不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202201003

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 97-106.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202201003

不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响

贾瑞瑞¹(), 祝艳艳¹, 杨秀莲¹^,^*(), 付钰¹, 岳远征¹, 王良桂¹^,²

1.南京林业大学风景园林学院, 江苏省风景园林重点实验室, 江苏南京 210037
2.南京林业大学,南方现代林业协同创新中心, 江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2022-01-05 修回日期:2022-05-15 出版日期:2023-09-30 发布日期:2023-10-10
作者简介:贾瑞瑞(371627553@qq.com)。
基金资助:
江苏省农业科技自主创新项目(CX(19)2038);江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)

Effects of different rootstocks on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of grafted seedlings of Catalpa bungei

JIA Ruirui¹(), ZHU Yanyan¹, YANG Xiulian¹^,^*(), FU Yu¹, YUE Yuanzheng¹, WANG Lianggui¹^,²

1. Key Laboratory of Landscape Architecture of Jiangsu Province,College of Landscape Architecture,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China
2. Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China,Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2022-01-05 Revised:2022-05-15 Online:2023-09-30 Published:2023-10-10

1. 不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响.zip(3910KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】分析不同梓树(Catalpa ovata)和滇楸(C. fargesii)嫁接苗第1年各生长指标和光合特性的差异,探究不同砧木对楸树(C. bungei)嫁接苗生长的影响,为初步筛选适宜楸树嫁接的砧木以及楸树良种繁育提供参考。【方法】以梓树和滇楸为砧木,以‘南林1号’(‘Nanlin 1’)‘洛楸’(‘Luoqiu’)和‘苏楸1号’(‘Su 1’)为接穗,进行芽接,共6个嫁接组合,测定嫁接后128、141、155、174和189 d的叶绿素含量、净光合速率与叶绿素荧光参数,并统计嫁接6个月后的成活率,测定接穗当年的高生长和径生长量及生长1年后嫁接口上下径粗度比。【结果】 6种砧穗组合中‘南林1号’/滇楸的成活率最高,达76.91%,‘苏楸1号’/滇楸成活率最低,仅有32.05%;‘南林1号’/梓树的接穗高生长和径生长量最大,分别为165.51、2.89 cm,‘苏楸1号’/滇楸的接穗高生长和径生长量最小,分别为83.43、1.63 cm。各嫁接组合嫁接口上下径粗度比均小于1,嫁接生长第1年,均未出现“大小脚”现象,但‘苏楸1号’/滇楸亲和性最差。在整个生长测定期,除以‘苏楸1号’为接穗的嫁接组合外,滇砧嫁接组合的叶绿素含量、净光合速率(P_n)、PSⅡ最大光化学效率(F_v/F_m)及PSⅡ潜在活性(F_v/F_o)总体上均不同程度地大于梓砧嫁接组合。不同嫁接组合和生长时期均对叶绿素a、叶绿素b、总叶绿素含量和P_n产生显著影响。嫁接后155 d,各组合差异显著,P_n与叶绿素a、叶绿素b和总叶绿素含量均呈显著正相关(P<0.05),‘南林1号’/滇楸、‘洛楸’/滇楸叶绿素含量较高,其能量转换效率高、光合能力强;P_n与F_m(最大荧光)、F_v/F_o呈显著正相关,‘苏楸1号’/滇楸和‘苏楸1号’/梓树组合P_n和F_v/F_o较低,F_o较高,说明其耐强光能力较弱。【结论】初步判断认为‘南林1号’和‘洛楸’以滇楸作砧木时,发展潜力更大,而‘苏楸1号’以梓树作砧木时,综合表现更好。该研究仅分析各砧穗组合嫁接第1年的生长差异,后期生长状况以及是否出现“大小脚”现象还需进一步探究。

关键词: 楸树, 砧穗组合, 光合特性, 叶绿素荧光, 生长状态

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study mainly analyzed the differences in the growth indexes and photosynthetic characteristics of different Catalpa ovata and C. fargesii grafted seedlings in the first year, and studied the effect of different rootstocks on the growth of C. bungei grafted seedlings, to provide a basic reference for the preliminary screening of suitable rootstocks for C. bungei grafting and subsequent in-depth research.【Method】C. ovata and C. fargesii were used as rootstocks, and C. bungei ‘Nanlin 1’, C. bungei ‘Luoqiu’and C. bungei ‘Su 1’ were used as scions. There were six grafting combinations in total. The chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rates and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured at 128, 141, 155, 174 and 189 d after grafting. After 6 months, the survival rate of each grafting combination was counted. The height and diameter growth of scions in the current year and the ratio of upper to lower diameters of grafting interface after one year were measured.【Result】The survival rate of C. bungei ‘Nanlin 1’/C. fargesii was the highest among the six grafting combinations, reaching 76.91%. The survival rate of C. bungei ‘Su 1’/C. fargesii was the lowest, only 32.05%. The scion height and diameter growth of C. bungei ‘Nanlin 1’/ C. ovata were the largest, 165.51 and 2.89 cm, respectively. The scion height and diameter growth of C. bungei ‘Su 1’/C. fargesii were the smallest, 83.43 and 1.63 cm respectively. The ratio of upper to lower diameter of each grafting combination was less than 1, and there was no phenomenon of ‘big and small feet’ in the first year of grafting growth. However, the compatibility of C. bungei ‘Su 1’/C. fargesii was the worst. In the whole growth period, except for the grafting combination with C. bungei ‘Su 1’ as scion, the chlorophyll content, net photosynthetic rate (P_n), maximum photochemical efficiency of PS Ⅱ (F_v/F_m) and potential activity of PS Ⅱ (F_v/F_o) of the grafting combination with C. fargesii as rootstock were generally higher than those with C. ovata as rootstock. Different grafting combinations and growth periods had significant effects on P_n, the content of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll the content of. 155 days after grafting, significant differences were among the combinations. P_n was significantly positively correlated with content of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll (P < 0.05). C. bungei ‘Nanlin 1’ / C. fargesii and C. bungei ‘Luoqiu’ / C. fargesii had a high chlorophyll content, high energy conversion efficiency and strong photosynthetic ability. P_n was significantly positively correlated with F_m (maximum fluorescence) and F_v/F_o. P_n and F_v/F_o of C. bungei ‘Su 1’/C. fargesii and C. bungei ‘Su 1’/C. ovata combinations were lower and F_o (initial fluorescence) was higher, indicating that their ability to withstand strong light was weak. 【Conclusion】 To sum up, the preliminary judgment showed that when C. bungei ‘Nanlin 1’ and C. bungei ‘Luoqiu’ used C. fargesii as rootstock, the development potential was greater. While when C. bungei ‘Su 1’ used C. ovata as rootstock, the comprehensive performance was better. This study only analyzed the growth difference of each rootstock-scion combination in the first year of grafting. The growth condition in the later stage and whether there are ‘big and small feet’ need to be further explored.

Key words: Catalpa bungei, rootstock and scion combination, photosynthetic characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence, growth state

中图分类号:

S688
S718

贾瑞瑞,祝艳艳,杨秀莲,等. 不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 97-106.

JIA Ruirui, ZHU Yanyan, YANG Xiulian, FU Yu, YUE Yuanzheng, WANG Lianggui. Effects of different rootstocks on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of grafted seedlings of Catalpa bungei[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(5): 97-106.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202201003.

图/表 9

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

表7

图1

表8

参考文献 39

[1]	马仕君, 彭泰来, 余韵, 等. 生根激素和磁场对楸树嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(6): 21-24.
	MA S J, PENG T L, YU Y, et al. Effect of plant hormones and magnetic field on rooting of soft cuttings for Catalpa bungei[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2020, 48(6):21-24. DOI: 0.13759/j.cnki.LDxb.2020.06.005.
[2]	张烨然, 彭言劼, 马勤, 等. 楸树与滇楸组培快繁技术[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(11):5-9,51.
	ZHANG Y R, PENG Y J, MA Q, et al. Rapid propagation system of Catalpa bungei and C.fargesii Bur.f.duclouxii[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2016, 44(11): 5-9, 51. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.LDxb.2016.11.002.
[3]	梁有旺, 杜旭华, 王顺财, 等. 楸树嫩枝扦插生根的主要影响因子分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2008, 17(4): 46-50.
	LIANG Y W, DU X H, WANG S C, et al. Analysis of main influence factors on rooting of twig cutting of Catalpa bungei[J]. J Plant Resour and Environ, 2008, 17(4): 46-50. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2008.04.009.
[4]	MELNYK C W, MEYEROWITZ E M. Plant grafting[J]. Curr Biol, 2015, 25(5): 183-188. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.01.029. pmid: 25734263
[5]	康向阳. 林木遗传育种研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(3): 1-10.
	KANG X Y. Research progress of forest genetics and tree breeding[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(3): 1-10. DOI: CNKI:SUN:NJLY.0.2020-03-002.
[6]	王改萍, 王良桂, 王晓聪, 等. 楸树嫩枝扦插生根发育及根系特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(6): 94-102.
	WANG G P, WANG L G, WANG X C, et al. Dynamic characteristics of cutting rooting of Catalpa bungei with tender branches[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(6): 94-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202003082.
[7]	吴统贵, 顾沈华, 颜福彬, 等. NaCl胁迫对3个楸树无性系苗期根系特征的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2013, 22(2): 67-71.
	WU T G, GU S H, YAN F B, et al. Effect of NaCl stress on root characteristics of three clones of Catalpa bungei at seedling stage[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2013, 22(2): 67-71. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2013.02.09.
[8]	王军辉, 贠慧玲, 冯小芹, 等. 不同砧木对灰楸生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2013, 41(10): 40-45.
	WANG J H, YUN H L, FENG X Q, et al. Effect of different root stock on Catalpa fargesii Bur growth and photosynthetic characteristics[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2013, 41(10): 40-45. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.LDxb.2013.10.017.
[9]	黄国伟, 彭婵, 马林江, 等. 不同系号楸树持续饱和水分下光合特征比较[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(8): 35-40.
	HUANG G W, PENG C, MA L J, et al. Growth and photosynthetic characteristics of the Catalpa bungei seedlings in saturated content of water in soils[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2019, 47(8): 35-40. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.08.007.
[10]	邹长明, 王允青, 刘英, 等. 四种豆科作物的光合生理和生长发育对弱光的响应[J]. 植物生态学报, 2015, 39(9): 909-916. doi: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0087
	ZOU C M, WANG Y Q, LIU Y, et al. Responses of photosynthesis and growth to weak light regime in four legume species[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2015, 39(9): 909-916. DOI: 10.17521/cjpe.2015.0087.
[11]	蔡仕珍, 李西, 潘远智, 等. 不同光照对蝴蝶花光合特性及生长发育研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(2): 264-272.
	CAI S Z, LI X, PAN Y Z, et al. A study on photosynthetic characteristics and growth and development of Iris japonica under different illumination[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin, 2013, 22(2): 264-272.
[12]	王佩兰, 康华荣, 李柏海, 等. 乡土珍贵树种钩栗幼苗种源间光合生理特性研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(3): 38-45.
	WANG P L, KANG H R, LI B H, et al. Photosynthetic traits of the precious native species of Castanopsis tibetana seedlings among different provenances[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2016, 36(3): 38-45. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2016.03.008.
[13]	武启飞, 范俊俊, 赵明明, 等. 5个观赏海棠品种光合特性的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(4): 64-70.
	WU Q F, FAN J J, ZHAO M M, et al. Study on photosynthetic characteristics of five Ornamental crabappl[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 41(4): 64-70. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201609014.
[14]	李小红, 周凯, 谢周, 等. 不同葡萄砧木对矢富罗莎葡萄嫁接苗光合作用的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2009, 26(1): 90-93.
	LI X H, ZHOU K, XIE Z, et al. Photosynthesis of Yatomi Rosa on eight grape rootstocks[J]. J Fruit Sci, 2009, 26(1): 90-93.
[15]	徐利霞, 姚小华, 杨水平, 等. 旱胁迫条件下3树种幼苗光合特性比较研究[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(5): 168-172.
	XU L X, YAO X H, YANG S P, et al. Effects of soil water stress on photosynthetic characteristics of three native tree species seedlings[J]. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2007, 29(5): 168-172. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9868.2007.05.035.
[16]	张烨然, 杜克兵, 仝瑞冠, 等. 3种梓树属植物的抗涝性[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2017, 45(3): 23-28.
	ZHANG Y R, DU K B, TONG R G, et al. Flood-tolerance comparison of three tree species belonging to Catalpa[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2017, 45(3): 23-28. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2017.03.005.
[17]	彭婵, 陈慧玲, 张新叶, 等. 楸树SSR标记在滇楸中的可转移性与应用[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(2): 50-55.
	PENG C, CHEN H L, ZHANG X Y, et al. Transferability of the Catalpa bungei SSRs in Catalpa fargesii f. duclouxii and its application[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2019, 47(2): 50-55. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.LDxb.2019.02.012.
[18]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
	LI H S. Principle and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiment[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[19]	周建, 杨立峰, 郝峰鸽, 等. 低温胁迫对广玉兰幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2009, 29(1): 136-142.
	ZHOU J, YANG L F, HAO F G, et al. Photosynthesis and chlorophyll-fluorescence of Magnolia grandiflora seedlings under low temperature stress[J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentallia Sin, 2009, 29(1): 136-142. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2009.01.021.
[20]	FORNER-GINER M A, RODRIGUEZ-GAMIR J, MARTINEZ-ALCANTARA B, et al. Performance of Navel orange trees grafted onto two new dwarfing rootstocks (Forner-Alcaide 517 and Forner-Alcaide 418)[J]. Sci Hortic, 2014, 179: 376-387. DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.07.032.
[21]	伊成勇, 孙权, 张敏, 等. 柿砧穗亲和性与叶片内源多胺种类及含量的关系[J]. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(8): 1191-1196.
	YI C Y, SUN Q, ZHANG M, et al. Relationship between compatibility of rootstock-scion and the kinds and contents of endogenous polyamine in leaves of persimmon[J]. Plant Physiol J, 2019, 55(8): 1191-1196. DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2019.0166.
[22]	张东来, 张玲. 高枝多头多龄异砧嫁接对红松生长和结实的影响[J]. 森林工程, 2021, 37(6):34-38.
	ZHANG D L, ZHANG L. Effects of intergeneric grafting with high branch, multiple heads and different age on trees growth and fruiting of Pinus koraiensis[J]. Forest Engineering, 2021, 37(6):34-38.
[23]	GOLDSCHMIDT E E. Plant grafting: new mechanisms, evolutionary implications[J]. Front in Plant Sci, 2014, 5(3): 727. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00727.
[24]	李娜, 朱培林, 丰采, 等. 青钱柳嫁接愈合过程中砧穗生理特性及其与亲和性的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1): 13-20.
	LI N, ZHU P L, FENG C, et al. Variations in physiological characteristics of rootstock-scion and its relationship to graft compatibility during the grafting union process of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(1): 13-20. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202010024.
[25]	张新叶, 李振芳, 张亚东, 等. 湖北引种滇楸优良无性系早期选择[J]. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(10): 24-29. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15070154
	ZHANG X Y, LI Z F, ZHANG Y D, et al. Early stage selection of fine clones of Catalpa fargesii f. duclouxii in Hubei Province[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2016, 32(10): 24-29. DOI: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb15070154.
[26]	郭从俭, 钱士金, 王连卿, 等. 楸树栽培[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1998: 10-18.
	GUO C J, QIAN S J, WANG L Q, et al. Catalpa bungei cultivation[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 1998: 10-18.
[27]	闫桂华. 梓树的形态结构及发育解剖学研究[D]. 长春: 吉林农业大学, 2011.
	YAN G H. Study on the morphological structure and developmental anatomy of Catalpa ovata[D]. Changchun: Jilin Agricultural University, 2011.
[28]	WEBSTER A D, VAUGHAN S P, LUCAS A S, et al. Effects of tree age at planting, root manipulation and trickle irrigation on growth and cropping of apple (Malus pumila) cultivar Queen Cox on M.9 rootstock[J]. J Hortic Sci Biot echnol, 2003, 78(5): 680-688. DOI:10.1080/14620316.2003.11511684.
[29]	SOMKUWAR R G, BAHETWAR A, KHAN I, et al. Changes in growth, photosynthetic activities, biochemical parameters and amino acid profile of Thompson seedless grapes (Vitis vinifera L.)[J]. J Environ Biol, 2014, 35(6): 1157-1163.
[30]	CAO L W, YU N N, LI J X, et al. Heritability and reversibility of DNA methylation induced by in vitro grafting between Brassica juncea and B. oleracea[J]. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 27233. DOI: 10.1038/srep27233.
[31]	RIBEIRO M A Q, DE ALMEIDA A A F, ALVES T F O, et al. Rootstock × scion interactions on Theobroma cacao resistance to witches’ broom: photosynthetic, nutritional and antioxidant metabolism responses[J]. Acta Physiol Plant, 2016, 38(3): 73. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-016-2095-9.
[32]	杜祥备, 王家宝, 刘小平, 等. 减氮运筹对甘薯光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4): 1253-1260.
	DU X B, WANG J B, LIU X P, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction management on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of sweetpotato[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30(4): 1253-1260. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.012.
[33]	龚艳箐. 蜜柚不同砧穗组合苗期嫁接亲和性及光合特性研究[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2016.
	GONG Y J. Study on grafting compatiblity and photosynthetic characteristics of different rootstock and ear combinations of honey pomelo at seedling stage[D]. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2016.
[34]	李莉, 周贝贝, 徐慧敏, 等. 不同砧木品种对核桃树体生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2017, 30(3): 472-478.
	LI L, ZHOU B B, XU H M, et al. Effects of different rootstock varieties on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of walnut[J]. For Res, 2017, 30(3): 472-478. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2017.03.016.
[35]	徐志龙. 几种柑橘砧穗组合的生理生化特性研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2013.
	XU Z L. Study on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of several Citrus rootstock and ear combinations[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2013.
[36]	BAKER N R. A possible role for photosystem Ⅱ in environmental perturbations of photosynthesis[J]. Physiol Plant, 1991, 81(4): 563-570. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1991.tb05101.x.
[37]	TRÄNKNER M, JAMALI J S. Minimum magnesium concentrations for photosynthetic efficiency in wheat and sunflower seedlings[J]. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2019, 144: 234-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.09.040.
[38]	YE X, CHEN X F, DENG C L, et al. Magnesium-deficiency effects on pigments, photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport of leaves, and nutrients of leaf blades and veins in Citrus sinensis seedlings[J]. Plants (Basel), 2019, 8(10):389. DOI: 10.3390/plants8100389.
[39]	WAN Y L, ZHANG Y X, ZHANG M, et al. Shade effects on growth, photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of three Paeonia species[J]. Peer J, 2020, 8: e9316. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9316.

嫁接组合 grafting combination	成活率/% survival rate	新梢高生长量/cm high scion growth	新梢粗生长量/cm scion diameter growth	嫁接口上下径粗比 ratio of scion diameter to stock diameter
NZ	59.08±1.46 c	165.51±4.85 a	2.89±0.92 a	0.933±0.124 a
ND	76.91±1.57 a	122.60±6.37 c	2.47±0.65 b	0.840±0.245 cd
LZ	72.35±2.25 b	159.06±11.05 a	2.34±1.09 b	0.885±0.071 bc
LD	73.22±3.76 b	139.25±14.32 b	2.27±1.69 b	0.891±0.065 b
SZ	60.95±2.33 c	107.51±12.25 d	1.94±1.30 c	0.822±0.029 d
SD	32.05±1.42 d	83.43±5.06 e	1.63±2.09 d	0.721±0.087 e

指标 index	嫁接组合 grafting combination		嫁接时间 grafting time		嫁接组合 × 嫁接时间 grafting combination× grafting time
指标 index	F	P	F	P	F	P
叶绿素a含量 Chl a content	92.231	<0.01	60.259	<0.01	7.265	<0.01
叶绿素b含量 Chl b content	83.321	<0.01	42.334	<0.01	5.126	<0.01
总叶绿素含量 Chl (a+b) content	90.587	<0.01	50.947	<0.01	3.888	<0.01
净光合速率 net photosynthetic rate	19.564	<0.01	204.873	<0.01	4.935	<0.01

嫁接时间/d grafting time	叶绿素a含量/(mg·g^-1) chlorophyll a content
嫁接时间/d grafting time	NZ	ND	LZ	LD	SZ	SD
128	1.826±0.065 Ab	1.875±0.059 Aa	1.825±0.025 Ab	1.807±0.032 Bb	1.654±0.067 Cc	1.624±0.041 BCc
141	1.853±0.042 Aa	1.876±0.041 Aa	1.695±0.033 Cb	1.859±0.030 Aa	1.709±0.046 Bb	1.657±0.042 Bc
155	1.862±0.053 Aa	1.852±0.037 Aa	1.751±0.041 Bc	1.851±0.031 Aa	1.786±0.024 Ab	1.736±0.036 Ac
174	1.805±0.014 Bb	1.844±0.036 ABa	1.689±0.032 Cc	1.791±0.036 Bb	1.714±0.025 Bc	1.592±0.040 Cd
189	1.788±0.025 Bb	1.835±0.029 Ba	1.586±0.025 Dd	1.642±0.040 Cc	1.382±0.034 Df	1.506±0.028 De

嫁接时间/d grafting time	叶绿素b含量/(mg·g^-1) chlorophyll b content
嫁接时间/d grafting time	NZ	ND	LZ	LD	SZ	SD
128	0.552±0.009 Bb	0.678±0.017 Ba	0.530±0.015 Ab	0.541±0.026 ABb	0.398±0.013 Bc	0.406±0.015 Bc
141	0.592±0.021 Bb	0.723±0.033 Aa	0.413±0.014 Bc	0.602±0.049 Ab	0.438±0.025 ABc	0.435±0.042 Ac
155	0.709±0.010 Aa	0.568±0.069 Cb	0.443±0.020 Bc	0.584±0.027 Ab	0.484±0.013 Ac	0.443±0.023 Ac
174	0.594±0.011 Ba	0.528±0.018 Cb	0.410±0.013 Bd	0.493±0.008 Bc	0.409±0.016 Bd	0.347±0.035 Ce
189	0.485±0.015 Cb	0.524±0.021 Ca	0.341±0.034 Cc	0.359±0.021 Cc	0.367±0.037 Cc	0.301±0.011 Cd

嫁接时间/d grafting time	总叶绿素含量/(mg·g^-1) total chlorophyll content
嫁接时间/d grafting time	NZ	ND	LZ	LD	SZ	SD
128	2.395±0.093 Bb	2.553±0.086 Aa	2.355±0.056 Ab	2.348±0.049 ABb	2.051±0.050 Cc	2.030±0.112 Bc
141	2.445±0.086 ABb	2.598±0.085 Aa	2.109±0.098 Bc	2.461±0.092 Ab	2.147±0.109 Bc	2.092±0.082 Bc
155	2.571±0.060 Aa	2.419±0.056 Bb	2.196±0.047 Bd	2.436±0.059 Ab	2.269±0.039 Ac	2.180±0.085 Ad
174	2.425±0.055 Ba	2.372±0.100 Bab	2.101±0.096 Bc	2.285±0.079 Bb	2.123±0.096 BCc	1.939±0.071 Cd
189	2.273±0.064 Cb	2.359±0.052 Ba	1.926±0.044 Bd	2.006±0.105 Cc	1.749±0.054 Df	1.814±0.060 De

不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响

Effects of different rootstocks on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of grafted seedlings of Catalpa bungei

RichHTML

PDF

详细数据

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 39

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

编号 No.	接穗 scion	砧木 rootstock	简称 abbreviation
1	‘南林1号’	梓树	NZ
2	‘洛楸’	梓树	LZ
3	‘苏楸1号’	梓树	SZ
4	‘南林1号’	滇楸	ND
5	‘洛楸’	滇楸	LD
6	‘苏楸1号’	滇楸	SD

嫁接时间/d grafting time	净光合速率/(μmol·m^-2·s^-1) net photosynthetic rate
嫁接时间/d grafting time	NZ	ND	LZ	LD	SZ	SD
128	11.35±0.50 Bc	13.25±0.63 Ba	12.27±0.72 Bb	12.88±0.64 Cab	11.23±0.41 Cc	9.77±0.45 Bd
141	15.93±0.71 Aa	14.23±0.60 Bb	13.07±1.67 Bab	14.65±1.23 Bab	13.67±1.58 Bb	14.05±2.39 Aab
155	15.77±0.69 Acd	18.47±0.45 Aa	16.83±2.51 Abc	17.26±1.10 Aab	15.17±0.51 Ad	13.62±0.43 Ae
174	10.78±1.38 BCbc	11.40±1.10 Cb	10.76±1.02 Cbc	13.73±2.19 BCa	10.68±1.32 Cbc	9.48±0.80 Bc
189	9.83±0.49 Cab	10.45±0.85 Cab	9.32±0.33 Cbc	9.53±0.93 Dbc	8.88±0.73 Dc	6.77±0.55 Cd

指标index	Chla	Chlb	Chl(a+b)	F_o	F_m	F_v/F_m	F_v/F_o	P_n
Chla	1
Chlb	0.855^*	1
Chl(a+b)	0.966^*	0.959^*	1
F_o	-0.054	-0.148	-0.104	1
F_m	0.599^*	0.495^*	0.578^*	0.096	1
F_v/F_m	0.428^*	0.416^*	0.436^*	0.078	0.486^*	1
F_v/F_o	0.433^*	0.409^*	0.430^*	0.269	0.358	0.859^*	1
P_n	0.587^*	0.551^*	0.584^*	0.084	0.424^*	0.315	0.406^*	1

[1]	马菊林, 邱玲玲, 谢寅峰, 闾倩, 马迎莉, 梁文超. 6-BA对太子参生长后期的生理调节作用[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 137-144.
[2]	徐薪璐, 孔淑鑫, 吕卓, 江帅君, 赵婉琪, 林树燕. 靓竹叶色表型叶片形态、结构与光合特性相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 145-154.
[3]	王琬钧, 于颖, 杨曦光. 基于叶绿素荧光的叶绿素含量估算[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(6): 157-165.
[4]	李喜梅, 赵君静, 回祎, 黄鑫, 高春雨, 牛雅璇, 廖晓宇, 于晨一. 郑州市4种园林树木光合特性及其影响因素研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(5): 105-112.
[5]	李潘亭, 杜满义, 王玥, 裴顺祥, 辛学兵. 元宝枫幼苗生长及光合特性对水肥耦合的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(5): 113-122.
[6]	伍长风, 国靖, 汪贵斌. 雌雄银杏对温度变化的形态和生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(4): 150-158.
[7]	马冲, 陆晖, 李运毛, 曹兵, 朱金忠, 亢彦东. 模拟大气CO₂浓度升高与氮添加对宁夏枸杞生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(4): 209-218.
[8]	杨皓, 刘超, 庄家尧, 张树同, 张文韬, 毛国豪. 不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.
[9]	王改萍, 章雷, 曹福亮, 丁延朋, 赵群, 赵慧琴, 王峥. 红蓝光质对银杏苗木生长生理特性及黄酮积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 105-112.
[10]	祝艳艳, 贾瑞瑞, 付钰, 常林, 岳远征, 杨秀莲, 王良桂. 不同楸树品种对茎腐病的抗性差异研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 155-165.
[11]	赵晓龙, 沈家怡, 刘涛, 吴家胜, 胡渊渊. 当年和越年生香榧叶片的光合效率及抗氧化特性的季节性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 45-50.
[12]	田梦阳, 朱树林, 窦全琴, 季艳红. 薄壳山核桃-茶间作对‘安吉白茶’速生期光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 86-96.
[13]	魏静, 谭星, 王昌盛, 闫瑞, 李林珂, 宁月, 刘芸. 引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 97-105.
[14]	梁文超, 步行, 罗思谦, 谢寅峰, 胡加玲, 张往祥. 施肥对增温促花后‘长寿冠’海棠叶片生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 114-120.
[15]	张银凤, 蔡洪月, 彭金根, 刘学军, 谢利娟, 张华, 王艳梅. 深圳城市公园不同栽植环境对毛棉杜鹃生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 197-204.