南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (05): 133-136.doi: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2010.05.029

• 林权制度改革研究专栏 • 上一篇    下一篇

集体林权制度改革绩效分析

王良桂1,董微熙2,沈文星3   

  1. 1.南京林业大学风景园林学院,江苏南京210037;2.南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院,江苏南京210037; 3.南京林业大学经济管理学院,江苏南京210037
  • 出版日期:2010-10-08 发布日期:2010-10-08
  • 基金资助:
    收稿日期:2009-11-19修回日期:2010-06-01基金项目:南京林业大学创新基金项目作者简介:王良桂(1962—),副教授,博士。Email: wlg@njfu.com.cn。引文格式:王良桂 ,董微熙,沈文星. 集体林权制度改革绩效分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2010,34(5):133-136.

Performance analysis on the reformation of collective forest rights

WANG Lianggui1, DONG Weixi2, SHEN Wenxing3   

  1. 1.College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2.College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 3.College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
  • Online:2010-10-08 Published:2010-10-08

摘要: 选择贵州省瓮安县为研究对象,通过与当地农民的集体对话和讨论的参与式农村评估(PRA)方法,探讨各利益相关主体对集体林权制度改革制度的满意度。通过对瓮安县集体林权制度改革情况调查研究,从林农是否获得一定的林地经营自主权和生产决策权、林农对产权变迁所持的态度、林地经营的投入、林权流转需求等方面,探讨集体林权制度改革绩效。结果表明:通过林改,农民收入有所增长,投入林业的劳动时间有所增加,林权纠纷也得到处理。但由于林农的年龄、受教育程度和林地规模的不同,林地的经营类型和流转意愿也存在差异。因此,林改在短期内对林农的收入增加不明显,需要在规模经营、要素市场、流转规则和生态补偿等方面进一步研究。

Abstract: Based on the investigation of willingness of farmer on Wongan county in Guizhou province, through the method of Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA), the satisfaction degree of every correlative behalf were discussed from different point in this paper. The key of the reformation of collective forest rights was pushing up to establish the system of management by family. Through the investigation in Wongan by participatory rural appraisal method, this paper analyzed the performance of reformation of collective forest rights, from the points of the farmer whether had the decision rights of management, the farmer’s attitude to the reformation, the inputs in the management of forest, and the demand of circulation of the forest land, etc. The results showed that through the reformation of collective forest rights, farmers got higher income and more labor hours were invested. Disputes of forest rights solved at the same time. However, farmers had some differences in the forest management and the forest land circulation, because of their differences in age, education and scale. In a short time, the increase of income was not so obviously, but to aspects liked largescale management, element marketing, circulation regulation and ecosystem compensation, more research work is needed.

中图分类号: