毛竹克隆构型及其生物量对不同营林模式的响应

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.014

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2015, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (01): 73-78.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.014

毛竹克隆构型及其生物量对不同营林模式的响应

朱强根¹,金爱武^1*,陈操²,王意锟¹,黄海泳³

1.丽水学院生态学院,浙江丽水 323000;
2.浙江农林大学林业与生物技术学院,浙江临安 311300;
3.浙江省龙泉市林业局,浙江龙泉 323700

出版日期:2015-01-31 发布日期:2015-01-31
基金资助:
收稿日期:2014-01-10 修回日期:2014-04-10
基金项目:中央财政林业科技推广项目(2009TS001); 丽水市公益性技术应用项目(2013ZC001,2013JYZB09)
第一作者:朱强根,讲师,博士。*通信作者:金爱武,研究员。E-mail: kinaw@zafu.edu.cn。
引文格式:朱强根,金爱武,陈操,等. 毛竹克隆构型及其生物量对不同营林模式的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2015,39(1):73-78.

The clonal architecture and biomass of Phyllostachys edulisas affected by different management modes

ZHU Qianggen¹, JIN Aiwu^1*, CHEN Cao², WANG Yikun¹, HUANG Haiyong³

1.College of Ecology, Lishui University, Lishui 323000, China;
2.School of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang Agriculture &
Forestry University, Lin’an 311300, China;
3.Longquan City Forestry Bureau of Zhejiang Province, Longquan 323700, China

Online:2015-01-31 Published:2015-01-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 克隆植物构型不仅受植物本身生物学的限制,对不同环境条件或干扰作用也会产生形态可塑性反应。笔者调查了不同营林模式下毛竹根茎克隆构型(分枝强度、分枝角度、根茎长度、节间长、根茎直径和节数等)的可塑性响应,同时对地下根茎和地上分株生物量的分配进行了分析。结果表明:在不同营林模式下,根茎的分枝强度与裂断数量均表现为笋用毛竹林>笋材两用林>材用林,根茎裂断显著增加了毛竹地下根茎分枝强度(P<0.05); 根茎分枝角度在不同营林模式下存在频率分布上的差异,毛竹通过改变分枝角度对土壤的异质状况产生可塑性适应。连续施肥12～14 a的笋用林和笋材两用林的根茎总长度较施肥1 a材用林的分别增长了11.09%和15.78%; 根茎节间长和直径的表现与不同营林模式下的养分状况、土壤异质性或根茎裂断情况不一致,而与地上分株胸径之间存在显著的异速生长关系。养分较贫瘠(施肥1 a)的材用毛竹林相对有更多的生物量分配到地下根茎,而连续施肥显著增加了笋用林和笋材两用林地上竹笋(新分株)生物量的比例。

Abstract: Clonal plant architecture depends on species-specific constraints, but also respond of morphological plasticity to extrinsic environmental factors or disturbance. This was well investigated in clonal grass, but little was known in giant clone specie such as Phyllostachys edulis. Our objectives were to study the effects of different management modes on clonal architecture of Ph. edulis, and ramets and rhizome biomass were also discussed. Three management modes were chosen to investigate clonal rhizome fragments and architectural traits such as length of rhizome or internodes, branching intensity or angles, number of nodes and rhizome diameter. These modes had differences in level of rhizome severing(rhizome severing or rhizome severing terminals)and fertilization and soil heterogeneity, and represented shoot(new ramet)food harvesting mode(SFH), stem harvesting mode(SH)and mixed mode with the two types(MM)by main use of forest land, respectively. Biomasses allocated to ramets or rhizomes were also investigated in three management modes. Results showed that branching intensity of rhizome significantly differed in different management modes(P<0.05), as indicated SFH>MM>SH, which was consistent with high, middle and low level of rhizome severing. The distribution percentages of branching angles were different among three modes, which indicated that Ph. edulis plastically responded to soil heterogeneity by changing branching angle. Continuous fertilization application(12-14 years)increased by 11.09% and 15.78% of total rhizome length respectively, when comparing SFH and MM to SH. The length of internodes and rhizome diameter were both not consistent with the change of rhizome severing and fertilization and soil heterogeneity in different management modes.However, significantly allometric functions were met by relating length of internodes or rhizome diameter to ramets diameter at breast height. More biomass was relatively allocated to the underground(such as rhizome)for SH which had one year fertilization, but this was adverse for SFH or MM that had long time fertilization(12-14 years).

中图分类号:

S718

朱强根,金爱武,陈操,等. 毛竹克隆构型及其生物量对不同营林模式的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(01): 73-78.

ZHU Qianggen, JIN Aiwu, CHEN Cao, WANG Yikun, HUANG Haiyong. The clonal architecture and biomass of Phyllostachys edulisas affected by different management modes[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 39(01): 73-78.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.014.

参考文献

[1] 陈劲松, 董鸣, 于丹, 等. 不同光照条件下聚花过路黄的克隆构型和分株种群特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(8): 1383-1388.Chen J S, Dong M, Yu D, et al. Clonal architecture and ramet population characteristics of Lysimachia congestiflora growing under different light conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(8): 1383-1388.
[2] Liu F H, Yu F H, Liu W S, et al. Large clones on cliff faces: expanding by rhizomes through crevices[J]. Annals of Botany, 2007, 100(1): 51-54.
[3] 何跃军, 韩文萍, 钟章成. 亚热带常绿阔叶林不同土壤和林冠环境下蝴蝶花的克隆可塑性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2011, 22(2): 337-342.He Y J, Han W P, Zhong Z C. Clonal plasticity of Iris japonica under different soil and canopy conditions in subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2011, 22(2): 337-342.
[4] Price E A C, Marshall C. Clonal plants and environmental heterogeneity[J]. Plant Ecology, 1999, 141(1-2): 3-7.
[5] 李睿, 钟章成, Werger M J A. 毛竹的无性系生长与立竹密度和叶龄结构的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 1997, 21(6):545-550.Li R, Zhong Z C, Werger M J A. The relationship between the clonal growth and the density of adult shoots with different leaf age in Phyllostachys pubescens mazel[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 1997, 21(6): 545-550.
[6] 张幼法, 林世奎, 张世渊. 毛竹林地下鞭动态生长的研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 1999, 18(3): 62-65.Zhang Y F, Lin S K, Zhang S Y. A study on dynamic growth of underground rhizome of Phyllostachys pubescens[J]. Journal of Bamboo Research, 1999, 18(3): 62-65.
[7] Li R, Werger M J A, Kroon H D, et al. Interactions between shoot age structure, nutrient availability and physiological integration in the giant bamboo Phyllostachys pubescens[J]. Plant Biology, 2000, 2(4): 437-446.
[8] Ikegami M, Whigham D F, Werger M J A. Ramet phenology and clonal architectures of the clonal sedge Schoenoplectus americanus(Pers.)Volk. ex Schinz & R. Keller[J]. Plant ecology, 2009, 200(2): 287-301.
[9] Wang J, Shi X, Zhang D, et al. Phenotypic plasticity in response to soil moisture availability in the clonal plant Eremosparton songoricum(Litv.)Vass[J]. Journal of Arid Land, 2011, 3(1): 34-39.
[10] Benot M L, Mony C, Puijalon S, et al. Responses of clonal architecture to experimental defoliation: a comparative study between ten grassland species[J]. Plant Ecology, 2009, 201(2): 621-630.
[11] Slade A J, Hutchings M J. The effects of light intensity on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea[J]. The Journal of Ecology, 1987, 75: 639-650.
[12] 李睿, 钟章成, Werger M J A. 毛竹(Phyllostachys pubescens)竹笋群动态的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 1997, 21(1): 53-59.Li R, Zhong Z C, Werger M J A. Studies on the dynamics of the bamboo shoots in Phyllostachys pubescens[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 1997, 21(1): 53-59.
[13] 陈双林, 吴柏林, 张德明, 等. 笋材两用毛竹林冠层结构及其生产力功能研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2001, 14(4):349-355.Chen S L, Wu B L, Zhang D M, et al. Study on crown structure and function of Phyllostachys pubescens stands for culm and shoot production[J]. Forest Research, 2001, 14(4): 349-355.
[14] 王宏, 金晓春, 金爱武, 等. 施肥对毛竹生长量和秆形的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(5): 741-746.Wang H, Jin X C, Jin A W, et al. Growth and culm form of Phyllostachys pubescens with fertilization[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2011, 28(5): 741-746.
[15] 庄若楠, 金爱武. 施肥对毛竹秆型特征的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33(1): 80-84.Zhuang R N, Jin A W. Effects of fertilization on culm form characteristics of Phyllostachys pubescens[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2013, 33(1): 80-84.
[16] Wildová R, Wild J, Herben T. Fine-scale dynamics of rhizomes in a grassland community[J]. Ecography, 2007, 30(2):264-276.
[17] 郑郁善, 王舒凤. 杉木毛竹混交林的毛竹地下鞭根结构特征研究[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(6): 69-72.Zheng Y S, Wang S F. Study on bamboo underground structure of mixed forest of chinese fir and bamboo[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2000, 36(6): 69-72.
[18] 廖光庐. 毛竹林鞭系结构调查分析[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 1988, 7(3): 35-44.Liao G L. Analysis and investigation on the structure of rhizome system of bamboo forests[J]. Journal of Bamboo Research, 1988, 7(3): 35-44.
[19] Klimes^ˇová J, Vít Latzel V, de Bello F, et al. Plant functional traits in studies of vegetation changes in response to grazing and mowing: towards a use of more specific traits[J]. Preslia, 2008, 80(3): 245-253.
[20] Charpentier A, Mesléard F, Thompson J D. The effects of rhizome severing on the clonal growth and clonal architecture of Scirpus maritimus[J]. Oikos, 1998, 83: 107-116.
[21] Benot M L, Bonis A, Mony C. Do spatial modes of clonal fragments and architectural responses to defoliation depend on the structural blue-print? An experimental test with two rhizomatous Cyperaceae[J]. Evolutionary Ecology, 2010, 24(6):1475-1487.
[22] 董鸣. 异质性生境中的植物克隆生长: 风险分摊[J]. 植物生态学报, 1996, 20(6): 543-548.Dong M. Plant clonal growth in heterogeneous habitats: risk-spreading[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 1996, 20(6):543-548.
[23] 毛达民, 陆媛媛, 郑林水, 等. 鞭笋挖掘后毛竹竹鞭的生长规律[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2011, 28(5): 833-836.Mao D M, Lu Y Y, Zheng L S, et al. Growth of bamboo running rhizomes after digging up bamboo rhizome shoots[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A&F University, 2011, 28(5): 833-836.
[24] Stoll P, Egli P, Schmid B. Plant foraging and rhizome growth modes of Solidago altissima in response to mowing and fertilizer application[J]. Journal of Ecology, 1998, 86(2): 341-354.
[25] Dong M, Alaten B. Clonal plasticity in response to rhizome severing and heterogeneous resource supply in the rhizomatous grass Psammochloa villosa in an Inner Mongolian dune, China[J]. Plant Ecology, 1999, 141(1-2): 53-58.
[26] Darby F A, Turner R E. Effects of eutrophication on salt marsh root and rhizome biomass accumulation[J]. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2008, 363: 63-70.
[27] Darby F A, Turner R E. Below-and aboveground biomass of Spartina alterniflora: response to nutrient addition in a Louisiana salt marsh[J]. Estuaries and Coasts, 2008, 31(2): 326-334.
[28] Wolfer S R, Straile D. Spatio temporal dynamics and plasticity of clonal architecture in Potamogeton perfoliatus[J]. Aquatic Botany, 2004, 78(4): 307-318.
[29] Benot M L, Bonis A, Rossignol N, et al. Spatial patterns in defoliation and the expression of clonal traits in grazed meadows[J]. Botany, 2011, 89(1): 43-54.
[30] 朱强根, 金爱武, 王意锟, 等. 不同营林模式下毛竹枝叶的生物量分配: 异速生长分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(9): 811-819.Zhu Q G, Jin A W, Wang Y K, et al. Biomass allocation of branches and leaves in Phyllostachys heterocycla ‘Pubescens’ under different management modes: allometric scaling analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(9): 811-819.
[31] Coyle D R, Coleman M D, Aubrey D P. Above and below ground biomass accumulation, production, and distribution of sweetgum and loblolly pine grown with irrigation and fertilization[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2008, 38(6): 1335-1348.

毛竹克隆构型及其生物量对不同营林模式的响应

The clonal architecture and biomass of Phyllostachys edulisas affected by different management modes

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	丛明珠, 刘琪璟, 孙震, 董淳超, 钱尼澎. 长白山北坡植物群落β多样性及其组分驱动因素分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 99-106.
[2]	曹荔荔, 阮宏华, 李媛媛, 倪娟平, 王国兵, 曹国华, 沈彩芹, 徐亚明. 不同林龄水杉人工林地表大型土壤动物群落特征比较研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 91-98.
[3]	张怡婷, 夏念和, 林树燕, 丁雨龙. 我国寒竹属空间分布特征及影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 107-114.
[4]	胡衍平, 刘卫东, 张珉, 陈明皋, 程勇, 魏志恒, 庞文胜, 吴际友. 山乌桕家系叶片叶色参数和色素含量及其解剖结构研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 123-133.
[5]	王一洁, 王璐冕, 丁真慧, 钱程, 曹加杰. 城市滨水绿地空间夏季微气候效应研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 233-241.
[6]	赵国扬, 洪波, 高俊平, 赵鑫, 黄洪峰, 徐彦杰. 菊属新品种‘雀欢’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 254-255.
[7]	任佳辉, 高捍东, 陈哲楠, 李浩, 刘强, 陈澎军. 杂交新美柳苗对盐涝胁迫的生长和生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 57-66.
[8]	董亚文, 陈双林, 谢燕燕, 郭子武, 张景润, 汪舍平, 徐勇敢. 林下植被演替过程中毛竹和主要优势树种叶片建成成本变化特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 179-186.
[9]	徐薪璐, 孔淑鑫, 吕卓, 江帅君, 赵婉琪, 林树燕. 靓竹叶色表型叶片形态、结构与光合特性相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 145-154.
[10]	曹永慧, 陈庆标, 周本智, 葛晓改, 王小明. 不同截雨干旱时间对毛竹叶片氮含量时空分布的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 155-161.
[11]	隋夕然, 李军, 陈娟, 华军, 沈谦, 杨洪胜, 何前程, 李由, 王伟, 彭冶, 葛之葳, 张增信. 徐州市侧柏人工林群落不同演替阶段物种多样性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 171-178.
[12]	尹华康, 张晋东, 黄金燕, 蒲冠桦, 毛泽恩, 周材权, 黄耀华, 付励强. 四川马边大风顶自然保护区大熊猫主食竹空间分布特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 187-193.
[13]	孔凡斌, 金晨涛, 徐彩瑶. 罗霄山地区生态系统服务与居民福祉耦合协调关系变化及其影响因素[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 245-254.
[14]	龚霞, 吴银明, 王海峰, 曾攀, 唐亚, 温铿, 焦文献. 花椒新品种‘蜀椒1号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 265-266.
[15]	吴桐, 王贤荣, 伊贤贵, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 陈祥珍, 高书成. 樱花新品种‘胭脂雪’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 267-268.