基于切花应用的观赏海棠品种评价与筛选

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803044

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (04): 70-76.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803044

基于切花应用的观赏海棠品种评价与筛选

杨祎凡¹,周婷¹,范俊俊¹,穆茜¹,张晶¹,张往祥^1,2,于忠明³

(1.南京林业大学,南方现代林业协同中心,南京林业大学林学院,江苏南京 210037; 2.扬州小苹果园艺有限公司, 江苏扬州 225200; 3.扬中市经济开发区鲲翔种植专业合作社,江苏扬中 212215)

出版日期:2019-07-22 发布日期:2019-07-22
基金资助:
收稿日期:2018-03-28 修回日期:2019-01-08 基金项目:江苏省重点研发计划子项目(BE2017375-2); 江苏农业科技自主创新资金项目(CX(16)1005-4-1)。第一作者:杨祎凡(1435301820@qq.com)。*通信作者:张往祥(malus2011@163.com),教授, ORCID(0000-0002-2647-5608)。

Cultivar evaluation and selection in ornamental crabapple for cut flower application

YANG Yifan¹, ZHOU Ting¹, FAN Junjun¹, MU Qian¹, ZHANG Jing¹, ZHANG Wangxiang^1,2*, YU Zhongming³

(1.Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China; 2.Yangzhou Crabapple Horticulture Limited Company, Yangzhou 225200, China; 3. Yangzhong Economic Development Zone Kunxiang Planting Specialized Cooperative, Yangzhong 212215, China)

Online:2019-07-22 Published:2019-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 【目的】发掘观赏海棠切花应用价值,促进相关产业的发展。【方法】运用层次分析法(AHP)对74个观赏海棠品种与1种的切花应用价值进行了综合评价,并通过绘制频率直方分布图进行切花品质性状稀缺性分析。【结果】花色、花型、着花密度、花径、瓶插寿命及开花率为海棠切花综合评价主要权重指标; 而重瓣、浓香、枝型优美为最稀缺的性状表现,可作为品种特异性判断依据。 ‘玛丽波特’、‘唐纳德’、湖北海棠等14个品种/种综合得分排序列前20%,为优良的观赏海棠切花品种/种,且其中‘当娜’、‘凯尔斯’、‘俏佳人’等6个品种还具有稀缺性状。此外,‘俏佳人’、‘芙蓉’、‘大卫’综合分值略低,但其个别性状表现突出,单列为观赏海棠特异品种。【结论】切花的综合应用价值是品种评价的基础,此外还应对特异性状有所考量,以提高评价结果的全面性。

Abstract: 【Objective】This study was performed to explore the value of a cut flower application of ornamental crabapples and promote the development of this niche industry.【Method】The application value of the cut flowers of 75 ornamental crabapple trees was evaluated using the analytic hierarchy process(AHP). Cut flower quality traits were analyzed by drawing the frequency distributions. 【Result】 Flower color, pattern, density, diameter, vase life and flowering rate were the main factors incorporated into this comprehensive evaluation of crabapple cultivars for cut flowers. A double flower, strong aroma and beautiful spray were the scarcest traits. These can provide a basis for ranking of cultivars. Forteen cultivars/species, including ‘Mary Potter’ ‘Donald Wyman’ and hupehensis were ranked in the top 20%. They were selected as excellent crabapple variants for cut flowers. Among these, six cultivars, including ‘Donald Wyman’ ‘Kelsey’ and ‘Bride’ had scarce traits. In addition, although the comprehensive scores for ‘Bride’ ‘Furong’ and ‘David’ were slightly lower, some single traits performed prominently. These were selected as the specific cut flower crabapples.【Conclusion】Comprehensive application value of cut flowers was used as the basis for cultivar evaluation. The specificity of a trait should also be taken into account in evaluating the application value of cut flowers, to enhance the comprehensiveness of the evaluation results.

中图分类号:

S685.99

杨祎凡,周婷,范俊俊,等. 基于切花应用的观赏海棠品种评价与筛选[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(04): 70-76.

YANG Yifan, ZHOU Ting, FAN Junjun, MU Qian, ZHANG Jing, ZHANG Wangxiang, YU Zhongming. Cultivar evaluation and selection in ornamental crabapple for cut flower application[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 43(04): 70-76.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803044.

参考文献

[1] 郭翎, 曹颖, 包铮炎, 等. 观赏海棠品种评价体系[C]. 苏州:国际风景园林师联合会(IFLA)第47届世界大会、中国风景园林学会2010年会, 2010. GUO L,CAO Y, BAO Z Y, et al. The evaluation system of ornamental crabapple cultivars[C]. Suzhou: IFLA 47th World Congress, 2010 Annual meeting of Chinese Landscape Architecture Society, 2010.
[2] 姜楠南, 汤庚国. 中国海棠花文化初探[J]. 南京林业大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2007(1):56-60. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1165.2007.01.008. JIANG N N, TANG G G. The study of crabapple culture in China[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2007(1):56-60.
[3] 张谦德. 瓶花谱[M]. 北京: 中华书局, 2012:22-23. ZHANG Q D.Bottle pattern[M]. Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company, 2012: 22-23.
[4] 袁宏道. 瓶史[M]. 济南: 山东画报出版社, 2015: 34. YUAN H D. Thehistory of bottle[M]. Jinan: Shandong Pictorial Press, 2015: 34.
[5] 郑杨, 曲晓玲, 郭翎, 等. 观赏海棠资源谱系分析及育种研究进展[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008(1):152-160. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2324.2008.01.033. ZHEN Y, QU X L, GUO L,et al. Advances on ornamental crabapple resources[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition), 2008(1):152-160.
[6] 唐菲, 丁增成, 任杰, 等. 我国观赏海棠种类及品种概述[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015(16):190-195. DOI:10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2015.16.070. TANG F, DING Z C, REN J,et al. An overview of the species and cultivars of ornamental crabapple in China.[J]. Journal of Anhui Agriculture, 2015(16):190-195.
[7] 房伟民, 陈发棣. 木本植物——有待开发的切花新领域[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2002(2):40-42. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2002.02.017. FANG W M, CHEN F D. Woody plant—a new field of cut flowers to be developed[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Forestry Science & Technology, 2002(2):40-42.
[8] 吴晓星, 刘凤栾, 房义福, 等. 36个欧美观赏海棠品种(种)应用价值的综合评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,39(1):93-98. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.017. WU X X, LIU F L, FANG Y F, et al.A comprehensive evaluation on application value of 36 Euro-American ornamental crabapples[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2015,39(1):93-98.
[9] 陈小丽, 姜卫兵, 魏家星, 等. 南京城市公园中观赏海棠园林价值的综合评价[J]. 广东农业科学, 2016, 43(9): 62-71. DOI:10.16768/j.issn.1004-874X.2016.09.010. CHEN X L, JIANG W B, WEI J X, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on the landscape value of ornamental crabapples in Nanjing city park[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 43(9): 62-71.
[10] 张往祥, 范俊俊, 杨萍, 等. ‘紫王子’海棠半同胞家系苗期表型特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(6):36-43. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201708012. ZHANG W X, FAN J J, YANG P, et al. Analysis of phenotypic characteristics of the Malus ‘Purple Prince’ half-sib progenies at seedling stage[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition), 2017,41(6):36-43.
[11] ALBAYRAK E, ERENSAL Y C.Using analytic hierarchy process(AHP)to improve human performance: an application of multiple criteria decision making problem[J]. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2004, 15(4):491-503. DOI:10.1023/B:JIMS.0000034112.00652.4c.
[12] 周媛, 姚崇怀, 王彩云. 桂花切花品种筛选[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2006, 23(6):660-663. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2006.06.012. ZHOU Y, YAO C H, WANG C Y. Study on selecting cut-flower cultivars of Osmanthus fragrans[J]. Journal of Zhejiang Forestry College, 2006, 23(6):660-663.
[12] 韩勇, 陈发棣, 房伟民,等. 单头切花菊品质性状综合评价体系构建[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2011, 34(5):32-36. DOI: 10.7685/j.issn.1000-2030.2011.05.006. HAN Y, CHENF D, FANG W M, et al. A synthetic system established for assessing the quality of standard cut chrysanthemum[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011, 34(5):32-36.
[14] 高平, 刘玉英, 成仿云,等. 基于专用目标的中原牡丹品种评价与筛选[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2013, 35(4):106-111. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2013.04.014. GAO P, LIU Y Y, CHENG F Y, et al. Cultivar evaluation and selection in Paeonia×suffruticosa Zhongyuan Group for specialized purpose to use[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2013, 35(4):106-111.
[15] 李晓颖, 余金保, 王保根, 等. 南京梅花品种资源若干花性状的数量分布及评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012(S1):45-49. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2012.s1.015. LI X Y, YU J B, WANG B G,et al. Quantitative distribution and evaluation of some flower characteristics of Prunus mume cultivars. [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2012(S1):45-49.
[16] 王菲彬, 芦建国. 蜡梅切花观赏特性的综合评价[J]. 林业科技开发, 2005, 19(5):25-27. DOI:10.3969/jissn.1000-8101.2005.05.009. WANG F B, LU J G. Ornamental characteristics evaluation of Chimonanthus praecox for cut flower use[J]. Forestry Science and Technology Development, 2005, 19(5):25-27.
[17] 何定萍, 孙瑞芳. 重庆市梅花切花品种筛选初报[J]. 园林科技, 2007(1):1-5. HE D P, SUN R F. A preliminary report on the selection of cut Prunus mume cultivars in Chongqing[J]. Garden Science and Technology, 2007(1):1-5.
[18] 陈婧婧, 王小德, 马进, 等. 不同瓶插液对梅花品种三轮玉蝶采后生理特性的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(7):252-254. DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2012.07.14. CHEN J J, WANG X D, MA J, et al. Effects of different bottles on postharvest physiological characteristics of Pmurne cv. Sanlun Yudie[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(7):252-254.
[19] SAATY T L. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Interfaces, 1994, 48(1):9-26.DOI: 10.1287/inte.24.6.19.
[20] 刘青林, 陈俊愉. 观赏植物花器官主要观赏性状的遗传与改良[J]. 园艺学报, 1998(1):81-86. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.1998.01.016. LIU Q L, CHEN J Y.Inheritance and improvement of the main ornamental traits of flower organs in ornamental plants[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 1998(1):81-86.
[21] 李海燕, 李火根, 杨秀莲,等. 植物花香物质合成与调控研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(1): 123-129. DOI: 10.13271/j.mpb.016.000123. LI H Y, LI H G, YANG X L et al. Advances studies on the synthesis and regulation of floral substances in plant[J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(1): 123-129.
[22] 盛爱武, 刘雪兰. 梅花切花品种筛选初探[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 1998(2):16-21. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.1998.02.004. SHENG A W, LIU X L. Preliminary studies on selecting cut flower cultivar s of Mei[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 1998(2):16-21.
[23] ASRAR A A. Effects of some preservative solutions on vase life and keeping quality of snapdragon(Antirrhinum majus L.)cut flowers[J]. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 11(1):29-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.jssas.2011.06.002.
[24] 姜文龙, 范俊俊, 张丹丹,等. 观赏海棠不同叶位色彩特征及特异种质挖掘[J]. 园艺学报, 2017. 44(6); 1135-1144. DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2016-0774. JIANG W L, FAN J J, ZHANG D D, et al. Research on the characteristics of different leaf positions of crabapple’s leaf color and elite germplasm excavation[J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(6):1135-1144.
[25] HA Y M, SHIM K K. Selection of new crabapple cultivars by cross and open pollination for landscape use[J]. Journal of the Korean Society for Horticultural Science, 1995,36(1):132-149.
[26] 孙凡雅, 沈向, 柬怀瑞,等. 观赏海棠杂交育种花色早期定向选择研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008(9):2748-2754. DOI:10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2008.09.024. SUN F Y, SHEN X, JIAN H R, et al. Study on early directional selection of flower color in hybrid breeding of ornamental crabapple[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2008(9):2748-2754.
[27] ROMER J P, HAYNES C L. A survey of selection preferences for crabapple cultivars and species[J]. Horttechnology, 2003, 13(3): 522-525. DOI:10.31274/rtd-180813-8341.

[1]	李家亮, 巫大宇, 毛康珊. 柏木属的分类地位和物种多样性研究现状与建议[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 36-45.
[2]	伊贤贵, 李蒙, 王贤荣. 樱亚属分类学研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 46-57.
[3]	尹增芳, 欧香, 陈瑶, 杨爱香, 孙李勇. 望春玉兰生物学基础研究进展与展望[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 256-262.
[4]	杨宏, 伊贤贵, 王贤荣, 吴桐, 周华近, 陈洁, 李蒙, 朱兆青. 樱花新品种‘元春’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 275-276.
[5]	周群. 三角梅新品种‘中闽2号’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 268-270.
[6]	鲍嵚, 许涛, 史锋厚, 沈永宝. 观赏海棠新品种‘赞春’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 234-236.
[7]	陈含, 王东升, 白冰, 李佳凤, 陈可心, 程蓓蓓. 21份木槿栽培品种表型多样性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 117-126.
[8]	黄粤, 马荣群, 葛红娟, 张蕊芬, 孙吉禄, 王芝云, 孙红涛, 沙广利. 苹果属观赏海棠新品种‘红禧儿’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 241-242.
[9]	胡丁猛, 许景伟, 王立辉, 囤兴建, 朱升祥, 杨健. ‘蕊沁’等7个海棠新品种[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 238-242.
[10]	储吴樾, 范俊俊, 张往祥. 观赏海棠花期物候稳定性及其对温度变化的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 49-54.
[11]	王琳, 朱淑霞, 李蒙, 伊贤贵, 段一凡, 何碧珠, 廖鹏辉, 王贤荣. 樱花新品种‘惜春’[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 223-224.
[12]	孙利娜, 周群, 黄妹平, 周长品, 徐世松, 杨舒婷, 杜铃, 甘四明, 唐庆. 基于SSR标记构建宝巾花品种的分子指纹[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(6): 60-66.
[13]	曹媛媛,贾斐斐,吴岐奎,陈晨,高振洲,喻方圆. 野茉莉属6个树种不同时期花香成分分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(04): 48-56.
[14]	朱淑霞,伊贤贵,王华辰,段一凡,李蒙,陈林,王贤荣. 樱花新品种‘粉彩'[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(02): 216-217.
[15]	芦建国,谢贵霞. 武汉地区蜡梅品种资源调查与分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(02): 155-158.

基于切花应用的观赏海棠品种评价与筛选

Cultivar evaluation and selection in ornamental crabapple for cut flower application

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿