
不同热解温度下杨树各组分生物质炭的理化特性分析与评价
丁思惠, 方升佐, 田野, 宋子琪, 张艳华
南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6) : 193-200.
不同热解温度下杨树各组分生物质炭的理化特性分析与评价
Analysis and evaluation on physicochemical properties of poplar biochar at different pyrolysis temperatures
【目的】通过对不同热解温度下杨树树叶、树枝、树皮生物质炭和秸秆生物质炭的理化特性及结构进行分析,筛选出更适用于林地土壤改良的农林废弃物种类和热解温度。【方法】以杨树不同组分树叶、树枝、树皮和秸秆等4种农林废弃物为原料,分别在300、500和700 ℃温度下制备生物质炭,测定其产率、pH、全碳、全氮含量、阳离子交换量(CEC)、比表面积和表面官能团等指标。【结果】随着热解温度的升高,4种原料生物质炭的产率逐渐降低,灰分含量和pH升高。同一热解温度下,树枝和树皮生物质炭的全碳含量高于树叶和秸秆生物质炭的,而全氮(TN)、全磷(TP)和全钾(TK)含量均低于树叶和秸秆生物质炭的。4种生物质炭水溶性盐基离子含量和交换性盐基离子含量均随着热解温度的升高而增加,树叶生物质炭的阳离子交换量总体高于其他3种原料的生物炭。树叶和树皮生物质炭的比表面积和总孔容积总体大于树枝和秸秆生物质炭,树皮和树叶生物质炭在700 ℃时比表面积分别高达597.02和121.01 m2/g。4种原料生物质炭的表面官能团种类基本相同,以芳香骨架为主,表面官能团数量均随着热解温度的升高而减少,芳香化程度增强。【结论】在不同热解温度和原料制备的生物质炭中,树叶和秸秆生物质炭的灰分、pH、N、K和盐基离子含量较高,比较适用于改良酸性土壤,增加土壤养分;而杨树树枝和树皮生物质炭含碳量较高,则适用于土壤固碳,提高土壤有机质含量。其中,500 ℃热解的杨树树叶生物质炭综合性能最好,氮、磷、钾养分耗失最少,阳离子交换能力较强,比表面积大,更适用于土壤改良。
【Objective】The characteristics and structure of polar leaf, twig, and bark and straw biochar at different pyrolysis temperatures were analyzed, the types and pyrolysis temperature of agricultural and forestry wastes which are more suitable for forest soil improvement were selected. 【Method】We selected four kinds of agricultural and forestry residues as raw materials, namely leaves, twigs, bark harvested from different components of poplar, and straw harvested from rice. Furnace temperatures were respectively set at 300, 500 and 700 ℃. We studied the properties of biochar, including yield, pH, total C content, total N content, cation exchange capacity (CEC), specific surface area, and surface functional group. 【Result】The results of this study showed that with an increase in pyrolysis temperature, the yield of biochar of the four selected materials gradually decreased, whereas the ash content and pH value continuously increased. At the same pyrolysis temperature, the total C content of twig biochar and bark biochar was evidently higher than that of leaf biochar and straw biochar, while the total N content, total P content, and total K content were lower than those of leaf biochar and straw biochar. The water-soluble and exchangeable base cations of the four kinds of biochar increased with an increase in pyrolysis temperature. The CEC of leaf biochar was higher than that of the other three feedstock biochar. The specific surface area and total pore volume of leaf biochar and bark biochar were generally larger than those of twig biochar and straw biochar. The specific surface area of bark biochar and leaf biochar at 700 ℃ was as high as 597.02 m2/g and 121.01 m2/g, respectively. The surface functional groups, particularly the aromatic skeleton, of the four kinds of biochar were almost the same. We found that with an increase in pyrolysis temperature, the type and number of surface functional groups decreased; however, the degree of aromatization increased. 【Conclusion】Through a comprehensive analysis, we found that among biochar of different raw materials and pyrolysis temperatures, ash content, pH, N, K and base ion content of leaf and straw biochar are relatively higher; the values are more suitable for improving acidic soil and increasing soil nutrients. However, the higher carbon content in poplar twigs and bark is suitable for soil carbon sequestration for improving soil organic matter content. Overall, poplar leaf biochar at 500 ℃ had the highest N, P, and K content, strong CEC, and large specific surface area, and is thus more suitable for soil improvement in woodlands.
杨树 / 生物组分 / 生物质炭 / 热解温度 / 土壤改良
poplar / biotic components / biochar / pyrolysis temperature / soil improvement
[1] |
MATOVICD. Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option:global and Canadian perspective[J]. Energy, 2011,36(4):2011-2016.DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.031.
|
[2] |
周建斌, 周秉亮, 马欢欢, 等. 生物质气化多联产技术的集成创新与应用[J]. 林业工程学报, 2016,1(2):1-8.
|
[3] |
陈温福, 张伟明, 孟军. 生物炭与农业环境研究回顾与展望[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2014,33(5):821-828.
|
[4] |
张旭辉, 李治玲, 李勇, 等. 施用生物炭对西南地区紫色土和黄壤的作用效果[J]. 草业学报, 2017,26(4):63-72.
|
[5] |
徐艺倩, 薛建辉, 吴永波, 等. 施用稻壳炭对黄棕壤氮磷淋失及微生物生物量碳氮含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(3):22-28.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
何绪生, 张树清, 佘雕, 等. 生物炭对土壤肥料的作用及未来研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(15):16-25.
|
[8] |
王国兵, 徐瑾, 王瑞, 等. 添加生物炭对东台滨海区杨树人工林3种温室气体排放的长期影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019,28(6):1152-1158.
|
[9] |
张隐, 魏留洋, 卢利明, 等. CNC负载ZnO纳米复合材料的吸附-光催化性能[J]. 林业工程学报, 2020,5(3):29-35.
|
[10] |
方升佐. 中国杨树人工林培育技术研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008,19(10):2308-2316.
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
裴继诚. 植物纤维化学[M]. 北京: 中国轻工业出版社, 2012: 13-18.
|
[16] |
辛善志. 基于组分的生物质热分解及交互作用机制研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2014.
|
[17] |
余春江. 生物质热解机理和工程应用研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学, 2000.
|
[18] |
李莹. 杉木生物质炭特性及其对土壤碳稳定性影响的研究[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2018.
|
[19] |
林珈羽, 张越, 刘沅, 等. 不同原料和炭化温度下制备的生物炭结构及性质[J]. 环境工程学报, 2016,10(6):3200-3206.
|
[20] |
曹延珺, 徐华东, 王立海, 等. 土壤理化性质对腐朽红松根部土壤微生物数量的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2018,34(2):45-49.
|
[21] |
叶协锋, 周涵君, 于晓娜, 等. 热解温度对玉米秸秆炭产率及理化特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23(5):1268-1275.
|
[22] |
富丽, 徐先英, 付贵全, 等. 五种生物质炭的特性分析[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019,33(9):202-208.
FUL,
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
孟李群, 张云鹏, 苏漳文, 等. 不同炭化温度下杉木生物炭产率及特性比较[J]. 福建林业科技, 2014,41(2):38-41.
|
[25] |
赵伟宁, 杨兴, 何丽芝, 等. 热解温度对典型南方木本园林废弃物生物质炭理化特性的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018,35(6):1007-1016.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
王晓晨. 生物质热解炭性质比较及对白浆土汞赋存形态影响[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2015.
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
陈再明, 陈宝梁, 周丹丹. 水稻秸秆生物碳的结构特征及其对有机污染物的吸附性能[J]. 环境科学学报, 2013,33(1):9-19.
|
[31] |
王国兵, 王瑞, 徐瑾, 等. 生物炭对杨树人工林土壤微生物生物量碳、氮、磷及其化学计量特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(2):1-6.
|
[32] |
杨刚. 高灰基生物炭农用对镉污染的控制机制及生态风险评价[D]. 南京:南京大学, 2018.
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
郑庆福, 王永和, 孙月光, 等. 不同物料和炭化方式制备生物炭结构性质的FTIR研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2014,34(4):962-966.
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |