次生栎林与火炬松人工林的土壤微生物量氮动态

doi:10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2010.06.009

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2010, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (06): 38-42.doi: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2010.06.009

次生栎林与火炬松人工林的土壤微生物量氮动态

吴春林¹,²,陶忠芳¹,³,王国兵¹^*,阮宏华¹

1.南京林业大学森林资源与环境学院，江苏南京210037；2.南京林业大学下蜀林场，江苏句容212411；3.安徽省林业调查规划院，安徽合肥230001

出版日期:2010-12-27 发布日期:2010-12-27
基金资助:
收稿日期：2010-05-24修回日期：2010-10-08基金项目：国家林业局林业公益性行业科研专项项目(200804006,200704005/wb02);国家自然科学基金项目(30370256)作者简介：吴春林(1963—)，工程师。*王国兵(通信作者)，讲师。Email: wangguobing81@yahoo.com.cn。引文格式：吴春林,陶忠芳,王国兵,等. 次生栎林与火炬松人工林的土壤微生物量氮动态

The study on soil microbial biomass N in secondary oak forest and pine plantation

WU Chunlin¹,², TAO Zhongfang¹,³, WANG Guobing¹^*, RUAN Honghua¹

1.College of Forest Resources and Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2.The Xiashu Forest Farm of Nanjing Forestry University, Jurong 212411, China; 3.Forest Inventory and Planning Institute of Anhui Province, Hefei 230001, China

Online:2010-12-27 Published:2010-12-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了阐明土壤微生物量氮(SMBN)对土壤中氮的植物有效性及氮循环的影响，从2006年4月到2007年4月对下蜀林场次生栎林和火炬松人工林中的SMBN进行了初步研究。结果表明：(1)次生栎林与火炬松人工林SMBN均具有明显的季节动态变化，且变化规律基本一致，均表现为SMBN夏季最高，冬季最低，春秋两季居中；(2)自然情况下次生栎林SMBN显著大于火炬松人工林的(p<0.01)，而在凋落物去除后二者之间差异消失；(3)相关分析表明，SMBN和土壤微生物量碳(SMBC)在不同林分中均表现出显著正相关关系(p<0.05)，但是与土壤总氮、土壤湿度、凋落物输入量之间均无显著相关关系。总之，SMBN的季节变化主要受土壤微生物量季节变化的影响，其调控机理可能与土壤中碳、氮元素的供应及植物生长状况有关，但凋落物的性质对SMBN含量具有显著的影响。

Abstract: In order to clarify the effects of soil microbial biomass N on soil N availability of plants and N cycling, SMBN, SMBC, soil N, litterfall input, and other factors were determined in a secondary oak forest and pine plantation in Xiashu experimental sites in Jiangsu province from April 2006 to April 2007, the results are as follows: (1)There are obvious seasonal dynamics of SMBN both in secondary oak forest and pine plantation, and the variation is consistent, which shows the highest microbial biomass N in summer, lowest in winter, spring and autumn are middle; (2)In the condition of the undisturbed natural state(control treatment), SMBN in oak forest is significantly larger than in pine plantation (p<0.01), but the difference between the two forest types disappear after the litterfall is removed(litterfall excluding treatment); (3)The correlation analysis shows that soil microbial biomass N is significantly and positively correlated to SMBC both in secondary oak forest and pine plantation (p<0.05), but not to soil nitrogen, soil moisture or litterfall input. Our results show that the obviously seasonal changes of SMBN mainly controlled by the seasonal changes of soil microbial biomass, which may be influenced by the soil C, N availability and the competition between soil microbial biomass and plant growth with the deeper reasons, but the properties of litterfall had a significant impact on the SMBN.

中图分类号:

S154.4

吴春林,陶忠芳,王国兵,等. 次生栎林与火炬松人工林的土壤微生物量氮动态[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 34(06): 38-42.

WU Chunlin,, TAO Zhongfang,, WANG Guobing, RUAN Honghua. The study on soil microbial biomass N in secondary oak forest and pine plantation[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2010, 34(06): 38-42.DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2010.06.009.

参考文献

[1]Jenkinson D S, Ladd J N. Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1981, 5: 415-471. [2]李世清,凌莉,李生秀. 影响土壤中微生物体氮的因子[J]. 土壤与环境,2000,9(2):158-162. [3]周建斌,陈竹君,李生秀. 土壤微生物量氮含量、矿化特性及其供氮作用[J]. 生态学报,2001,21(10):1718-1725. [4]王淑平,周广胜. 土壤微生物量氮的动态及其生物有效性研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(1):87-90. [5]庞欣,张福锁,王敬国. 不同供氮水平对根际MB-N及微生物活度的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2000,6(4):476-480. [6]凌莉,闫湘,关中地区农田生态系统土壤微生物体氮分异性研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2000,18(3):32-36. [7]谭周进,汤海涛,余崇祥. 秸秆还田栽培晚稻土壤微生物动态研究[J]. 湖南农业科技,2001(4):30-33. [8]田育军. 林杉长期不同施肥土壤微生物态氮作为土壤供氮指标的研究[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2000,35(1):24-28. [9]沈其荣,王岩,史瑞和. 土壤微生物量和土壤固定态铵的变化及水稻对残留N的利用[J]. 土壤学报,2000,37(3):330-338. [10]唐玉霞,贾树龙,孟春香. 土壤微生物生物量氮研究综述[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2002,10(2):76-78. [11]龚伟,胡庭兴,宫渊波,等. 土壤微生物量P研究综述[J]. 四川林勘设计,2005(2):60-63. [12]Barbhuiya A R, Arunachalam A, Pandey H N, et al. Dynamics of soil microbial biomass C, N and P in disturbed and undisturbed stands of a tropical wet evergreen forest[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2004, 40: 113-121. [13]Devi N B, Yadava P S. Seasonal dynamics in soil microbial biomass C, N and P in a mixedoak forest ecosystem of Manipur, Northeast India[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2006, 31: 220-227. [14]Esther Enowashu, Christian Poll, Norbert Lamersdorf. Microbial biomass and enzyme activities under reduced nitrogen deposition in a spruce forest soil [J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2009, 43: 11-21. [15]周建斌,李生秀,陈竹君,等. 利用 15NO-3标记法研究土壤微生物量氮的化学及生物有效性[J]. 土壤学报,2003,40(6):888-893. [16]姚槐应,何振立,黄昌勇. 提高氮肥利用效率的微生物量机制探讨[J]. 农业环境保护,1999,18(2):54-56,75 [17]宋建国,林杉,吴文良,等. 土壤易矿化有机态氮和微生物态氮作为土壤氮素生物有效性指标的评价[J]. 生态学报,2001,21(2):290-294. [18]王国兵,郝岩松,阮宏华. 土地利用方式的改变对土壤呼吸及土壤微生物生物量的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2006,28(Supp.2):73-79. [19]Brookes P C, Aader L, Pruden G, et al. Chloroform fumigation and there lease of soil nitrogen: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1985, 17: 837-842. [20]Brookes P C, Kragt J F, Powlson D S, et al. Chloroform fumigation and there lease of soil nitrogen: The effects of fumigation time and temperature[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1985, 17: 831-835. [21]何振立. 土壤微生物量及其在养分循环和环境质量评价中的意义[J]. 土壤,1997(2):61-69. [22]Jenkinson D S. The determination of microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in soil[C]//Wilson J R. Advances in Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystem. Brishane: International Symposium, 1987. [23]王国兵,阮宏华,唐燕飞,等. 森林土壤微生物生物量动态变化研究进展[J]. 安徽农业大学学报,2009,36(1):100-104. [24]Wardle D A. A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil [J]. Biological Reviews, 1992, 67: 321-358. [25]陈国潮,何振立,姚槐应. 红壤微生物量的季节性变化研究[J]. 浙江大学学报,1999,25(4):387-388. [26]李世清,任杰,李生秀. 土壤微生物体氮的季节性变化及其与土壤水分和温度的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2004,10(1):18-23. [27]Garcia F O, Rice C W. Microbial biomass dynamics in tall grass prairie [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1994, 58: 816-824. [28]Singh T S, Raghubansh A S, Singh R S, et al. Microbial biomass acts as a source of plant nutrient in dry tropical forest and savanna[J]. Nature, 1989, 338: 499-500. [29]Van G M, Ladd J N, Amato M. Microbial biomass responses to seasonal change and imposed drying regimes at increasing depths of undisturbed topsoil profiles[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1992, 24: 103-111. [30]郭剑芬,杨玉盛,陈光水,等. 森林凋落物分解研究进展[J]. 林业科学,2006,42(4):93-100. [31]郭忠玲,郑金萍,马元丹,等. 长白山各植被带主要树种凋落物分解速率及模型模拟的试验研究[J]. 生态学报,2006,26(4):1037-1046. [32]刘建军,余仲东,李华.油松与锐齿栎林土壤微生物生物量初步研究[J]. 陕西林业科技,2001(2):7-10. [33]杨刚,何寻阳,王克林,等. 不同植被类型对土壤微生物量碳氮及土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2008,39(1):189-191. [34]陈小燕,吕家珑,张红,等. 子午岭不同植被类型土壤微生物量与有机酸含量[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2008,26 (3):167-170. [35]赵先丽,周广胜,吕国红. 辽河三角洲不同植被类型土壤微生物特征研究[J]. 土壤通报,2009,40(6):1266-1269. [36]周焱,徐宪根,王丰,等. 武夷山不同海拔梯度土壤微生物生物量、微生物呼吸及其商值(qMB,qCO2)[J]. 生态学杂志,2009,28(2):265-269. [37]Kaiser K A, Martens R, Heinemeyer O. Temporal changes in soil microbial biomass carbon in an arable soil. Consequence for soil sampling[J]. Plant and Soil, 1995, 170: 287-295. [38]刘满强,胡锋,何园球,等. 退化红壤不同植被恢复下土壤微生物量季节动态及其指示意义[J]. 土壤学报,2003,40(6):937-944.

次生栎林与火炬松人工林的土壤微生物量氮动态

The study on soil microbial biomass N in secondary oak forest and pine plantation

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿