崇明东滩自然与人工修复湿地鸟类种群特征对比研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708029

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2018, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (06): 113-120.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708029

崇明东滩自然与人工修复湿地鸟类种群特征对比研究

曹牧¹,蒋劭妍²,陈婷媛³,陈韡玭³,汤臣栋³,景晓玮²,薛建辉^1*

(1.南京林业大学,南方现代林业协同创新中心,南京林业大学生物与环境学院,江苏南京 210037; 2.南京林业大学经济管理学院,江苏南京 210037; 3.上海崇明东滩鸟类国家级自然保护区管理处,上海 202183)

出版日期:2018-11-30 发布日期:2018-11-30
基金资助:
收稿日期:2017-08-22 修回日期:2018-08-22
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201404305); 江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金项目(2017SJB0113); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
第一作者:曹牧(cm129mc@163.com),博士生。*通信作者:薛建辉(jhxue@njfu.edu.cn),教授。

Characteristics of the avian communities in the natural wetland and artificially restored wetland in Chongming Dongtan, Shanghai

CAO Mu¹, JIANG Shaoyan², CHEN Tingyuan³,CHEN Weipin³,TANG Chendong³, JING Xiaowei², XUE Jianhui^1*

(1.Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2. College of Economics and Management,Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 3. Shanghai Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve, Shanghai 202183, China)

Online:2018-11-30 Published:2018-11-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】探讨上海崇明东滩鸟类自然保护区自然湿地与人工修复湿地在维持鸟类生物多样性上生态服务功能的区别,为进一步推进崇明东滩互花米草控制和鸟类栖息地优化工程提供参考。【方法】对比崇明东滩鸟类自然保护区自然湿地与人工修复湿地上各月鸟类观测数量、种类、多样性指数、均匀度指数、优势种数量所占比例的差异,并对两种湿地中鸻形目、雁形目鸟类种类、数量及共有的优势种、常见种鸟类进行两两配对的Kendall相关性分析。【结果】自然湿地与人工修复湿地鸟类种群相似度为0.36,全年鸟类生物多样性及均匀度方面自然湿地低于人工修复湿地。两种湿地的鸟类多样性指数、均匀度指数、鸻形目鸟类的数量及种类、雁形目鸟类的种类有显著差异(P< 0.05),而鸟类总数量、种类及雁形目鸟类数量无显著差异。在自然湿地中,鸻形目鸟类的数量占绝对优势(占62.92%); 在人工修复湿地中,雁形目鸟类的数量最多(占50.20%)。在鸟类迁徙过程中,两种湿地的雁形目鸟类变化有极显著的正相关性,鸻形目鸟类无此特征。7种优势种及常见种鸟类的变化中,两种湿地中记录到的雁鸭类存在显著的种内及种间相关性; 两种湿地记录到的4种鸻鹬及白鹭的数量变化无显著种内相关性。【结论】人工修复湿地为多种途径东滩自然保护区的水鸟,特别是雁形目鸟类提供了良好的栖息地,而鸻形目鸟类更偏好栖息于自然湿地,所以除开展人工湿地修复工程外,保障未被破坏的自然湿地不受外界干扰也很重要。

Abstract: 【Objective】Differences between natural and artificially restored wetlands in maintaining avian biodiversity in Shanghai Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve were studied for implementing the ecological control of Spartina alterniflora and improvement of bird habitats.【Method】The number, species, species diversity, evenness of the bird populations, and proportion of the dominant avian populations were compared between the two types of wetlands. Kendall correlation was used to analyze the number and species number of Charadriiformes and Anseriformes birds and seven dominant species in two types of wetlands.【Result】The species co-occurrence in the avian communities in the two types of wetlands was 0.36. Throughout the year, the diversity index and evenness index of the natural wetland were lower than those of the artificially restored wetland. Significant differences in the avian diversity index and evenness index, number and species number of Charadriiformes birds, and species number of Anseriformes birds were observed, and no significant differences in the avian number, species number, and number of Anseriformes were detected. In the natural wetland, the number of Charadriiformes birds was the highest and accounted for 62.92% of total number of birds. In the artificially restored wetland, the number of Anseriformes birds was the highest and accounted for 50.20% of the total number of birds. During migration, changes in the number of Anseriformes birds were significantly and positively correlated between the two types of wetlands, but changes in the number of Charadriiformes birds were not significantly correlated between the two types of wetlands. Changes in the number of ducks showed significantly positive intraspecific and interspecific correlations in the two types of wetlands. However, changes in the number of 4 kinds waders and egret didn’t show significantly positive intraspecific correlations in the two types of wetlands.【Conclusion】The artificially restored wetland in Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve provides a good habitat for a variety of migratory birds, especially Anseriformes; however, the Charadriiformes birds prefer to perch in the natural wetland. Therefore, it is important to not only protect the undamaged natural wetland from the external interference, but also conduct artificial wetland restoration projects.

中图分类号:

Q958
S718

曹牧,蒋劭妍,陈婷媛,等. 崇明东滩自然与人工修复湿地鸟类种群特征对比研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(06): 113-120.

CAO Mu, JIANG Shaoyan, CHEN Tingyuan,CHEN Weipin,TANG Chendong, JING Xiaowei, XUE Jianhui. Characteristics of the avian communities in the natural wetland and artificially restored wetland in Chongming Dongtan, Shanghai[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 42(06): 113-120.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708029.

参考文献

[1] 李伟, 崔丽娟, 赵欣胜, 等. 中国滨海湿地及其生态系统服务功能研究概述[J]. 林业调查规划, 2014, 39(4): 24-30.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2014.04.006.
LI W, CUI L J, ZHAO X S, et al. An overview of Chinese coastal wetland and their ecosystem services[J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2014, 39(4):24-30.
[2] 曹牧, 薛建辉. 崇明东滩湿地生态系统服务功能与价值评估研究述评[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5): 163-169. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.026.
CAO M, XUE J H. Review of service function and value research on Chongming Dongtan wetland ecosystem[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(5): 163-169.
[3] 蒋劭妍, 曹牧, 汤臣栋, 等. 基于CVM的崇明东滩湿地非使用价值评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(1): 21-27.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.004.
JIANG S Y, CAO M, TANG C D, et al.Non-use value assessment of the Chongming Dongtan wetland based on the contingent valuation method[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017,41(1):21-27.
[4] GAUDREAU N, BOISCLAIR D. The influence of spatial heterogeneity on the study of fish horizontal daily migration[J]. Fisheries Research, 1998, 35(1): 65-73.DOI:10.1016/s0165-7836(98)00060-5.
[5] ZOU Y A, TANT C D, NIU J Y, et al. Migratorywaterbirds response to coastal habitat changes: Conservation implications from long-term detection in the Chongming Dongtan wetlands, China[J]. Estuaries and Coasts, 2016, 39(1): 273-286. DOI:10.1007/s00267-008-9247-7.
[6] KE C Q, ZHANG D, WANG F Q, et al. Analyzing coastal wetland change in the Yancheng National Nature Reserve, China[J]. Regional Environmental Change, 2010, 11(1): 161-173. DOI:10.1007/s10113-010-0130-8.
[7] AMITAGE A R, JENSEN S M, YOON J E, et al. Wintering shorebird assemblages and behavior in restored tidal wetlands in Southern California[J]. Restoration Ecology, 2007, 15(1):139-148.DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2006.00198.x.
[8] SNELL-ROOD E C, CRISTOL D A. Avian communities of created and natural wetlands:bottomland forests in Virginia[J]. The Condor, 2003, 105(2): 303. DOI:10.1650/0010-5422(2003)105[0303:ACOCAN]2.0.CO; 2.
[9] 马强, 吴巍, 汤臣栋, 等. 崇明东滩湿地互花米草治理对鸟类及底栖动物多样性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(1): 9-14. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.002.
MA Q,WU W,TANG C D, et al. Effects of habitat restored on the diversity of bird and marcobenthos in the Chongming Dongtan wetland[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017,41(1): 9-14.
[10] 汤臣栋. 上海崇明东滩互花米草生态控制与鸟类栖息地优化工程[J]. 湿地科学与管理, 2016, 12(3): 4-8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3290.2016.03.01.
TANT C D.Ecological control of Spartina alterniflora and improvement of birds habitats in Chongming Dongtan wetland, Shanghai[J]. Wetland Science & Management, 2016, 12(3):4-8.
[11] 张姚, 谢汉宾, 王天厚. 崇明东滩人工湿地春季水鸟群落结构及其生境分析[C]// 海峡两岸鸟类学术研讨会. 2013:490-504.DOI:10.13859/j.cjz.201404004.
ZHANG Y, XIE H B,WANG T H, et al. Analysis on the waterbird community structure and its habitat on the artificial wetlands in Spring in Chongming Dongtan,China[C]//Symposium on Birds on both sides of the Taiwan Strait, 2013:490-504.
[12] 上海崇明东滩鸟类国家级自然保护区.上海崇明东滩鸟类国家级自然保护区年度资源监察报告[R].上海:上海崇明东滩鸟类国家级自然保护区,2014.[2016-09-19].http://www.dongtan.cn/warehouse/Upload/20160919105906838.pdf.
[13] HOLEVO A.S. Problems in the mathema-tical theory of quantum communication channels[J]. Reports on Mathematical Physics, 1977(2): 273-278. DOI:10.1016/0034-4877(77)90010-6.
[14] NISBET I C T. Mathematical ecology an introduction to mathema-tical ecology E. C. Pielou[J]. BioScience, 1970, 20(21): 1180.
[15] 胡春健. 小样本下Kendall τ相关系数的显著性检验[J]. 控制工程, 2013, 20(6): 1195-1197.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7848.2013.06.048.
HU C J. The significance test and algorithm of Kendall τ correlation coefficient under small sample[J]. Control Engineering of China, 2013, 20(6):1195-1197.
[16] 曹牧, 汤臣栋, 马强, 等. 崇明东滩鸟类国家级自然保护区环志鸟类种群特征年际变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(1): 15-20.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.003.
CAO M, TANG C D, MA Q, et al.Inter-annual population variation of migratory birds in Chongming Dongtan National Nature Reserve[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017,41(1):15-20.
[17] 陈雁飞, 汤臣栋, 马强, 等. 崇明东滩自然保护区景观格局动态分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(1): 1-8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2017.01.001.
CHEN Y F, TANG C D,MA Q, et al.Landscape pattern change of Chongming Dongtan Nature Reserve of Shanghai from 2011 to 2015[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017,41(1):1-8.
[18] 张斌, 袁晓, 裴恩乐, 等. 长江口滩涂围垦后水鸟群落结构的变化——以南汇东滩为例[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(16): 4599-4608.
ZHANG B, YANG X, PEI E L, et al. Change of waterbird community structure after the intertidal mudflat reclamation in the Yangtze River Mouth: a case study of Nanhui Dongtan Area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(16):4599-4608.
[19] MISTRY J, BERARDI A, SIMPSON M. Birds as indicators of wetland status and change in the North Rupununi, Guyana[J]. Biodiversity & Conservation, 2008, 17(10):2383-2409.DOI:10.1007/s10531-008-9388-2.
[20] HAGY H M, HINE C S, HORATH M M, et al. Waterbird response indicates floodplain wetland restoration[J]. Hydrobiologia, 2016, 804(1): 119-137.DOI:10.1007/s10750-016-3004-3.
[21] 刘晶, 牛俊英, 邹业爱, 等. 上海浦东东滩鸟类栖息地生态修复区的水鸟群落变化[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2015, 24(2): 219-226.DOI:10.11870/cjlyzyyhj201502006.
LIU J, NIU J Y, ZOU Y A, et al. Changes in the waterbird community of the ecological restored wetlands in Pudong Dongtan, Shanghai[J]. Resources & Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2015, 24(2):219-226.
[22] SUN C Z, ZHEN L, WANG C, et al. Impacts of ecological restoration and human activities on habitat of overwintering migratory birds in the wetland of Poyang Lake, Jiangxi Province, China[J]. Journal of Mountain Science, 2015, 12(5): 1302-1314. DOI:10.1007/s11629-014-3128-8.
[23] 徐付霞, 董永权, 汪忠志. 基于Copula理论的随机变量的相关性[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2012, 32(4): 485-495.
XU F X, DONG Y Q, WANG Z Z. Dependence of random variables based on copula theory[J]. Journal of Systems Science & Mathematical Sciences, 2012, 32(4)485-495.

崇明东滩自然与人工修复湿地鸟类种群特征对比研究

Characteristics of the avian communities in the natural wetland and artificially restored wetland in Chongming Dongtan, Shanghai

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	张文旭, 林晓越, 毛岭峰, 伊理孝, 李垚, 应建平, 唐超和. 浙江绿葱湖省级湿地公园小麂活动节律和集群行为研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 81-87.
[2]	冯林艳, 周火艳, 赵晓迪. 乌兰布和沙漠两种植物的分布格局及其变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 155-160.
[3]	于赐刚, 郭晓平, 马月, 张振华, 刘燕, 董姗姗, 孙硕. 浙江松阳县鸟类群落结构和多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 231-236.
[4]	罗丽, 侯亚男, 杨敬元, 于新文, 高灵旺, 欧阳萱, 杨铭伦, 高家军, 郭安琪, 刘昱坤. 基于声学指数的神农架国家公园声音多样性动态变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 39-48.
[5]	夏凡, 鲍伟东, 盖立新, 巨龙飞, 黄文华, 蒋健, 哈希博. 北京冬奥会延庆赛区施工作业对野生动物的影响分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 219-225.
[6]	邵君学, 胡昕欣, 王俪玢, 周婷婷, 李欣, 冯育青, 周敏军, 戴小华, 王洁, 谢冬. 湿地公园鸟类栖息地禾本科群落盖度对雀形目鸟类集团的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 194-200.
[7]	林远锋, 鲁长虎, 许鹏, 崔鹏, 张文文. 1976年以来丹顶鹤在我国的分布变迁及就地保护状况[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 200-208.
[8]	王玄, 崔鹏, 丁晶晶, 常青. 江苏南部沿海越冬水鸟群落结构及多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 178-184.
[9]	马丹丹, 库伟鹏, 夏国华, 毛洁莹, 薛建辉. 珍稀濒危植物堇叶紫金牛种群结构及动态分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(3): 159-164.
[10]	王磊, 刘强, 杨俊杰, 雷宇, 祁天法. 基于卫星跟踪的钳嘴鹳家域研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(6): 33-38.
[11]	石树敏,王楠,李扎西姐. 白马鸡繁殖期等级行为和社群结构的社会网络分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(03): 137-144.
[12]	侯金,杨建,李玉杰,黄金燕,刘巅,张晋东. 基于红外相机调查的卧龙自然保护区兽类资源时空分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(03): 187-192.
[13]	侯森林1,贾竞波2,张明海2,朴仁珠3. 黑河林区驼鹿冬季营养容纳量的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 30(05): 79-82.
[14]	邓丽娜,吴小芹. 松材线虫毒力及发育转型与细胞自噬关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(04): 171-176.
[15]	王文娟,谭祖国,胡文泰. 基于OWC和ASP的鸟类区系动态图表的构建与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 30(01): 101-104.