以红壤区湿地松林下栽植的6树种为研究对象，监测了各树种叶片净光合速率（Pn）的日变化，同时系统分析了Pn与各环境因子间的关系。结果发现，麻栎（Quercus acutissima）、黧蒴锥（Castanopsis fissa）、木荷（Schima superba）和胡枝子（Lespedeza bicolor）的Pn日变化均呈现为先增加后降低的趋势，最大值均出现在11:00，分别为(1982±266)、(1458±179)、(1611±482)、(1492±367) μmol/（m2〖DK〗·s）；而椤木石楠（Photinia davidsoniae）和杨桐（Adinandra millettii）则呈现为双峰曲线，最大值分别为（891±181）、（1085±163）μmol/（m2〖DK〗·s）。各树种日平均Pn从大到小的顺序依次为麻栎、木荷、黧蒴锥、胡枝子、杨桐、椤木石楠。方差分析发现，麻栎、黧蒴锥、木荷的Pn显著大于椤木石楠和杨桐（p＜005）。通径分析发现，黧蒴锥、麻栎和胡枝子的Pn动态变化主要受饱和水蒸气压差（VPD）、温度（T）、相对湿度（RH）和光合有效辐射（PAR）的影响；木荷主要受VPD、T和PAR的影响，而椤木石楠和杨桐的主要受VPD、T、RH的影响，且各物种各因子均具有较大的间接通径系数。
Abstract
Daily variations of net photosynthesis rates (Pn) of 6 tree species in red soil under Pinus elliotii forest were determined and their relation with environmental factors were analyzed using path analysis. The daily courses of Quercus acutissima, Schima superba, Castanopsis fissa and Lespedeza bicolor showed unimodal curves, with the maximum of （1982±266）, （1458±179）, （1611±482）, （1492±367） μmol/（m2〖DK〗·s） at 11:00 am, and Adinandra millettii, Photinia davidsoniae presented bimodal curves, with the maximum of （891±181）, （1085±163） μmol/（m2〖DK〗·s）. The sequence of daily average of Pn was Q. acutissima >S. superba > C. fissa > L. bicolor > A. millettii > Ph. davidsoniae, and significant differences were found among Q. acutissima, S. superba, C. fissa and A. millettii, Ph. davidsoniae (p＜005). Based on pathway analysis, Pn was mainly influenced by vapor press deficit (VPD), temperature (T), relative humidity (RH) and photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) for Q. acutissima, C. fissa and L. bicolor. While S. superba was mainly influenced by VPD, T and PAR. Whereas for A. millettii and Ph. davidsoniae
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1]Tuittila E S, Vasander H, Laine J. Sensitivity of C sequestration in reintroduced Sphagnum to waterlevel variation in a Cutaway peatland[J].Restoration Ecology, 2004, 12（4）: 483-493.
[2]Selaya N G, Anten N P. Leaves of pioneer and latersuccessional trees have similar lifetime carbon gain in tropical secondary forest[J]. Ecology, 2010, 91（4）: 1102-1113.
[3]Lewis J D, Lucash M, Olszyk D, et al. Seasonal patterns of photosynthesis in Douglas fir seedlings during the third and fourth year of exposure to elevated CO2 and temperature[J]. Plant, Cell and Environment, 2001, 24（5）: 539-548.
[4]夏尚光, 张金池, 梁淑英. 南方岩榆光合作用日变化及其影响因子研究[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2007, 36(3): 8-11.
[5]吴统贵, 周和锋, 吴明, 等. 旱柳光合作用动态及其与环境因子的关系[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(12): 2056-2061.
[6]Muraoka H, Koizumi H. Photosynthetic and structural characteristics of canopy and shrub trees in a cooltemperate deciduous broadleaved forest: implication to the ecosystem carbon gain[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2005, 134: 39-59.
[7]Coxson D S, Coyle M. Niche partitioning and photosynthetic response of alectorioid lichens from subalpine sprucefir forest in northcentral British Columbia, Canada: the role of canopy microclimate gradients[J]. The Lichenologist, 2003, 35（2）: 157-175.
[8]王爱民, 祖元刚. 以光合效率度量天然白桦种群生态位初探[J]. 生态学杂志, 2002, 21(1): 65-67.
[9]吴统贵, 吴明, 萧江华. 杭州湾湿地不同演替阶段优势物种光合生理生态特性[J]. 西北植物学报, 2008, 28(8): 1683-1688.
[10]Bassow S L, Bazzaz F A. How environmental conditions affect canopy leaflevel photosynthesis in four deciduous tree species[J]. Ecology, 1998, 79: 2660-2675.
[11]Bloor J M G. Light responses of shadetolerant tropical tree species in northeast Queensland: a comparison of forestand shadehousegrown seedlings[J]. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 2003, 19: 163-170.
[12]张进忠, 林桂珠, 林植芳, 等. 几种南亚热带木本植物光合作用对生长光强的响应[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报,2005,13(5):413-418.
[13]Marschall M, Proctor M C F. Are bryophytes shade plants? Photosynthetic light responses and proportions of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total carotenoids[J]. Annals of Botany, 2004, 94（4）: 593-603.
[14]尹佟明, 戴晓港, 沈永宝. 南京椴和心叶椴苗期光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报：自然科学版, 2010, 34(2), 133-136.
[15]Sharkey T D. Effects of moderate heat stress on photosynthesis: importance of thylakoid reactions, rubisco deactivation, reactive oxygen species, and thermotolerance provided by isoprene[J].Plant, Cell and Environment, 2005, 28: 269-277.
[16]张文标, 金则新, 柯世省, 等. 木荷光合特性日变化及其与环境因子相关性分析[J]. 广西植物, 2006, 26(5): 492-498.
[17]王玉辉, 周广胜. 松嫩草地羊草叶片光合作用生理生态特征分析[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(1): 75-79.
[18]Yang M H, Li Z H, Liu Y A, et al. Study on diurnal variation of photosynthesis in Magnolia grandiflora L. and Magnolia denudate DESR[J].Acta Horticulturae,2006, 769: 433-440.
[19]中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会.中国植物志[M].北京：科学出版社, 1999.
[20]孙清斌, 董晓英, 沈仁芳. 施用磷、钙对红壤上胡枝子生长和矿质元素含量的影响[J]. 土壤, 2009(2):206-211.
[21]吴家胜, 应叶青, 黎章矩. 杨桐苗期光合特性的研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2004, 26(6): 896-900.
基金
收稿日期：2010-06-28修回日期：2010-11-09基金项目：国家林业局“948”项目（2008-4-50）；“十一五”国家科技支撑计划（2006BAD03A1603）；浙江省林业科技项目（06A01）作者简介：吴统贵（1981—），助理研究员，博士。*虞木奎（通信作者），研究员。Email：yumukui@sina.com。
PDF(1375427 KB)
