杨树能源林新无性系苗期生物量及热值研究

翟学昌1,2,彭丽2,方升佐1*,万劲3

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2009, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (06) : 91.

南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2009, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (06) : 91. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2009.06.021
研究论文

杨树能源林新无性系苗期生物量及热值研究

  • 翟学昌1,2,彭丽2,方升佐1*,万劲3
作者信息 +

A study on biomass production and calorific values of new poplar clone seedlings for bioenergy

  • ZHAI Xuechang1,2, PENG Li2, FANG Shengzuo1*, WAN Jin3
Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

以1年生杂交杨树无性系为试验材料,在生长季结束后对茎、皮、根等器官的生物量及热值进行研究。结果表明:共有13个杨树无性系的生物量高于平均值,无性系208的地上部分、地下部分和生物量均为最高,分别达到485.77、146.18、631.95 g;不同器官间干质量热值的顺序为茎、皮、根。不同杨树无性系的单株干质量热值存在极显著差异,其变异幅度为18.659~19.141 kJ/g。选出的优良无性系单株热值、生物量和单株干质量热值平均值分别比群体平均值高26.12%、25.99%和0.12%。不同无性系单株热值的差异主要来源于生物量。

Abstract

In this paper, biomass production and calorific values of components for oneyearold hybrid poplar clones were studied after one growth season. The results showed that the biomass production in 13 poplar clones were higher than population mean, and clones 208 had the highest biomass production in aboveground, underground and total, reached 485.77g, 146.18g and 631.95 g. Gross calorific values of components were also different, it was ordered as stem, bark, root. There were significant difference in seedling individual gross calorific values among all poplar clones, and the variation ranges were 18.659—19.141 kJ/g. The means of individual calorific values, biomass production and individual gross calorific values for poplar clones that were selected as elite clones were 26.12%, 25.99% and 0.12% higher than the population mean. The differences of individual calorific values for poplar clones were mainly determined by their biomass production.

引用本文

导出引用
翟学昌1,2,彭丽2,方升佐1*,万劲3. 杨树能源林新无性系苗期生物量及热值研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版). 2009, 33(06): 91 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2009.06.021
ZHAI Xuechang1,2, PENG Li2, FANG Shengzuo1*, WAN Jin3. A study on biomass production and calorific values of new poplar clone seedlings for bioenergy[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2009, 33(06): 91 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2009.06.021
中图分类号: S727.4   

参考文献

[1]邱寿丰,诸大建. 我国生态效率指标设计及其应用[J]. 科学管理研究,2007,25(1):20-24.
[2]彭水军,包群. 经济增长与环境污染[J]. 财经问题研究,2006,273(8):3-17.
[3]宋桂香,江莉莉,陈国海,等. 上海市大气气态污染物与居民每日死亡关系的时间序列研究[J]. 环境与健康杂志, 2006,23(5):390-393.
[4]姜巍,高卫东,张雷. 西部地区能源开发综合效应评价[J]. 资源科学,2007,29(1):9-15.
[5]Jonsson A, Hillring B. Planning for increased bioenergy useevaluating the impact on local air quality[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2006, 30 (6): 543-554.
[6]Matthews R W. Modelling of energy and carbon budgets of wood fuel coppice systems[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2001, 21(1): 1-19.
[7]Roos A, Bohlin F, Hektor B, et al. Woodfuel procurement strategies of district heating plants[J]. Energy, 2003, 28(2): 127-140.
[8]Gan J B, Smith C T. A comparative analysis of woody biomass and coal for electricity generation under various CO2 emission reductions and taxes[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2006, 30 (4): 296-303.
[9]Zheng Y Q. Fuelwood production in northwest China[J]. Wood Energy News, 2000, 15(1): 8-10.
[10]王久臣,董仁杰. 农村能源综合建设对西部农村室内空气质量的影响[J]. 可再生能源, 2005, 123(5): 1-4.
[11]蒋建新,陈晓阳. 能源林与林木生物转化能源化研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2005, 18(6): 39-44.
[12]谭振军,范俊岗,关正君,等. 瑞典短轮伐期林业及其环境影响评价[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2004(6): 33-36.
[13]方升佐,徐锡增,吕士行. 杨树定向培育[M]. 合肥:安徽科学技术出版社, 2004.
[14]Walle I, Camp N, Casteele L, et al. Shortrotation forestry of birch, maple, poplar and willow in Flanders(Belgium) II. Energy production and CO2 emission reduction potential[J]. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2007, 31(5): 276-283.
[15]Van Loo S, Koppejan J. Handbook of Biomass Combustion and Cofiring[M]. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2008.

基金

收稿日期:2009-02-20修回日期:2009-05-07基金项目:国家林业局“948”项目(2005-4-44)作者简介:翟学昌(1980—),助教。*方升佐(通讯作者),教授,研究方向为森林培育。Email: fangsz@njfu.edu.cn。引文格式:翟学昌,彭丽,方升佐,等. 杨树能源林新无性系苗期生物量及热值研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(6):91-94.

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/