氮磷肥对西南桦无性系生物量分配和根系形态的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201809018

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 23-29.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201809018

氮磷肥对西南桦无性系生物量分配和根系形态的影响

刘士玲¹(), 陈琳¹, 杨保国¹, 贾宏炎¹^,^*(), 庞圣江¹, 张培¹, 王晖²

1.中国林业科学研究院热带林业实验中心,广西友谊关森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,广西凭祥 532600
2.中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所,国家林业和草原局森林生态环境重点实验室,北京 100091

收稿日期:2018-09-18 修回日期:2019-04-16 出版日期:2019-10-08 发布日期:2019-10-08
通讯作者: 贾宏炎
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2016YFD0600604-01)

Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on biomass allocation and root morphology in Betula alnoides clones

LIU Shiling¹(), CHEN Lin¹, YANG Baoguo¹, JIA Hongyan¹^,^*(), PANG Shengjiang¹, ZHANG Pei¹, WANG Hui²

1. Experimental Center of Tropical Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Guangxi Youyiguan Forest Ecosystem Research Station, Pingxiang 532600, China
2. Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Environment,State Forestry and Grassland Administration, Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection,Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China

Received:2018-09-18 Revised:2019-04-16 Online:2019-10-08 Published:2019-10-08
Contact: JIA Hongyan

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】西南桦(Betula alnoides)具有较高的经济价值和生态效益,是中国热带、亚热带地区重要的乡土速生阔叶树种。氮和磷的有效性和空间分布显著影响着植物生长和根系发育。笔者研究施肥对西南桦无性系生物量分配和根系形态的影响,筛选出优良西南桦无性系及适宜的施肥配方,为西南桦的科学培育提供参考。【方法】以西南桦4个无性系(编号分别为A5、FB4、FB4⁺、BY-1)组培苗为试验材料,采用完全随机区组设计,每个小区 25 株。设置氮(0、200、400 mg/株)和磷(0、70、140 mg/株)共9个组合处理,重复 3 次。以不施肥为对照。为防止苗木缺素,每株施钾量为332 mg。磷肥作为基肥一次性施入基质中,组培苗移栽成活1个月后,开始追施氮和钾肥,每次施肥间隔时间为7 d,共10次。最终苗木收获时,先分离出根系进行形态指标扫描,获得根长、根表面积、根体积和根平均直径,最后全株烘干用于测定各器官的生物量,比较不同施肥处理下西南桦无性系的生物量分配和根系形态差异。【结果】①不同无性系和施肥处理下西南桦幼苗的地上、地下和总生物量差异均达到显著水平,但无性系×施肥处理的交互作用不显著。施肥处理幼苗的地上、地下和总生物量较对照(不施肥)有明显的增幅。处理5(N 200 mg/株+P 70 mg/株)幼苗的地上、地下和总生物量最大,分别比其他施肥处理提高了11.27%~460.49%、7.14%~200.00%、10.57%~390.09%。进一步比较不同无性系,无性系FB4⁺的地上、地下和总生物量表现出明显的生长优势,分别是无性系A5、FB4和BY-1的1.14~1.21、1.22~1.31、1.15~1.22倍。②不同无性系和施肥处理下幼苗的根表面积、根平均直径和各根径等级细根的根长差异显著或极显著,且无性系×施肥处理的交互作用对根体积、根表面积、根平均直径和各根径等级细根(根径d>2 mm除外)的根长影响均极显著。施肥处理的幼苗根系形态参数均高于对照。在所有无性系中,处理5的根系形态参数均显著高于其他施肥处理,其根表面积、根平均直径、根体积和总根长,分别比其他施肥处理提高了0.77%~227.20%、2.13%~152.63%、0.60%~264.13%和4.53%~214.04%。进一步比较不同根径等级细根的根长,西南桦幼苗的小细根(0<d≤1 mm)、粗细根(1<d≤2 mm)和粗根(d>2 mm)的根长亦表现出处理5最大。无性系FB4⁺在处理5下的根系形态参数显著高于其他无性系和施肥组合。③总生物量与地上、地下生物量均呈极显著的正相关关系,这三者与根平均直径、总根长、根表面积、根体积亦分别表现为极显著的正相关关系。【结论】施肥显著促进了西南桦幼苗的生物量和根系生长发育,且存在无性系差异。综合幼苗的生物量和根系形态指标,认为西南桦无性系FB4⁺在处理5(N 200 mg/株+P 70 mg/株)条件下生长表现最优。

关键词: 西南桦, 无性系, 氮, 磷, 施肥, 生物量分配, 根系形态

Abstract:

【Objective】 Betula alnoides is a native, fast-growing, broad-leaved tree species found in the tropical and subtropical regions of China, and it has a high economic value and ecological benefits. The availability and spatial distribution of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) significantly affect plant growth and root development. By studying the effect of fertilization on biomass allocation and root morphology in B. alnoides clones, the optimum B. alnoides clone and fertilization treatments were screened to provide scientific guidance for cultivating B. alnoides. 【Method】 Four B. alnoides clones (A5, FB4, FB4⁺ and BY-1) were selected as research materials, and a completely randomized experimental design was conducted with nine treatments including three N levels (0, 200 and 400 mg/seedling) and three P levels (0, 70 and 140 mg/seedling) with three replications and 25 plants for each subplot. To prevent nutrient deficiency in seedlings, 332 mg/seedling potassium (K) was applied. P fertilizer was supplied to the medium as a basal fertilizer. The application of N and K fertilizers was initiated at 1 month after seedling transplantation and was conducted at intervals of 7 days for a total of 10 times. When the seedlings were harvested, the roots were separated and scanned to measure morphological indexes (root length, surface area, volume and mean diameter). Finally, whole plants were dried to determine the biomass of each part, and the biomass allocation and root morphology of B. alonoides clones under different fertilization treatments were compared. 【Result】 ① The above-ground, below-ground and total biomass were significantly affected by fertilization treatment and differed according to clones, but they were not influenced by the interaction between clones and fertilization treatment. Compared with the control treatment, the fertilization treatment significantly increased the above-ground, below-ground, and total biomass. Regardless of the clone, treatment 5 (200 mg/seedling N+70 mg/seedling P) resulted in the highest biomass among all treatments, which was 11.27%-460.49%, 7.14%-200.00% and 10.57%-390.09% higher than the other treatments for above ground, below ground, and total biomass, respectively. On further comparing different clones, FB4⁺ showed obvious growth advantages, with an above ground, below ground, and total biomass of 1.14-1.21, 1.22-1.31 and 1.15-1.22 times than those of other clones (A5,FB4 and BY-1), respectively. ② The root surface area, mean diameter and total length were significantly different among different clones and fertilization treatments. Except the total length of roots with a diameter of <2 mm, the interaction effect between clones and fertilization treatment resulted in significant differences in terms of root volume, surface area, mean diameter and total length. The fertilization treatment improved root morphology compared with the control treatment. In all clones, treatment 5 resulted in superior root morphological indexes than the other treatments, with values 0.77%-227.20%, 2.13%-152.63%, 0.60%-264.13% and 4.53%-214.04% higher than those of root surface area, mean diameter, volume and total length, respectively. On further comparing the total lengths of fine roots of different diameters, treatment 5 also produced the longest thin fine roots (0 < diameter ≤ 1 mm), thick fine roots (1 < diameter ≤ 2 mm), and coarse roots (diameter>2 mm) in B. alnoides seedlings. The clone FB4⁺ under treatment 5 exhibited the optimum root morphology among all combinations of clones and fertilization treatment. ③ There were significant positive correlations among the above ground, below ground and total biomass. Further, these three measures of biomass were positively correlated with root mean diameter, total length, surface area and volume. 【Conclusion】 Fertilization significantly increased biomass and promoted root growth ofB. alnoides seedlings, although there were differences among clones. Based on biomass and root morphological indexes, clone FB4⁺ and treatment 5 (200 mg/seedling N+70 mg/seedling P) exhibited the optimum growth performance for this tree species.

Key words: Betula alnoides, clone, nitrogen, phosphorus, fertilization, biomass allocation, root morphology

中图分类号:

S723.7

刘士玲,陈琳,杨保国,等. 氮磷肥对西南桦无性系生物量分配和根系形态的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(5): 23-29.

LIU Shiling, CHEN Lin, YANG Baoguo, JIA Hongyan, PANG Shengjiang, ZHANG Pei, WANG Hui. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on biomass allocation and root morphology in Betula alnoides clones[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(5): 23-29.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201809018.

图/表 3

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 30

[1]	HODGE A. The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients[J]. New Phytologist, 2004, 162(1):9-24.DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01015.x. doi: 10.1111/nph.2004.162.issue-1
[2]	VANCE C P, UHDE-STONE C, ALLAN D L. Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource[J]. New Phytologist, 2003, 157(3):423-447. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x
[3]	VITOUSEK P. Nutrient cycling and nutrient use efficiency[J]. The American Naturalist, 1982, 119(4):553-572. DOI: 10.1086/283931. doi: 10.1086/283931
[4]	邝雷, 邓小梅, 余斐, 等. 氮、磷、钾配比施肥对任豆容器苗生长的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2014, 35(6):79-82,88.DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2014.06.015.
	KUANG L, DENG X M, YU F, et al. Effects of fertilization on the growth of Zenia insignis container seedlings [J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2014, 35(6):79-82.
[5]	徐福利, 赵亚芳, 张潘, 等. 施肥对华北落叶松人工林根茎叶中氮磷含量的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2014, 50(3):139-143.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20140320.
	XU F L, ZHAO Y F, ZHANG P, et al. Effects of fertilization on nitrogen and phosphorus content in roots,stems and leaves of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantation [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2014, 50(3):139-143.
[6]	周玮, 周运超. 施肥对马尾松幼苗及根系生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(3):13-17.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.03.014.
	ZHOU W, ZHOU Y C. Effect on the growth of Pinus massoniana seedlings and root under different fertilizer treatments [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2011, 35(3):13-17.
[7]	王力朋, 晏紫伊, 李吉跃, 等. 指数施肥对楸树无性系生物量分配和根系形态的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(23):7452-7462.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201203040288.
	WANG L P, YAN Z Y, LI J Y, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on biomass allocation and root morphology of Catalpa bungei clones [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(23):7452-7462.
[8]	韦如萍, 胡德活, 陈金慧, 等. 低磷胁迫下杉木无性系根系形态及养分利用响应研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(2):1-8.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201704027.
	WEI R P, HU D H, CHEN J H, et al. Response of roots morphological characteristics and nutrient utilization to low phosphorus stress among five clones of Cunninghamia lanceolate(Lamb.)Hook [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 42(2):1-8.
[9]	宋平, 张蕊, 张一, 等. 模拟氮沉降对低磷胁迫下马尾松无性系细根形态和氮磷效率的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(11):1136-1144.DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0109. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2016.0109
	SONG P, ZHANG R, ZHANG Y, et al. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on fine root morphology,nitrogen and phosphorus efficiency of Pinus massoniana clone under phosphorus deficiency [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(11):1136-1144.
[10]	蒋云东, 王达明, 邱琼, 等. 7种热带阔叶树种的苗木施肥试验[J]. 云南林业科技, 2003(2):11-16.DOI: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2003.02.004.
	JIANG Y D, WANG D M, QIU Q, et al. Fertilization experiment on young plants of seven broad-leaved tree species indigenous to tropical areas[J]. Yunnan Forestry Science and Technology, 2003(2):11-16.
[11]	郑海水, 杨斌, 傅强, 等. 不同施肥措施对西南桦幼林生长的影响[J]. 西部林业科学, 2007, 36(3):1-6. DOI: 10.16473/j.cnki.xblykx1972.2007.03.004.
	ZHENG H S, YANG B, FU Q, et al. Effect of different fertilization treatments on sapling growth of Betula alnoides [J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science, 2007, 36(3):1-6.
[12]	陈琳, 曾杰, 徐大平, 等. 氮素营养对西南桦幼苗生长及叶片养分状况的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(5):35-40.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20100506.
	CHEN L, ZENG J, XU D P, et al. Effects of exponential nitrogen loading on growth and foliar nutrient status of Betula alnoides seedlings [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2010, 46(5):35-40.
[13]	CHEN L, JIA H Y, ZENG J, et al. Growth and nutrient efficiency of Betula alnoides clones in response to phosphorus supply[J]. Annals of Forest Research, 2016, 59(2):199-207.DOI: 10.15287/afr.2016.561.
[14]	李化山, 汪金松, 法蕾, 等. 模拟氮沉降对油松幼苗生长的影响[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2013, 19(5):774-780.DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1145.2013.00774.
	LI H S, WANG J S, FA L, et al. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on seedling growth of Pinus tabulaeformis [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2013, 19(5):774-780.
[15]	REICH P B, OLEKSYN J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(30):11001-11006.DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403588101.
[16]	CHEN L, JIA H Y, DELL B, et al. Responses of Castanopsis hystrix seedlings to macronutrient imbalances: growth,photosynthetic pigments and foliar nutrient interactions[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2016, 39(12):1663-1671.DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1161784. doi: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1161784
[17]	LI J Y, GUO Q X, ZHANG J X, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus supply on growth and physiological traits of two Larix species[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2016, 130:206-215.DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.06.006. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.06.006
[18]	STUDER C, HU Y C, SCHMIDHALTER U. Interactive Effects of N-, P-and K-nutrition and drought stress on the development of maize seedlings[J]. Agriculture, 2017, 7(11):90-102.DOI: 10.3390/agriculture7110090. doi: 10.3390/agriculture7110090
[19]	王益明, 李瑞瑞, 张慧, 等. 指数施肥对美国山核桃幼苗生物量及氮积累的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(10):2920-2926.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201810.028.
	WANG Y M, LI R R, ZHANG H, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on biomass and nitrogen accumulation of Carya illinoensis seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(10):2920-2926.
[20]	WANG J R, HAWKINS C D B, LETCHFORD T. Relative growth rate and biomass allocation of paper birch (Betula papyrifera) populations under different soil moisture and nutrient regimes[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1998, 28(1):44-55.DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-28-1-44. doi: 10.1139/x97-191
[21]	DENG S X, SHI K K, MA J, et al. Effects of fertilization ratios and frequencies on the growth and nutrient uptake of Magnolia wufengensis (Magnoliaceae)[J]. Forests, 2019, 10(1):65-94.DOI: 10.3390/f10010065. doi: 10.3390/f10010065
[22]	TRESEDER K K, VITOUSEK P M. Effects of soil nutrient availability on investment in acquisition of N and P in hawaiian rain forests[J]. Ecology, 2001, 82(4):946-954.DOI: 10.2307/2679894. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0946:EOSNAO]2.0.CO;2
[23]	GÜSEWELL S. Responses of wetland graminoids to the relative supply of nitrogen and phosphorus[J]. Plant Ecology, 2005, 176(1):35-55.DOI: 10.1007/s11258-004-0010-8. doi: 10.1007/s11258-004-0010-8
[24]	白晶晶, 吴俊文, 何茜, 等. 不同配方施肥对楸树幼苗生物量分配及养分利用的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2015, 36(6):91-97.DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2015.06.015.
	BAI J J, WU J W, HE Q, et al. Effects of different fertilization formulas on Catalpa bungei seedling biomass allocation and nutrient use efficiency [J]. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2015, 36(6):91-97.
[25]	MANTER D K, KAVANAGH K L, ROSE C L. Growth response of Douglas-fir seedlings to nitrogen fertilization:importance of Rubisco activation state and respiration rates[J]. Tree Physiology, 2005, 25(8):1015-1021.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/25.8.1015. doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.8.1015
[26]	PREGITZER K S, DEFOREST J L, BURTON A J, et al. Fine root architecture of nine north american trees[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2002, 72(2):293-309.DOI: 10.2307/3100029. doi: 10.1890/0012-9615(2002)072[0293:FRAONN]2.0.CO;2
[27]	EINSMANN J C, JONES R H, PU M, et al. Nutrient foraging traits in 10 co-occurring plant species of contrasting life forms[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1999, 87(4):609-619.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00376.x. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00376.x
[28]	CAO P, REN Y Z, ZHANG K P, et al. Further genetic analysis of a major quantitative trait locus controlling root length and related traits in common wheat[J]. Molecular Breeding, 2014, 33(4):975-985. DOI: 10.1007/s11032-013-0013-z. doi: 10.1007/s11032-013-0013-z
[29]	刘莹, 王国梁, 刘国彬, 等. 不同分类系统下油松幼苗根系特征的差异与联系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(12):1386-1393.DOI: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2010.12.004.
	LIU Y, WANG G L, LIU G B, et al. Difference and inherent linkage of root characteristics in different root classification of Pinus tabulaeformis seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(12):1386-1393.
[30]	TATENO R, HISHI T, TAKEDA H. Above-and belowground biomass and net primary production in a cool-temperate deciduous forest in relation to topographical changes in soil nitrogen[J]. Forest Ecology Management, 2004, 193(3):297-306.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.11.011. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.11.011

项目 item	处理号 treatment No.	地下生物量/g below-ground biomass	地上生物量/g above-ground biomass	总生物量/g total biomass	根冠比 ratio of root to shoot
施肥处理 fertilization treatment	1(CK)	0.30±0.09 c	0.81±0.18 c	1.11±0.25 c	0.31±0.07 b
	2	0.36±0.10 c	0.98±0.23 c	1.34±0.32 c	0.38±0.07 a
	3	0.36±0.10 c	1.17±0.34 c	1.53±0.43 c	0.38±0.03 a
	4	0.77±0.17 ab	3.50±0.68 b	4.26±0.83 b	0.22±0.02 c
	5	0.90±0.19 a	4.54±0.82 a	5.44±0.96 a	0.20±0.03 c
	6	0.81±0.29 ab	3.92±1.10 b	4.72±1.37 b	0.21±0.02 c
	7	0.73±0.13 b	3.60±0.52 b	4.33±0.61 b	0.20±0.03 c
	8	0.84±0.15 ab	4.08±0.78 ab	4.92±0.91 ab	0.21±0.02 c
	9	0.73±0.14 b	3.67±0.97 b	4.33±0.91 b	0.20±0.02 c
无性系 clone	A5	0.59±0.25 b	2.71±1.53 b	3.30±1.78 b	0.25±0.08 a
	FB4	0.59±0.17 b	2.81±1.33 b	3.40±1.49 b	0.24±0.09 a
	FB4⁺	0.77±0.37 a	3.28±1.88 a	4.02±2.20 a	0.26±0.06 a
	BY-1	0.63±0.21 b	2.87±1.46 b	3.49±1.66 b	0.26±0.10 a
变异来源 source of variance	施肥处理fertilization treatment	34.94^**	54.23^**	57.01^**	40.86^**
	无性系clone	11.38^**	3.48^*	4.60^**	1.67
	施肥处理×无性系 fertilization treatment × clone	1.43	0.66	0.77	0.81

项目 item	处理号 treatment No.	根表面积/cm² root surface area	根体积/cm³ root volume	根平均直径/mm root mean diameter	根长/cm root length
项目 item	处理号 treatment No.	根表面积/cm² root surface area	根体积/cm³ root volume	根平均直径/mm root mean diameter	小细根 (0<d≤1 mm) thin fine root	粗细根 (0<d≤2 mm) thick fine root	粗根 (d>2 mm) coarse root
施肥处理 fertilization treatment	1(CK)	46.51±9.59 e	0.92±0.12 e	0.57±0.12 c	278.80±72.95 f	17.33±6.42 d	3.16±1.90 e
	2	64.01±14.98 d	1.16±0.30 de	0.67±0.13 c	353.75±107.34 e	21.71±10.91 d	4.89±3.66 d
	3	64.46±8.92 d	1.27±0.33 d	0.71±0.23 c	410.58±82.04 e	26.36±11.05 d	5.81±3.56 d
	4	115.65±6.43 c	2.44±0.23 c	1.33±0.23 ab	638.81±230.79 d	57.98±29.39 c	7.88±4.54 cd
	5	152.18±14.16 a	3.35±0.06 a	1.44±0.04 a	844.48±153.57 a	82.72±21.71 a	12.70±6.00 a
	6	133.53±15.41 b	3.00±0.21 ab	1.38±0.15 ab	756.18±117.32 bc	71.01±37.81 b	7.96±6.26 cd
	7	120.02±7.07 bc	2.62±0.20 bc	1.15±0.20 b	611.63±176.05 de	54.32±31.68 c	6.62±3.16 cd
	8	151.02±13.12 a	3.33±0.33 a	1.41±0.19 ab	812.28±122.02 ab	75.17±25.29 b	11.74±6.85 ab
	9	135.46±5.69 ab	2.92±0.54 ab	1.38±0.11 ab	732.20±161.85 cd	73.14±30.88 b	9.16±4.51 bc
无性系 clone	A5	101.36±43.95 b	2.33±1.18 a	1.03±0.5 c	516.69±189.40 c	45.33±41.56 b	5.38±5.79 c
	FB4	117.16±39.79 a	2.31±0.94 a	1.26±0.45 ab	668.85±216.66 a	52.97±30.44 ab	8.45±3.94 ab
	FB4⁺	124.51±58.65 a	2.54±1.56 a	1.35±0.66 a	707.27±262.37 a	62.45±62.28 a	9.57±6.02 a
	BY-1	115.95±49.98 a	2.66±1.19 a	1.08±0.55 bc	623.72±262.57 b	57.55±30.45 ab	6.14±5.33 b
变异来源 source of variance	施肥处理fertilization treatment	83.71^**	27.54^**	106.76^**	71.8^**	29.69^**	5.34^**
	无性系clone	9.51^**	1.79	32.97^**	31.85^**	2.98^*	3.02^*
	施肥处理×无性系 fertilization treatment × clone	7.50^**	3.43^**	6.44^**	4.11^**	7.61^**	0.92

氮磷肥对西南桦无性系生物量分配和根系形态的影响

Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on biomass allocation and root morphology in Betula alnoides clones

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 3

参考文献 30

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

处理编号 treatment No.	施肥组合 combination	施肥量/(mg·株^-1) fertilization amount
处理编号 treatment No.	施肥组合 combination	N	P	K
1(CK)	N₁P₁	0	0	332
2	N₁P₂	0	70	332
3	N₁P₃	0	140	332
4	N₂P₁	200	0	332
5	N₂P₂	200	70	332
6	N₂P₃	200	140	332
7	N₃P₁	400	0	332
8	N₃P₂	400	70	332
9	N₃P₃	400	140	332

[1]	丰伟, 单昌丹, 张慧, 刘家蔓, 柳国昂, 姚增玉. 施肥方式和施肥量对华山松幼苗生长及针叶营养状况的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 191-198.
[2]	肖晖, 林泽忠, 苏顺德, 江晓丽, 陈海强, 吴炜, 罗水金, 潘隆应, 郑仁华. 杉木无性系圃地测定性状遗传变异分析及超早期选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 63-70.
[3]	丁咏, 刘鑫, 张金池, 王宇浩, 陈美玲, 李涛, 刘孝武, 周悦湘, 孙连浩, 廖艺. 酸雨类型转变对杉木林地土壤和细根生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 90-98.
[4]	李承基, 官凤英, 周潇, 张璇, 郑亚雄. 配比施肥对带状采伐毛竹林立竹数量和质量恢复的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 79-85.
[5]	孙劲伟, 王圣燕, 范弟武, 朱咏莉. C源与NP添加对Cd胁迫下林地土壤呼吸作用的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 140-146.
[6]	左壮, 张韫, 崔晓阳. 火烧对兴安落叶松林土壤氮形态和含量的初期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 147-154.
[7]	陆启帆, 林上平, 刘胜辉, 郑翔, 毕毓芳, 肖子璋, 姜姜, 王安可, 杜旭华. 施肥对毛竹林产量影响的Meta分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 88-96.
[8]	欧阳, 欧阳芳群, 孙猛, 王超, 王军辉, 安三平, 王丽芳, 许娜, 王猛. 欧洲云杉无性系幼龄生长节律、年度和密度互作效应及选择策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 95-104.
[9]	杨甲定, 刘雨节, 冯建元, 张远兰. 树木叶片衰老中的氮素再吸收机制研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 1-8.
[10]	梁文超, 步行, 罗思谦, 谢寅峰, 胡加玲, 张往祥. 施肥对增温促花后‘长寿冠’海棠叶片生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 114-120.
[11]	邓家珍, 叶绍明, 林铭业, 蓝雅惠, 燕羽, 樊容源, 潘彩玲. 降香黄檀根瘤以及根瘤菌形态和超微结构特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 259-267.
[12]	郭伟, 韩秀, 张利, 王迎, 杜辉, 燕语, 孙忠奎, 张林, 李国华, 罗磊. 青檀扦插苗对不同氮素水平的形态、光合生理响应和转录组分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 87-96.
[13]	刘增才, 王淑婷, 佟鑫宇, 邹莉. 暴马桑黄GPS基因克隆及响应茉莉酸甲酯诱导表达研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 123-130.
[14]	袁莹, 王雪峰, 王甜, 陈飞飞, 黄川腾, 林玲, 董晓娜. 基于多图像特征的幼龄沉香全氮估测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 19-28.
[15]	赵铭臻, 刘静, 邹显花, 郑宏, 范福金, 林开敏, 马祥庆, 李明. 间伐施肥对杉木中龄林生长和材种结构的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 70-78.