
文冠果物候期对环境因子的响应
Response of phenophase of Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge to environmental factors
【目的】文冠果(Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge)具有喜光、耐寒、耐旱、不耐涝等特性,在中国天然分布于东北、西北、华北等地区,是造林绿化、防风固沙、退耕还林的首选树种。研究不同分布区多种环境因子对文冠果物候期的综合影响,分析其物候期变异规律,为文冠果资源保护和开发利用提供依据。【方法】以中国6个主要分布区(内蒙古坤都、内蒙古天山、内蒙古乌丹、河北省承德、河北省蔚县、河南省陕县)实生群体的文冠果植株为对象,于2016年在各样地内选择长势相对一致的样株30株,采取定株定枝方法,对文冠果的初花期、叶芽萌动期、盛花期、末花期、展叶期、果速生期、果熟期、落果期和落叶期等共9个物候期进行系统观测。采用相关性分析、回归分析等方法,明确影响文冠果各物候期的主导环境因子及其作用规律。【结果】不同分布区文冠果物候期存在明显差异,其中,盛花期差异最大(42 d),果速生期差异最小(29 d)。河南陕县群体的文冠果大部分物候期出现最早,但落叶期最晚,总生长期最长(221 d);内蒙古坤都群体的文冠果落叶期最早,其他物候期出现最晚,总生长期最短(146 d)。大部分物候期与经纬度、年日照时间正相关,与其他环境因子负相关。年均气温是影响初花期、盛花期、末花期、展叶期、果速生期、落叶期和总生长期的主要因子;影响叶芽萌发期和落果期的主要因子是无霜期;影响果熟期的主要因子是年日照时间;影响总花期的主要因子是绝对最高温。【结论】文冠果物候期呈现明显的地理变异规律,环境因子对其物候变化影响显著。随着经纬度升高,气温逐渐下降,春季达到生长临界温度越晚,文冠果开花、展叶、结实越晚,并且秋季植株停止生长和落叶越早,因此其总生长期变短。
【Objective】 Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge is a light-loving species and adapts well to low temperatures and drought conditions, but it is susceptible to waterlogging. This species is naturally distributed in northeastern, northwestern and northern China. It is an ideal species for afforestation, wind and sand fixation, and conversion of cropland to forest. This study aimed to clarify the comprehensive effects of various environmental factors in different distribution areas on the phenophases ofX. sorbifolium Bunge and analyze the related variation pattern to provide a scientific basis for resource protection and development of this species. 【Method】 Six X. sorbifolium Bunge seedling populations from its main distribution areas, including Kundu, Tianshan and Wudan in Inner Mongolia Autonomons Region, Chengde and Yuxian in Hebei Province, and Shaanxian in Henan Province, were considered for this study. In 2016, 30 individual plants with consistent growth vigor were selected from each seedling population to systematically observe nine phenophases, including the early flowering stage, leaf bud germination stage, full flowering stage, late flowering stage, leaf expansion stage, fruit fast-growing stage, fruit maturing stage, fruit dropping stage and deciduous stage. Correlation and regression analyses were performed to reveal the dominant environmental factors that affected phenophase and function rules.【Result】 Significant differences were observed in the phenophases among the plants from the different distribution areas. The maximum and minimum differences were observed in the full flowering stage (42 days) and fruit fast-growing stage (29 days), respectively. Most of the phenophases of the plants from the Shaanxian population occurred earlier than those of the plants from the other populations, although the deciduous stage was the longest in the Shaanxian population, which led to the longest total growth period (221 days). In the Kundu population, the deciduous stage occurred early and the other phenophases occurred late; as a result, this population had the shortest total growth period (146 days). Most of the phenophases were positively correlated with longitude, latitude, and annual sunshine hours and negatively correlated with altitude, annual average temperature, absolutely highest temperature, absolutely lowest temperature, ≥10 ℃ annual accumulated temperature, annual rainfall, annual evaporation and frostless period. Annual average temperature was the main factor that influenced the early flowering stage, full flowering stage, late flowering stage, leaf expansion stage, fruit fast-growing stage, deciduous stage and total growth period. Frost-free period had a significant effect on the leaf bud germination stage and fruit dropping stage. The fruit maturing stage was mainly affected by the annual sunshine hours. The absolute maximum temperature was the main factor that affected the total flowering period.【Conclusion】 There is an obvious geographical variation pattern in the phenophases ofX. sorbifolium Bunge, and environmental factors significantly affect these phenophases. Higher latitude and longitude decrease the temperature and postpone the critical growth period of X. sorbifolium Bunge. Correspondingly, its florescence, bud bursting, and fruiting stage are postponed and the species stops growing and defoliates earlier in autumn. As a result, the total growth period ofX. sorbifolium is shortened.
Xanthoceras sorbifolium Bunge / population / phenophase / environmental factor
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
刘淑明, 孙丙寅, 贺安乾, 等. 西部地区文冠果种群种子特征及主要化学成分的地理变化[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(4):43-48. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20120407.
|
[4] |
牟洪香. 木本能源植物文冠果(Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge)的调查与研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2006:3-64.
|
[5] |
严婷. 文冠果优良单株开花结实生物学特性研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2014:10-12.
|
[6] |
敖妍, 张宁, 赵磊磊, 等. 不同分布区文冠果物候期的差异及其与地理-气候因子和结实性状的相关性[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2017, 26(2):27-34. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2017.02.04.
|
[7] |
马利苹, 王力华, 阴黎明, 等. 乌丹地区文冠果生物学特性及物候观测[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(12):2583-2587. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2008.0062.
|
[8] |
古丽江·许库尔汗, 张东亚, 汪智军, 等. 新疆木垒县文冠果物候特征研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(17):9356-9357,9391. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn:0517-6611.2012.17.063.
Gulijiang·Xukuerhan,
|
[9] |
汪智军, 张东亚, 卓立. 准噶尔盆地南缘文冠果物候与气温变化的关系[J]. 经济林研究, 2013, 31(1):102-105. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2013.01.010
|
[10] |
张晓燕. 神东矿区不同种源地文冠果生长适宜性及耐盐性研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2012:16-40.
|
[11] |
宛敏渭, 刘秀珍. 中国物候观测方法[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1979:42-47.
|
[12] |
夏林喜, 牛永波, 李爱萍, 等. 浅谈木本植物物候观测要求及各物候期观测标准[J]. 山西气象, 2006(2):47-48.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
宋富强, 张一平, 许再富, 等. 不同来源地同种植物种群间物候期比较研究[J]. 广西植物, 2010, 30(6):835-839,843. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3142.2010.06.022.
|
[15] |
邓莉君. 中国华北植物物候对气候变化的响应分析及基于监控相机的花期监测[D]. 北京:中国地质大学, 2017:21-35.
|
[16] |
郑景云, 葛全胜, 赵会霞. 近40年中国植物物候对气候变化的响应研究[J]. 中国农业气象, 2003, 24(1):28-32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2003.01.009.
|
[17] |
龚高法, 简慰民. 我国植物物候期的地理分布[J]. 地理学报, 1983, 38(1):33-40.
植物发芽、展叶、开花、结实等物候期的早晚综合地反映了气候等环境因子的季节变化。同一种植物物候现象出现日期随地区的推移速度是反映一个地区生物季节的重要指标。
|
[18] |
裴顺祥. 我国高纬度地区典型植物及全国广布种毛桃、山桃物候对气候变化的响应[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2011:62-66.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
本文根据我国近30年的物候资料和气候资料的统计分析,论证了气温是影响中国木本植物物候的主要因子,在此基础上建立了物候与年平均气温的线性统计模式,又利用此模式分别计算了未来全球年平均气温升高0.5–2.0℃和未来大气中CO<sub>2</sub>浓度倍增而增暖情况下,我国主要木本植物物候期的大致变幅。
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
李瑞英, 孙东宝, 江晓东. 鲁西南木本植物物候期对气候变暖的响应[J]. 中国农业气象, 2014, 35(2):135-140. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2014.02.003.
|
[26] |
王秀荣, 赵杨, 丁贵杰. 气象因子对麻疯树主要物候的影响[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(5):613-620.
|
[27] |
李荣平, 周广胜, 王玉辉, 等. 羊草物候特征对气候因子的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(3):277-280. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4890.2006.03.009.
|
[28] |
韩超, 郑景云, 葛全胜. 中国华北地区近40年物候春季变化[J]. 中国农业气象, 2007, 28(2):113-117. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2007.02.001.
|
[29] |
宣继萍, 周志芳, 刘建秀, 等. 结缕草属(Zoysia Willd.)植物物候期的差异分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2008, 17(3):53-57. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2008.03.010.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |