条件价值评估法(CVM)是目前最受欢迎的环境资源价值评估方法之一,但同时也是争议最多的方法,争议的焦点围绕该方法的有效性和可靠性。影响CVM结果有效性的因素很多,其中范围效应是最重要因素。笔者归纳了研究CVM范围效应有关理论,并通过1个实际案例来验证CVM评估环境资源非使用价值时范围效应是否存在。研究结果表明:范围效应不是CVM普遍现象,并非由CVM方法本身的缺陷造成。
Abstract
Contingent valuation method(CVM)is widely used in environmental impact assessment, but it is also critical. Major criticisms of which revolve mainly around its validity and reliability. There are many factors impacting CVM results bias. In which, “scope effect” is one of the main reason. The major objective of this paper is to summarize scope effect relating this theory issues and to investigate whether “scope effect” existing in this phenomenon. The result reveals that “scope effect” was not a universal matter for CVM and not deficient in something itself.
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
参考文献
[1] 张翼飞.CVM评估生态服务价值的经济有效性和可靠性理论书评[J].生态经济,2007(6):34-37. Zhang Y F. Theoretical analyses on the validity and reliability study of CVM applying in ecosystem service valuation[J]. Ecological Economy, 2007(6):34-37.
[2] Kahneman D, Knestch J L. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1992,22(1):57-70.
[3] Desvousgest W H, Johnson F R, Dunford R W, et al. Measusing natural resource damage with contingent valuation: test of validity and reliability[C]// Hausman J A. Contributions to Economic Analysis. Amsterdam: North Holland,1993.
[4] Smith K V. Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1992,22(1):71-89.
[5] Michell R C, Carson R T. Using Survey to Value Public Goods: the Contingent Valuation Methods[M]. Washington DC: Resources for the Furure,1989.(2011-03-01)http://books.google.com.
[6] Bateman I J, Munro A, Rhodes B, et al. Does part-whole bias exist? An experimental investigation[J]. Economic Journal,1997,107(441):322-332.
[7] Randall A, Hoehn J P. Embedding in market demand system[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1996, 30(3):369-380.
[8] Arrow K J, Slow R, leamer E, et al. Report of NOAA panel on Contingent Valuation[EB/OL]. Federal Register, 1993.(2011-03-01)http://www.cbe.csueastbay.edu/～alima/courses/4306/articles/NOAA 20% on 20% contingent 20% valuation 20%,1993.pdf.
[9] Weisten K,Hoen H F,Navrud S,et al.Valuing Biodiversity in Norwegiant Forests:A Contingent Valuation Study with Multiple Bias testing[R]. Oslo: Oslo University, 1993.
[10] Carson R, Michell R. Sequencing and nesting in contingent valuation surveys[J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1995,28(2):155-173.
基金
收稿日期:2012-03-29 修回日期:2012-11-13
基金项目:江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(2010JDXM016); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
第一作者:阮氏春香,讲师,博士生。*通信作者:温作民,教授。E-mail: zmwen@njfu.edu.cn。
引文格式:阮氏春香,温作民. 条件价值评估法在森林生态旅游非使用价值评估中范围效应的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2013,37(1):122-126.
PDF(1417245 KB)
