竹、麻竹与C3植物水稻、小麦相类似,初步确定其光合途径属于C3植物类型。

Abstract

The fast-growing characteristic of bamboo means that it has strong assimilative capacity, which is closely related to photosynthetic pathway. By comparing with the typical C3 plants Triticum aestivum and Oryza sativa as well as C4 plants Zea mays and Sorghum vulgare, the typical pachymorph rhizome bamboo Phyllostachys edulis and leptomorph rhizome bamboo Dendrocalamus latiflorus were selected for the study of bamboo photosynthetic pathways based on the structure and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of leaves. Paraffin observations showed that the leaf structures of both D. latiflorus and Ph.edulis did not have the “kranz anatomy” and vesicular cells distributed. These characteristics were significantly different from those of C4 plants such as Z. mays and S. vulgare, but were similar to those of T. aestivum and O. sativa belonging to C3 plants. Meanwhile the results of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters demonstrated that the average values of Y(Ⅱ)of D. latiflorus and Ph. edulis were similar to that of T. aestivum and O. sativa, but were significantly higher than that of Z. mays and S. vulgare(P<0.01). The average values of qN of D. latiflorus and Ph. edulis(0.77)were much lower than those of Z. mays and S. vulgare(P<0.05), while they were close to that of O. sativa (0.76). Correlation analysis showed that there were significant or extreme positive correlations among Fv/Fm, Y(Ⅱ)and qN in O. sativa and T. aestivum. However, highly significant positive correlation did not existed in Z. mays and S. vulgare. The correlation between Fv/Fm and Y(Ⅱ)was demonstrated significantly positive in D. latiflorus and Ph. edulis which were similar to those of in C3 plants. These results indicat that the type of photosynthetic pathway in D. latiflorus and Ph. edulis belongs to C3 plants.

引用本文

导出引用
杨丽,娄永峰,彭镇华,高志民. 毛竹、麻竹光合途径类型分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2015, 39(05): 169-173 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.05.028
YANG Li, LOU Yongfeng, PENG Zhenhua, GAO Zhimin. A preliminary study on the type of photosynthetic pathway in Phyllostachys edulis and Dendrocalamus latiflorus[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2015, 39(05): 169-173 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.05.028
中图分类号: S718.3   

参考文献

[1] Edwards G E, Black C C. Isolation of mesophyll cells and bundle sheath cells from Digitaria sanguinalis(L.)Scop. leaves and a scanning microscopy study of the internal leaf cell morphology [J]. Plant Physiology, 1971, 47(1):149-156.
[2] Sage R F. The evolution of C4 photosynthesis [J]. New Phytologist, 2004, 161(4):341-370.
[3] 杨虎彪,李晓霞,虞道耿,等.海南具C4、C3解剖特征的禾本科植物[J].植物学报, 2011, 46(4):456-469. Yang H B, Li X X, Yu D G, et al. Anatomical characteristics of C4 and C3 photosynthetic-pathway Poaceae plants in Hainan [J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2011, 46(4):456-469.
[4] 江泽慧.世界竹藤[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社, 2002. Jiang Z H. Bamboo and rattan in the world [M]. Shenyang: Liaoning Science and Technology Publishing House, 2002.
[5] 江泽慧.竹类植物基因组学研究进展[J].林业科学,2012,48(1):159-166. Jiang Z H. Progress in bamboo genomics research[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(1): 159-166.
[6] 王啸晨,岳祥华,吴杰,等.2种观赏彩叶竹形态结构的观察与分析[J].中国农学通报, 2012, 28(16):233-238. Wang X C, Yue X H, Wu J, et al. Appearance and structure analysis of chimeric leaves from two ornamental bamboos[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(16):233-238.
[7] 黄启民,杨迪蝶,高爱新.毛竹光合作用的研究[J].林业科学,1989, 25(4):366-369. Huang Q M, Yang D D, Gao A X, et al. A study on photosynthesis of bamboo[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,1989, 25(4):366-369.
[8] 张丽.C3、C4不同作物光合生理特性比较的研究[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2004. Zhang L. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics for C3 and C4 plants [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2002.
[9] 肖俊涛.C3、C4植物和转PEPC基因水稻光合生理特性比较[D].北京:中国农业大学, 2005. Xiao J T. Comparison of photosynthetic characteristics for C3, C4 plants and PEPC transgenic rice [D]. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2005.
[10] 林新春,袁晓亮,林绕,等.雷竹无限制花序的形态建成[J].福建林学院学报,2012,32(2):141-145. Lin X C, Yuan X L, Lin R, et al. Morphogenesis of indefinite inflorescence of Phyllostachys violascens [J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 2012, 32(2):141-145.
[11] Demmig-Adams B, Adams W W I. Chlorophyll and carotenoid composition in leaves of Euonymus kiautschovicus acclimated to different degrees of light stress in the field[J]. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 1996, 23(5)649-659.
[12] Bilger W, Björkman O. Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis [J]. Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25(3):173-185.
[13] van Kooten O, Snel J F. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology[J]. Photosynthesis Research, 1990, 25(3): 147-150.
[14] 王可玢,许春辉,赵福洪,等.水分胁迫对小麦旗叶某些体内叶绿素a荧光参数的影响[J].生物物理学报,1997,13(2):273-278. Wang K B, Xu C H, Zhao F H, et al. The effects of water stress on some in vivo chlorophyll a fluorescence parameters of wheat flag leaves [J]. Acta Biophysica Sinica, 1997, 13(2):273-278.
[15] 陆时万,徐祥生,沈敏健.植物学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 1991. Lu S W, Xu X S, Shen M J. Botany [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1991.
[16] 蔡联炳,郭延平.禾本科植物叶片表皮细胞结构主要类型的演化与系统分类和发育途径的探讨[J].西北植物学报,1995,15(4):323-335. Cai L B, Guo Y P. Study on constituent cells of leaf epidermis, systematics and phylogenetic path of the family Poaceae[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 1995, 15(4): 323-335.
[17] 吕芳德,徐德聪,侯红波,等.5种红山茶叶绿素荧光特性的比较研究[J].经济林研究,2003, 21(4):4-7. Lv F D, Xu D C, Hou H B, et al. Comparative study on chlorophyll fluorescence character of five kinds of Camellia[J]. Economic Forest Researches, 2003, 21(4):4-7.
[18] 许大全,张玉忠,张荣铣.植物光合作用的光抑制[J].植物生理学通讯,1992, 28(4):237-243. Xu D Q, Zhang Y Z, Zhang R X. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in plants[J]. Plant Physiology Communication,1992, 28(4):237-243.

基金

收稿日期:2014-05-26 修回日期:2015-03-15
基金项目:“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD23B0504); 国家自然科学基金项目(31370588)
第一作者:杨丽,博士。*通信作者:高志民,博士。E-mail: gaozhimin@icbr.ac.cn。
引文格式:杨丽,娄永峰,彭镇华,等. 毛竹、麻竹光合途径类型分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(5):169-173.

PDF(1482797 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/