底部渗灌下缓释肥对华北落叶松容器苗生长和氮积累的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.012

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2017, Vol. 60 ›› Issue (01): 75-81.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.012

底部渗灌下缓释肥对华北落叶松容器苗生长和氮积累的影响

万芳芳,刘勇^*,李国雷,孙巧玉,蒋乐,史文辉,滕飞,张劲

省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,北京林业大学林学院,北京 100083

出版日期:2017-02-18 发布日期:2017-02-18
基金资助:
基金项目:国家林业局“948”项目(2012-4-66)
第一作者:万芳芳(81256904@qq.com)。*通信作者:刘勇(lyong@bjfu.edu.cn),教授。

Effect of sub-irrigation with slow-release fertilizer on growth and accumulation of nitrogen of Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr container seedlings

WAN Fangfang, LIU Yong^*, LI Guolei, SUN Qiaoyu, JIANG Le, SHI Wenhui, TENG Fei, ZHANG Jin

Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083,China

Online:2017-02-18 Published:2017-02-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】确定底部渗灌技术下培育华北落叶松容器苗合理的缓释肥施用量,探索在高效节水的渗灌条件下缓释肥对华北落叶松容器苗的苗木生长以及氮养分积累的影响。【方法】以华北落叶松播种容器苗为研究对象,在底部渗灌条件下,采用单因素完全随机区组设计,设置3个不同浓度梯度的缓释肥施氮量(50 、100 、150 mg/株),通过比较苗木不同生长期的形态指标、氮浓度和氮含量以及基质不同部位的酸碱度和电导率的差异,系统研究底部渗灌下缓释肥对1年生华北落叶松容器苗生长和氮积累的影响。【结果】施氮量对华北落叶松容器苗不同时期的苗高和地径影响差异显著。当施氮量为100 mg/株时,1年生华北落叶松容器苗的苗高、地径达到最大值,分别为34.38 cm、3.67 mm; 施氮量对生长季末的根生物量影响差异显著,对茎、叶不同时期的生物量影响差异显著,当施氮量为100 mg/株时,华北落叶松容器苗的总生物量最大,生长季末达1.80 g; 施氮量越大,华北落叶松容器苗各器官的氮浓度和氮含量越大,施氮量为150 mg/株下的氮浓度和氮含量显著高于50 mg/株的处理,而与100 mg/株的施氮处理无明显差异; 当施氮量为150 mg/株时,苗木体内的氮浓度和含量达到最大,根、茎、叶的氮质量分数分别为1.78%、1.28%、2.14%,氮含量分别为8.41、9.56、11.71 mg/株,但其苗高、地径、生物量等形态指标呈下降趋势; 随着施氮量的增大,基质的EC值升高、pH降低,且基质上层的EC值显著高于下层的,而pH则表现为上层较低,但未影响苗木质量。【结论】缓释肥能够促进华北落叶松容器苗生长,并且有利于苗木体内的氮积累; 底部渗灌技术下培育华北落叶松容器苗合理的缓释氮量为100 mg/株。

Abstract: 【Objective】Determining the appropriate slow-release fertilizer(SRF)application rate of Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr container seedling, and exploring the effect of fertilizer with sub-irrigation on seedling growth and nitrogen accumulation.【Method】An univariate completely randomized block design with treatments of 50,100,150 mg/ind(mg per individual)SRF was applied.Seedling morphological indexes, nitrogen concentration, media pH and electrical conductivity(EC)at different depth in different growth period were measured with different treatments.【Result】There were significant effects for plant height and root-collar diameter in different fertilizer application rates at different growth period. The largest plant height(34.38cm)and root-collar diameter(3.67 mm)were detected at 100 mg/ind SRF treatment. There was a significant effect on the root biomass at the end of the growing season, while the biomass of the stem and leaf was significantly different at different growth stages. The total seedling biomass was the highest(1.80 g)at the 100 mg/ind SRF treatment at the end of the growing season. The nitrogen concentration and nitrogen content in different organs increased with the increasing fertilizer application rate. N concentration and N content in 150 mg/ind SRF treatments were significantly higher than that of 50 mg/ind SRF, while no significant difference was observed between 100 mg/ind SRF and 150 mg/ind SRF treatments. The 150 mg/ind SRF treatment had the largest N concentration and content, the nitrogen concentrations of root, stem and leaf were 1.78%, 1.28% and 2.14%, respectively, and the nitrogen contents were 8.41, 9.56, 11.71 mg/ind, respectively. However, the seedling morphological indexes including height, diameter and biomass declined. The EC value of the media increased and the pH value decreased with the increasing fertilizer application rate, and the EC value of the top media layer was higher than that of the bottom layer, while the pH value of the top layer was lower than the bottom, however, these did not affect the seedling quality.【Conclusion】SRF could promote the growth and nitrogen accumulation of L. principis-rupprechtii container seedlings. The optimum SRF amount is 100 mg/ind SRF per seedling under sub-irrigation.

中图分类号:

S723

万芳芳,刘勇,李国雷,等. 底部渗灌下缓释肥对华北落叶松容器苗生长和氮积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 60(01): 75-81.

WAN Fangfang, LIU Yong, LI Guolei, SUN Qiaoyu, JIANG Le, SHI Wenhui, TENG Fei, ZHANG Jin. Effect of sub-irrigation with slow-release fertilizer on growth and accumulation of nitrogen of Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr container seedlings[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 60(01): 75-81.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.012.

参考文献

[1] DUMROESE R K, WENNY D L, PAGE-DUMROESE D S. Nursery waste water:the problem and possible remedies[C]//LANDIS T D, CREGG B. Gen Tech Rep. Portland: National Proceedings, Forest and Conservation Nursery Association. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 1995: 89-97.
[2] FARE D C, GILLIAM C H, KEEVER G J, et al. Cyclic irrigation reduces container leachate nitrate-nitrogen concentration[J]. Hort Science, 1994, 29(12): 1514-1517.
[3] JUNTUNEN M L, HAMMAR T, RIKALA R. Leaching of nitrogen and phosphorus during production of forest seedlings in containers[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2002, 31(6): 1868-1874.
[4] COGGESHALL M V, Van SAMBEEK J W. Development of a subirrigation system with potential for hardwood tree propagation[C]// The International Plant Propagators Society. Combined Proceedings,2002,51:443-448.
[5] DUMROESE R K, JACOBS D F, DAVIS A S, et al. An introduction to subirrigation in forest and conservation nurseries and some preliminary results of demonstrations[C]// RILEY L E, DUMROESE R K, LANDIS T D. National Proceedings Portland: Forest and Conservation Nursery Association. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2007: 20-26.
[6] SCHMAL J L, DUMROESE R K, DAVIS A S, et al. Subirrigation for production of native plants in nurseries — concepts, current knowledge, and implementation[J]. Native Plants Journal, 2011, 12(2): 81-93.
[7] 祝燕,刘勇,李国雷,等. 林木容器育苗底部渗灌技术研究现状与展望[J]. 世界林业研究,2013, 26(5): 48-52. ZHU Y,LIU Y,LI G L, et al. Current development and prospect on sub-irrigation in container cultivation of forest trees[J]. World Forestry Research, 2013, 26(5): 48-52.
[8] PINTO J R, CHANDLER R A, DUMROESE R K. Growth, nitrogen use efficiency, and leachate comparison of subirrigated and overhead irrigated pale purple coneflower seedlings[J]. Hort Science, 2008,43(3), 897-901.
[9] 陈闯,刘勇,李国雷,等. 底部渗灌灌水梯度对栓皮栎容器苗生长和养分状况的影响[J]. 林业科学,2015, 51(7), 21-27. DOI: 10.11707 /j.1001-7488.20150703. CHEN C,LIU Y, LI G L,et al. Effects of sub-irrigation gradients on growth and nutrient status of containerized seedlings of Quercus variabilis[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(7), 21-27.
[10] 奚旺,刘勇,马履一,等. 底部渗灌对华北落叶松容器苗水肥利用状况及生长, 光合特性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2014, 42(12): 37-42. XI W,LIU Y,MA L Y,et al. Effect of sub-irrigation with different water and fertilizer supplies on growth,photosynthetic characteristics and water-use efficiency of containerized Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr seedlings[J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2014, 42(12): 37-42.
[11] 唐拴虎, 张发宝, 黄旭, 等. 缓/控释肥料对辣椒生长及养分利用率的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2008, 19(5): 986-991. TANG S H, ZHANG F B, HUANG X, et al. Effect of slow/controlled release fertilizers on the growth and nutrient efficience of pepper[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2008, 19(5): 986-991.
[12] 陈艳萍, 肖尧, 孔令杰, 等. 缓释肥施用量对超高产夏玉米氮素积累分配的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(27): 34-40. CHEN Y P, XIAO Y, KONG L J, et al. Effects of slow-release fertilizer treatments on nitrogen accumulation and distribution of super-high yield summer maize[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2015, 31(27): 34-40.
[13] 梁新安, 张守仕, 梁芳芳, 等. 袋控缓释肥对日光温室番茄生长发育及土壤氮素淋失的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2015, 29(3): 306-310. DOI:10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2015.03055. LIANG X A, ZHANG S S, LIANG F F, et al. Effects of bag-controlled release fertilizer on tomato growth and soil nitrogen leaching in greenhouse[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2015, 29(3): 306-310.
[14] 楚秀丽, 孙晓梅, 张守攻, 等. 日本落叶松容器苗不同控释肥生长效应[J]. 林业科学研究, 2013, 25(6): 697-702. CHU X L, SUN X M, ZHANG S G, et al. Effect of controlled release fertilizers on net container seedlings growth of Larix kaempferi[J]. Forest Research,2013, 25(6): 697-702.
[15] 阮颖, 林夏珍, 王旭艳, 等. 缓释肥对大叶桂樱容器苗生长发育及质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29(10): 70-73. RUAN Y, LIN X Z, WANG X Y, et al. The effects of slow-release fertilizer on growth and quality of Prunus zippeliana[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013, 29(10): 70-73.
[16] 王艺, 王秀花, 吴小林, 等. 缓释肥加载对浙江楠和闽楠容器苗生长和养分库构建的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(12): 57-63. DOI: 10.11707 / j.1001-7488.20131209. WANG Y, WANG X H, WU X L, et al. Effects of slow-release fertilizer loading on growth and construction of nutrients reserves of Phoebe chekiangensis and Phoebe bournei container seedlings[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2013, 49(12): 57-63.
[17] 彭玉华, 郝海坤, 曹艳云, 等. 缓释肥和复合肥对火力楠容器苗的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46(1): 47-52. DOI:10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2015.1.47. PENG Y H, HAO H K, CAO Y Y, et al. Effects of slow-release fertilizer and compound fertilizer on container seedlings of Michelia macclurei Dandy[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2015, 46(1): 47-52.
[18] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2005.
[19] 陈秋夏, 王金旺, 郑坚, 等. 不同施氮水平对青冈栎容器苗的形态和生理特性影响 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(28): 28-35. CHEN Q X, WANG J W, ZHENG J, et al. Effects of nitrogen on morphological and physiological characteristics of Cyclobalanopsis glauca container seedlings[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(28): 28-35.
[20] 李海霞, 许传玲, 郭树平, 等. 供氮水平对长白落叶松幼苗生物量, 氮磷浓度及其季节变化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 38(5): 79-84. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006. 2014. 05. 016. LI H X, XU C L, GUO S P, et al. Effects of different nitrogen supply on biomass,N and P concentration and their seasonal variation of Larix olgensis seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2014, 38(5): 79-84.
[21] 奚旺, 刘勇, 马履一,等.底部渗灌条件下水肥对华北落叶松容器苗生长及基质 pH值, 电导率的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(6), 36-43. DOI: 10.11707 /j.1001-7488.20150605. XI W, LIU Y, MA L Y, et al. Effects of sub-irrigation with different water and fertilizer supplies on growth,media pH and electric conductance of containerized Larix principis-rupprechtii seedlings[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(6), 36-43. DOI: 10.11707 /j.1001-7488.20150605.
[22] 杜康,谢源泉,林赵淼,等.秸秆还田条件下氮肥对水稻幼苗生长及养分吸收的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2016,39(01):18-25.DOI:10.7685/jnau.201503034. DU K, XIE Y Q, LIN Z M, et al. Effect of nitrogen on rice seedling growth and nutrient uptake under wheat straw returning[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University,2016,39(1):18-25.
[23] 苏芸芸,王康才,薛启.氮素形态对藿香光合作用、氮代谢及品质的影响[J].南京农业大学学报,2016,39(4):543-549. DOI:10.7685/jnau.201601014. SU Y Y,WANG K C, XUE Q. Effects of nitrogen form on photosynthesis, nitrogen metabolism and quality of Agastache rugosa[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University,2016,39(4):543-549.
[24] SALIFU K F, JACOBS D F, BIRGE Z K D. Nursery nitrogen loading improves field performance of bare root oak seedlings planted on abandoned mine lands[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2009, 17(3): 339-349. DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2008.00373.x.
[25] 祝燕, 马履一, 刘勇, 等. 控释氮肥对长白落叶松苗木生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(1): 24-28. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.01.006. ZHU Y, MA L Y, LIU Y, et al. Application of controlled release fertilizer in the cultivation of Larix olgensis seedling[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition),2011, 35(1): 24-28.
[26] 马雪红, 胡根长, 冯建国, 等. 基质配比, 缓释肥量和容器规格对木荷容器苗质量的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(4), 505-509. DOI:10.13275/j.cnki. lykxyj.2010.04.010. MA X H, HU G C, FENG J G, et al. Comparison on the substrate and container size of container nursery of Schima superba[J]. Forest Research, 2010, 23(4), 505-509.
[27] BUMGAMER M L, SALIFU K F, JACOBS D F. Subirrigation of Quercus rubra seedlings: nursery stock quality, media chemistry, and early field performance[J]. Hort Science, 2008, 43(7): 2179-2185.
[28] 李国雷, 刘勇, 祝燕,等. 苗木稳态营养加载技术研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(2), 117-123. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.02.025. LI G L, LIU Y, ZHU Y, et al. Study of techniques for steady-state nutrition supply of seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2011, 35(2), 117-123.
[29] 祝燕, 李国雷, 李庆梅, 等. 持续供氮对长白落叶松播种苗生长及抗寒性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2013, 37(1), 44-48. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.01.007 ZHU Y, LI G L, LI Q M, et al. Influence of continually supplementing nitrogen on the quality of Larix olgensis seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2013, 37(1), 44-48.
[30] JACOBS D F, TIMMER V R. Fertilizer-induced changes in rhizosphere electrical conductivity: relation to forest tree seedling root system growth and function[J]. New Forests, 2005, 30(2-3):147-166. DOI: 10.1007/ s11056 -005-6572-z.

底部渗灌下缓释肥对华北落叶松容器苗生长和氮积累的影响

Effect of sub-irrigation with slow-release fertilizer on growth and accumulation of nitrogen of Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr container seedlings

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	叶可可, 李庆梅, 祝燕, 闫晶晶, 张子晗, 冯赛, 杨晓辉. 油松容器苗和裸根苗生长与造林效果对秋季施肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 136-144.
[2]	李振双, 王倩, 朱媛, 杨富成, 梁俊峰, 陆俊锟. 外源信号物质对檀香幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 271-278.
[3]	韦庆钰, 黄海龙, 吴纯泽, 苏嘉熙, 卫星. 3种倍性青杨扦插苗对覆膜滴肥的生长响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 93-101.
[4]	倪铭, 高振洲, 吴文, 张于卉, 喻方圆. 不同氮素施肥方法对纳塔栎容器苗生长及非结构性碳水化合物积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 107-113.
[5]	张琳, 程亚男, 张欣, 杨伟婷, 孔庆涛, 谢东锋. 两种植物生长调节剂对木槿插穗生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 123-129.
[6]	吴丽君, 游云飞, 陈达, 陈文荣, 李文芳. ‘黄樽’薄叶金花茶组培苗生根与移栽技术研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 117-122.
[7]	杨阳, 施皓然, 及利, 杨立学. 指数施肥对紫椴实生苗生长和根系形态的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 91-97.
[8]	刘士玲, 陈琳, 杨保国, 贾宏炎, 庞圣江, 张培, 王晖. 氮磷肥对西南桦无性系生物量分配和根系形态的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 23-29.
[9]	王苗苗,张瑞,李国雷,付妍琳,王佳茜,刘文. 控释肥类型与施肥量对2年生油松容器苗苗圃表现的交互影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 62(04): 17-25.
[10]	黄小辉,陈道静,冯大兰. 不同基质条件下丛枝菌根真菌对桑树生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 62(03): 9-16.
[11]	姚光刚,李国雷,郑永林,薛敦孟,李世安,袁启华. 缓释肥施用量对槲栎容器苗苗木质量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 62(01): 69-75.
[12]	卫星杓,戴腾飞,刘诗琦,贾黎明. 施肥对无患子叶片养分动态及产量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(05): 17-24.
[13]	吴丽君,高楠,陈达,陈文荣. 金花茶杂交种子无菌苗的组培快繁研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(05): 32-38.
[14]	宋协海,郭欢欢,刘勇,贺国鑫,薛敦孟,李成. 黄连木容器苗生长对缓释肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(03): 117-122.
[15]	安常蓉,韦小丽,段如雁,叶润,黎星炜. 接种方式对花榈木幼苗结瘤效应的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(02): 9-16.