干旱胁迫及复水对刺槐苗水分运输过程的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.013

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 67-72.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.013

干旱胁迫及复水对刺槐苗水分运输过程的影响

王丁^1,2,杨雪²,韩鸿鹏²,张丽琴²,薛建辉^1*

1.南京林业大学生物与环境学院,南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏南京 210037;
2.河南教育学院生命科学系,河南郑州 450046

出版日期:2015-01-31 发布日期:2015-01-31
基金资助:
收稿日期:2013-12-01 修回日期:2014-03-31
基金项目:国家林业公益性行业科研专项项目(201104002); 河南省教育厅自然科学基金项目(2011B180017); 河南教育学院青年科研课题(20100102); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)
第一作者:王丁,副教授,博士。*通信作者:薛建辉,教授。E-mail: jhxue@njfu.edu.cn。
引文格式:王丁,杨雪,韩鸿鹏,等. 干旱胁迫及复水对刺槐苗水分运输过程的影响[J].

The impact of drought and rewatering on water transportation process of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings

WANG Ding^1,2,YANG Xue²,HAN Hongpeng²,ZHANG Liqin²,XUE Jianhui^1*

1. Collaborative Innovation Center of Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037,China;
2. Department of Life Science,Henan Institute of Education,Zhengzhou 450046,China

Online:2015-01-31 Published:2015-01-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨在干旱胁迫及复水条件下,植物对体内水分运输过程的调控能力,以盆栽2年生刺槐苗木为材料,用改良的“冲洗法”测定了干旱及复水处理条件下刺槐苗木体内水分运输过程参数。结果表明:①刺槐苗木水分运输过程胁迫指数随干旱胁迫程度的增大而增大,不同处理间胁迫指数均差异显著(P<0.05)。不同时期刺槐苗木水分运输过程胁迫指数从大到小呈现为:生长初期、生长旺期、生长末期的趋势。②干旱胁迫复水24 h后,刺槐苗木水分运输过程参数均有不同程度恢复,恢复度变化随干旱胁迫程度的增加而减小,不同处理间恢复度均差异显著(P<0.05)。③干旱胁迫复水24 h后,刺槐苗木水分运输过程存在补偿效应且主要出现在苗木的生长旺期轻度干旱胁迫条件下,补偿指数随胁迫强度的增加而下降,不同处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。因此,干旱胁迫会对植物造成一定的伤害,然而植物为保持正常的生理活动,能够启动一系列应激反应来阻止、降低或修复干旱胁迫造成的伤害且恢复程度与苗木生长时期及干旱胁迫程度密切相关。复水24 h后,刺槐苗木水分运输过程存在明显补偿现象,这是生物保存自身的一种重要机制,弥补干旱胁迫对苗木所造成的损失。

Abstract: Drought is one of the most stressful conditions limiting plant yield around the world. However,plants have developed multiple strategies to cope with environmental constraints. This study aimed to investigate the ability of Robinia pseudoacacia L.(2 years old)to regulate the process of water transportation in vivo under condition of drought and re-watering. Measurements of water transportation process parameters(water potential of leaves,leaf specific conductivity,relative water content of leaves and water consumption of seedlings)were made in R. pseudoacacia(2 years old)under condition of drought and re-watering.Results showed that:①R. pseudoacacia seedlings(2 years old)water transportation process stress index(Si)with the degree of drought stress increased and Si among different treatments was significantly different(P<0.05). ②Re-watering after drought stress 24 h,R. pseudoacacia seedlings(2 years old)water transport transportation process parameters had different degree of recovery,restoration degree(Rd)decreases with the increase of the degree of drought stress and Rd among different treatments was significantly different(P<0.05).③Re-watering after drought stress 24 h,compensation effect of R. pseudoacacia seedlings(2 years old)water transportation process was seen in the early growth stage of mild drought stress. Compensation index(Ci)decreased with the increase of drought stress. There were significant differences among different treatments(P<0.05).The conclusions were as follows:Drought stress could cause some damage to the water transportation process of plants,plants in order to maintain normal physiological activities,however,be able to start a series of stress response to prevent,reduce or repair the damage and the degree of recovery was closely related to growth period of seedlings and the degree of drought stress. This ability of seedlings to reduce or repair the injury was an essential index to evaluate the drought resistance and especially the selection of drought-resistant trees. Rewatering after 24 h,an obvious compensation effect of water transportation process was seen in R. pseudoacacia seedlings(2 years old),which was an important biological function to protect themselves,to a certain extent,could compensate for the injury of seedlings drought stress caused.

中图分类号:

S718

王丁,杨雪,韩鸿鹏,等. 干旱胁迫及复水对刺槐苗水分运输过程的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(01): 67-72.

WANG Ding,YANG Xue,HAN Hongpeng,ZHANG Liqin,XUE Jianhui. The impact of drought and rewatering on water transportation process of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(01): 67-72.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.013.

参考文献

[1] 马小芬,王兴芳,李强,等.不同种源地文冠果叶片解剖结构比较及抗旱性分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2013,27(6):92-96.Ma X F,Wang X F,Li Q,et al. The analysis of drought resistance and the comparison of anatomical structures of the leave of Xanthoceras sorbifolia Bunge introduced from different regions[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2013,27(6):92-96.
[2] 安玉艳,梁宗锁. 植物应对干旱胁迫的阶段性策略[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23(10):2907-2915. An Y Y,Liang Z S.Staged strategy of plants in response to drought stress[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2012,23(10):2907-2915.
[3] Tamir K,Shabtai C,Dan Y.Hydraulic adjustments underlying drought resistance of Pinus halepensis[J]. Tree Physiology,2011,31(6):637-648.
[4] Mark R,Michael J D.Comparison of drought resistance among Prunus species from divergent habitats[J]. Tree Physiology,1992,11(4):369-380.
[5] 王丁,姚健,薛建辉.土壤干旱胁迫对樟树(Cinnamomum camphora(L.)Presl)苗木水力结构特征的影响[J].生态学报,2009,29(5):2725-2731. Wang D,Yao J,Xue J H. Effects of soil drought stress on hydraulic architecture characteristics of Camphor seedlings[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2009,29(5):2725-2731.
[6] 王如岩,于水强,张金池,等.干旱胁迫下接种菌根真菌对滇柏和楸树幼苗根系的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,36(6):23-27. Wang R Y,Yu S Q,Zhang J C,et al.Effects of mycorrhizal fungus inoculation on the root of Cupressus duclouxiana and Catalpa bungei seedlings under drought stress[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2012,36(6):23-27.
[7] 季孔庶,孙志勇,方彦. 林木抗旱性研究进展[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2006,30(6):123-128.Ji K S,Sun Z Y,Fang Y.Research advance on the drought resistant in forest[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2006,30(06):123-128.
[8] Zimmermann M H. Xylem structure and the ascent of sap[M]. Berlin: Springer-Verlag,1983.
[9] 王丁,薛建辉,姚健.林木水力结构与抗旱性研究综述[J].中国沙漠,2009,29(4):711-717.Wang D,Xue J H,Yao J. Review of research on tree hydraulic architecture and drought resistance[J].Journal of Desert Research,2009,29(4):711-717.
[10] 王丁.喀斯特地区六种苗木水分生理与抗旱性研究[D].南京:南京林业大学,2009.Wang D.A study on the relationship between water physiological characteristic and drought resistance of 6 tree species seedlings in karst area[D].Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University,2009.
[11] 王丁,张丽琴,薛建辉.苗木抗旱性综合评价研究——以6种喀斯特造林树种苗木为例[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(25):5-12.Wang D,Zhang L Q,Xue J H. The study on comprehensive evaluation of seedlings’ drought resistance—example of 6 forestation seedlings in Karst Mountainous Region[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2011,27(25):5-12.
[12] 金鉴明.环境科学大辞典[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1991.
[13] 施积炎,袁小凤,丁贵杰.作物水分亏缺补偿与超补偿效应的研究现状[J].山地农业生物学报,2000,19(3):226-233.Shi J Y,Yuan X F,Ding G J. The reviews of study on water deficit compensation and over-compensation effect for crops[J]. Journal of Mountain Agriculture and Biology,2000,19(3):226-233.
[14] 胡田田,康绍忠.植物抗旱性中的补偿效应及其在农业节水中的应用[J].生态学报,2005,25(4):885-891.Hu T T,Kang S Z.The compensatory effect in drought resistance of plants and its application in water-saving agriculture[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2005,25(4):885-891.
[15] Sperry J S,Donnelly J R,Tyree M T, et al. A method for measuring hydraulic conductivity and embolism in xylem[J]. Plant Cell and Environment,1988,11(1):35-40.
[16] Mackay A D,Barber S A. Effect of cyclic wetting and drying of a soil in root hair growth of maize roots[J]. Plant and Soil,1987,104(2):291-293.
[17] Tardieu F,Reymond M,Hamard P.Spatial distributions of expansion rate,cell division rate and cell size in maize leaves:a synthesis of the effects of soil water status, evaporative demand and temperature[J].Journal Experimental Botany,2000,51(350):1505-1514.
[18] 李吉跃,翟洪波.木本植物水力结构与抗旱性[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(2):301-305.Li J Y,Zhai H B. Hydraulic architecture and drought resistance of woody plants[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2000,11(2):301-305.
[19] 李吉跃,周平,招礼军.干旱胁迫对苗木蒸腾耗水的影响[J].生态学报,2002,22(9):1380-1386.Li J Y,Zhou P,Zhao L J. Influence of drought stress on transpiring water-consumption of seedlings[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica,2002,22(9):1380-1386.
[20] 曹让,梁宗锁,吴洁云,等.干旱胁迫及复水对棉花叶片氮代谢的影响[J].核农学报,2013,27(2):231-239.Cao R,Liang Z S,Wu J Y,et al. Effect of progressive drought stress and the subsequent re-watering on leaf nitrogen metabolism cotton seedlings[J].Acta Agriculturae Nucleatae Sinica,2013,27(2):231-239.
[21] Elizabeth A B. Molecular responses to water deficit[J].Plant Physiology,1993,103(4):1035-1040.
[22] 胡晓健,喻方圆,刘建兵,等.干旱胁迫对不同种源马尾松苗木针叶内可溶性糖含量的影响[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2009,33(5):55-59. Hu X J,Yu F Y,Liu J B,et al. Effect of drought stress on soluble sugar content in needles of Pinus massoniana seedlings from different provenances[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2009,33(5):55-59.
[23] 陈亚鹏,陈亚宁,李卫红,等.干旱胁迫下的胡杨脯氨酸累积特点分析[J].干旱区地理,2003,26(4):420-424.Chen Y P,Chen Y N,Li W H,et al. Analysis on the change of drought stress on praline of Populus euphratica in the lower reaches of tarim river[J].Arid Land Geography,2003,26(4):420-424.
[24] 胡景江,张林森,刘建朝.干旱及外源低聚壳聚糖对1年生苹果幼树渗透调节能力的影响[J].林业科学,2012,48(9):15-21.Hu J J,Zhang L S,Liu J C. Effect of drought stress and exogenous oligo-chitosan on the osmotic adjustment ability of one-year-old apple treelet[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2012,48(9):15-21.
[25] 刘洪展,郑伟,郑风荣,等.复水对海水浇灌的玉米幼苗根系补偿效应的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(3):101-106. Liu H Z,Zheng W,Zheng F R,et al. Influence of rewatering on compensatory effect of maize seedling roots with diluted seawater irrigation[J].Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2012,28(3):101-106.
[26] 潘向艳,季孔庶,方彦.淹水胁迫下杂交鹅掌楸无性系叶片内源激素含量的变化[J].南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2008,32(1):29-32.Pan X Y,Ji K S,Fang Y. Changes in contents of endogenous hormones in different clones of Liriodendron chinense × L. tulipifera under flooding stress[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University:Natural Sciences Edition,2008,32(1):29-32.
[27] 卜令铎,张仁和,韩苗苗,等.干旱复水激发玉米叶片补偿效应的生理机制[J].西北农业学报,2009,18(2):88-92.Bu L D,Zhang R H,Han M M,et al.The physiological mechanism of compensation effect in maize leaf by re-watering after draught stress[J].Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica,2009,18(2):88-92.
[28] 刘丽平,欧阳竹,武兰芳,等.阶段性干旱及复水对小麦光合特性和产量的影响[J].生态学杂志,2012,31(11):2797-2803.Liu L P,Ouyang Z,Wu L F,et al. Effects of phased drought and re-watering on the photosynthetic characteristics and grain yield of winter wheat[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2012,31(11):2797-2803.

干旱胁迫及复水对刺槐苗水分运输过程的影响

The impact of drought and rewatering on water transportation process of Robinia pseudoacacia L. seedlings

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	丛明珠, 刘琪璟, 孙震, 董淳超, 钱尼澎. 长白山北坡植物群落β多样性及其组分驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 99-106.
[2]	曹荔荔, 阮宏华, 李媛媛, 倪娟平, 王国兵, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 徐亚明. 不同林龄水杉人工林地表大型土壤动物群落特征比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 91-98.
[3]	张怡婷, 夏念和, 林树燕, 丁雨龙. 我国寒竹属空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 107-114.
[4]	胡衍平, 刘卫东, 张珉, 陈明皋, 程勇, 魏志恒, 庞文胜, 吴际友. 山乌桕家系叶片叶色参数和色素含量及其解剖结构研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 123-133.
[5]	王一洁, 王璐冕, 丁真慧, 钱程, 曹加杰. 城市滨水绿地空间夏季微气候效应研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 233-241.
[6]	赵国扬, 洪波, 高俊平, 赵鑫, 黄洪峰, 徐彦杰. 菊属新品种‘雀欢’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 254-255.
[7]	任佳辉, 高捍东, 陈哲楠, 李浩, 刘强, 陈澎军. 杂交新美柳苗对盐涝胁迫的生长和生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 57-66.
[8]	董亚文, 陈双林, 谢燕燕, 郭子武, 张景润, 汪舍平, 徐勇敢. 林下植被演替过程中毛竹和主要优势树种叶片建成成本变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 179-186.
[9]	徐薪璐, 孔淑鑫, 吕卓, 江帅君, 赵婉琪, 林树燕. 靓竹叶色表型叶片形态、结构与光合特性相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 145-154.
[10]	曹永慧, 陈庆标, 周本智, 葛晓改, 王小明. 不同截雨干旱时间对毛竹叶片氮含量时空分布的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 155-161.
[11]	隋夕然, 李军, 陈娟, 华军, 沈谦, 杨洪胜, 何前程, 李由, 王伟, 彭冶, 葛之葳, 张增信. 徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 171-178.
[12]	尹华康, 张晋东, 黄金燕, 蒲冠桦, 毛泽恩, 周材权, 黄耀华, 付励强. 四川马边大风顶自然保护区大熊猫主食竹空间分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 187-193.
[13]	孔凡斌, 金晨涛, 徐彩瑶. 罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 245-254.
[14]	龚霞, 吴银明, 王海峰, 曾攀, 唐亚, 温铿, 焦文献. 花椒新品种‘蜀椒1号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 265-266.
[15]	吴桐, 王贤荣, 伊贤贵, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 陈祥珍, 高书成. 樱花新品种‘胭脂雪’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 267-268.