控释肥类型与施肥量对2年生油松容器苗苗圃表现的交互影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811026

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (04): 17-25.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811026

控释肥类型与施肥量对2年生油松容器苗苗圃表现的交互影响

王苗苗¹, 张瑞^1,2, 李国雷^1,2*, 付妍琳¹, 王佳茜¹, 刘文³

(1.北京林业大学省部共建森林培育与保护教育部重点实验室,干旱半干旱地区森林培育及生态系统国家林业局重点实验室,北京 100083; 2.北京林业大学,城乡生态环境北京实验室,北京 100083; 3北京西山试验林场,北京 100083)

出版日期:2019-07-22 发布日期:2019-07-22
基金资助:
收稿日期:2018-11-19 修回日期:2019-04-15 基金项目:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2017PT02); 国家自然科学基金项目(31670628)。第一作者:王苗苗(18811302887@126.com)。*通信作者:李国雷(glli226@163.com),教授, ORCID(0000-0002-2244-4716)。

Effect of controlled-release fertilizer(type and dosage)on the performance of nursery-grown Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Seedlings

WANG Miaomiao¹, ZHANG Rui ^1,2, LI Guolei^1,2*, FU Yanlin¹, WANG Jiaxi¹, LIU Wen³

(1. Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Forest Ecosystem in Arid and Semi-arid Area of State Forestry Administration, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; 2. Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China; 3. Beijing Xishan Experimental Forest Farm, Beijing 100083, China)

Online:2019-07-22 Published:2019-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】基于苗木养分加载模型,探究控释肥释放类型与施肥量对2年生油松容器苗苗圃的交互影响,选择最优施肥体系。【方法】以2年生油松容器苗为材料,设置2个肥料释放类型(双层膜和单层膜)和7个施肥梯度(0 ～ 9.2 g/L, 即 0 ～1 350 mg/株),生长季末测定苗木生长、养分状态及非结构性碳水化合物(NSC)水平。【结果】肥料类型与施肥量交互作用于苗木P和NSC水平; 生物量、N及NSC含量与施肥量间存在曲线关系,双膜肥料释放类型在施肥量为4.5～6.1 g/L时苗木生长最佳; 两种肥料释放类型下,施肥量为9.2 g/L对苗木地径、生物量和N含量产生毒害,施肥量为7.6～9.2 g/L对苗木淀粉和可溶性糖含量产生毒害。在苗木营养加载区间内,叶片养分质量分数分别为N 2.80%～3.05%、P 0.20%～0.24%、K 3.40%～3.41%。【结论】基于肥料成本和肥料利用效率,推荐2年生油松最佳施肥体系为双膜类型 4.5 g/L(N 675 mg /株)。

关键词: 油松, 施肥体系, 肥料类型, 奢侈消耗, 叶片N浓度

Abstract: 【Objective】 Non-structural carbohydrates(NSCs)are a critical parameter affecting seedling quality and have not been widely adopted while optimizing fertilizer regimes. Controlled-release fertilizer(CRF)is a simple and effective substitute for fertigation and can be used to optimize nutrient delivery in nursery settings. However, the mechanisms by which fertilizer type and dosage interact to influence nursery performance of multiple-year-old seedlings is poorly understood. 【Method】 Two-year-old, container-grown Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.(Chinese pine)seedlings were fertilized with CRF, with either one or two coating layers applied at seven dosages, ranging from 0 to 9.2 g/L medium(0 to 1 350 mg N per seedling). At the end of the second growing season, the dry mass, mineral nutrients and NSCs of the seedlings were measured. 【Result】 There was a significant interaction between the P and NSC status. Dry mass and content of N and NSC exhibited a curvilinear relationship with fertilizer dosage, reaching optimal values with multiple-layer CRF at 4.5-6.1 g/L. Furthermore, it appeared that dosage levels of 9.2 g/L were toxic for plant diameter, dry mass and N content, whereas dosages of 7.6-9.2 g/L were toxic for starch and soluble sugar content. For luxury conditions, the recommended needle concentrations of N, P and K are 2.80%-3.05%, 0.20%-0.24% and 3.40%-3.41%, respectively. 【Conclusion】Based on cost and fertilizer use efficiency, the ideal fertilization regime for the two-year-old P. tabulaeformis seedlings was the use of two-layered CRF at a dosage of 4.5 g/L(675 mg N per seedling).

Key words: Pinus tabulaeformis Carr.(Chinese pine), fertilization regime, fertilizer type, luxury consumption, foliar N concentration

中图分类号:

S723

王苗苗,张瑞,李国雷,等. 控释肥类型与施肥量对2年生油松容器苗苗圃表现的交互影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(04): 17-25.

WANG Miaomiao, ZHANG Rui , LI Guolei, FU Yanlin¹, WANG Jiaxi, LIU Wen. Effect of controlled-release fertilizer(type and dosage)on the performance of nursery-grown Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Seedlings[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(04): 17-25.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811026.

参考文献

[1] VILLAR-SALVADOR P, PUéRTOLAS J, CUESTA B, et al.Increase in size and nitrogen concentration enhances seedling survival in Mediterranean plantations. Insights from an ecophysiological conceptual model of plant survival [J]. New Forests, 2012, 43(5/6): 755-770.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-012-9328-6.
[2] OLIET J A, PUéRTOLAS J, PLANELLES R, et al. Nutrient loading of forest tree seedlings to promote stress resistance and field performance: a Mediterranean perspective [J]. New Forests, 2013, 44:649-669. DOI: 10.1007/s11056-013-9382-8.
[3] Van den DRIESSCHE R. Nursery growth of conifer seedlings using fertilizers of different solubilities and application time, and their forest growth [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1988, 18:172-180 DOI: 10.1139/x88-027.
[4] LANDIS T D, TINUS R W, MCDONALD S E, et al. The container tree nursery manual. Vol. 4 [M]// Seedling nutrition and irrigation. Agricultural Handbook. Washington(DC): USDA Forest Service, 1989.
[5] DUMROESE R K, DAVIS A S, JACOBS D F. Nursery response of Acacia koa seedlings to container size, irrigation method, and fertilization rate [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2011,34(6): 877-887 DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2011.544356.
[6] LI G L, ZHU Y, LIU Y, et al. Combined effects of pre-hardening and fall fertilization on nitrogen translocation and storage in Quercus variabilis seedlings [J]. European Journal of Forest Research, 2014, 133(6): 983-992. DOI.10.1007/s10342-014-0816-4.
[7] USCOLA M, SALIFU K F, OLIET J A, et al. An exponential fertilization dose-response model to promote restoration of the Mediterranean oak Quercu ilex [J]. New Forests, 2015, 46(5):795-812. DOI:10.1007/s11056-015-9493-5.
[8] 林平,邹尚庆,李国雷,等. 油松容器苗生长和氮吸收对指数施肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(3):23-28. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.03.005. LIN P, ZOU S Q, LI G L, et al. Response of growth and N uptake of Pinus tabulaeformis container seedlings to exponential fertilization [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2013, 37(3):23-28.
[9] SALIFU K F, TIMMER V R. Optimizing nitrogen loading of Picea mariana seedlings during nursery culture [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2003, 33:1287-1294 DOI: 10.1139/x03-057.
[10] BIRGE Z K D, SALIFU K F, JACOBS D F. Modified exponential nitrogen loading to promote morphological quality and nutrient storage of bareroot-cultured Quercus rubra and Quercus alba seedlings [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2006, 21(4), 306-316. DOI: 10.1080/02827580600761611.
[11] SALIFU K F, JACOBS D F. Characterizing fertility targets and multi-element interactions in nursery culture of Quercus rubra seedlings [J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2006, 63:231-237 DOI: 10.1051/forest:2006001.
[12] WANG J X, LI G L, PINTO J R, et al. Both nursery and field performance determine suitable nitrogen supply of nursery-grown, exponentially fertilized Chinese pine [J]. Silva Fennica, 2015, 49(3):1295. DOI: 10.14214/sf.1295.
[12] VILLAR-SALVADOR P, USCOLA M, JACOBS D F, The role of stored carbohydrates and nitrogen in the growth and stress tolerance of planted forest trees [J]. New Forests, 2015, 46(5): 813-939. DOI: 10.1007/s11056-015-9499-z.
[14] FU Y L, OLIET J A, LI G L, et al. Effect of controlled release fertilizer type and rate on mineral nutrients, non-structural carbohydrates, and field performance of Chinese pine container-grown seedlings [J]. Silva Fennica, 2017, 51: 2. DOI: 10.14214/sf.1607.
[15] MILLARD P, GRELET G. Nitrogen storage and remobilization by trees: ecophysiological relevance in a changing world [J]. Tree Physiology, 2010, 30(9): 1083-1095. DOI:10.1093/treephys/tpq042.
[16] JACOBS D F, HAASE D L, ROSE R. Growth and foliar nutrition of Douglas-fir seedlings provided with supplemental Polymer-coated fertilizer [J]. WJAF, 2005, 20(1):58-63 DOI:10.1093/wjaf/20.1.58.
[17] HAASE D L, ROSE R, TROBAUGH J. Field performance of three stock sizes of Douglas-fir container seedlings grown with slow-release fertilizer in the nursery growing medium [J]. New Forests, 2006, 31:1-24. DOI: 10.1007/s11056-004-5396-6.
[18] GROSSNICKLE S C. Ecophysiology of northern spruce species: the performance of planted seedlings [M]. Ottawa, Canada: NRC Research Press, 2000.
[19] KAAKINEN S, JOLKKONEN A, IIVONEN S, et al. Growth, allocation and tissue chemistry of Picea abies seedlings affected by nutrient supply during the second growing season[J]. Tree Physiology, 2004, 24(6): 707-719. DOI:10.1093/treephys/24.6.707.
[20] OLIET J A, PLANELLES R, ARTERO F, et al. Field performance of Pinus halepensis planted in Mediterranean arid conditions: relative influence of seedling morphology and mineral nutrition[J]. New Forests, 2009, 37(3): 313-331. DOI:10.1007/s11056-008-9126-3.
[21]李国雷,祝燕,李庆梅,等. 红松苗龄型对苗木质量和造林效果的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48(1): 35-41. LI G L, ZHU Y, LI Q M, et al. Effect of seedling age on the seedling quality and field performance of Pinus koraiensis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2012, 48(1): 35-41.
[22] 徐化成,孙肇凤,郭广荣,等. 油松天然林的地理分布和种源区的划分[J]. 林业科学, 1981, 17(3): 258-270. XU H C, SUN Z F, GUO G R, et al. Geographic distribution of Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. and classification of provenance regions [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 1981, 17(3): 258-270.
[23] 国家林业局. 中华人民共和国林业行业标准:容器育苗技术. LY/T 1000-2013 2013[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[24] LUNA T, WILKINSON K M. Collecting, processing, and storing seeds [M]// DUMROESE RK, LUNA T, LANDIS TD. Nursery manual for native plants: a guide for tribal nurseries-Vol. 1. Nursery management. Agriculture Handbook 730. Washington, D C: Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 2009: 113-131.
[25] 李国雷,刘勇,祝燕,等. 苗木稳态营养加载技术研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,35(2):117-123. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.02.025. LI G L, LIU Y, ZHU Y, et al. Study of techniques for steady-state nutrition supply of seedlings [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2011,35(2): 117-123.
[26] CLOSE D C, BAIL I, HUNTER S, et al. Defining seedling specifications for Eucalyptus globulus: effects of seedling size and container type on early after-planting performance[J]. Australian Forestry, 2006, 69(1): 2-8. DOI:10.1080/00049158.2006.10674981.
[27] PINTO J R, CHANDLER R A, DUMROESE R K. Growth, nitrogen use efficiency, and leachate comparison of subirrigated and overhead irrigated pale purple coneflower seedlings [J]. HortScience, 2008,43(3): 897-901. DOI:10.21273/hortsci.43.3.897.
[28] LOWTHER J R. Use of a single sulphuric-hydrogen peroxide digest for the analysis of Pinus radiata needles [J]. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1980, 11(2): 175-188. DOI:10.1080/00103628009367026.
[29] ALLEN S E. Chemical analysis of ecological materials [M]. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Scientific, 1980: 575.
[30] WANG X K, HUANG J L. Principles and techniques of plant physiological biochemical experiment [M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press,2015:171-186.
[31] 沈海龙. 苗木培育学[M]. 东北林业大学出版社, 2009. SHEN H L. Seedling culture [M]. Harbin:Northeast Forestry University Press, 2009.
[32]翟明普,沈国舫. 森林培育学 [M]. 3版. 北京:中国林业出版社,2016. ZHAI M P, SHEN G F. Silviculture[M]. 3 ed. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2016.
[33] RUTER J M. Influence of source, rate, and method of applicating controlled release fertilizer on nutrient release and growth of ‘Savannah’ holly [J].Fertilizer Research, 1992, 32(1): 101-106. DOI:10.1007/bf01054399.
[34] PLANELLES R. Efectos de la fertilización N-P-K en vivero sobre la calidad funcional de planta de Ceratonia siliqua L [D]. Madrid:Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 2004
[35] ANDIVIA E, FERNáNDEZ M, VáZQUE-PIQUé J. Autumn fertilization of Quercus ilex ssp. ballota(Desf.)Samp. nursery seedlings: effects on morpho-physiology and field performance [J]. Annals of Forest Science, 2011, 68:543-553. DOI:10.1007/s13595-011-0048-4.
[36] VILLAR-SALVADOR P, PEÑUELAS J L, JACOBS D F. Nitrogen nutrition and drought hardening exert opposite effects on the stress tolerance of Pinus pinea L. seedlings [J]. Tree Physiology, 2013, 33(2): 221-232. DOI:10.1093/treephys/tps133.
[37] NAMBIAR E K S, FIFE D N. Growth and nutrient retranslocation in needles of radiata pine in relation to nitrogen supply [J]. Annals of Botany, 1987, 60:147-156 DOI:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087431.
[38] CUESTA B, VILLAR-SALVADOR P, PUéRTOLAS J, et al. Why do large, nitrogen rich seedlings better resist stressful transplanting conditions? A physiological analysis in two functionally contrasting Mediterranean forest species [J]. Forest Ecology and Management, 2010b, 260:71-78 DOI:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.002.
[39] DUMROESE R K. Hardening fertilization and nutrient loading of conifer seedlings [M] // RILEY LE, DUMROESE RK, LANDIS TD. Technical coordinators.National Proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations-2002. Utah: USDA Forest Service, Proceedings RMRS-P-2003, 28: 31-36.
[40] 康瑶瑶. 长白落叶松移植苗分级施肥培育技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2011. KANG Y Y. Studies on techniques of fertilizering and grading for Larix olgensis transplantings[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011.
[41] 孙慧彦. 长白落叶松苗木质量动态评价与施肥技术研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2011. SUN H Y. Studies on dynamic quality evaluation and fertilization techniques of Larix olgensis henry seedlings [D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011.

[1]	赵亚楠, 孙天骅, 王利峰, 许强, 刘军侠, 高宝嘉, 周国娜. 油松抗性相关激素与代谢物对油松毛虫取食与剪叶刺激的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 219-226.
[2]	叶可可, 李庆梅, 祝燕, 闫晶晶, 张子晗, 冯赛, 杨晓辉. 油松容器苗和裸根苗生长与造林效果对秋季施肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 136-144.
[3]	刘文丽, 包怡红. 松针精油的协同抑菌效应及机制[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 98-104.
[4]	于辉,陈燕,张欢,周志勇. 添加无机氮对山西太岳山油松林土壤氮素及温室气体通量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(03): 85-91.
[5]	蒋乐,刘勇,李国雷,林平,史文辉,万芳芳. 短日照处理诱导油松容器苗针叶差异表达蛋白质的功能分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(02): 17-24.
[6]	欧晓岚,刘艳红. 不同坡向及径级油松异龄叶的功能性状[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(04): 80-88.
[7]	于一,郭华峰,周志勇. 油松林氮矿化随土壤有机物质量的变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(01): 69-74.
[8]	滕飞,刘勇,胡嘉伟,孙巧玉,万芳芳,杨晨,张劲. 蘑菇渣堆肥对油松移植容器苗生长和养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(05): 184-190.
[9]	成泽虎,丁坤元,刘艳红. 北京油松天然林和人工林乔木层生产力与气候因子的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(05): 177-183.
[10]	贾全全,罗春旺,刘琪璟,刘丽婷,李俊清. 不同林分密度油松人工林生物量分配模式[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(06): 87-92.
[11]	胡嘉伟,刘勇,马履一,李国雷,贾忠奎,王琰,娄军山,杨晓辉. 园林废弃物堆肥替代油松容器苗基质材料的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(05): 81-86.
[12]	张彦雷,康峰峰,韩海荣,尹学哲,程小琴,李勇,周彬,刘可,孙敬军. 太岳山油松人工林冠下光环境特征与冠层结构[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 38(02): 169-174.
[13]	林平,邹尚庆,李国雷,黄冬辉,祝燕,蒋乐,史文辉. 油松容器苗生长和氮吸收对指数施肥的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(03): 23-28.
[14]	吕瑞恒,李国雷,刘勇,金虎范,林娜. 不同林龄油松针叶凋落物初期分解特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(02): 39-44.
[15]	林娜，刘勇，于海群，，李国雷，吕瑞恒. 不同林龄飞播油松林林下植被多样性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 35(03): 3-.

控释肥类型与施肥量对2年生油松容器苗苗圃表现的交互影响

Effect of controlled-release fertilizer(type and dosage)on the performance of nursery-grown Pinus tabulaeformis Carr. Seedlings

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿