南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 51-54.doi: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2010.05.011

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

关帝山天然次生针叶林林隙大小模型研究

符利勇1,2,何铮3,刘应安1*   

  1. 1.南京林业大学理学院,江苏南京210037;2.中国林业科学研究院资源信息技术研究所,北京100091; 3.江西省林业调查规划研究院,江西南昌330046
  • 出版日期:2010-10-08 发布日期:2010-10-08
  • 基金资助:
    收稿日期:2009-10-11修回日期:2010-01-14基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(10671032)作者简介:符利勇(1984—)博士生。*刘应安(通信作者),教授。Email: lyastat@njfu.edu.cn。引文格式:符利勇,何铮,刘应安. 关帝山天然次生针叶林林隙大小模型研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(5):51-54.

Study of the gap size model in a secondary coniferous forest of Guandi Mountain

FU Liyong1,2, HE Zheng31*   

  1. 1.College of Science, Nanjing Forest University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2.Institute of Forest Resources Information Techniques, CAF, Beijing 100091, China; 3.Forest Inventory and Planning Institute of Jiangxi Province, Nanchang 330046, China
  • Online:2010-10-08 Published:2010-10-08

摘要: 对关帝山3种天然林(华北落叶松、云杉、油松林)林隙大小进行实地调查,通过对实测数据的分析与研究可得:3种林分的林隙(冠层林隙CG、扩展林隙EG)大小都有差异,其中各种林分CG的大小主要集中在0~100 m2之间,以云杉林最大,其次是油松林,华北落叶松林最小。 EG的大小主要集中在50~100 m2之间,以油松林最大,其次是云杉林,华北落叶松最小;对林分CG及EG大小分布进行了拟合,结果发现正态分布模型、对数正态分布模型及Weibull分布模型都可以对3种林分CG、EG林隙大小进行拟合;最后通过复相关系数对3种分布拟合模型进行了优度比较,结果为对数正态分布的拟合精度更高。

Abstract: With regard to proceeding onsite investigation on gap size of the three species of natural forests (Larix principisrupprechtii, Picea asperata, Pinus tabulaeformis) in Guandi Mountain, as well as obtained from analyzing and researching the measured data: Stands of the three forest species are discrepancy in terms of canopy gap (CG) and expanded gap (EG) size, of which CG size mainly concentrated in range of 0—100 m2, in which the largest one was P.asperata, followed by P.tabulaeformis forest’s, while Larix principisrupprechtii’s was the smallest; EG size mainly concentrated in range of 50—100 m2, in which the largest one was P.tabulaeformis forest, followed by Picea asperata, and L.principisrupprechtii’s was the smallest. Fitting both CG and EG size and the result was of normal distribution and both logarithmic normal distribution and Weibull distribution could be fitting CG and EG size for the forest stands of the three species, whereas for fitting precision, Logarithmic normal distribution was considered the best fitting model by comparing the multiple correlation coefficient.

中图分类号: