基于CVM的崇明东滩湿地非使用价值评价

蒋劭妍,曹牧,汤臣栋,马强,曹莹,薛建辉

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01) : 21-27.

PDF(1294 KB)
PDF(1294 KB)
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (01) : 21-27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.004
专题报道

基于CVM的崇明东滩湿地非使用价值评价

  • 蒋劭妍1,曹 牧2,汤臣栋3,马 强3,曹 莹2,薛建辉2*
作者信息 +

Non-use value assessment of the Chongming Dongtan wetland based on the contingent valuation method

  • JIANG Shaoyan1, CAO Mu2, TANG Chendong3, MA Qiang3, CAO Ying2, XUE Jianhui2*
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】上海崇明东滩湿地在维持鸟类生物多样性、净化大气和湿地水质及促淤成陆等方面具有较大的非使用价值,为了对湿地生态系统的生态资源价值核算、生态补偿政策制定等提供参考,对崇明东滩湿地的非使用价值进行评估。【方法】基于条件价值法(CVM),针对该湿地生态系统非使用价值保护支付意愿,采用支付卡式问卷进行湿地生态价值调查。【结果】研究共发放问卷490份,回收有效问卷462份,发现受访者为保护崇明东滩湿地环境、维持湿地功能,平均每年愿意支付58.3元,则估算出崇明东滩湿地生态系统非使用价值为48.75亿元/a。根据Pearson相关分析及Logistic 回归分析结果,支付意愿与受访者年龄、职业、近3 a旅游次数等因素极显著相关,与教育程度、对崇明东滩湿地的熟悉程度显著相关,与性别、月收入、居住地等因素相关性不显著。最大支付意愿值与受访者性别、教育程度、近3 a旅游次数等因素极显著相关; 与年龄、职业、月收入、对崇明湿地了解程度、居住地等的相关性因素不显著。【结论】应加强对崇明东滩湿地提供生态服务功能的宣传, 增强人们对东滩湿地作用和功能的认识以有利于东滩湿地非使用价值体现, 从而有效开展东滩湿地的建设和管理。

Abstract

【Objective】Chongming Dongtan wetland plays an important role in ecological services, including the maintenance of bird biodiversity, purification of the atmosphere, water quality and sediment deposition. It can provide the reference for the ecological resource value accounting and the policy making of the ecological compensation in the wetland ecosystem. 【Method】The contingent valuation method(CVM)was used to evaluate the non-use value of Chongming Dongtan wetland. A questionnaire of payment card based on CVM was developed for the survey study. 【Result】 We sent out the questionnaires to 490 respondents,and received 462 usable responses.Data analysis reveals that the value of willingness to pay(WTP)of Dongtan wetland is RMB 58.3 Yuan per year.The total annual non-use value of Chongming Dongtan wetland is RMB 4.875 billion Yuan per year.The results showed that age,occupation and travel times in recent three years were extremely closely correlated with WTP, also educational status, familiarity to Dongtan wetland were closely correlated with WTP, while gender, domicile, monthly income level were not correlated with WTP. Further more, the gender, educational level and travel times in recent three years were extremely correlated with the WTP value, while age, occupation, monthly in come, familiarity to Dongtan wetland and domicile were not correlated with WTP value. 【Conclusion】 This study highlights the need for publicity and awareness of wetland ecosystem services among the public. This could be useful for increasing the non-use value of the wetland, and then would be benefit to the wetland management.

引用本文

导出引用
蒋劭妍,曹牧,汤臣栋,马强,曹莹,薛建辉. 基于CVM的崇明东滩湿地非使用价值评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2017, 41(01): 21-27 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.004
JIANG Shaoyan, CAO Mu, TANG Chendong, MA Qiang, CAO Ying, XUE Jianhui. Non-use value assessment of the Chongming Dongtan wetland based on the contingent valuation method[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2017, 41(01): 21-27 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.004
中图分类号: S718.53    Q 14   

参考文献

[1] 曹牧, 薛建辉. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能与价值评估研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016,40(5):163-169. DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.026 CAO M,XUE J H. Review of service function and value research on Chongming Dongtan wetland ecosystem [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016,40(5):163-169.
[2] Daily G C. Nature’s Services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. 4th ed. Washington D.C.:Island Press, 1997.
[3] 赵士洞, 张永民, 赖鹏飞.千年生态系统评估报告集[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2007:16-67.
[4] 吉丽娜, 温艳萍. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能价值评估[J]. 中国农学通报,2013,29(5):160-166. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2013.05.030 JI L N, WEN Y P. Wetland ecosystem services valuation of Chongming Dongtan[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(5):160-166.
[5] O’NEIL WILLIAM B. On the usefulness of the contingent valuation method for resource damage assessments and ecosystem valuation[J]. Forum for Social Economics, 1990, 20(1):40-44.DOI: 10.1007/BF02778826
[6] 敖长林, 李一军, 冯磊, 等. 基于CVM的三江平原湿地非使用价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(23): 6470-6477. AO C L, LI Y J, FENG L, et al. Evaluating the non-use value of sanjiang wetland based on contigent valuation method[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(23): 6470-6477.
[7] 崔丽娟, 张曼胤. 扎龙湿地非使用价值评价研究[J]. 林业科学研究,2006, 19(4):491-496. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2006.04.016 CUI L J, YIN Z M. Valuation on non-use values of Zhalong wetlands[J]. Forest Research, 2006, 19(4): 491-496. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2006.04.016.
[8] 庄大昌. 基于CVM的洞庭湖湿地资源非使用价值评估[J]. 地域研究与开发,2006, 25(2):105-110. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2006.02.022. ZHUANG D C. Evaluation of the no-use values of the wetland resources in Dongting Lake based on CVM[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2006, 25(2): 105-110.
[9] 俞玥, 何秉宇. 基于CVM的新疆天池湿地生态系统服务功能非使用价值评估[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(12):53-58. YU Y, HE B Y. Estimation of the non-tratable value of Xinjiang Tianchi wetland ecosystem service function based on the CVM[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources & Environment, 2012, 26(12):53-58.
[10] 杜浩, 甘芳, 危起伟, 等. 基于条件价值法对长江宜昌中华鲟自然保护区的非使用价值评估[J]. 四川动物, 2010, 29(6):933-937. DU H, GAN F, WEI Q W, et al. Non-use value assessment of Chinese Sturgeon Nature Reserve of Yangtze River in Yichang, Hubei Province based on the contingent valuation method[J]. Sichuan Journal of Zoology, 2010, 29(6):933-937.
[11] 胡喜生, 洪伟, 吴承祯. 基于CVM的闽江河口湿地生态系统非使用价值评价[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2012, 10(6):64-70. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-3007.2012.06.011 HU X S, HONG W, WU C Z. Evaluating the non-use value of Minjiang estuary wetland ecosystem based on contigent valuation method[J]. Science of Soil & Water Conservation, 2012, 10(6):64-70.
[12] 郑伟, 沈程程, 乔明阳, 等. 长岛自然保护区生态系统维护的条件价值评估[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(1):82-87. DOI:10.5846/stxb201304280848 ZHENG W, SHEN C C, QIAO M Y, et al. Contingent valuation of preserving ecosystem of Changdao Island Nature Reserve[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(1):82-87.
[13] 陆健健. 中国湿地[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社, 1990:96-105.
[14] 王凤珍, 周志翔, 郑忠明. 武汉市典型城市湖泊湿地资源非使用价值评价[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(12):3261-3269. WANG F Z, ZHOU Z X, ZHENG Z M. Evaluation on non-use values of typical lake wetlands in Wuhan[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(12):3261-3269.
[15] LO A Y, JIM C Y. Protest response and willingness to pay for culturally significant urban trees: implications for contingent valuation method[J]. Ecological Economics, 2015, 114:58-66. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.012
[16] RANDALL A, MITCHELL R C, CARSON R T. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method[J]. Land Economics, 1990, 66(1): 107. DOI:10.2307/3146688.
[17] 张翼飞, 赵敏. 意愿价值法评估生态服务价值的有效性与可靠性及实例设计研究[J]. 地球科学进展, 2007, 22(11):1141-1149. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-8166.2007.11.006 ZHANG Y F, ZHAO M. Review on the validity and reliability of CVM in evaluation of ecosystem service and a case design study[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2007, 22(11):1141-1149.
[18] MARKANTONIS V, BITHAS K. The application of the contingent valuation method in estimating the climate change mitigation and adaptation policies in Greece: an expert-based approach[J]. Environment Development & Sustainability, 2010, 12(5):807-824.DOI:10.1007/s10668-009-9225-0.
[19] 庞丙亮, 崔丽娟, 马牧源,等. 基于CVM的扎龙湿地生物多样性维持服务价值评价[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2014,10(4):20-25. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3290.2014.04.06 PANG B L,CUI L J, MA M Y,et al. Valuation of the services of Zhalong wetland for maintaining biodiversity based on contingent valuation method[J]. Wetland Science & Management, 2014,10(4):20-25.

基金

基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201404305); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
第一作者:蒋劭妍(4281885@qq.com),博士生。*通信作者:薛建辉(jhxue@njfu.edu.cn),教授。

PDF(1294 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/