江苏咖啡豹蠹蛾风险分析

巨云为; 朱晨曦; 严晓茹; 章宇; 吴娅莉; 赵玉玲; 王克春; 李永荣

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901032

江苏咖啡豹蠹蛾风险分析

巨云为, 朱晨曦, 严晓茹, 章宇, 吴娅莉, 赵玉玲, 王克春, 李永荣

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 207-210.

PDF(1363 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(1363 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (6) : 207-210. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901032

研究简报

江苏咖啡豹蠹蛾风险分析

巨云为 ¹ ,
朱晨曦 ¹ ,
严晓茹 ¹^,² ,
章宇 ¹ ,
吴娅莉 ¹ ,
赵玉玲 ¹ ,
王克春 ³ ,
李永荣 ⁴

作者信息 +

Risk analysis ofZeuzera coffeae Nietner in Jiangsu Province

JU Yunwei ¹ ,
ZHU Chenxi ¹ ,
YAN Xiaoru ¹^,² ,
ZHANG Yu ¹ ,
WU Yali ¹ ,
ZHAO Yuling ¹ ,
WANG Kechun ³ ,
LI Yongrong ⁴

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】对咖啡豹蠹蛾危害薄壳山核桃的风险进行综合分析,确定其危险程度,为咖啡豹蠹蛾的防控提供参考。【方法】于2016—2017年在江苏南京六合、镇江句容薄壳山核桃种植基地各选取4块50 m×50 m样地调查咖啡豹蠹蛾对薄壳山核桃林的危害情况,采用对角线法在每块样地中选取7个样方,用隔行取样法在每个样方选取10株样树,记录每个样方中的样株数、树龄、树高以及受害株数量,统计受害株率。根据林业有害生物风险分析指标体系对咖啡豹蠹蛾的危险程度进行定量分析,并采用综合分析法进行了风险评估。【结果】调查地3年生薄壳山核桃的受害株率为41.43%,4年生受害株率为32.86%,5年生受害株率为22.14%,6年生受害株率为17.86%。咖啡豹蠹蛾危害风险分析指标及运算值为:①分析区域内分布情况,风险值为2.00;②传入、定殖和扩散的可能性,风险值为3.00;③潜在危害性,风险值为1.80;④受害寄主经济重要性(受害对象的重要性),风险值为3.00;⑤危险性管理难度,风险值为1.67。根据各项风险分析指标计算得咖啡豹蠹蛾的风险综合评价(R)值为2.22。【结论】通过对咖啡豹蠹蛾传播、危害及风险性分析,认为该虫是薄壳山核桃高度危险的有害生物。应加强对咖啡豹蠹蛾虫情的监测,发现后及时防控,控制其虫口密度,以降低对薄壳山核桃经济、生态等效益的负面影响。

Abstract

【Objective】The risk analysis of Carya illinoinensis Koch harmed by Zeuzera coffeae Nietner was conducted to determine the degree of hazard, which provided a reference for the prevention and control of Z. coffeae in the production of C. illinoinensis.【Method】From 2016 to 2017, four sample lands (50 m × 50 m) of C. illinoinensis Koch planting bases in Luhe of Nanjing and Jurong of Zhenjiang of Jiangsu Province, were investigated for the damage caused by Z. coffeae Nietner to the C. illinoinensis Koch forest. Seven sample plots were selected from each sample land by the diagonal method, and ten sample plots from each sample were selected by interlaced sampling. The calculation method of the damaged rate ofC. illinoinensis Koch is the total number of damaged C. illinoinensis Koch divided by the total number of plants investigated. According to the evaluation criteria of forestry pest risk analysis, the risk degree of Z. coffeae was quantitatively analyzed for the first time, and the risk analysis was carried out by a comprehensive analysis method.【Result】The damaged rate of C. illinoinensis Koch was 41.43% for 3-year-old victims; the rate of 4-year-old victims was 32.86%; the rate of 5-year-old victims was 22.14%; the rate of 6-year-old victims was 17.86%. Based on the rules of pest risk analysis, we categorized the risk level of Z. coffeae Nietner using five indexes: the distribution, potential degree of damage, economical value of infected host plants, possibility of transmission and spreading, and difficulty of risk management in Jiangsu. The values of the five indexes were calculated as 2.00, 3.00, 1.80, 3.00 and 1.67, respectively. The overall risk value of Z. coffeae Nietner was 2.22. 【Conclusion】Through the analysis of the spread, harm, and risk of Z. coffeae Nietner, it is considered to be a highly dangerous pest for C. illinoinensis Koch. During production, the monitoring of Z. coffeae Nietner should be strengthened, and timely detection and prevention should be carried out to control the density of this insect population; this will reduce the negative impact on the economic and ecological benefits of C. illinoinensis.

导出引用

巨云为, 朱晨曦, 严晓茹, 等. 江苏咖啡豹蠹蛾风险分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2019, 43(6): 207-210 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901032

JU Yunwei, ZHU Chenxi, YAN Xiaoru, et al. Risk analysis ofZeuzera coffeae Nietner in Jiangsu Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2019, 43(6): 207-210 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201901032

中图分类号： S763.42

参考文献

列表( 原文顺序 | 文献年度倒序 | 文中引用次数倒序 ) 可视化分析

[1]	刘联仁. 咖啡豹蠹蛾生物学特性的初步观察[J]. 四川果树, 1995(3):12-13. LIU L R. Preliminary observation on the biological characteristics of Zeuzera coffeae Nietner [J]. Sichuan Fruits, 1995(3):12-13. 本文引用 [3]

[2]	冯荣扬, 郭良珍, 梁恩义, 等. 咖啡豹蠹蛾生物学特性及其防治[J]. 植物保护, 2000, 26(4):12-14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2000.04.005. 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2000.04.005 FENG R Y, GUO L Z, LIANG E Y, et al. Bionomics and control of Zeuzera coffeae Nietner [J]. Plant Protection, 2000, 26(4):12-14. 本文引用 [1]

[3]

薛婷婷, 刘嘉, 沈永宝, 等. 温度对薄壳山核桃种子萌发的影响及其机制初探[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(11):42-50.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.11.008.

10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.11.008

XUE T

, LIU

, SHEN Y

, et al. Study on the seed germination characteristic of Carya illinoensis [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(11):42-50.

本文引用 [1]

[4]

韩杰, 张明, 林苏宝, 等. 不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃幼树光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(6):13-18.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703024.

10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703024

HAN

, ZHANG

, LIN S

, et al. Effects of different pruning measures on the photosynthetic characteristics of pecan seedlings[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(6):13-18.

本文引用 [1]

[5]

刘壮壮, 曹凡, 张瑞, 等. 5个薄壳山核桃品种花粉形态电镜扫描观察[J]. 经济林研究, 2016, 34(2):137-142. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2016.02.025.

10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2016.02.025

LIU Z

, CAO

, ZHANG

, et al. Observation of pollen morphologies in five cultivars of Carya illinoensis by SEM [J]. Nonwood Forest Research, 2016, 34(2):137-142.

本文引用 [1]

[6]

郭新峰. 宁国市山核桃蛀干性害虫的发生规律及防治技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2010(7):202-203. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2010.07.139.

10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2010.07.139

GUO X

. Occurrence and control techniques of stem borers onCarya cathayensis Sarg. in Ningguo City [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010(7):202-203.

本文引用 [1]

[7]	朱广奇, 龚巧枝. 山核桃园咖啡木蠹蛾的发生与防治[J]. 安徽林业, 2005(4):43. ZHU G Q, GONG Q Z. Occurrence and control of Zeuzera coffeae Nietner in pecan garden [J]. Anhui Forestry Journal, 2005(4):43. 本文引用 [1]

[8]	蔡彤. 汪清林业局森林昆虫多样性及其对林木危害评估的初步研究[D]. 长春:吉林农业大学, 2016. CAI T. Preliminary studies of forest insect diversity and damage assessment of forest insect pests in Wangqing Forestry Bureau[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2016. 本文引用 [4]

[9]

彭方仁, 李永荣, 郝明灼, 等. 我国薄壳山核桃生产现状与产业化发展策略[J]. 林业科技开发, 2012, 26(4):1-4.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2012.04.001.

10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2012.04.001

PENG F

, LI Y

, HAO M

, et al. Production status and industrialization development strategy of Carya illinoensis Koch in China [J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2012, 26(4):1-4.

本文引用 [2]

[10]

蒋志新. 江苏薄壳山核桃发展态势分析与策略[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2011, 38(4):51-53.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2011.04.015.

10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2011.04.015

JIANG Z

. Development situation analysis and strategy of Jiangsu Carya illinoensis Koch [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2011, 38(4):51-53.

本文引用 [2]

[11]

吴文龙, 闾连飞. 薄壳山核桃的引种栽培[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2003(1):11-13.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2003.01.004.

10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2003.01.004

WU W

, LYU L

. Cultivation of Carya illinoensis(Wangenn.)K.Koch as an exotic species [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2003, 30(1):11-13.

本文引用 [2]

[12]

王曼, 李贤忠, 宁德鲁, 等. 薄壳山核桃研究概况及发展趋势[J]. 林业调查规划, 2009, 34(6):93-95.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2009.06.024.

10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2009.06.024

WANG

, LI X

, NING D

, et al. The research summary and developmental trend of Carya illinoensis [J]. Forest Inventory and Planning, 2009, 34(6):93-95.

本文引用 [1]

[13]	陈克, 范晓虹, 李尉民. 有害生物的定性与定量风险分析[J]. 植物检疫, 2002, 16(5):257-261.DOI: 10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2002.05.001. 10.19662/j.cnki.issn1005-2755.2002.05.001 CHEN K, FAN X H, LI W M. Qualitative and quantitative pest risk analysis[J]. Plant Quarantine, 2002, 16(5):257-261. 本文引用 [1]

[14]

严晓茹, 熊大斌, 周际丰, 等. 南方板栗林黑星天牛的风险分析[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2017, 36(5):22-25.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2017.05.006.

10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2017.05.006

YAN X

, XIONG D

, ZHOU J

, et al. Risk analysis of Anoplophora leechi (Gahan) in southern chestnut forests [J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2017, 36(5):22-25, 46.

本文引用 [1]

[15]	李杰, 李峰, 王建海. 界首市美国白蛾风险分析[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2017, 43(3):24-28.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0152.2017.03.005. 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0152.2017.03.005 LI J, LI F, WANG J H. Risk analysis on Hyphantria cunea in Jieshou City [J]. Anhui Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 43(3):24-28.

[16]

刘丽, 陈楠, 郑奋, 等. 海南主要林业有害生物风险评估信息系统的开发[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018, 40(2):282-289. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2018.02.6.

10.3969/j.issn.1674-0858.2018.02.6

LIU

, CHEN

, ZHENG

, et al. Development of risk assessment information system of main forest pest in Hainan[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology, 2018, 40(2):282-289.

[17]

孙小霞, 蔡继增, 李小燕, 等. 林业有害生物云杉大小蠹风险分析[J]. 甘肃科技, 2014, 30(8):143-145.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2014.08.052.

10.3969/j.issn.1000-0952.2014.08.052

SUN X

, CAI J

, LI X

, et al. Risk analysis of forest pests Dendroctonus micans(Kugelann) [J]. Gansu Science and Technology, 2014, 30(8):143-145.

本文引用 [1]

[18]

李娟, 赵宇翔, 陈小平, 等. 林业有害生物风险分析指标体系及赋分标准的探讨[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2013, 32(3):10-15.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2013.03.003.

10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2013.03.003

, ZHAO Y

, CHEN X

, et al. Discussion on the forest pest risk analysis index system and standard of natural endowments[J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2013, 32(3):10-15.

本文引用 [2]

[19]	巨云为, 曹霞, 叶健, 等. 美国薄壳山核桃虫害研究综述[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2014, 33(1):29-34.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2014.01.009. 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2014.01.009 JU Y W, CAO X, YE J, et al. Research advances on pests attacking Carya illinoensis [J]. Forest Pest and Disease, 2014, 33(1):29-34, 43. 本文引用 [1]

[20]	周祖琳. 咖啡豹蠹蛾危害葡萄[J]. 植物保护, 1993, 19(6):45-46. ZHOU Z L. Zeuzera coffeae Nietner harms grapes [J]. Plant Protection, 1993, 19(6):45-46. 本文引用 [1]

[21]	胡淼. 越桔两种蛀干害虫的发生与防治[J]. 昆虫知识, 2001, 38(3):221-222.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0452-8255.2001.03.018. 10.3969/j.issn.0452-8255.2001.03.018 HU M. Occurence and control of two stem borers on blueberry[J]. Entomological Knowledge, 2001, 38(3):221-222. 本文引用 [1]