长江中游流域国家级自然保护地交叉重叠特征及其优化整合研究

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2020110003

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3): 12-20.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2020110003

所属专题：长江大保护视域下的长江中游自然保护地及景观生态研究

• 专题报道：长江大保护视域下的长江中游自然保护地及景观生态研究（执行主编　王浩） • 上一篇下一篇

长江中游流域国家级自然保护地交叉重叠特征及其优化整合研究

唐晓岚(), 马坤, 任宇杰

南京林业大学风景园林学院,南京林业大学中国特色生态文明建设与林业发展研究院,江苏南京 210037

收稿日期:2020-11-17 接受日期:2021-09-13 出版日期:2022-05-30 发布日期:2022-06-10
基金资助:
中国学位与研究生教育学会项目(2019-NLZX-ZD15);南京林业大学国家公园与保护地研究中心项目(2020NPB01);国家自然科学基金项目(31270746);南京林业大学高等教育研究课题(2018B22);南京林业大学专业学位研究生课程案例库建设项目(2018AL07);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX18_0979)

Study on overlapping characteristics and optimization of national natural protected areas in the middle Yangtze River basin

TANG Xiaolan(), MA Kun, REN Yujie

College of Landscape Architecture, Academy of Chinese Ecological Progress and Forestry Development Studies, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2020-11-17 Accepted:2021-09-13 Online:2022-05-30 Published:2022-06-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】定量分析长江中游流域国家级自然保护地交叉重叠特征及其优化整合对策,为我国自然保护地的合理规划与布局提供科学依据。【方法】以长江中游流域6类661处国家级自然保护地为研究对象,运用ArcGIS核密度指数方法,定量分析其交叉重叠特征和优化整合对策。【结果】长江中游流域共214处国家级自然保护地存在交叉重叠,主要集聚分布于鄱阳环湖、大别山南部武陵山脉和伏牛山等区域;在省级行政区划交界、流域区划交界、生物多样性保护优先区和生态功能保护区内,优化整合应优先考虑以国家公园、自然保护区、风景名胜区和自然公园4类为主体分别进行类型整合、范围调整、吸收合并和同类合并。【结论】运用ArcGIS定量可视化叠加分析方法,可以有效识别并判断自然保护地交叉重叠现状、特征及问题,有利于科学构建我国自然保护地体系及其空间格局规划。

关键词: 长江中游流域, 国家级自然保护地, 交叉重叠, 优化整合

Abstract:

【Objective】The aim of this study is to conduct a quantitative analysis of the overlapping characteristics of national natural protected areas in the middle Yangtze River basin and their optimization and integration strategies. This could provide a scientific basis for rational planning and layout of natural protected areas in China. 【Method】The 661 national natural protected areas in the middle Yangtze River basin were classified into six types and used as the research object. This study quantitatively revealed their overlapping characteristics and optimized integration strategies by using the ArcGIS nearest neighbor index and nuclear density index. 【Result】We found 214 overlapping national natural protected areas in the middle Yangtze River basin, mainly concentrated in the Poyang Lake, South of the Dabie Mountains Wuling Mountains and Funiu Mountains, as well as provincial administrative divisions, river basin divisions, biodiversity conservation priority areas, and ecological function protection areas. Priority should be given to the above areas for optimization and integration and type integration. Moreover, similar mergers, absorption mergers, and scope adjustments should be carried out with national parks, nature reserves, scenic spots, and natural parks as goals. 【Conclusion】Using the ArcGIS quantitative visualization overlay analysis method, the problem of overlapping of natural protected areas can be effectively solved, which is conducive to the scientific construction of a country’s nature reserve system and its spatial pattern planning.

Key words: the middle Yangtze River basin, national natural protected area, overlapping, optimization and integration

中图分类号:

S759.9
X171

唐晓岚,马坤,任宇杰. 长江中游流域国家级自然保护地交叉重叠特征及其优化整合研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 12-20.

TANG Xiaolan, MA Kun, REN Yujie. Study on overlapping characteristics and optimization of national natural protected areas in the middle Yangtze River basin[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 46(3): 12-20.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2020110003.

图/表 7

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

图6

参考文献 21

[1]	王毅. 中国国家公园顶层制度设计的实践与创新[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(10):1037-1039. doi: 10.17520/biods.2017276
	WANG Y. Practice and innovation for overarching institution design of China’s national park[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2017, 25(10):1037-1039.DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017276. doi: 10.17520/biods.2017276
[2]	杨锐, 曹越. 论中国自然保护地的远景规模[J]. 中国园林, 2018, 34(7):5-12.
	YANG R, CAO Y. Discussion on the long-term target of protected area coverage in China[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2018, 34(7):5-12.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2018.07.002. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2018.07.002
[3]	LOVEJOY T E. Protected areas:a prism for a changing world[J]. Trends Ecol Evol, 2006, 21(6):329-333.DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.005. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.005
[4]	MASCIA M B. The human dimension of coral reef marine protected areas:recent social science research and its policy implications[J]. Conserv Biol, 2003, 17(2):630-632.DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01454.x. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01454.x.
[5]	CHAPE S, HARRISON J, SPALDING M, et al. Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets[J]. Philos Trans Royal Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci, 2005, 360(1454):443-455.DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1592. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1592
[6]	DEWAR K. Tourism in national parks and protected areas:planning and management[J]. Tour Manag, 2004, 25(2):288-289.DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5177(03)00091-8. doi: 10.1016/s0261-5177(03)00091-8
[7]	CETIN M, SEVIK H. Evaluating the recreation potential of ilgaz mountain national park in Turkey[J]. Environ Monit Assess, 2016, 188(1):52.DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-5064-7. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-5064-7
[8]	孔石, 曾頔, 杨宇博, 等. 中国国家级自然保护区与森林公园空间分布差异比较[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2013, 44(11):56-61.
	KONG S, ZENG D, YANG Y B, et al. Spatial differences comparison between national nature reserves and national forest park[J]. J Northeast Agric Univ, 2013, 44(11):56-61.DOI: 10.19720/j.cnki.issn.1005-9369.2013.11.011. doi: 10.19720/j.cnki.issn.1005-9369.2013.11.011
[9]	姜超, 马社刚, 王琦淞, 等. 中国5种主要保护地类型的空间分布格局[J]. 野生动物学报, 2016, 37(1):61-66.
	JIANG C, MA S G, WANG Q S, et al. Spatial distribution pattern of five major categories of protected area in China[J]. Chin J Wildl, 2016, 37(1):61-66.DOI: 10.19711/j.cnki.issn2310-1490.2016.01.012. doi: 10.19711/j.cnki.issn2310-1490.2016.01.012
[10]	杨振, 程鲲, 付励强, 等. 东北林业系统自然保护区、森林公园和湿地公园的空间重叠分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(11):3305-3310.
	YANG Z, CHENG K, FU L Q, et al. Spatial overlapping analysis for nature reserves,forest parks and wetland parks in forestry management system of northeast China[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36(11):3305-3310.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201711.008. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201711.008
[11]	郭子良, 张曼胤, 崔丽娟, 等. 中国国家湿地公园的建设布局及其动态[J]. 生态学杂志, 2019, 38(2):532-540.
	GUO Z L, ZHANG M Y, CUI L J, et al. Establishment and dynamics of national wetland park system in China[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2019, 38(2):532-540.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201902.008. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.201902.008
[12]	马童慧, 吕偲, 雷光春. 中国自然保护地空间重叠分析与保护地体系优化整合对策[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(7):758-771. doi: 10.17520/biods.2019087
	MA T H, LÜ C, LEI G C. The spatial overlapping analysis for China’s natural protected area and countermeasures for the optimization and integration of protected area system[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2019, 27(7):758-771.DOI: 10.17520/biods.2019087. doi: 10.17520/biods.2019087
[13]	欧阳志云, 徐卫华, 杜傲, 等. 中国国家公园总体空间布局研究[M]. 北京: 中国环境出版集团, 2018.
	OUYANG Z Y, XU W H, DU A, et al. Research on overall spatical planning for China’s national park system[M]. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2018.
[14]	张卓然, 唐晓岚, 贾艳艳. 保护地空间分布特征与影响因素分析:以长江中下游为例[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2017, 44(3):439-447.
	ZHANG Z R, TANG X L, JIA Y Y. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of protected areas: a case of middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River[J]. J Anhui Agric Univ, 2017, 44(3):439-447.DOI: 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.20170524.022. doi: 10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.20170524.022
[15]	王法辉. 基于GIS的数量方法与应用[M]. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2009.
	WANG F H. Quantitative method and application based on GIS[M]. Beijing: Business Printing Hall, 2009.
[16]	彭杨靖, 樊简, 邢韶华, 等. 中国大陆自然保护地概况及分类体系构想[J]. 生物多样性, 2018, 26(3):315-325. doi: 10.17520/biods.2017235
	PENG Y J, FAN J, XING S H, et al. Overview and classification outlook of natural protected areas in mainland China[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2018, 26(3):315-325.DOI: 10.17520/biods.2017235. doi: 10.17520/biods.2017235
[17]	唐芳林, 王梦君, 孙鸿雁. 建立以国家公园为主体的自然保护地体系的探讨[J]. 林业建设, 2018(1):1-5.
	TANG F L, WANG M J, SUN H Y. Analysis on establishing the protected area system dominated by national park[J]. For Constr, 2018(1):1-5.
[18]	吕偲, 曾晴, 雷光春. 基于生态系统服务的保护地分类体系构建[J]. 中国园林, 2017, 33(8):19-23.
	LÜ C, ZENG Q, LEI G C. Ecosystem service-based protected area category system[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2017, 33(8):19-23.
[19]	赵智聪, 杨锐. 论国土空间规划中自然保护地规划之定位[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(8):5-11.
	ZHAO Z C, YANG R. On the positioning of protected area planning in national spatial planning[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2019, 35(8):5-11.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.08.0005. doi: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.08.0005
[20]	HOEKSTRA J M, BOUCHER T M, RICKETTS T H, et al. Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection[J]. Ecol Lett, 2005, 8(1):23-29.DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00686.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00686.x.
[21]	CANTÚ-SALAZAR L, GASTON K J. Very large protected areas and their contribution to terrestrial biological conservation[J]. Bio Science, 2010, 60(10):808-818.DOI: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.10.7. doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.10.7

序号 code	自然保护地 national natural protected area			交叉重叠情况统计 overlapping statistics						一地多名 multiple names in one place				相交 intersect				内嵌 inline
序号 code	类型 type	数量 number	面积/ ×10³ km² area	数量 number		重复率/% repetition rate		面积/ ×10³ km² area		数量 number		面积/ ×10³ km² area		数量 number		面积/ ×10³ km² area		数量 number		面积/ ×10³ km² area
Ⅰ	自然保护区	81	20 882.45	22	27.2		7.1		8		1.4		15		6.0		7		1.7
Ⅱ	风景名胜区	50	10 711.49	34	68.0		7.3		15		3.4		19		4.6		13		3.6
Ⅲ	森林公园	159	13 625.83	44	27.7		4.6		10		1.2		22		2.7		18		1.7
Ⅳ	湿地公园	197	6 436.44	42	21.3		2.8		10		1.2		28		2.1		6		0.3
Ⅴ	水利风景区	136	17 065.95	46	33.8		3.7		12		1.5		24		2.4		14		1.0
Ⅵ	地质公园	38	16 390.63	26	68.4		9.4		11		2.6		14		6.5		10		0.5
总计total		661	72 849.79	214	32.4		34.9		66		11.3		122		24.3		68		8.9

长江中游流域国家级自然保护地交叉重叠特征及其优化整合研究

Study on overlapping characteristics and optimization of national natural protected areas in the middle Yangtze River basin

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 21

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿